Search Results

Search found 13752 results on 551 pages for 'ip protocol'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 244/551 | < Previous Page | 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251  | Next Page >

  • Is WAP still in use?

    - by pek
    I apologize if this question sounds too generic, but I am researching WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) and I am having a hard time finding recent news. Do cell phones still use WAP or is it replaced by TCP/IP? I am guessing that since WiFi is supported in new cell phones, WAP isn't used anymore. Or did I misunderstand what is WAP? Is any aspect of WAP used today? I supposed there is still Push Mail and MMS.

    Read the article

  • After segment lost TCP connection never recovers

    - by mvladic
    Take a look at following trace taken with Wireshark: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/145579/trace1.pcap or http://dl.dropbox.com/u/145579/trace2.pcap I will repeat here an interesting part (from trace1.pcap): No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1850 2012-02-09 13:44:32.609 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=581704 Win=65392 Len=0 1851 2012-02-09 13:44:32.610 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 550 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1852 2012-02-09 13:44:32.639 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1853 2012-02-09 13:44:32.639 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=582736 Win=65392 Len=0 1854 2012-02-09 13:44:32.657 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Previous segment lost] 62479 > iso-tsap [ACK] Seq=583232 Ack=345 Win=65191 Len=536 1855 2012-02-09 13:44:32.657 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 108 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1856 2012-02-09 13:44:32.657 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1853#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=582736 Win=65392 Len=0 1857 2012-02-09 13:44:32.657 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1853#2] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=582736 Win=65392 Len=0 1858 2012-02-09 13:44:32.675 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 [TCP Fast Retransmission] DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1859 2012-02-09 13:44:32.715 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1860 2012-02-09 13:44:32.715 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=583272 Win=65392 Len=0 1861 2012-02-09 13:44:32.796 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 [TCP Retransmission] DT TPDU (0) EOT 1862 2012-02-09 13:44:32.945 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1863 2012-02-09 13:44:32.945 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=583808 Win=65392 Len=0 1864 2012-02-09 13:44:32.963 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1865 2012-02-09 13:44:32.963 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1863#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=583808 Win=65392 Len=0 1866 2012-02-09 13:44:32.963 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 576 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1867 2012-02-09 13:44:32.963 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1863#2] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=583808 Win=65392 Len=0 1868 2012-02-09 13:44:33.235 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 [TCP Retransmission] DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1869 2012-02-09 13:44:33.434 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=584344 Win=65392 Len=0 1870 2012-02-09 13:44:33.447 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1871 2012-02-09 13:44:33.447 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1869#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=584344 Win=65392 Len=0 1872 2012-02-09 13:44:33.806 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 [TCP Retransmission] DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1873 2012-02-09 13:44:34.006 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=584880 Win=65392 Len=0 1874 2012-02-09 13:44:34.018 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1875 2012-02-09 13:44:34.018 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1873#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=584880 Win=65392 Len=0 1876 2012-02-09 13:44:34.932 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1877 2012-02-09 13:44:35.132 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=585416 Win=65392 Len=0 1878 2012-02-09 13:44:35.144 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1879 2012-02-09 13:44:35.144 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1877#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=585416 Win=65392 Len=0 1880 2012-02-09 13:44:37.172 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1881 2012-02-09 13:44:37.372 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=585952 Win=65392 Len=0 1882 2012-02-09 13:44:37.385 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1883 2012-02-09 13:44:37.385 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1881#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=585952 Win=65392 Len=0 1884 2012-02-09 13:44:41.632 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1885 2012-02-09 13:44:41.832 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=586488 Win=65392 Len=0 1886 2012-02-09 13:44:41.844 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1887 2012-02-09 13:44:41.844 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1885#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=586488 Win=65392 Len=0 1888 2012-02-09 13:44:50.554 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1889 2012-02-09 13:44:50.753 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=587024 Win=65392 Len=0 1890 2012-02-09 13:44:50.766 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1891 2012-02-09 13:44:50.766 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1889#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=587024 Win=65392 Len=0 1892 2012-02-09 13:45:08.385 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1893 2012-02-09 13:45:08.585 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=587560 Win=65392 Len=0 1894 2012-02-09 13:45:08.598 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1895 2012-02-09 13:45:08.598 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1893#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=587560 Win=65392 Len=0 1896 2012-02-09 13:45:44.059 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 1897 2012-02-09 13:45:44.259 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=588096 Win=65392 Len=0 1898 2012-02-09 13:45:44.272 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 COTP 590 DT TPDU (0) [COTP fragment, 509 bytes] 1899 2012-02-09 13:45:44.272 172.22.37.4 192.168.4.213 TCP 54 [TCP Dup ACK 1897#1] iso-tsap > 62479 [ACK] Seq=345 Ack=588096 Win=65392 Len=0 1900 2012-02-09 13:46:55.386 192.168.4.213 172.22.37.4 TCP 590 [TCP Retransmission] [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] Some background information (not much, unfortunately, as I'm responsible only for server part): Server (172.22.37.4) is Windows Server 2008 R2 and client (192.168.4.213) is Ericsson telephone exchange of whom I do not know much. Client sends a file to server using FTAM protocol. This problem happens very often. I think, either client or server is doing sliding window protocol wrong. Server sends dup ack, client retransmits lost packet, but soon after client sends packets with wrong seq. Again, Server sends dup ack, client retransmits lost packet - but, this time with longer retransmission timeout. Again, client sends packet with wrong seq. Etc... Retransmission timeout grows to circa 4 minutes and communications never recovers to normal.

