Search Results

Search found 10548 results on 422 pages for 'standard deviation'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 21/422 | < Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >

  • Are there any plans to create a standard based on libunity?

    - by Sebastian Billaudelle
    In the last few month and maybe even years, Ubuntu and Canonical often were criticised for developing software and desktop components without talking to other groups in the free software community. I don't want to comment on this topic, but I see problems arising with creating a "proprietary" solution for displaying indicators and progressbars with a launcher like Unity. In the world of free and open Desktop Environments we often try to standardize parts and libraries or write specifications to increase collaboration between different desktops. We have the instrument of http://freedesktop.org and a lot of specifications are getting implemented by the major Desktop Environments. In this context, proposing a standard for those indicators would be a great step towards better interoperability between desktops. These indicators represent a great feature on the Linux Desktop and I'm sure that other projects like AWN, Docky, etc. would pick them up. With the great market share of Ubuntu, Canonical is in a position to propose it as a standard and encourage projects to implement it. Thank you in advance, Sebastian Billaudelle

    Read the article

  • Is there a quasi-standard set of attributes to annotate thread safety, immutability etc.?

    - by Eugene Beresovksy
    Except for a blog post here and there, describing the custom attributes someone created, but that do not seem to get any traction - like one describing how to enforce immutability, another one on Documenting Thread Safety, modeling the attributes after JCIP annotations - is there any standard emerging? Anything MS might be planning for the future? This is something that should be standard, if there's to be any chance of interoperability between libraries concurrency-wise. Both for documentation purposes, and also to feed static / dynamic test tools. If MS isn't doing anything in that direction, it could be done on CodePlex - but I couldn't find anything there, either. <opinion>Concurrency and thread safety are really hard in imperative and object-languages like C# and Java, we should try to tame it, until we hopefully switch to more appropriate languages.</opinion>

    Read the article

  • OpenACC : le standard de programmation parallèle par NVIDIA, accélérer les applications hybrides CPU/GPU avec les directives

    OpenACC : le nouveau standard de développement parallèle par NVIDIA Accélérer plus facilement les applications hybrides combinant CPU/GPU avec les directives En compagnie de Cray, PGI et avec le soutien de Caps ; NVidia a développé un nouveau standard ouvert pour la programmation parallèle. OpenACC est conçu pour permettre aux programmeurs d'exploiter facilement la puissance transformatrice de l'hétérogénéité des systèmes informatiques hybrides CPU/GPU (processeur graphique). Il trouve son indication auprès des programmeurs travaillant dans l'analyse de donnée, l'intelligence artificielle et la physique entre autres domaines scientifiques et techniques. [IMG]http://...

    Read the article

  • What video graphic card would permit ubuntu's standard driver to work well?

    - by Rick
    I installed ubuntu 12.04. All seemed well until I installed the nvidia driver. Then crashola! This situation is untenable. It seems I cannot trust nvidia, and it seems that I cannot rely on ubuntu gurus to test 3rd party drivers. So, apparently some video card manufacturers do not care enough about the linux market to test their drivers, or are there too many 3rd party video cards so that ubuntu folks do not test any 3rd party video drivers? Hence the question: What video graphic card would permit me to use ubuntu's standard driver so that I do not have to rely on nvidia's or any other 3rd-party driver? Perhaps I could then install THAT card and have things work? The ubuntu standard driver actually worked prior to installing the nvidia driver, but not well, and that was because the display flickered, and flickering gives me a headache.

    Read the article

  • Microsoft propose Office 2010 Professionnel pour le prix d'Office 2010 Standard jusqu'à fin mars, et des réductions sur Windows 7

    Microsoft propose Office 2010 Professionnel pour le prix d'Office 2010 Standard Jusqu'à fin mars, et des réductions sur Windows 7 Professionel Microsoft vient de lancer une opération qui ravira les professionnels qui souhaitent passer à Office 2010. Jusqu'à la fin du mois de mars, la version Professionnel Plus de la suite bureautique est en effet au même prix que la licence standard. Selon l'organisation concernée (PME, secteur public , etc.) l'économie va de 125€ à plus de 190€ par licence. Une économie qui se matérialise sous la forme d'un remboursement après achat. A noter cependant que pour bénéficier de cette ristourne, le nombre de licences minimum à commander est fixé à 4...

