Search Results

Search found 1700 results on 68 pages for 'pixel shading'.

Page 25/68 | < Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >

  • Gimp: change one colour to another?

    - by AP257
    Simple to explain: possibly not so simple to do. In Gimp, I have a green button GIF image: it shades from dark green to light green, against a transparent background. I would like to change it to blue, and keep the shading, so it shades from dark blue to light blue. Anyone know how I can do this? Can't find an explanation by Googling! Thanks.

    Read the article

  • WPF Blurry Images - Bitmap Class

    - by Luke
    I am using the following sample at http://blogs.msdn.com/dwayneneed/archive/2007/10/05/blurry-bitmaps.aspx within VB.NET. The code is shown below. I am having a problem when my application loads the CPU is pegging 50-70%. I have determined that the problem is with the Bitmap class. The OnLayoutUpdated() method is calling the InvalidateVisual() continously. This is because some points are not returning as equal but rather, Point(0.0,-0.5) Can anyone see any bugs within this code or know a better implmentation for pixel snapping a Bitmap image so it is not blurry? p.s. The sample code was in C#, however I believe that it was converted correctly. Imports System Imports System.Collections.Generic Imports System.Windows Imports System.Windows.Media Imports System.Windows.Media.Imaging Class Bitmap Inherits FrameworkElement ' Use FrameworkElement instead of UIElement so Data Binding works as expected Private _sourceDownloaded As EventHandler Private _sourceFailed As EventHandler(Of ExceptionEventArgs) Private _pixelOffset As Windows.Point Public Sub New() _sourceDownloaded = New EventHandler(AddressOf OnSourceDownloaded) _sourceFailed = New EventHandler(Of ExceptionEventArgs)(AddressOf OnSourceFailed) AddHandler LayoutUpdated, AddressOf OnLayoutUpdated End Sub Public Shared ReadOnly SourceProperty As DependencyProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("Source", GetType(BitmapSource), GetType(Bitmap), New FrameworkPropertyMetadata(Nothing, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsRender Or FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.AffectsMeasure, New PropertyChangedCallback(AddressOf Bitmap.OnSourceChanged))) Public Property Source() As BitmapSource Get Return DirectCast(GetValue(SourceProperty), BitmapSource) End Get Set(ByVal value As BitmapSource) SetValue(SourceProperty, value) End Set End Property Public Shared Function FindParentWindow(ByVal child As DependencyObject) As Window Dim parent As DependencyObject = VisualTreeHelper.GetParent(child) 'Check if this is the end of the tree If parent Is Nothing Then Return Nothing End If Dim parentWindow As Window = TryCast(parent, Window) If parentWindow IsNot Nothing Then Return parentWindow Else ' Use recursion until it reaches a Window Return FindParentWindow(parent) End If End Function Public Event BitmapFailed As EventHandler(Of ExceptionEventArgs) ' Return our measure size to be the size needed to display the bitmap pixels. ' ' Use MeasureOverride instead of MeasureCore so Data Binding works as expected. ' Protected Overloads Overrides Function MeasureCore(ByVal availableSize As Size) As Size Protected Overloads Overrides Function MeasureOverride(ByVal availableSize As Size) As Size Dim measureSize As New Size() Dim bitmapSource As BitmapSource = Source If bitmapSource IsNot Nothing Then Dim ps As PresentationSource = PresentationSource.FromVisual(Me) If Me.VisualParent IsNot Nothing Then Dim window As Window = window.GetWindow(Me.VisualParent) If window IsNot Nothing Then ps = PresentationSource.FromVisual(window.GetWindow(Me.VisualParent)) ElseIf FindParentWindow(Me) IsNot Nothing Then ps = PresentationSource.FromVisual(FindParentWindow(Me)) End If End If ' If ps IsNot Nothing Then Dim fromDevice As Matrix = ps.CompositionTarget.TransformFromDevice Dim pixelSize As New Vector(bitmapSource.PixelWidth, bitmapSource.PixelHeight) Dim measureSizeV As Vector = fromDevice.Transform(pixelSize) measureSize = New Size(measureSizeV.X, measureSizeV.Y) Else measureSize = New Size(bitmapSource.PixelWidth, bitmapSource.PixelHeight) End If End If Return measureSize End Function Protected Overloads Overrides Sub OnRender(ByVal dc As DrawingContext) Dim bitmapSource As BitmapSource = Me.Source If bitmapSource IsNot Nothing Then _pixelOffset = GetPixelOffset() ' Render the bitmap offset by the needed amount to align to pixels. dc.DrawImage(bitmapSource, New