    Read the article

  • IIS7 permit access only to local network

    - by user335518
    Hi, I am having a problem with the IIS 7 on a Win 2008 server. I only want to have access to it inside my network and denied access from anyone outside the network. I had created a rule to permit access to the group of computers with the IP: 192.168.0.1 (255.255.255.0). In the IIS6 this was enougth to prevent access of any IP that don't belong to the network. Any idea of how can I block these access? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Functional implications of differences in SSL and TLS

    - by Randell
    I know that TLS is essentially a newer version of SSL, and that it generally supports transitioning a connection from unsecured to secured (commonly through a STARTTLS command). What I don't understand is why TLS is important to an IT Professional, and why given the choice I would pick one over the other. Is TLS really just a newer version, and if so is it a compatible protocol? As an IT Professional: When do I use which? When do I not use which?

    Read the article

  • Save certificate to use with lftp

    - by Greg C
    How can I save a certificate for use with lftp? The certificate in question is not accepted by lftp when downloaded from the server. I tried openssl s_client -connect {HOSTNAME}:21 -showcerts from How to save a remote server SSL certificate locally as a file but this returns CONNECTED(00000003) 3074045628:error:140770FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_clnt.c:766: no peer certificate available I am connecting with lftp -p 21 -u {USER} {HOSTNAME} and receive ls: Fatal error: Certificate verification: Not trusted

    Read the article

  • linux: disable using loopback and send data via wire between 2 eth cards of one comp

    - by osgx
    Hello I have a comp with 2 eth cards, connected with patch-cord (direct eth. cable from 1st to 2nd). The linux is installed, I want to send data from 1st network card to 2nd. And I want to force the packet to pass via cable. I can set up any ip on cards. With ping I get counters on cards constant. Is it possible with tcp/ip sockets? PS. I need to write a program. which will send packets via eth, so stackoverflow-related question. There can be some OS-dependent way, they will help me too