    Read the article

  • HTTP events? Is there a standard / precedent for this?

    - by user619818
    Our architecture is HTTP servers (custom written) which whereby custom clients send a HTTP request for some information and information is returned just as HTTP works. But we need a special custom 'extension' which is a request which is a subscription for receiving asynchronous 'events' on a resource. For example the client sends an http request subscribing for events on some entity. As the 'entity' generates events they are passed to the http server and the http server must then lookup subscriptions for that entity and send the event message to all subscribed clients. Hope that makes sense. So my questions are: Has this been done before / or is there a standard I should be looking at? If no standard, any suggestions on how to implement? How does a http server send an unsolicited 'message' to a client?

    Read the article

  • Database Mail and SMO are indeed supported on 64-bit, Standard Edition instances of SQL Server 2012

    - by Argenis
      This is something that comes up rather regularly at forums, so I decided to create a quick post to make sure that folks out there can feel better about SQL Server 2012. If you read this Web article, “Features Supported By Editions of SQL Server 2012” as of time of writing this post, you will see that the article points out that these two features are not supported on x64 Standard Edition. This is NOT correct. It is most definitely a documentation bug – one that unfortunately has caused some customers to sit on a waiting pattern before upgrading to SQL Server 2012. Database Mail and SMO indeed work and are fully supported on SQL Server 2012 Standard Edition x64 instances. These features work as they should. I have contacted the documentation teams internally to make sure that this is reflected on next releases of said Web article.

    Read the article

  • Should I continue to learn and program using ansi c or non standard? [closed]

    - by Erik
    I am a Cs Student, enthusiastic about programming. C is my first programming language that I learned. (Never been exposed to programming, data structures, algorithms before) I failed the exam because I studied on my own and didn't know how to use windows non standard libraries like conio.h. (I had to draw circles, etc using get x and get y). I told them but they just don't care. What do I do because for a beginner this is very confusing? Do I continue to study ansi c on my own, or should I study non standard c? Should I do them in parallel? *I did use the search bar but found nothing useful that could help me.