Rect(_pixelOffset, DesiredSize)) End If End Sub Private Shared Sub OnSourceChanged(ByVal d As DependencyObject, ByVal e As DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs) Dim bitmap As Bitmap = DirectCast(d, Bitmap) Dim oldValue As BitmapSource = DirectCast(e.OldValue, BitmapSource) Dim newValue As BitmapSource = DirectCast(e.NewValue, BitmapSource) If ((oldValue IsNot Nothing) AndAlso (bitmap._sourceDownloaded IsNot Nothing)) AndAlso (Not oldValue.IsFrozen AndAlso (TypeOf oldValue Is BitmapSource)) Then RemoveHandler DirectCast(oldValue, BitmapSource).DownloadCompleted, bitmap._sourceDownloaded RemoveHandler DirectCast(oldValue, BitmapSource).DownloadFailed, bitmap._sourceFailed ' ((BitmapSource)newValue).DecodeFailed -= bitmap._sourceFailed; // 3.5 End If If ((newValue IsNot Nothing) AndAlso (TypeOf newValue Is BitmapSource)) AndAlso Not newValue.IsFrozen Then AddHandler DirectCast(newValue, BitmapSource).DownloadCompleted, bitmap._sourceDownloaded AddHandler DirectCast(newValue, BitmapSource).DownloadFailed, bitmap._sourceFailed ' ((BitmapSource)newValue).DecodeFailed += bitmap._sourceFailed; // 3.5 End If End Sub Private Sub OnSourceDownloaded(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) InvalidateMeasure() InvalidateVisual() End Sub Private Sub OnSourceFailed(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As ExceptionEventArgs) Source = Nothing ' setting a local value seems scetchy... RaiseEvent BitmapFailed(Me, e) End Sub Private Sub OnLayoutUpdated(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) ' This event just means that layout happened somewhere. However, this is ' what we need since layout anywhere could affect our pixel positioning. Dim pixelOffset As Windows.Point = GetPixelOffset() If Not AreClose(pixelOffset, _pixelOffset) Then InvalidateVisual() End If End Sub ' Gets the matrix that will convert a Windows.Point from "above" the ' coordinate space of a visual into the the coordinate space ' "below" the visual. Private Function GetVisualTransform(ByVal v As Visual) As Matrix If v IsNot Nothing Then Dim m As Matrix = Matrix.Identity Dim transform As Transform = VisualTreeHelper.GetTransform(v) If transform IsNot Nothing Then Dim cm As Matrix = transform.Value m = Matrix.Multiply(m, cm) End If Dim offset As Vector = VisualTreeHelper.GetOffset(v) m.Translate(offset.X, offset.Y) Return m End If Return Matrix.Identity End Function Private Function TryApplyVisualTransform(ByVal Point As Windows.Point, ByVal v As Visual, ByVal inverse As Boolean, ByVal throwOnError As Boolean, ByRef success As Boolean) As Windows.Point success = True If v IsNot Nothing Then Dim visualTransform As Matrix = GetVisualTransform(v) If inverse Then If Not throwOnError AndAlso Not visualTransform.HasInverse Then success = False Return New Windows.Point(0, 0) End If visualTransform.Invert() End If Point = visualTransform.Transform(Point) End If Return Point End Function Private Function ApplyVisualTransform(ByVal Point As Windows.Point, ByVal v As Visual, ByVal inverse As Boolean) As Windows.Point Dim success As Boolean = True Return TryApplyVisualTransform(Point, v, inverse, True, success) End Function Private Function GetPixelOffset() As Windows.Point Dim pixelOffset As New Windows.Point() Dim ps As PresentationSource = PresentationSource.FromVisual(Me) If ps IsNot Nothing Then Dim rootVisual As Visual = ps.RootVisual ' Transform (0,0) from this element up to pixels. pixelOffset = Me.TransformToAncestor(rootVisual).Transform(pixelOffset) pixelOffset = ApplyVisualTransform(pixelOffset, rootVisual, False) pixelOffset = ps.CompositionTarget.TransformToDevice.Transform(pixelOffset) ' Round the origin to the nearest whole pixel. pixelOffset.X = Math.Round(pixelOffset.X) pixelOffset.Y = Math.Round(pixelOffset.Y) ' Transform the whole-pixel back to this element. pixelOffset = ps.CompositionTarget.TransformFromDevice.Transform(pixelOffset) pixelOffset = ApplyVisualTransform(pixelOffset, rootVisual, True) pixelOffset = rootVisual.TransformToDescendant(Me).Transform(pixelOffset) End If Return pixelOffset End Function Private Function AreClose(ByVal Point1 As Windows.Point, ByVal Point2 As Windows.Point) As Boolean Return AreClose(Point1.X, Point2.X) AndAlso AreClose(Point1.Y, Point2.Y) End Function Private Function AreClose(ByVal value1 As Double, ByVal value2 As Double) As Boolean If value1 = value2 Then Return True End If Dim delta As Double = value1 - value2 Return ((delta < 0.00000153) AndAlso (delta > -0.00000153)) End Function End Class