    Read the article

  • C++ classes & linked list: adding & counting items

    - by user342289
    I need to make a linked list with classes. Each list will store two values: a URI and IP. After doing all the adding, I need to be able count the total number of items in the linked list. I have tried the following code but it doesn't compile. Any suggestions please? #include <iostream> #include <cstdlib> #include <string> using namespace std; class ip_uri_store { protected: string ip; string uri; ip_uri_store *next; public: ip_uri_store(string huri, string hip); void additem(string auri, string aip); void deleteitem(string duri); void findbyuri(string furi); void findbyip(string fip); int totalitems(); }; ip_uri_store *head = NULL; ip_uri_store *curr = NULL; void ip_uri_store::additem(string auri, string aip) { curr = head; while (curr->next != NULL) { curr = curr->next; } curr->uri = auri; curr->next = new ip_uri_store; curr->ip = aip; curr->next = new ip_uri_store; curr = curr->next; curr = head; } int ip_uri_store::totalitems() { int i = 0; curr = head; while (curr->next != NULL) { i += 1; curr = curr->next; } return i; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { if (argc == 1) { cout << "123456, [email protected], Gordon Brown" << endl; return (0); } head = new ip_uri_store; curr = head; int i; for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { if (argv[i][0] == 'A') //add item { ip_uri_store.additem(argv[i + 1], argv[i + 2]); i += 2; } else if (argv[i][0] == 'N') //print total tiems { cout << ip_uri_store.totalitems() << endl; } else { cout << "command error\n"; return 0; } } return (0); }

    Read the article

  • How to configure apache and mod_proxy_ajp in order to forward ssl client certificate

    - by giovanni.cuccu
    Hi, I've developed a java application that need a ssl client certificate and in the staging environment with apache 2.2 and mod_jk it is working fine. In production the configuration is not using mod_jk but mod_proxy_ajp. I'm looking for an apache configuration example that configure ssl and mod_proxy_ajp for sending the ssl client certificate to the java application server (which listens with the ajp protocol). Thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • SSH_ORIGINAL_ENVIRONMENT error with snow leopard client to a gitosis server on debian

    - by Mica
    I have a server running gitosis (installed from the package manager) on debian lenny. I am able to perform all operations from my linux mint laptop, but from my Mac running an up-to-date Snow Leopard gives me the following error: mica@waste Desktop$ git clone [email protected]:Poems.git Initialized empty Git repository in /Users/micas/Desktop/Poems/.git/ ERROR:gitosis.serve.main:Repository read access denied fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly mica@waste Desktop$ ssh -v [email protected] OpenSSH_5.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8l 5 Nov 2009 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to 192.168.0.156 [192.168.0.156] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /Users/micas/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /Users/micas/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 debug1: identity file /Users/micas/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-5 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.2 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host '192.168.0.156' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /Users/mica/.ssh/known_hosts:5 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering public key: /Users/mica/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Remote: Forced command: gitosis-serve mica@waste debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disabled. debug1: Remote: X11 forwarding disabled. debug1: Remote: Agent forwarding disabled. debug1: Remote: Pty allocation disabled. debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 277 debug1: Remote: Forced command: gitosis-serve micas@waste debug1: Remote: Port forwarding disabled. debug1: Remote: X11 forwarding disabled. debug1: Remote: Agent forwarding disabled. debug1: Remote: Pty allocation disabled. debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). debug1: channel 0: new [client-session] debug1: Requesting [email protected] debug1: Entering interactive session. debug1: Requesting authentication agent forwarding. PTY allocation request failed on channel 0 ERROR:gitosis.serve.main:Need SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND in environment. debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 0 rtype exit-status reply 0 debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 0 rtype [email protected] reply 0 debug1: channel 0: free: client-session, nchannels 1 Connection to 192.168.0.156 closed. Transferred: sent 2544, received 2888 bytes, in 0.1 seconds Bytes per second: sent 29642.1, received 33650.3 debug1: Exit status 1 Extensive googling of the error isn't returning much-- I changed the /etc/sshd_config file on my Mac as per http://www.schmidp.com/2009/06/23/enable-ssh-agent-key-forwarding-on-snow-leopard/. I still get the same error.

    Read the article

  • Local links ( in browsers ) on *nix systems

    - by meder
    On Windows I can access files directly from the browser ( or at least I have it configured currently, forget if it was native like this ) with the file:// protocol, so I can access files from say the C drive. I'm wondering what the equivalent would be to accessing my files from the browser, if at all possible on a *nix system such as Debian.