    Read the article

  • Generating a drop down list of timezones with PHP

    - by Xeoncross
    Most sites need some way to show the dates on the site in the users preferred timezone. Below are two lists that I found and then one method using the built in PHP DateTime class in PHP 5. I need help knowing which of these would be the best to attempt to use when trying to get the UTC offset from the user on register. One: <option value="-12">[UTC - 12] Baker Island Time</option> <option value="-11">[UTC - 11] Niue Time, Samoa Standard Time</option> <option value="-10">[UTC - 10] Hawaii-Aleutian Standard Time, Cook Island Time</option> <option value="-9.5">[UTC - 9:30] Marquesas Islands Time</option> <option value="-9">[UTC - 9] Alaska Standard Time, Gambier Island Time</option> <option value="-8">[UTC - 8] Pacific Standard Time</option> <option value="-7">[UTC - 7] Mountain Standard Time</option> <option value="-6">[UTC - 6] Central Standard Time</option> <option value="-5">[UTC - 5] Eastern Standard Time</option> <option value="-4.5">[UTC - 4:30] Venezuelan Standard Time</option> <option value="-4">[UTC - 4] Atlantic Standard Time</option> <option value="-3.5">[UTC - 3:30] Newfoundland Standard Time</option> <option value="-3">[UTC - 3] Amazon Standard Time, Central Greenland Time</option> <option value="-2">[UTC - 2] Fernando de Noronha Time, South Georgia &amp; the South Sandwich Islands Time</option> <option value="-1">[UTC - 1] Azores Standard Time, Cape Verde Time, Eastern Greenland Time</option> <option value="0" selected="selected">[UTC] Western European Time, Greenwich Mean Time</option> <option value="1">[UTC + 1] Central European Time, West African Time</option> <option value="2">[UTC + 2] Eastern European Time, Central African Time</option> <option value="3">[UTC + 3] Moscow Standard Time, Eastern African Time</option> <option value="3.5">[UTC + 3:30] Iran Standard Time</option> <option value="4">[UTC + 4] Gulf Standard Time, Samara Standard Time</option> <option value="4.5">[UTC + 4:30] Afghanistan Time</option> <option value="5">[UTC + 5] Pakistan Standard Time, Yekaterinburg Standard Time</option> <option value="5.5">[UTC + 5:30] Indian Standard Time, Sri Lanka Time</option> <option value="5.75">[UTC + 5:45] Nepal Time</option> <option value="6">[UTC + 6] Bangladesh Time, Bhutan Time, Novosibirsk Standard Time</option> <option value="6.5">[UTC + 6:30] Cocos Islands Time, Myanmar Time</option> <option value="7">[UTC + 7] Indochina Time, Krasnoyarsk Standard Time</option> <option value="8">[UTC + 8] Chinese Standard Time, Australian Western Standard Time, Irkutsk Standard Time</option> <option value="8.75">[UTC + 8:45] Southeastern Western Australia Standard Time</option> <option value="9">[UTC + 9] Japan Standard Time, Korea Standard Time, Chita Standard Time</option> <option value="9.5">[UTC + 9:30] Australian Central Standard Time</option> <option value="10">[UTC + 10] Australian Eastern Standard Time, Vladivostok Standard Time</option> <option value="10.5">[UTC + 10:30] Lord Howe Standard Time</option> <option value="11">[UTC + 11] Solomon Island Time, Magadan Standard Time</option> <option value="11.5">[UTC + 11:30] Norfolk Island Time</option> <option value="12">[UTC + 12] New Zealand Time, Fiji Time, Kamchatka Standard Time</option> <option value="12.75">[UTC + 12:45] Chatham Islands Time</option> <option value="13">[UTC + 13] Tonga Time, Phoenix Islands Time</option> <option value="14">[UTC + 14] Line Island Time</option> Or using PHP friendly values: <option value="Pacific/Midway">(GMT-11:00) Midway Island, Samoa</option> <option value="America/Adak">(GMT-10:00) Hawaii-Aleutian</option> <option value="Etc/GMT+10">(GMT-10:00) Hawaii</option> <option value="Pacific/Marquesas">(GMT-09:30) Marquesas Islands</option> <option value="Pacific/Gambier">(GMT-09:00) Gambier Islands</option> <option value="America/Anchorage">(GMT-09:00) Alaska</option> <option value="America/Ensenada">(GMT-08:00) Tijuana, Baja California</option> <option value="Etc/GMT+8">(GMT-08:00) Pitcairn Islands</option> <option value="America/Los_Angeles">(GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)</option> <option value="America/Denver">(GMT-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)</option> <option value="America/Chihuahua">(GMT-07:00) Chihuahua, La Paz, Mazatlan</option> <option value="America/Dawson_Creek">(GMT-07:00) Arizona</option> <option value="America/Belize">(GMT-06:00) Saskatchewan, Central America</option> <option value="America/Cancun">(GMT-06:00) Guadalajara, Mexico City, Monterrey</option> <option value="Chile/EasterIsland">(GMT-06:00) Easter Island</option> <option value="America/Chicago">(GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada)</option> <option value="America/New_York">(GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)</option> <option value="America/Havana">(GMT-05:00) Cuba</option> <option value="America/Bogota">(GMT-05:00) Bogota, Lima, Quito, Rio Branco</option> <option value="America/Caracas">(GMT-04:30) Caracas</option> <option value="America/Santiago">(GMT-04:00) Santiago</option> <option value="America/La_Paz">(GMT-04:00) La Paz</option> <option value="Atlantic/Stanley">(GMT-04:00) Faukland Islands</option> <option value="America/Campo_Grande">(GMT-04:00) Brazil</option> <option value="America/Goose_Bay">(GMT-04:00) Atlantic Time (Goose Bay)</option> <option value="America/Glace_Bay">(GMT-04:00) Atlantic Time (Canada)</option> <option value="America/St_Johns">(GMT-03:30) Newfoundland</option> <option value="America/Araguaina">(GMT-03:00) UTC-3</option> <option value="America/Montevideo">(GMT-03:00) Montevideo</option> <option value="America/Miquelon">(GMT-03:00) Miquelon, St. Pierre</option> <option value="America/Godthab">(GMT-03:00) Greenland</option> <option value="America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires">(GMT-03:00) Buenos Aires</option> <option value="America/Sao_Paulo">(GMT-03:00) Brasilia</option> <option value="America/Noronha">(GMT-02:00) Mid-Atlantic</option> <option value="Atlantic/Cape_Verde">(GMT-01:00) Cape Verde Is.