Search Results

Search found 11381 results on 456 pages for 'intellectual property'.

Page 25/456 | < Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >

  • Delphi getting property value of a member from ClassType

    - by Kayode Yusuf
    I am implementing a Boilerplate feature - allow users to Change descriptions of some components - like Tlabels - at run time. e.g. TFooClass = Class ( TBaseClass) Label : Tlabel; ... End; Var FooClass : TFooClass; ... At Design time, the value Label's caption property is say - 'First Name', when the application is run, there is a feature that allows the user to change the caption value to say 'Other Name'. Once this is changed, the caption for the label for the class instance of FooClass is updated immediately. The problem now is if the user for whatever reason wants to revert back to the design time value of say 'First Name' , it seems impossible. I can use the RTTIContext methods and all that but I at the end of the day, it seems to require the instance of the class for me to change the value and since this has already being changed - I seem to to have hit a brick wall getting around it. My question is this - is there a way using the old RTTI methods or the new RTTIContext stuff to the property of a class' member without instantiating the class - i.e. getting the property from the ClassType definition. This is code snippet of my attempt at doing that : c : TRttiContext; z : TRttiInstanceType; w : TRttiProperty; Aform : Tform; .... Begin ..... Aform := Tform(FooClass); for vCount := 0 to AForm.ComponentCount-1 do begin vDummyComponent := AForm.Components[vCount]; if IsPublishedProp(vDummyComponent,'Caption') then begin c := TRttiContext.Create; try z := (c.GetType(vDummyComponent.ClassInfo) as TRttiInstanceType); w := z.GetProperty('Caption'); if w <> nil then Values[vOffset, 1] := w.GetValue(vDummyComponent.ClassType).AsString ..... ..... .... .... I am getting all sorts of errors and any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • C# property definition

    - by Sunny
    For C# properties, I can do this: public class Employee{ public string Name { get; private set; } public Employee(string name){ Name = name; } } which means that the Name property can be set within the class Employee & can be read publicly. But, if I want to restrict the set to only within the constructors of the Employee class, I need to do: public class Employee{ public readonly string Name = String.Empty; public Employee(string name){ Name = name; } } But, for this case, I had to change the property to a field. Is there any reason this is not possible/allowed in C#: public class Employee{ public string Name { get; private readonly set; } public Employee(string name){ Name = name; } } IMO this will allow us to have properties which can be set only in the constructor & does not require us to change properties to fields... Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Silly Objective-C inheritance problem when using property

    - by Ben Packard
    I've been scratching my head with this for a couple of hours - I haven't used inheritance much. Here I have set up a simple Test B class that inherits from Test A, where an ivar is declared. But I get the compilation error that the variable is undeclared. This only happens when I add the property and synthesize declarations - works fine without them. TestA Header: #import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h> @interface TestA : NSObject { NSString *testString; } @end TestA Implementation is empty: #import "TestA.h" @implementation TestA @end TestB Header: #import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h> #import "TestA.h" @interface TestB : TestA { } @property NSString *testProp; @end TestB Implementation (Error - 'testString' is undeclared) #import "TestB.h" @implementation TestB @synthesize testProp; - (void)testing{ NSLog(@"test ivar is %@", testString); } @end

    Read the article

  • Are Python properties broken?

    - by jacob
    How can it be that this test case import unittest class PropTest(unittest.TestCase): def test(self): class C(): val = 'initial val' def get_p(self): return self.val def set_p(self, prop): if prop == 'legal val': self.val = prop prop=property(fget=get_p, fset=set_p) c=C() self.assertEqual('initial val', c.prop) c.prop='legal val' self.assertEqual('legal val', c.prop) c.prop='illegal val' self.assertNotEqual('illegal val', c.prop) fails as below? Failure Traceback (most recent call last): File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 279, in run testMethod() File "/Users/jacob/aau/admissions_proj/admissions/plain_old_unit_tests.py", line 24, in test self.assertNotEqual('illegal val', c.prop) File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/lib/python2.6/unittest.py", line 358, in failIfEqual (msg or '%r == %r' % (first, second)) AssertionError: 'illegal val' == 'illegal val'