    Read the article

  • Export JPG out of Dicom File With mDCM

    - by Ross Peoples
    Hello, I'm using mDCM with C# to view dicom tags, but I'm trying to convert the pixel data to a Bitmap and eventually out to a JPG file. I have read all of the posts on the mDCM Google Group on the subject and all of the code examples either don't work or are missing important lines of code. The image I am working with is a 16 bit monochrome1. I have tried using LockBits, SetPixel, and unsafe code in order to convert the pixel data to a Bitmap but all attempts fail. Does anyone have any code that could make this work. Thanks in advance P.S. Before anyone suggests trying something else like ClearCanvas, know that mDCM is the only library that suits my needs and ClearCanvas is WAY too bloated for what I need to do.

    Read the article

  • Resizing JPEG image during decoding

    - by Thomas
    I'm working on a program that creates thumbnails of JPEG images on the fly. Now I was thinking: since a JPEG image is built from 8x8-pixel blocks (Wikipedia has a great explanation), would it be possible to skip part of the decoding? Let's say that my thumbnails are at least 8 times smaller than the original image. We could then map each 8x8 block in the input file to 1 pixel in the decoding output, by including only the constant term of the discrete cosine transform. Most of the image data can be discarded right away, and need not be processed. Moreover, the memory usage is reduced by a factor of 64. I don't want to implement this from scratch; that'll easily take a week. Is there any code out there that can do this? If not, is this because this approach isn't worthwhile, or simply because nobody has thought of it yet?

    Read the article

  • Fastest Algorithm to scale down 32Bit RGB IMAGE.

    - by Sunny
    which algorithm to use to scale down 32Bit RGB IMAGE to custom resolution? Algorithm should average pixels. for example If I have 100x100 image and I want new Image of size 20x50. Avg of first five pixels of first source row will give first pixel of dest, And avg of first two pixels of first source column will give first dest column pixel. Currently what I do is first scale down in X resolution, and after that I scale down in Y resolution. I need one temp buffer in this method. Is there any optimized method that you know?

    Read the article

  • Web service creates stack overflow

    - by mouthpiec
    I have an application that when executed as a windows application works fine, but when converted to a web service, in some instances (which were tested successfully) by the windows app) creates a stack overflow. Do you have an idea of what can cause this? (Note that it works fine when the web service is placed on the localhost). Could it be that the stack size of a Web Service is smaller than that of a Window Application? UPDATE The below is the code in which I am getting a stack overflow error private bool CheckifPixelsNeighbour(Pixel c1, Pixel c2, int DistanceAllowed) { bool Neighbour = false; if ((Math.Abs(c1.X - c2.X) <= DistanceAllowed) && Math.Abs(c1.Y - c2.Y) <= DistanceAllowed) { Neighbour = true; } return Neighbour; }

    Read the article

  • Novel fitness measure for evolutionary image matching simulation

    - by Nick Johnson
    I'm sure many people have already seen demos of using genetic algorithms to generate an image that matches a sample image. You start off with noise, and gradually it comes to resemble the target image more and more closely, until you have a more-or-less exact duplicate. All of the examples I've seen, however, use a fairly straightforward pixel-by-pixel comparison, resulting in a fairly predictable 'fade in' of the final image. What I'm looking for is something more novel: A fitness measure that comes closer to what we see as 'similar' than the naive approach. I don't have a specific result in mind - I'm just looking for something more 'interesting' than the default. Suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Winforms Hotkey, Help?

    - by Di4g0n4leye
    namespace WebBrowser { public partial class MainForm : Form { public MainForm() { InitializeComponent(); } int GetPixel(int x, int y) { Bitmap bmp = new Bitmap(1, 1, PixelFormat.Format32bppPArgb); Graphics grp = Graphics.FromImage(bmp); grp.CopyFromScreen(new Point(x,y), Point.Empty, new Size(1,1)); grp.Save(); return bmp.GetPixel(0, 0).ToArgb(); } void Button1Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { int x = Cursor.Position.X; int y = Cursor.Position.Y; int pixel = GetPixel(x,y); textBox1.Text = pixel.ToString(); } void MainFormLoad(object sender, EventArgs e) { webBrowser1.Navigate("http://google.com"); } } } } i want to add a hotkey that call Button1 on Press, How can that be done?

    Read the article

  • How does glClear() improve performance?

    - by Jon-Eric
    Apple's Technical Q&A on addressing flickering (QA1650) includes the following paragraph. (Emphasis mine.) You must provide a color to every pixel on the screen. At the beginning of your drawing code, it is a good idea to use glClear() to initialize the color buffer. A full-screen clear of each of your color, depth, and stencil buffers (if you're using them) at the start of a frame can also generally improve your application's performance. On other platforms, I've always found it to be an optimization to not clear the color buffer if you're going to draw to every pixel. (Why waste time filling the color buffer if you're just going to overwrite that clear color?) How can a call to glClear() improve performance?

    Read the article

  • How can I encode four unsigned bytes (0-255) to a float and back again using HLSL?

    - by Statement
    Hello! I am facing a task where one of my hlsl shaders require multiple texture lookups per pixel. My 2d textures are fixed to 256*256, so two bytes should be sufficient to address any given texel given this constraint. My idea is then to put two xy-coordinates in each float, giving me eight xy-coordinates in pixel space when packed in a Vector4 format image. These eight coordinates are then used to sample another texture(s). The reason for doing this is to save graphics memory and an attempt to optimize processing time, since then I don't require multiple texture lookups. By the way: Does anyone know if encoding/decoding 16 bytes from/to 4 floats using 1 sampling is slower than 4 samplings with unencoded data?

    Read the article

  • How can I use a Shader in XNA to color single pixels?

    - by George Johnston
    I have a standard 800x600 window in my XNA project. My goal is to color each individual pixel based on a rectangle array which holds boolean values. Currently I am using a 1x1 Texture and drawing each sprite in my array. I am very new to XNA and come from a GDI background, so I am doing what I would have done in GDI, but it doesn't scale very well. I have been told in another question to use a Shader, but after much research, I still haven't been able to find out how to accomplish this goal. My application loops through the X and Y coordinates of my rectangular array, does calculations based on each value, and reassigns/moves the array around. At the end, I need to update my "Canvas" with the new values. A smaller sample of my array would look like: 0,0,0,0,0,0,0 0,0,0,0,0,0,0 0,0,0,0,0,0,0 1,1,1,1,1,1,1 1,1,1,1,1,1,1 How can I use a shader to color each pixel?