</option> <option value="Atlantic/Azores">(GMT-01:00) Azores</option> <option value="Europe/Belfast">(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Belfast</option> <option value="Europe/Dublin">(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Dublin</option> <option value="Europe/Lisbon">(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : Lisbon</option> <option value="Europe/London">(GMT) Greenwich Mean Time : London</option> <option value="Africa/Abidjan">(GMT) Monrovia, Reykjavik</option> <option value="Europe/Amsterdam">(GMT+01:00) Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna</option> <option value="Europe/Belgrade">(GMT+01:00) Belgrade, Bratislava, Budapest, Ljubljana, Prague</option> <option value="Europe/Brussels">(GMT+01:00) Brussels, Copenhagen, Madrid, Paris</option> <option value="Africa/Algiers">(GMT+01:00) West Central Africa</option> <option value="Africa/Windhoek">(GMT+01:00) Windhoek</option> <option value="Asia/Beirut">(GMT+02:00) Beirut</option> <option value="Africa/Cairo">(GMT+02:00) Cairo</option> <option value="Asia/Gaza">(GMT+02:00) Gaza</option> <option value="Africa/Blantyre">(GMT+02:00) Harare, Pretoria</option> <option value="Asia/Jerusalem">(GMT+02:00) Jerusalem</option> <option value="Europe/Minsk">(GMT+02:00) Minsk</option> <option value="Asia/Damascus">(GMT+02:00) Syria</option> <option value="Europe/Moscow">(GMT+03:00) Moscow, St. Petersburg, Volgograd</option> <option value="Africa/Addis_Ababa">(GMT+03:00) Nairobi</option> <option value="Asia/Tehran">(GMT+03:30) Tehran</option> <option value="Asia/Dubai">(GMT+04:00) Abu Dhabi, Muscat</option> <option value="Asia/Yerevan">(GMT+04:00) Yerevan</option> <option value="Asia/Kabul">(GMT+04:30) Kabul</option> <option value="Asia/Yekaterinburg">(GMT+05:00) Ekaterinburg</option> <option value="Asia/Tashkent">(GMT+05:00) Tashkent</option> <option value="Asia/Kolkata">(GMT+05:30) Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi</option> <option value="Asia/Katmandu">(GMT+05:45) Kathmandu</option> <option value="Asia/Dhaka">(GMT+06:00) Astana, Dhaka</option> <option value="Asia/Novosibirsk">(GMT+06:00) Novosibirsk</option> <option value="Asia/Rangoon">(GMT+06:30) Yangon (Rangoon)</option> <option value="Asia/Bangkok">(GMT+07:00) Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta</option> <option value="Asia/Krasnoyarsk">(GMT+07:00) Krasnoyarsk</option> <option value="Asia/Hong_Kong">(GMT+08:00) Beijing, Chongqing, Hong Kong, Urumqi</option> <option value="Asia/Irkutsk">(GMT+08:00) Irkutsk, Ulaan Bataar</option> <option value="Australia/Perth">(GMT+08:00) Perth</option> <option value="Australia/Eucla">(GMT+08:45) Eucla</option> <option value="Asia/Tokyo">(GMT+09:00) Osaka, Sapporo, Tokyo</option> <option value="Asia/Seoul">(GMT+09:00) Seoul</option> <option value="Asia/Yakutsk">(GMT+09:00) Yakutsk</option> <option value="Australia/Adelaide">(GMT+09:30) Adelaide</option> <option value="Australia/Darwin">(GMT+09:30) Darwin</option> <option value="Australia/Brisbane">(GMT+10:00) Brisbane</option> <option value="Australia/Hobart">(GMT+10:00) Hobart</option> <option value="Asia/Vladivostok">(GMT+10:00) Vladivostok</option> <option value="Australia/Lord_Howe">(GMT+10:30) Lord Howe Island</option> <option value="Etc/GMT-11">(GMT+11:00) Solomon Is., New Caledonia</option> <option value="Asia/Magadan">(GMT+11:00) Magadan</option> <option value="Pacific/Norfolk">(GMT+11:30) Norfolk Island</option> <option value="Asia/Anadyr">(GMT+12:00) Anadyr, Kamchatka</option> <option value="Pacific/Auckland">(GMT+12:00) Auckland, Wellington</option> <option value="Etc/GMT-12">(GMT+12:00) Fiji, Kamchatka, Marshall Is.</option> <option value="Pacific/Chatham">(GMT+12:45) Chatham Islands</option> <option value="Pacific/Tongatapu">(GMT+13:00) Nuku'alofa</option> <option value="Pacific/Kiritimati">(GMT+14:00) Kiritimati</option> Or just using PHP it's self $timezones = DateTimeZone::listAbbreviations(); $cities = array(); foreach( $timezones as $key => $zones ) { foreach( $zones as $id => $zone ) { /** * Only get timezones explicitely not part of "Others". * @see http://www.php.net/manual/en/timezones.others.php */ if ( preg_match( '/^(America|Antartica|Arctic|Asia|Atlantic|Europe|Indian|Pacific)\//', $zone['timezone_id'] ) && $zone['timezone_id']) { $cities[$zone['timezone_id']][] = $key; } } } // For each city, have a comma separated list of all possible timezones for that city. foreach( $cities as $key => $value ) $cities[$key] = join( ', ', $value); // Only keep one city (the first and also most important) for each set of possibilities. $cities = array_unique( $cities ); // Sort by area/city name. ksort( $cities ); It seems like the last one would be the safest as it would grow with the PHP release being used. You could also flip that array around when needed to tie timezones to city names.