    Read the article

  • -webkit-transition-property for translation

    - by sexyprout
    Hai. What is the transition property for translations in CSS3? I'm currently using all but I got a bug in iOS so I want to test another property. -webkit-transform: translate(-320px, 0);   -webkit-transition: ??? .5 ease-in-out; See the bug with an iOS device here (swipe horizontally), there's a kind of flash. Update: to anyone interested, I found a way to fix it thanks to Duopixel: E { -webkit-transition: all .5s ease-in-out; -webkit-transform: translate3d(0, 0, 0); // perform an "invisible" translation } // Then you can translate with translate3d(), no bug! document.querySelector('E').webkitTransform = 'translate3d(-320px, 0, 0)'

    Read the article

  • linq to sql string property from non-null column with default

    - by Barry Fandango
    I have a LINQ to SQL class "VoucherRecord" based on a simple table. One property "Note" is a string that represents an nvarchar(255) column, which is non-nullable and has a default value of empty string (''). If I instantiate a VoucherRecord the initial value of the Note property is null. If I add it using a DataContext's InsertOnSubmit method, I get a SQL error message: Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'Note', table 'foo.bar.tblVoucher'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails. Why isn't the database default kicking in? What sort of query could bypass the default anyway? How do I view the generated sql for this action? Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • Ant var and property scope

    - by bobtheowl2
    I have a main build script that calls various targets. One of these targets needs to store a value and another target needs to display it. Obviously this is not working so I think it may be related to scope. I've tried var, property, and declaring the property outside of target1. Since var seems to be mutable, it looks like I need to use it instead, but each time my output is empty. Main script <antcall target="target1"/> <antcall target="display"/> In target1: <var name="myVar" value="${anotherVar}"/> In display: <echo>${myVar}</echo>

    Read the article

  • Java - Array's length property

    - by The New Idiot
    We can determine the length of an ArrayList<E> using its public method size() , like ArrayList<Integer> arr = new ArrayList(10); int size = arr.size(); Similarly we can determine the length of an Array object using the length property String[] str = new String[10]; int size = str.length; Whereas the size() method of ArrayList is defined inside the ArrayList class , where is this length property of Array defined ? Is it implemented by JVM or does it reside in any Java API class file ?

    Read the article

  • Powershell - Select the values of one property on all objects of an array

    - by Sylvain Reverdy
    Sorry, I'm still a noob on Powershell and I could not find an answer on Internet... Let's say we have an array of objects $objects. Let's say these objects have a "Name" property. This is what I want to do $results = @() $objects | %{ $results += $_.Name } this works but can it be done on a better way? If I do something like : $results = objects | Select Name $results is an array of objects having a Name property. I want $results to contain an array of Names So, is there a better way ? Thx a lot

    Read the article

  • C# Custom Control Properties load before Load and arrays are empties

    - by Wildhorn
    Hello, I made a custom control with custom properties. When I modify these properties in the "Form.cs [Design]", I need stuff to happens (it fill some arrays and modify the look of the control), so I call a function within the "set" of the property. All of this works good. My problem is that when I run the program with my custom control, it seems that properties "set" is called, which will call the function, but then, my arrays seems now to have lost all their values and the function use these arrays, but now because they are all empty, it crashes due to NullException blahblahblah. It also seems that properties "set" is called before the control Load (which I guess is called only when it is added to my Form, and not when the Form load). So question is, why does my arrays become empty once I try to run the Form and is there an event that is called before that when the Form load? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Flash AS3: automate property assignment to new instance from arguments in constructor

    - by matt lohkamp
    I like finding out about tricky new ways to do things. Let's say you've got a class with a property that gets set to the value of an argument in the constructor, like so: package{ public class SomeClass{ private var someProperty:*; public function SomeClass(_someProperty:*):void{ someProperty = _someProperty; } } } That's not exactly a hassle. But imagine you've got... I don't know, five properties. Ten properties, maybe. Rather then writing out each individual assignment, line by line, isn't there a way to loop through the constructor's arguments and set the value of each corresponding property on the new instance accordingly? I don't think that the ...rest or arguments objects will work, since they only keep an enumerated list of the arguments, not the argument names - I'm thinking something like this would be better: for(var propertyName:String in argsAsAssocArray){this[propertyName] = argsAsAssocArray[propertyName];} ... does something like this exist?