    Read the article

  • Removing http301 redirect from client's cache

    - by ChessWhiz
    Hi, I have a server/client architecture where the client hits the ASP.NET server's service at a certain host name, IP address, and port. Without thinking, I logged on to the server and set up permanent HTTP301 redirection through IIS from that service to another URL that the machine handles via IIS (same IP and port), mistakenly thinking it was another site that is hosted there. When the client hit the server at the old host name, it cached the permanent redirect. Now, even though I have removed the redirection, the client no longer uses the old address. How can I clear the client's cache so that it no longer stores the redirect? I have read about how permanent HTTP301 can be, but in this case, it should be possible to reset a single client's knowledge of the incorrectly-learned host name. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How does ospf control flooding?

    - by iamrohitbanga
    What method is used by ospf protocol to prevent looping of flooded packets for link state advertisements? The packet header does not contain any timestamp. How do the routers recognize that it is the same advertisement that they sent before?

    Read the article

  • Prevent IE users from visiting my site?

    - by Paul Hatcherian
    Internet Explorer has caused me a lot of trouble over the years, between security problems, memory leaks, endless CSS and JavaScript hacks to get my site to look correct, and inconsistencies between releases, I've spent countless hours as the hapless victim of IE's idiosyncrasies. Well that ends today, I've decided to take matters into my own hands and ban all users of IE from visiting my website. That will teach them to use such a cruddy browser. My question is how best to do this? I don't want to rely on JavaScript, which could be disabled, nor the request agent string, which could be tampered with. A clever user could even temporarily switch to Firefox or Chrome just to visit my site. Ideally, I'd have a list of the IP addresses of every IE user in the world and restrict based on the IP address. The main problem I'm having, aside from getting the list in the first place, is how do I keep it updated? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • using ftp or webdav?

    - by ajsie
    if i want to mount remote folders in my mac and use them as a local one, should i use webdav over ftp? basically, i have read that webdav is better than ftp (old protocol). does this mean that i should never use ftp and only webdav?

    Read the article

  • How to monitor traffic on certain ports with ntop

    - by Claudiu
    How to configure ntop so I can get the amount of upload traffic sent through a certain port ? I've added port in ntop/protocol.list, restarted ntop and after some time I've checked Summary - Traffic - TCP/UDP Traffic Port Distribution: Last Minute View, but data from that table is not too relevant. I think there is much more about this ntop that I don't know (configuration, usage).

    Read the article

  • OpenSSH does not accept public key?

    - by Bob
    I've been trying to solve this for a while, but I'm admittedly quite stumped. I just started up a new server and was setting up OpenSSH to use key-based SSH logins, but I've run into quite a dilemma. All the guides are relatively similar, and I was following them closely (despite having done this once before). I triple checked my work to see if I would notice some obvious screw up - but nothing is apparent. As far as I can tell, I haven't done anything wrong (and I've checked very closely). If it's any help, on my end I'm using Cygwin and the server is running Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS. Anyways, here is the output (I've removed/censored some parts for privacy (primarily anything with my name, website, or its IP address), but I can assure you that nothing is wrong there): $ ssh user@host -v OpenSSH_5.9p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8r 8 Feb 2011 debug1: Connecting to host [ipaddress] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa type 1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.9p1 Debian-5ubuntu1 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.9 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY debug1: Server host key: ECDSA 24:68:c3:d8:13:f8:61:94:f2:95:34:d1:e2:6d:e7:d7 debug1: Host 'host' is known and matches the ECDSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/user/.ssh/known_hosts:2 debug1: ssh_ecdsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: Roaming not allowed by server debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/user/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/user/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/user/.ssh/id_ecdsa debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey). What can I do to resolve my problem?

    Read the article

  • Why is my mail stuck in the queue with the status "retry" in Exchange 2003?

    - by Mike C
    I have been having a problem recently where some of our mail is not getting to clients. I looked into the Message queue on my SBS2k3 server and noticed that several recipients are showing up in the queue with a state of "Retry". When I highlight the recipient, the additional queue information says "An SMTP protocol error occured". How can I find out more specifically what error occured, and how could I then go about correcting it? Thanks, Mike

    Read the article

  • MultiCast Messages to multiple clients on the same machine

    - by Christopher Chase
    Im trying to write a server/service that broadcasts a message on the lan ever second or so, Kind of like a service discovery. The message needs to be received by multiple client programs that could be on the same machine or different machines. But there could be more than one program on each machine running at the same time. Im using delphi7, with indy 9.0.18 where im stuck is if i should be using UDP or IP MultiCast or if its even possible... Ive managed to get it to work with IP Multi Cast with one client per machine, but even after many trys with different bindings.. max/min ports etc, i cant seem to find a solution.