    Read the article

  • Faster way to iterate through a jaggad array?

    - by George Johnston
    I would like to iterate through an array that covers every pixel on my screen. i.e: for (int y = 598; y > 0; y--) { for (int x = 798; x > 0; x--) { if (grains[x][y]) { spriteBatch.Draw(Grain, new Vector2(x,y), Color.White); } } } ...my texture is a 1x1 pixel image that is drawn to the screen when the array value is true. It runs decent -- but there is definitely lag the more screen I cover. Is there a better way to accomplish what I am trying to achieve?

    Read the article

  • Finding distance travelled by robot using Optical Flow

    - by user280454
    Hi, I'm working on a project right now in which we are developing an autonomous robot. I have to basically find out the distance travelled by the robot between any 2 intervals. I'm using OpenCV, and using the Optical Flow functions of OpenCV, I'm able to find out the velocity/distance of each pixel in 2 different images. Using this information, I want to be able to find out the distance travelled by the robot in the interval between those 2 images. I thought of a way in which we could develop an input output mapping between the distance travelled by pixels and the distance travelled by the bot (using some tests). In this way, using neural networks, we would be able to find the relationship. However, the optical flow would depend on the distance of the camera from the pixel, which would cause problems. Is there any way to solve this problem?

    Read the article

  • Faster way to iterate through a jagged array?

    - by George Johnston
    I would like to iterate through an array that covers every pixel on my screen. i.e: for (int y = 598; y > 0; y--) { for (int x = 798; x > 0; x--) { if (grains[x][y]) { spriteBatch.Draw(Grain, new Vector2(x,y), Color.White); } } } ...my texture is a 1x1 pixel image that is drawn to the screen when the array value is true. It runs decent -- but there is definitely lag the more screen I cover. Is there a better way to accomplish what I am trying to achieve?

    Read the article

  • Screen Capture with Open GL using glReadPixels

    - by Raja
    Hi, I created a CGRegisterScreenRefreshCallback(refreshCallback, NULL) and in the refreshCallback method get the list of rectangles which have changed. I am getting the rectangle data from frameBuffer using OpenGL glReadPixels. Is there a better way of screen capture either with/without opengl and also using OpenGL can I skip reading pixel by pixel ? I have looked at glGetTexImage and glCopyTexSubImage2D. Any simple code block which can explain how to use these functions to get the changed rectangle data would be very helpful ? Thanks, Raja.

    Read the article

  • 3ds collada UV mapping problem in Papervision

    - by MonsieurOreilles
    Hi everyone, as I briefly explained in the title, my prblem concerns texturing a collada export in papervision. Basically I was exporting collada models from Cinema 4d with its uv map. I was able to see everything, but the texture was not displaying properly (hidden polygons). So I decided to try with 3dsMax. I used the same code to display the texture : var materials:MaterialsList = new MaterialsList(); var torusMaterial:BitmapFileMaterial = new BitmapFileMaterial("model/tex.png"); torusMaterial.precise = true; materials.addMaterial(torusMaterial, "ID1"); Again, I can see every elements, but this time my model uses only one pixel of my texture. So if I use a red texture and if I color only the pixel at the left bottom corner in green, all my model will be green. Any advice about how to properly wrap the texture around a 3ds export model ? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Blurry text in WPF even with ClearTypeHinting enabled?