    Read the article

  • Catch access to undefined property in JavaScript

    - by avri
    The Spider-Monkey JavaScript engine implements the noSuchMethod callback function for JavaScript Objects. This function is called whenever JavaScript tries to execute an undefined method of an Object. I would like to set a callback function to an Object that will be called whenever an undefined property in the Object is accessed or assigned to. I haven't found a noSuchProperty function implemented for JavaScript Objects and I am curios if there is any workaround that will achieve the same result. Consider the following code: var a = {}; a.__defineGetter__("bla", function(){alert(1);return 2;}); alert(a.bla); It is equivalent to [alert(1);alert(2)] - even though a.bla is undefined. I would like to achieve the same result but to unknown properties (i.e. without knowing in advance that a."bla" will be the property accessed)

    Read the article

  • How to set a bean property before executing this f:event listener

    - by user
    How to set a bean property from jsf page before executing this f:event listener: <f:event type="preRenderComponent" listener="bean.method}"/> I tried the below code but it does not set the value to the bean property. <f:event type="preRenderComponent" listener="bean.method}"> <f:setPropertyActionListener target="#{bean.howMany}" value="2"/> </f:event> JSF2.1.6 with PF 3.3 EDIT Any issues with this below code? (This works! but I just want to confirm if there are any issues with this!?) <f:event type="preRenderComponent" listener="#{bean.setHowMany(15)}"/> <f:event type="preRenderComponent" listener="#{bean.method}"/>

    Read the article

  • Id property not populated

    - by fingers
    I have an identity mapping like so: Id(x => x.GuidId).Column("GuidId") .GeneratedBy.GuidComb().UnsavedValue(Guid.Empty); When I retrieve an object from the database, the GuidId property of my object is Guid.Empty, not the actual Guid (the property in the class is of type System.Guid). However, all of the other properties in the object are populated just fine. The database field's data type (SQL Server 2005) is uniqueidentifier, and marked as RowGuid. The application that is connecting to the database is a VB.NET Web Site project (not a "Web Application" or "MVC Web Application" - just a regular "Web Site" project). I open the NHibernate session through a custom HttpModule. Here is the HttpModule: public class NHibernateModule : System.Web.IHttpModule { public static ISessionFactory SessionFactory; public static ISession Session; private static FluentConfiguration Configuration; static NHibernateModule() { if (Configuration == null) { string connectionString = cfg.ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["myDatabase"].ConnectionString; Configuration = Fluently.Configure() .Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2005.ConnectionString(cs => cs.Is(connectionString))) .ExposeConfiguration(c => c.Properties.Add("current_session_context_class", "web")) .Mappings(x => x.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<LeadMap>().ExportTo("C:\\Mappings")); } SessionFactory = Configuration.BuildSessionFactory(); } public void Init(HttpApplication context) { context.BeginRequest += delegate { Session = SessionFactory.OpenSession(); CurrentSessionContext.Bind(Session); }; context.EndRequest += delegate { CurrentSessionContext.Unbind(SessionFactory); }; } public void Dispose() { Session.Dispose(); } } The strangest part of all, is that from my unit test project, the GuidId property is returned as I would expect. I even rigged it to go for the exact row in the exact database as the web site was hitting. The only differences I can think of between the two projects are The unit test project is in C# Something with the way the session is managed between the HttpModule and my unit tests The configuration for the unit tests is as follows: Fluently.Configure() .Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2005.ConnectionString(cs => cs.Is(connectionString))) .Mappings(x => x.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<LeadDetailMap>()); I am fresh out of ideas. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Extension method not working if I set controller property in Action, works in OnExecuting

    - by Blankman
    I have a class MyController that inherits from Controller, so all my controllers inherit from MyController. I have a property in MyController: public class MyController : Controller { public string SomeProperty {get;set;} } if I set this property in MyController's OnExecuting method, my HtmlHelper extension method works fine: public static string SomeExtension(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper) { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); string result = ""; var controller = htmlHelper.ViewContext.Controller as MyController; if (controller != null) { result = controller.SomeProperty; } return result; } it doesn't work if I set 'SomeProperty' in my controllers action method. I guess because I am doing 'as MyController' in the extension method? is there a way for it to work in both situations? I am using the value of SomeProperty to be outputted on my view pages.