    Read the article

  • How to start wampp server automatically for standard user?

    - by Ashvin
    Is there a way to use WAMP in windows professional-standard user mode. I have to use wamp and i am given only a standard user account. My boss installed wamp for me through his admin account, but i am unable to open it via my user account. I have to call him everytime i have to open wamp and its being a real hazzle to me ? Is there a way my standard user account be given privileges to use wamp and other datababse related things?

    Read the article

  • Range-based `for` statement definition redundancy

    - by GMan - Save the Unicorns
    Looking at n3092, in §6.5.4 we find the equivalency for a range-based for loop. It then goes on to say what __begin and __end are equal to. It differentiates between arrays and other types, and I find this redundant (aka, confusing). It says for arrays types that __begin and __end are what you expect: a pointer to the first and a pointer to one-past the end. Then for other types, __begin and __end are equal to begin(__range) and end(__range), with ADL. Namespace std is associated, in order to find the std::begin and std::end defined in <iterator>, §24.6.5. However, if we look at the definition of std::begin and std::end, they are both defined for arrays as well as container types. And the array versions do exactly the same as above: pointer to the first, pointer to one-past the end. Why is there a need to differentiate arrays from other types, when the definition given for other types would work just as well, finding std::begin and std::end? Some abridged quotes for convenience: §24.6.5 The range-based for statement — if _RangeT is an array type, begin-expr and end-expr are __range and __range + __bound, respectively, where __bound is the array bound. If _RangeT is an array of unknown size or an array of incomplete type, the program is ill-formed. — otherwise, begin-expr and end-expr are begin(_range) and end(_range), respectively, where begin and end are looked up with argument-dependent lookup (3.4.2). For the purposes of this name lookup, namespace std is an associated namespace. and §24.6.5 range access template T* begin(T (&array)[N]); Returns: array. template T* end(T (&array)[N]); Returns: array + N.

    Read the article

  • How can I use functools.partial on multiple methods on an object, and freeze parameters out of order

    - by Joseph Garvin
    I find functools.partial to be extremely useful, but I would like to be able to freeze arguments out of order (the argument you want to freeze is not always the first one) and I'd like to be able to apply it to several methods on a class at once, to make a proxy object that has the same methods as the underlying object except with some of its methods parameter being frozen (think of it as generalizing partial to apply to classes). I've managed to scrap together a version of functools.partial called 'bind' that lets me specify parameters out of order by passing them by keyword argument. That part works: >>> def foo(x, y): ... print x, y ... >>> bar = bind(foo, y=3) >>> bar(2) 2 3 But my proxy class does not work, and I'm not sure why: >>> class Foo(object): ... def bar(self, x, y): ... print x, y ... >>> a = Foo() >>> b = PureProxy(a, bar=bind(Foo.bar, y=3)) >>> b.bar(2) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: bar() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) I'm probably doing this all sorts of wrong because I'm just going by what I've pieced together from random documentation, blogs, and running dir() on all the pieces. Suggestions both on how to make this work and better ways to implement it would be appreciated ;) One detail I'm unsure about is how this should all interact with descriptors. Code follows. from types import MethodType class PureProxy(object): def __init__(self, underlying, **substitutions): self.underlying = underlying for name in substitutions: subst_attr = substitutions[name] if hasattr(subst_attr, "underlying"): setattr(self, name, MethodType(subst_attr, self, PureProxy)) def __getattribute__(self, name): return getattr(object.__getattribute__(self, "underlying"), name) def bind(f, *args, **kwargs): """ Lets you freeze arguments of a function be certain values. Unlike functools.partial, you can freeze arguments by name, which has the bonus of letting you freeze them out of order. args will be treated just like partial, but kwargs will properly take into account if you are specifying a regular argument by name. """ argspec = inspect.getargspec(f) argdict = copy(kwargs) if hasattr(f, "im_func"): f = f.im_func args_idx = 0 for arg in argspec.args: if args_idx >= len(args): break argdict[arg] = args[args_idx] args_idx += 1 num_plugged = args_idx def new_func(*inner_args, **inner_kwargs): args_idx = 0 for arg in argspec.args[num_plugged:]: if arg in argdict: continue if args_idx >= len(inner_args): # We can't raise an error here because some remaining arguments # may have been passed in by keyword. break argdict[arg] = inner_args[args_idx] args_idx += 1 f(**dict(argdict, **inner_kwargs)) new_func.underlying = f return new_func

    Read the article

  • Calling assignment operator in copy constructor

    - by stas
    Are there some drawbacks of such implementation of copy-constructor? Foo::Foo(const Foo& i_foo) { *this = i_foo; } As I remember, it was recommend in some book to call copy constructor from assignment operator and use well-known swap trick, but I don't remember, why...

    Read the article

  • Design of std::ifstream class

    - by Nawaz
    Those of us who have seen the beauty of STL try to use it as much as possible, and also encourage others to use it wherever we see them using raw pointers and arrays. Scott Meyers have written a whole book on STL, with title Effective STL. Yet what happened to the developers of ifstream that they preferred char* over std::string. I wonder why the first parameter of ifstream::open() is of type const char*, instead of const std::string &. Please have a look at it's signature: void open(const char * filename, ios_base::openmode mode = ios_base::in ); Why this? Why not this: void open(const string & filename, ios_base::openmode mode = ios_base::in ); Is this a serious mistake with the design? Or this design is deliberate? What could be the reason? I don't see any reason why they have preferred char* over std::string. Note we could still pass char* to the latter function that takes std::string. That's not a problem! By the way, I'm aware that ifstream is a typedef, so no comment on my title.:P. It looks short that is why I used it. The actual class template is : template<class _Elem,class _Traits> class basic_ifstream;

    Read the article

  • How to code for Alternate Course AKA Rainy Day Scenary?

    - by janetsmith
    Alternate course is something when user doesn't do what you expected, e.g. key in wrong password, pressing back button, or database error. For any programming project, alternate course accounts for more than 50% of a project timeline. It is important. However, most computer books only focus on Basic Course (when everything goes fine). Basic course is rather simple, compared to Alternate course, because this is normally given by client. Alternate course is what we, as a programmer or Business Analyst needs to take care of. Java has some built-in mechanism (try-catch) to force us to handle those unexpected behavior. The question is, how to handle them? Any pattern to follow? Any guideline or industry practice for handling alternate course?

    Read the article

  • Simplest way to mix sequences of types with iostreams?

    - by Kylotan
    I have a function void write<typename T>(const T&) which is implemented in terms of writing the T object to an ostream, and a matching function T read<typename T>() that reads a T from an istream. I am basically using iostreams as a plain text serialisation format, which obviously works fine for most built-in types, although I'm not sure how to effectively handle std::strings just yet. I'd like to be able to write out a sequence of objects too, eg void write<typename T>(const std::vector<T>&) or an iterator based equivalent (although in practice, it would always be used with a vector). However, while writing an overload that iterates over the elements and writes them out is easy enough to do, this doesn't add enough information to allow the matching read operation to know how each element is delimited, which is essentially the same problem that I have with a single std::string. Is there a single approach that can work for all basic types and std::string? Or perhaps I can get away with 2 overloads, one for numerical types, and one for strings? (Either using different delimiters or the string using a delimiter escaping mechanism, perhaps.)

    Read the article

  • Should I consider memmove() O(n) or O(1) ?

    - by Andrei Ciobanu
    Hello, this may be a silly question, but I want to calculate the complexity of one of my algorithms, and I am not sure what complexity to consider for the memmove() function. Can you please help / explain ? void * memmove ( void * destination, const void * source, size_t num ); So is the complexity O(num) or O(1). I suppose it's O(num), but I am not sure as I lack for now the understanding of what's going on under the hood.

    Read the article

  • Read whole ASCII file into C++ std::string

    - by Arrieta
    Hello, I need to read a whole file into memory and place it in a C++ std::string. If I were to read it into a char, the answer would be very simple: std::ifstream t; int lenght; t.open("file.txt", "r"); // open input file t.seekg(0, std::ios::end); // go to the end length = t.tellg(); // report location (this is the lenght) t.seekg(0, std::ios::beg); // go back to the beginning buffer = new char[length]; // allocate memory for a buffer of appropriate dimension t.read(buffer, length); // read the whole file into the buffer t.close(); // close file handle // ... do stuff with buffer here ... Now, I want to do the exact same thing, but using a std::string instead of a char. I want to avoid loops, i. e., I don't want to: std::ifstream t; t.open("file.txt", "r"); std::string buffer; std::string line; while(t){ std::getline(t, line); // ... append line to buffer and go on } t.close() any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Does std::multiset guarantee insertion order?

    - by Naveen
    I have a std::multiset which stores elements of class A. I have provided my own implementation of operator< for this class. My question is if I insert two equivalent objects into this multiset is their order guaranteed? For example, first I insert a object a1 into the set and then I insert an equivalent object a2 into this set. Can I expect the a1 to come before a2 when I iterate through the set? If no, is there any way to achieve this using multiset?

    Read the article

  • What is an appropriate way to programmatically exit an application?

    - by denchr
    I am evaluating user inputs as commands for my application. If the user presses Q, or q, and then hits enter, the application quits and execution terminates. Is there a proper context, or best practices on how to do that? I do not have any resources to release, or anything like that. Should I just use System.exit(0);? Is there a recommended way to do that? As my first approach I do something like this: while (true){ try{ BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)); //Other logic goes here... if (br.readLine().equalsIgnoreCase("Q")){ System.exit(0); } } catch (IOException ioe) { System.out.println("IO error trying to read your selection"); } }

    Read the article

  • Sun Fire X4270 M3 SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) Two-Tier Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) Benchmark