    Read the article

  • rsync + Permission denied

    - by Diana
    I want to copy the some_file using rsync to my machine (red hat 5.3) from other linux server also (red hat 5.3) Is it possible to copy the file without to get "Permission denied." ? Remark - the login and password on 130.146.120.11 machine is: login=root password=moon rsync -WavH --progress 130.146.120.11:/tmp/some_file . Permission denied. rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(165)

    Read the article

  • gluster IOPS performance

    - by Gotys
    Can "gluster" serve FLV files without any front-end server layers just using the built-in HTTP protocol ? How would the IOPS compare to standard apache serving? Would gluster help me with I/O limits of harddrives, if I chained a lot of machines together? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • mysql index optimization for a table with multiple indexes that index some of the same columns

    - by Sean
    I have a table that stores some basic data about visitor sessions on third party web sites. This is its structure: id, site_id, unixtime, unixtime_last, ip_address, uid There are four indexes: id, site_id/unixtime, site_id/ip_address, and site_id/uid There are many different types of ways that we query this table, and all of them are specific to the site_id. The index with unixtime is used to display the list of visitors for a given date or time range. The other two are used to find all visits from an IP address or a "uid" (a unique cookie value created for each visitor), as well as determining if this is a new visitor or a returning visitor. Obviously storing site_id inside 3 indexes is inefficient for both write speed and storage, but I see no way around it, since I need to be able to quickly query this data for a given specific site_id. Any ideas on making this more efficient? I don't really understand B-trees besides some very basic stuff, but it's more efficient to have the left-most column of an index be the one with the least variance - correct? Because I considered having the site_id being the second column of the index for both ip_address and uid but I think that would make the index less efficient since the IP and UID are going to vary more than the site ID will, because we only have about 8000 unique sites per database server, but millions of unique visitors across all ~8000 sites on a daily basis. I've also considered removing site_id from the IP and UID indexes completely, since the chances of the same visitor going to multiple sites that share the same database server are quite small, but in cases where this does happen, I fear it could be quite slow to determine if this is a new visitor to this site_id or not. The query would be something like: select id from sessions where uid = 'value' and site_id = 123 limit 1 ... so if this visitor had visited this site before, it would only need to find one row with this site_id before it stopped. This wouldn't be super fast necessarily, but acceptably fast. But say we have a site that gets 500,000 visitors a day, and a particular visitor loves this site and goes there 10 times a day. Now they happen to hit another site on the same database server for the first time. The above query could take quite a long time to search through all of the potentially thousands of rows for this UID, scattered all over the disk, since it wouldn't be finding one for this site ID. Any insight on making this as efficient as possible would be appreciated :) Update - this is a MyISAM table with MySQL 5.0. My concerns are both with performance as well as storage space. This table is both read and write heavy. If I had to choose between performance and storage, my biggest concern is performance - but both are important. We use memcached heavily in all areas of our service, but that's not an excuse to not care about the database design. I want the database to be as efficient as possible.

    Read the article

  • Calculation of charged traffic in GPRS network

    - by TyBoer
    I am working with a distributed application communicating over GPRS. I use UDP packets to send business data and ICMP pings to verify connectivity. And now I have a problem with calculating a traffic for which I will be charged by the provider. I have to consider following factors: UDP payload: that is obvious. UDP overhead: UDP header + IP header = 8 + 20 bytes. ICMP echo request without data: IP header + ICMP payload = 28 bytes. ICMP echo reply: as in 3. Above means that for evey data packet I am charged for payload + 28 bytes and for every ping 56 bytes. Am I right or I am missing/misunderstanding something?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251  | Next Page >