    - by rFactor
    I have a grid with this template and styles in WPF/XAML: <Setter Property="TextOptions.TextFormattingMode" Value="Display" /> <Setter Property="RenderOptions.ClearTypeHint" Value="Enabled" /> <Setter Property="Template"> <Setter.Value> <ControlTemplate TargetType="{x:Type DataGridCell}"> <Border Padding="{TemplateBinding Padding}" BorderBrush="{TemplateBinding BorderBrush}" BorderThickness="{TemplateBinding BorderThickness}" Background="{TemplateBinding Background}" SnapsToDevicePixels="True"> <ContentPresenter x:Name="CellContent" SnapsToDevicePixels="{TemplateBinding SnapsToDevicePixels}" RenderOptions.ClearTypeHint="Enabled" /> </Border> <ControlTemplate.Triggers> <Trigger Property="IsSelected" Value="True"> <Setter TargetName="CellContent" Property="TextOptions.TextFormattingMode" Value="Display" /> <Setter TargetName="CellContent" Property="RenderOptions.ClearTypeHint" Value="Enabled" /> <Setter TargetName="CellContent" Property="Effect"> <Setter.Value> <DropShadowEffect ShadowDepth="2" BlurRadius="2" Color="Black" RenderingBias="Quality" /> </Setter.Value> </Setter> </Trigger> </ControlTemplate.Triggers> </ControlTemplate> </Setter.Value> </Setter> The DropShadowEffect I have when you select a grid row, seems to make the text rendering blurry (gray anti-aliasing): When I remove the drop shadow effect, it looks clear because it now uses ClearType and not gray sub-pixel anti-aliasing: I have tried applying RenderOptions.ClearTypeHint="Enabled" to the ContentPresenter as seen above, but it does not help. How do I force WPF to render the text that gets displayed with drop shadow effect to retain Cleartype anti-aliasing, instead of that ugly blurry gray sub-pixel anti-aliasing? Some believe it's blurry because of the drop shadow -- this is not true. It's blurry only because ClearType is not used. This is how it looks like in Firefox when shadow AND ClearType: ClearType enabled text is colorful -- but that blurry text is not, because it does not use ClearType -- it uses gray sub-pixel anti-aliasing and that's not how ClearType works: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClearType The question is: how do I enable ClearType for this text?

    Read the article

  • I've got my 2D/3D conversion working perfectly, how to do perspective

    - by user346992
    Although the context of this question is about making a 2d/3d game, the problem i have boils down to some math. Although its a 2.5D world, lets pretend its just 2d for this question. // xa: x-accent, the x coordinate of the projection // mapP: a coordinate on a map which need to be projected // _Dist_ values are constants for the projection, choosing them correctly will result in i.e. an isometric projection xa = mapP.x * xDistX + mapP.y * xDistY; ya = mapP.x * yDistX + mapP.y * yDistY; xDistX and yDistX determine the angle of the x-axis, and xDistY and yDistY determine the angle of the y-axis on the projection (and also the size of the grid, but lets assume this is 1-pixel for simplicity). x-axis-angle = atan(yDistX/xDistX) y-axis-angle = atan(yDistY/yDistY) a "normal" coordinate system like this --------------- x | | | | | y has values like this: xDistX = 1; yDistX = 0; xDistY = 0; YDistY = 1; So every step in x direction will result on the projection to 1 pixel to the right end 0 pixels down. Every step in the y direction of the projection will result in 0 steps to the right and 1 pixel down. When choosing the correct xDistX, yDistX, xDistY, yDistY, you can project any trimetric or dimetric system (which is why i chose this). So far so good, when this is drawn everything turns out okay. If "my system" and mindset are clear, lets move on to perspective. I wanted to add some perspective to this grid so i added some extra's like this: camera = new MapPoint(60, 60); dx = mapP.x - camera.x; // delta x dy = mapP.y - camera.y; // delta y dist = Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy); // dist is the distance to the camera, Pythagoras etc.. all objects must be in front of the camera fac = 1 - dist / 100; // this formula determines the amount of perspective xa = fac * (mapP.x * xDistX + mapP.y * xDistY) ; ya = fac * (mapP.x * yDistX + mapP.y * yDistY ); Now the real hard part... what if you got a (xa,ya) point on the projection and want to calculate the original point (x,y). For the first case (without perspective) i did find the inverse function, but how can this be done for the formula with the perspective. May math skills are not quite up to the challenge to solve this. ( I vaguely remember from a long time ago mathematica could create inverse function for some special cases... could it solve this problem? Could someone maybe try?)

    Read the article

  • Webservice creates Stack Overflow

    - by mouthpiec
    I have an application that when executed as a windows application works fine, but when converted to a webservice, in some instances (which were tested successfully) by the windows app) creates a stack overflow. Do you have an idea of what can cause this? (Note that it works fine when the web service is placed on the localhost). Could it be that the stack size of a Web Service is smaller than that of a Window Application? UPDATE The below is the code in which I am getting a stack overflow error private bool CheckifPixelsNeighbour(Pixel c1, Pixel c2, int DistanceAllowed) { bool Neighbour = false; if ((Math.Abs(c1.X - c2.X) <= DistanceAllowed) && Math.Abs(c1.Y - c2.Y) <= DistanceAllowed) { Neighbour = true; } return Neighbour; }

    Read the article

  • v8 is too slow for my purpose

    - by Scott
    I'm working on a music visualization plugin for libvisual. It's an AVS clone -- AVS being from Winamp. Right now I have a superscope plugin. This element has 4 scripts, and "point" is run at every pixel. You can imagine that it has to be rather fast. The original libvisual avs clone had a JIT compiler that was really fast, but it had some bugs and wasn't fully implemented, so I decided to try v8. Well, v8 is too slow running the compiled script at every pixel. Is there any other script engine that would be pretty fast for this purpose?

    Read the article

  • How to scroll and zoom in/out large images on iPhone?

    - by Horace Ho
    I have a large image, size around 30000 (w) x 6000 (h) pixels. You may consider it's like a big map. I assume I need to crop it up into smaller tiles. Questions: what are the right ViewControllers to use? (link) what is the tile strategy? (I put this in another question, as it's not iPhone specific) Requirements: whole image (though cropped) can be scrolled up/down/left/right by swipes zoom in (up to pixel-to-pixel) out (down to screen-fit-by-height) by the 2-finger operation memory efficiency by lazy loading tiles Bonus requirements: automatic scroll, say from left to right slowly and smoothly Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How does Bitmap.Save(Stream, ImageFormat) format the data?

    - by Matt Jacobsen
    I have a non transparent, colour bitmap with length 2480 and width 3507. Using Bitmap.GetPixel(int x, int y) I am able to get the colour information of each pixel in the bitmap. If I squirt the bitmap into a byte[]: MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream(); bmp.Save(ms, ImageFormat.Bmp); ms.Position = 0; byte[] bytes = ms.ToArray(); then I'd expect to have the same information, i.e. I can go to bytes[1000] and read the colour information for that pixel. It turns out that my array of bytes is larger than I anticipated. I thought I'd get an array with 2480 x 3507 = 8697360 elements. Instead I get an array with 8698438 elements - some sort of header I presume. In what format the bytes in my array stored? Is there a header 1078 bytes long followed by Alpha, Red, Green, Blue values for every byte element, or something else?

    Read the article

  • HowTo make a marching ants border in Morphic?

    - by Helene Bilbo
    I am looking for a marching ants border or line in Morphic: Wikipedia describes a possbile algorithm: The easiest way to achieve this animation is by drawing the selection using a pen pattern that contains diagonal lines. If the selection outline is only one pixel thick, the slices out of the pattern will then look like a dashed line, and the animation can easily be achieved by simply shifting the pattern one pixel sideways and redrawing the outline. As there is probably none readymade, has anybody a hint for me how to create such a border or line? (The marching ants pattern as a GIF animation is licensed under CC by Uli Kusterer)

    Read the article

  • Import a Collada model doesn't align to pixels

    - by Dan Friedman
    Assume I have a model that is simply a cube. (It is more complicated than a cube, but for the purposes of this discussion, we will simplify.) So when I am in Sketchup, the cube is Xmm by Xmm by Xmm, where X is an integer. I then export the a Collada file and subsequently load that into threejs. Now if I look at the geometry bounding box, the values are floats, not integers. So now assume I am putting cubes next to each other with a small space in between say 1 pixel. Because screens can't draw half pixels, sometimes I see one pixel and sometimes I see two, which causes a lack of uniformity. I think I can resolve this satisfactorily if I can somehow get the imported model to have integer dimensions. I have full access to all parts of the model starting with Sketchup, so any point in the process is fair game. Is it possible? Thanks.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  | Next Page >