    Read the article

  • Pass property to access using .NET

    - by BitFiddler
    I'm fairly sure this is possible, but what I want to do is have a generic method where I can pass in an object along with a Expression that will tell the method which Property to use in it's logic. Can anyone get me started on the syntax for something like this? Essentially what I would like to code is something like: Dim firstNameMapper as IColumnMapper = new ColumnMapper(of Author)(Function(x) x.FirstName) Dim someAuthorObject as new Author() fistNameMapper.Map("Richard", someAuthorObject) Now the mapper object would know to set the FirstName property to "Richard". Now using a Function here won't work, I know this... I'm just trying to give an idea what I'm trying to work towards. Thanks for any help!

    Read the article

  • Are @property's necessary for Interface Builder?

    - by Rits
    In my UIViewController subclass, I have 3 UIView's with each a @property as an IBOutlet. I do not use these properties at all in my code. The views get instantiated as soon as the view controller is created and they are deallocated when the view controller is deallocated. I was thinking; can't I just remove the @property's? I did, and I could still connect my instance variables (with IBOutlet) in Interface Builder. So my question now is; is there any use for properties in combination with Interface Builder, or is it OK to leave them out? Is it required for some memory management or something? Or are they really just for use in your own code? And if I do leave them out, do I still need to release them in dealloc?

    Read the article

  • iPhone - a question about @property

    - by Roger
    Hi, I am kind of newbie on Objective-C and I was looking at a code, trying to understand a few things, and I come across with this .h file: there was a declaration like that on the @interface section MyVideoClass *contrast_; then below we have @property (nonatomic, retain) MyVideoClass *contrast; @property (nonatomic, retain) FetchClass *fetchMe; The strange part is that the first has an underscrore after the name and the second one, doesn't. The other strange thing is that the guy has a call to these properties like this: FetchClass *fetchOne = [self.fetchMe contrast]; What kind of call is that? This seems pretty insane to me. I simply cannot understand what is going on here, but the code works. pretty insane. Can you guys explain me that? Forgive the stupid question, but I am still learning... thanks

    Read the article

  • Property Scope (Iphone)

    - by Hank
    Hello All. I am having trouble accessing a declared property and I think I am missing something fundamental about the nature of properties and perhaps view controllers. Here's what I'm doing so far: declaring a property "myPhone" in a root view controller called RootViewController. grabbing a phone number from a modally presented people picker setting "myPhone" to the value from the people picker (from within shouldContinueAfterSelectingPerson of ABPeoplePickerNavigationController) trying to access "myPhone" from another modally presented view controller "myPhone" continues to NSLog to null despite trying every permutation of self.myPhone, super, RootViewController, etc. to try and access the value I set. What am I missing?

    Read the article

  • Use SQL query to populate property in nHibernate mapping file

    - by brainimus
    I have an object which contains a property that is the result of an SQL statement. How do I add the SQL statement to my nHibernate mapping file? Example Object: public class Library{ public int BookCount { get; set; } } Example Mapping File: <hibernate-mapping> <class name="Library" table="Libraries"> <property name="BookCount" type="int"> <- This is where I want the SQL query to populate the value. -> </class> </hibernate-mapping> Example SQL Query: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM BOOKS WHERE BOOKS.LIBRARY_ID = LIBRARIES.ID

    Read the article

  • C# style properties in python

    - by 3D-Grabber
    I am looking for a way to define properties in Python similar to C#, with nested get/set definitions. This is how far I got: #### definition #### def Prop(fcn): f = fcn() return property(f['get'], f['set']) #### test #### class Example(object): @Prop def myattr(): def get(self): return self._value def set(self, value): self._value = value return locals() # <- how to get rid of this? e = Example() e.myattr = 'somevalue' print e.myattr The problem with this is, that it still needs the definition to 'return locals()'. Is there a way to get rid of it? Maybe with a nested decorator?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >