Search Results

Search found 23792 results on 952 pages for 'void pointers'.

Page 185/952 | < Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >

  • Adding Information in SQLite

    - by Cam
    Hi All, I am having trouble with my Android App when adding information into SQLite. I am relatively new to Java/SQLite and though I have followed a lot of tutorials on SQLite and have been able to get the example code to run I am unable to get tables to be created and data to import when running my own app. I have included my code in two Java files Questions (Main Program) and QuestionData (helper class represents the database). Questions.java: public class Questions extends Activity { private QuestionData questions; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.quiztest); questions = new QuestionData(this); try { Cursor cursor = getQuestions(); showQuestions(cursor); } finally { questions.close(); } } private Cursor getQuestions() { //Select Query String loadQuestions = "SELECT * FROM questionlist"; SQLiteDatabase db = questions.getReadableDatabase(); Cursor cursor = db.rawQuery(loadQuestions, null); startManagingCursor(cursor); return cursor; } private void showQuestions(Cursor cursor) { // Collect String Values from Query and Display them this part of the code is wokring fine when there is data present. QuestionData.java public class QuestionData extends SQLiteOpenHelper { private static final String DATABASE_NAME = "TriviaQuiz.db" ; private static final int DATABASE_VERSION = 2; public QuestionData(Context ctx) { super(ctx, DATABASE_NAME, null, DATABASE_VERSION); } @Override public void onCreate(SQLiteDatabase db) { db.execSQL("CREATE TABLE questionlist (_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT, QID TEXT, QQuestion TEXT, QAnswer TEXT, QOption1 TEXT, QOption2 TEXT, QOption3 TEXT, QCategoryTagLvl1 TEXT, QCategoryTagLvl2 TEXT, QOptionalTag1 TEXT, QOptionalTag2 TEXT, QOptionalTag3 TEXT, QOptionalTag4 TEXT, QOptionalTag5 TEXT, QTimePeriod TEXT, QDifficultyRating TEXT, QGenderBias TEXT, QAgeBias TEXT, QRegion TEXT, QWikiLink TEXT, QValidationLink1 TEXT, QValidationLink2 TEXT, QHint TEXT, QLastValidation TEXT, QNotes TEXT, QMultimediaType TEXT, QMultimediaLink TEXT, QLastAsked TEXT);"); db.execSQL("INSERT INTO questionlist (_id, QID, QQuestion, QAnswer, QOption1, QOption2, QOption3, QCategoryTagLvl1, QCategoryTagLvl2, QOptionalTag1, QOptionalTag2, QOptionalTag3, QOptionalTag4, QOptionalTag5, QTimePeriod, QDifficultyRating, QGenderBias, QAgeBias, QRegion, QWikiLink, QValidationLink1, QValidationLink2, QHint, QLastValidation, QNotes, QMultimediaType, QMultimediaLink, QLastAsked)"+ "VALUES (null,'Q00001','Example','Ans1','Q1','Q2','Q3','Q4','','','','','','','','','','','','','','','','','','','','')"); } @Override public void onUpgrade(SQLiteDatabase db, int oldVersion, int newVersion) { db.execSQL("DROP TABLE IF EXISTS " + TABLE_NAME); onCreate(db); } } Any suggestions at all would be great. I have tried debugging which suggests that the database does not exist. Thanks in advance for your assistance.

    Read the article

  • Where to define exception classes, inside classes or on a higher level?

    - by rve
    Should exception classes be part of the class which may throw them or should they exist on a higher level? For example : class Test { public: class FooException: public ExceptionBase { }; void functionThrowingFooException(); }; or class FooException: public ExceptionBase { }; class Test { public: void functionThrowingFooException(); }; (functionThrowingFooException() is the only function to ever throw a FooException)

    Read the article

  • Storing a type in C++

    - by perimosocordiae
    Is it possible to store a type name as a C++ variable? For example, like this: type my_type = int; // or string, or Foo, or any other type void* data = ...; my_type* a = (my_type*) data; I know that 99.9% of the time there's a better way to do what you want without resorting to casting void pointers, but I'm curious if C++ allows this sort of thing.

    Read the article

  • Invoking static methods containing Generic Parameters using Reflection.

    - by AJP
    While executing the following code i gets this error "Late bound operations cannot be performed on types or methods for which ContainsGenericParameters is true." class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { MethodInfo MI = typeof(MyClass).GetMethod("TestProc"); MI.MakeGenericMethod(new [] {typeof(string)}); MI.Invoke(null, new [] {"Hello"}); } } class MyClass { public static void TestProc<T>(T prefix) { Console.WriteLine("Hello"); } } Please help.

    Read the article

  • How do I search the MediaStore for a specific directory instead of entire external storage?

    - by Nick Lopez
    In my app I have an option that allows users to browse for audio files on their phone to add to the app. I am having trouble however with creating a faster way of processing the query code. Currently it searches the entire external storage and causes the phone to prompt a force close/wait warning. I would like to take the code I have posted below and make it more efficient by either searching in a specific folder on the phone or by streamlining the process to make the file search quicker. I am not sure how to do this however. Thanks! public class BrowseActivity extends DashboardActivity implements OnClickListener, OnItemClickListener { private List<Sound> soundsInDevice = new ArrayList<Sound>(); private List<Sound> checkedList; private ListView browsedList; private BrowserSoundAdapter adapter; private long categoryId; private Category category; private String currentCategoryName; private String description; // private Category newCategory ; private Button doneButton; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); requestWindowFeature(Window.FEATURE_NO_TITLE); setContentView(R.layout.activity_browse); checkedList = new ArrayList<Sound>(); browsedList = (ListView) findViewById(android.R.id.list); doneButton = (Button) findViewById(R.id.doneButton); soundsInDevice = getMediaSounds(); if (soundsInDevice.size() > 0) { adapter = new BrowserSoundAdapter(this, R.id.browseSoundName, soundsInDevice); } else { Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), getString(R.string.no_sounds_available), Toast.LENGTH_SHORT) .show(); } browsedList.setAdapter(adapter); browsedList.setOnItemClickListener(this); doneButton.setOnClickListener(this); } private List<Sound> getMediaSounds() { List<Sound> mediaSoundList = new ArrayList<Sound>(); ContentResolver cr = getContentResolver(); String[] projection = {MediaStore.Audio.Media._ID, MediaStore.Audio.Media.DISPLAY_NAME, MediaStore.Audio.Media.TITLE, MediaStore.Audio.Media.DATA, MediaStore.Audio.Media.DURATION}; final Uri uri = MediaStore.Audio.Media.EXTERNAL_CONTENT_URI; Log.v("MediaStore.Audio.Media.EXTERNAL_CONTENT_URI", "" + uri); final Cursor cursor = cr.query(uri, projection, null, null, null); int n = cursor.getCount(); Log.v("count", "" + n); if (cursor.moveToFirst()) { do { String soundName = cursor .getString(cursor .getColumnIndexOrThrow(MediaStore.Audio.Media.DISPLAY_NAME)); Log.v("soundName", "" + soundName); String title = cursor .getString(cursor .getColumnIndexOrThrow(MediaStore.Audio.Media.TITLE)); Log.v("title", "" + title); String path = cursor.getString(cursor .getColumnIndexOrThrow(MediaStore.Audio.Media.DATA)); Log.v("path", "" + path); Sound browsedSound = new Sound(title, path, false, false, false, false, 0); Log.v("browsedSound", "" + browsedSound); mediaSoundList.add(browsedSound); Log.v("mediaSoundList", "" + mediaSoundList.toString()); } while (cursor.moveToNext()); } return mediaSoundList; } public class BrowserSoundAdapter extends ArrayAdapter<Sound> { public BrowserSoundAdapter(Context context, int textViewResourceId, List<Sound> objects) { super(context, textViewResourceId, objects); } @Override public View getView(final int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { ViewHolder viewHolder; View view = convertView; LayoutInflater inflater = getLayoutInflater(); if (view == null) { view = inflater.inflate(R.layout.list_item_browse, null); viewHolder = new ViewHolder(); viewHolder.soundNameTextView = (TextView) view .findViewById(R.id.browseSoundName); viewHolder.pathTextView = (TextView) view .findViewById(R.id.browseSoundPath); viewHolder.checkToAddSound = (CheckBox) view .findViewById(R.id.browse_checkbox); view.setTag(viewHolder); } else { viewHolder = (ViewHolder) view.getTag(); } final Sound sound = soundsInDevice.get(position); if (sound.isCheckedState()) { viewHolder.checkToAddSound.setChecked(true); } else { viewHolder.checkToAddSound.setChecked(false); } viewHolder.soundNameTextView.setText(sound.getName()); viewHolder.pathTextView.setText(sound.getUri()); viewHolder.checkToAddSound .setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { CheckBox cb = (CheckBox) v .findViewById(R.id.browse_checkbox); boolean checked = cb.isChecked(); boolean newValue = checked; updateView(position, newValue); doneButtonStatus(checkedList.size()); } }); return view; } } // Adapter view holder class private class ViewHolder { private TextView soundNameTextView; private TextView pathTextView; private CheckBox checkToAddSound; } // done button On Click @Override public void onClick(View view) { boolean status = getIntent().getBooleanExtra("FromAddCat", false); Log.v("for add category","enters in if"); if(status){ Log.v("for add category","enters in if1"); currentCategoryName = getIntent().getStringExtra("categoryName"); description = getIntent().getStringExtra("description"); boolean existCategory = SQLiteHelper.getCategoryStatus(currentCategoryName); if (!existCategory) { category = new Category(currentCategoryName, description, false); category.insert(); category.update(); Log.v("for add category","enters in if2"); } }else{ categoryId = getIntent().getLongExtra("categoryId",-1); category = SQLiteHelper.getCategory(categoryId); } for (Sound checkedsound : checkedList) { checkedsound.setCheckedState(false); checkedsound.insert(); category.getSounds().add(checkedsound); final Intent intent = new Intent(this, CategoriesActivity.class); finish(); startActivity(intent); } } @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> arg0, View view, int position, long arg3) { boolean checked = true; boolean newValue = false; CheckBox cb = (CheckBox) view.findViewById(R.id.browse_checkbox); if (cb.isChecked()) { cb.setChecked(!checked); newValue = !checked; } else { cb.setChecked(checked); newValue = checked; } updateView(position, newValue); doneButtonStatus(checkedList.size()); } private void doneButtonStatus(int size) { if (size > 0) { doneButton.setEnabled(true); doneButton.setBackgroundResource(R.drawable.done_button_drawable); } else { doneButton.setEnabled(false); doneButton.setBackgroundResource(R.drawable.done_btn_disabled); } } private void updateView(int index, boolean newValue) { System.out.println(newValue); Sound sound = soundsInDevice.get(index); if (newValue == true) { checkedList.add(sound); sound.setCheckedState(newValue); } else { checkedList.remove(sound); sound.setCheckedState(newValue); } } }

    Read the article

  • How to ensure structures are completly initialized (by name) in GCC?

    - by Steven Spark
    How do I ensure each and every field of my structures are initialized in GCC when using designated initializers? (I'm especially interested in function pointers.) (I'm using C not C++.) Here is an example: typedef struct { int a; int b; } foo_t; typedef struct { void (*Start)(void); void (*Stop)(void); } bar_t; foo_t fooo = { 5 }; foo_t food = { .b=4 }; bar_t baro = { NULL }; bar_t bard = { .Start = NULL }; -Wmissing-field-initializers does not help at all. It works for fooo only in GCC (mingw 4.7.3, 4.8.1), and clang does only marginally better (no warnings for food and bard). I'm sure there is a reason for not producing warnings for designated initializer (even when I explicitly ask for them) but I want/need them. I do not want to initialize structures based on order/position because that is more error prone (for example swapping Start and Stop won't even give any warning). And neither gcc nor clang will give any warning that I failed to explicitly initialize a field (when initializing by name). I also don't want to litter my code with if(x.y==NULL) lines for multiple reasons, one of which is I want compile time warnings and not runtime errors. At least splint will give me warnings on all 4 cases, but unfortunately I cannot use splint all the time (it chokes on some of the code (fails to parse some C99, GCC extensions)). Note: If I'm using a real function instead of NULL GCC will also show a warning for baro (but not bard). I searched google and stack overflow but only found related questions and have not found answer for this specific problem. The best match I have found is 'Ensure that all elements in a structure are initialized' Ensure that all elements in a structure are initialized Which asks pretty much the same question, but has no satisfying answer. Is there a better way dealing with this that I have not mentioned? (Maybe other code analysis tool? Preferably something (free) that can be integrated into Eclipse or Visual Studio...)

    Read the article

  • What Design Pattern is this?

    - by 01
    I know that everything we do in programming can be described as design pattern(even abstract method has design pattern called template method) public class Guicer extends AbstractModule { private static Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new Guicer()); public static void setInjector(Injector injector) { Guicer.injector = injector; } public static T getInstance(Class c) { return injector.getInstance(c); } @Override protected void configure() { } } What design patterns are used in this code?

    Read the article

  • What does this C++ construct do?

    - by cambr
    Somewhere in lines of code, I came across this construct... //void* v = void* value from an iterator int i = (int)(long(v)) What possible purpose can this contruct serve? Why not simply use int(v) instead? Why the cast to long first?

    Read the article

  • Double.ToString with N Number of Decimal Places

    - by Ngu Soon Hui
    I know that if we want to display a double as a two decimal digit, one would just have to use public void DisplayTwoDecimal(double dbValue) { Console.WriteLine(dbValue.ToString("0.00")); } But how to extend this to N decimal places, where N is determined by the user? public void DisplayNDecimal(double dbValue, int nDecimal) { // how to display }

    Read the article

  • c++ template function compiles in header but not implementation

    - by flies
    I'm trying to learn templates and I've run into this confounding error. I'm declaring some functions in a header file and I want to make a separate implementation file where the functions will be defined. Here's the code that calls the header (dum.cpp): #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <string> #include "dumper2.h" int main() { std::vector<int> v; for (int i=0; i<10; i++) { v.push_back(i); } test(); std::string s = ", "; dumpVector(v,s); } now, here's a working header file (dumper2.h): #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <vector> void test(); template <class T> void dumpVector( std::vector<T> v,std::string sep); template <class T> void dumpVector(std::vector<T> v, std::string sep) { typename std::vector<T>::iterator vi; vi = v.begin(); std::cout << *vi; vi++; for (;vi<v.end();vi++) { std::cout << sep << *vi ; } std::cout << "\n"; return; } with implentation (dumper2.cpp): #include <iostream> #include "dumper2.h" void test() { std::cout << "!olleh dlrow\n"; } the weird thing is that if I move the code that defines dumpVector from the .h to the .cpp file, I get the following error: g++ -c dumper2.cpp -Wall -Wno-deprecated g++ dum.cpp -o dum dumper2.o -Wall -Wno-deprecated /tmp/ccKD2e3G.o: In function `main': dum.cpp:(.text+0xce): undefined reference to `void dumpVector<int>(std::vector<int, std::allocator<int> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [dum] Error 1 So why does it work one way and not the other? Clearly the compiler can find test(), so why can't it find dumpVector?

    Read the article

  • Implementation of interface when using child class of a parent class in method of interface

    - by dotnetdev
    I don't have access to my dev environment, but when I write the below: interface IExample void Test (HtmlControl ctrl); class Example : IExample { public void Test (HtmlTextArea area) { } I get an error stating the methods in the class implementation don't match the interface - so this is not possible. HtmlTextArea is a child class of HtmlControl, is there no way this is possible? I tried with .NET 3.5, but .NET 4.0 may be different (I am interested in any solution with either framework). Thanks

    Read the article

  • C# BestPractice: Private var and Public Getter/Setter or Public Var

    - by Desiny
    What are the advantages and differences between the below two coding styles... public void HelloWorld () { private string _hello; public string Hello { get { return _hello; } set { _hello = value; } } } or public void HelloWorld () { public string Hello { get; set; } } My preference is for short simple code, but interested to hear opinions as I see many developers who insist on the long route.

    Read the article

  • PyQt4 plugin in c++ application

    - by veverica17
    How is it posible to load python script as plugin in qt based application? The basic idea would be to make a class in c++ class b { virtual void method1(); virtual void method2(); } and 'somehow' inherit it in python like class c(b): def method1: #do something def method2: #do something I need to be able to modify the gui from python( add buttons to some widgets made in c++ with qt ). Basicaly something similiar to (gedit, blender, etc) plugin architecture with qt

    Read the article

  • C++ beginner question regarding chars

    - by Samwhoo
    I'm just messing around with some C++ at the moment trying to make a simple tic-tac-toe game and I'm running into a bit of a problem. This is my code: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Square { public: char getState() const; void setState(char); Square(); ~Square(); private: char * pState; }; class Board { public: Board(); ~Board(); void printBoard() const; Square getSquare(short x, short y) const; private: Square board[3][3]; }; int main() { Board board; board.getSquare(1,2).setState('1'); board.printBoard(); return 0; } Square::Square() { pState = new char; *pState = ' '; } Square::~Square() { delete pState; } char Square::getState() const { return *pState; } void Square::setState(char set) { *pState = set; } Board::~Board() { } Board::Board() { } void Board::printBoard() const { for (int x = 0; x < 3; x++) { cout << "|"; for (int y = 0; y < 3; y++) { cout << board[x][y].getState(); } cout << "|" << endl; } } Square Board::getSquare(short x, short y) const { return board[x][y]; } Forgive me if there are blatantly obvious problems with it or it's stupidly written, this is my first program in C++ :p However, the problem is that when I try and set the square 1,2 to the char '1', it doesn't print out as a 1, it prints out as some strange character I didn't recognise. Can anyone tell me why? :) Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • I cannot get mlocManager.removeUpdates(mlocListener); to work

    - by Colin
    I have an app that uses the LocationManage functions which works well until the app is stopped or paused. The location listener function is still carrying on in the background. Relevant bits of code follow. When I click home or back the onstop() function is being triggered correctly. package uk.cr.anchor; import android.app.Activity; import android.content.Context; import android.location.Location; import android.location.LocationListener; import android.location.LocationManager; import android.media.MediaPlayer; import android.media.RingtoneManager; import android.net.Uri; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.View; import android.widget.EditText; import android.widget.TableRow; import android.widget.Toast; import android.widget.ToggleButton; import android.content.SharedPreferences; import android.graphics.Color; public class main extends Activity { /** Called when the activity is first created. */ private LocationManager mlocManager; private LocationListener mlocListener; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); LocationManager mlocManager = (LocationManager)getSystemService(Context.LOCATION_SERVICE); LocationListener mlocListener = new MyLocationListener(); mlocManager.requestLocationUpdates( LocationManager.GPS_PROVIDER, 0, 0, mlocListener); } @Override protected void onStop(){ stoplistening(); super.onStop(); } /* Class My Location Listener */ public class MyLocationListener implements LocationListener { @Override public void onLocationChanged(Location loc) { loc.getLatitude(); loc.getLongitude(); etc etc etc } private void stoplistening() { if (mlocManager != null) { Toast.makeText( getApplicationContext(), "kill", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show(); mlocManager.removeUpdates(mlocListener); } else { Toast.makeText( getApplicationContext(), " not kill", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT ).show(); } } } I always get the "not kill" message. Can anyone help me!

    Read the article

  • Update View at runtime in Android

    - by seretur
    The example is pretty straightforward: i want to let the user know about what the app is doing by just showing a text (canvas.drawText()). Then, my first message appears, but not the other ones. I mean, i have a "setText" method but it doesn't updates. onCreate(Bundle bundle) { super.onCreate(bundle); setContentView(splash); // splash is the view class loadResources(); splash.setText("this"); boundWebService(); splash.setText("that"): etc(); splash.setText("so on"); } The view's text drawing works by doing just a drawText in onDraw();, so setText changes the text but doesn't show it. Someone recommended me replacing the view with a SurfaceView, but it would be alot of trouble for just a couple of updates, SO... how the heck can i update the view dinamically at runtime? It should be quite simple, just showing a text for say 2 seconds and then the main thread doing his stuff and then updating the text... Thanks! Update: I tried implementing handler.onPost(), but is the same story all over again. Let me put you the code: package coda.tvt; import android.app.Activity; import android.graphics.Canvas; import android.graphics.Paint; import android.os.Bundle; import android.view.View; import android.widget.TextView; import android.widget.Toast; public class ThreadViewTestActivity extends Activity { Thread t; Splash splash; /** Called when the activity is first created. */ @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); splash = new Splash(this); t = new Thread(splash); t.start(); splash.setTextow("OA"); try { Thread.sleep(4000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { } splash.setTextow("LALA"); } } And: public class Splash implements Runnable { Activity activity; final Handler myHandler = new Handler(); public Splash(Activity activity) { this.activity=activity; } @Override public void run() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub } public synchronized void setTextow(final String textow) { // Wrap DownloadTask into another Runnable to track the statistics myHandler.post(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { TextView t = (TextView)activity.findViewById(R.id.testo); t.setText(textow); t.invalidate(); } }); } } Although splash is in other thread, i put a sleep on the main thread, i use the handler to manage UI and everything, it doesn't changes a thing, it only shows the last update.

    Read the article

  • C# Why does code compile fine when there is an ambiguous virtual method?

    - by Jimbo
    I have a class (Class B) that inherits another class (Class A) that contains virtual methods. Mistakenly, I omitted the override keyword when declaring a (supposed to be) overriding method in Class B. Class A public class ClassA{ public virtual void TestMethod(){ } } Class B public class ClassB : ClassA{ public void TestMethod(){ } } The code compiled without a problem. Can anyone explain why?

    Read the article

  • C# work with functions

    - by gloris
    Hi, I'am new with C#. How works in C# functions? My try: private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { MessageBox.Show(Convert.ToString(number_p(5))); } public void number_p(int number) { int one = 1; number = number + one; return number; } Error: return, why? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Detect if class has overloaded function fails on Comeau compiler

    - by Frank
    Hi Everyone, I'm trying to use SFINAE to detect if a class has an overloaded member function that takes a certain type. The code I have seems to work correctly in Visual Studio and GCC, but does not compile using the Comeau online compiler. Here is the code I'm using: #include <stdio.h> //Comeau doesnt' have boost, so define our own enable_if_c template<bool value> struct enable_if_c { typedef void type; }; template<> struct enable_if_c< false > {}; //Class that has the overloaded member function class TestClass { public: void Func(float value) { printf( "%f\n", value ); } void Func(int value) { printf( "%i\n", value ); } }; //Struct to detect if TestClass has an overloaded member function for type T template<typename T> struct HasFunc { template<typename U, void (TestClass::*)( U )> struct SFINAE {}; template<typename U> static char Test(SFINAE<U, &TestClass::Func>*); template<typename U> static int Test(...); static const bool Has = sizeof(Test<T>(0)) == sizeof(char); }; //Use enable_if_c to only allow the function call if TestClass has a valid overload for T template<typename T> typename enable_if_c<HasFunc<T>::Has>::type CallFunc(TestClass &test, T value) { test.Func( value ); } int main() { float value1 = 0.0f; int value2 = 0; TestClass testClass; CallFunc( testClass, value1 ); //Should call TestClass::Func( float ) CallFunc( testClass, value2 ); //Should call TestClass::Func( int ) } The error message is: no instance of function template "CallFunc" matches the argument list. It seems that HasFunc::Has is false for int and float when it should be true. Is this a bug in the Comeau compiler? Am I doing something that's not standard? And if so, what do I need to do to fix it?

    Read the article

  • How to handle error on other thread?

    - by markattwood
    Hi, I'm trying to handle errors that have occurred on other threads the .NET CF program is like below: static void Main() { Thread t = new Thread(Start); t.Start(); ... } void Start() { ... Exception here } In my situation, putting try catch in the Start method is impossible. How can I handle it in the global code?

    Read the article

  • Regarding address operator C/C++

    - by iSight
    Hi, What does address operator mean. say in the method below. what should be passed in the method as parameter value of integer or the address of an integer variable. void func1(int&)// method declaration void func1(int& inNumber)//method definition { //some code }

    Read the article

  • C# Attributes Aren't Supposed to Inherit

    - by Adam
    Since attributes don't inherit in C# (at least I didn't think they did) - how does the following code still display the Hello popup when the MyTestMethod test is run: [TestClass] public class BaseTestClass { [TestInitialize] public void Foo() { System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show("Hello"); } } [TestClass] public class TestClass : BaseTestClass { [TestMethod] public void MyTestMethod() { Assert.IsTrue(true); } }

    Read the article

  • c++ Function pointer inlining

    - by wb
    I know I can pass a function pointer as a template parameter and get a call to it inlined but I wondered if any compilers these days can inline an 'obvious' inline-able function like: inline static void Print() { std::cout << "Hello\n"; } .... void (*func)() = Print; func(); Under Visual Studio 2008 its clever enough to get it down to a direct call instruction so it seems a shame it can't take it a step further?

    Read the article

  • Java: "implements Runnable" vs. "extends Thread"

    - by user65374
    From what time I've spent with threads in Java, I've found these two ways to write threads. public class ThreadA implements Runnable { public void run() { //Code } } //with a "new Thread(threadA).start()" call public class ThreadB extends Thread { public ThreadB() { super("ThreadB"); } public void run() { //Code } } //with a "threadB.start()" call Is there any significant difference in these two blocks of code?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192  | Next Page >