    - by Brian
    Oracle's Sun Fire X4270 M3 server achieved 8,320 SAP SD Benchmark users running SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 with unicode software using Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10. The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server using Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat both IBM Flex System x240 and IBM System x3650 M4 server running DB2 9.7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition. The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server running Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 server using SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition by 6%. The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server using Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat Cisco UCS C240 M3 server running SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Datacenter Edition by 9%. The Sun Fire X4270 M3 server running Oracle Database 11g and Oracle Solaris 10 beat the Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7 server using SQL Server 2008 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise Edition by 10%. Performance Landscape SAP-SD 2-Tier Performance Table (in decreasing performance order). SAP ERP 6.0 Enhancement Pack 4 (Unicode) Results (benchmark version from January 2009 to April 2012) System OS Database Users SAPERP/ECCRelease SAPS SAPS/Proc Date Sun Fire X4270 M3 2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz 128 GB Oracle Solaris 10 Oracle Database 11g 8,320 20096.0 EP4(Unicode) 45,570 22,785 10-Apr-12 IBM Flex System x240 2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz 128 GB Windows Server 2008 R2 EE DB2 9.7 7,960 20096.0 EP4(Unicode) 43,520 21,760 11-Apr-12 HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz 128 GB Windows Server 2008 R2 EE SQL Server 2008 7,865 20096.0 EP4(Unicode) 42,920 21,460 29-Mar-12 IBM System x3650 M4 2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz 128 GB Windows Server 2008 R2 EE DB2 9.7 7,855 20096.0 EP4(Unicode) 42,880 21,440 06-Mar-12 Cisco UCS C240 M3 2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz 128 GB Windows Server 2008 R2 DE SQL Server 2008 7,635 20096.0 EP4(Unicode) 41,800 20,900 06-Mar-12 Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7 2xIntel Xeon E5-2690 @2.90GHz 128 GB Windows Server 2008 R2 EE SQL Server 2008 7,570 20096.0 EP4(Unicode) 41,320 20,660 06-Mar-12 Complete benchmark results may be found at the SAP benchmark website http://www.sap.com/benchmark. Configuration and Results Summary Hardware Configuration: Sun Fire X4270 M3 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690 processors 128 GB memory Sun StorageTek 6540 with 4 * 16 * 300GB 15Krpm 4Gb FC-AL Software Configuration: Oracle Solaris 10 Oracle Database 11g SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) Certified Results (published by SAP): Number of benchmark users: 8,320 Average dialog response time: 0.95 seconds Throughput: Fully processed order line: 911,330 Dialog steps/hour: 2,734,000 SAPS: 45,570 SAP Certification: 2012014 Benchmark Description The SAP Standard Application SD (Sales and Distribution) Benchmark is a two-tier ERP business test that is indicative of full business workloads of complete order processing and invoice processing, and demonstrates the ability to run both the application and database software on a single system. The SAP Standard Application SD Benchmark represents the critical tasks performed in real-world ERP business environments. SAP is one of the premier world-wide ERP application providers, and maintains a suite of benchmark tests to demonstrate the performance of competitive systems on the various SAP products. See Also SAP Benchmark Website Sun Fire X4270 M3 Server oracle.com OTN Oracle Solaris oracle.com OTN Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Enterprise Edition oracle.com OTN Disclosure Statement Two-tier SAP Sales and Distribution (SD) standard SAP SD benchmark based on SAP enhancement package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0 (Unicode) application benchmark as of 04/11/12: Sun Fire X4270 M3 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 8,320 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, Oracle 11g, Solaris 10, Cert# 2012014. IBM Flex System x240 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,960 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, DB2 9.7, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012016. IBM System x3650 M4 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,855 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, DB2 9.7, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012010. Cisco UCS C240 M3 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,635 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, SQL Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 DE, Cert# 2012011. Fujitsu PRIMERGY RX300 S7 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,570 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, SQL Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012008. HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 (2 processors, 16 cores, 32 threads) 7,865 SAP SD Users, 2 x 2.90 GHz Intel Xeon E5-2690, 128 GB memory, SQL Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2 EE, Cert# 2012012. SAP, R/3, reg TM of SAP AG in Germany and other countries. More info www.sap.com/benchmark

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >