Search Results

Search found 916 results on 37 pages for 'stdio'.

Page 26/37 | < Previous Page | 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33  | Next Page >

  • Scan file contents into an array of a structure.

    - by ZaZu
    Hello, I have a structure in my program that contains a particular array. I want to scan a random file with numbers and put the contents into that array. This is my code : ( NOTE : This is a sample from a bigger program, so I need the structure and arrays as declared ) The contents of the file are basically : 5 4 3 2 5 3 4 2 #include<stdio.h> #define first 500 #define sec 500 struct trial{ int f; int r; float what[first][sec]; }; int trialtest(trial *test); main(){ trial test; trialtest(&test); } int trialtest(trial *test){ int z,x,i; FILE *fin; fin=fopen("randomfile.txt","r"); for(i=0;i<5;i++){ fscanf(fin,"%5.2f\t",(*test).what[z][x]); } fclose(fin); return 0; } But the problem is, whenever this I run this code, I get this error : (25) : warning 508 - Data of type 'double' supplied where a pointer is required I tried adding do{ for(i=0;i<5;i++){ q=fscanf(fin,"%5.2f\t",(*test).what[z][x]); } }while(q!=EOF); But that didnt work either, it gives the same error. Does anyone have a solution to this problem ?

    Read the article

  • Problem with passing array of pointers to struct among functions in C

    - by karatemonkey
    The Code that follows segfaults on the call to strncpy and I can't see what I am doing wrong. I need another set of eyes to look it this. Essentially I am trying to alloc memory for a struct that is pointed to by an element in a array of pointers to struct. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #define MAX_POLICY_NAME_SIZE 64 #define POLICY_FILES_TO_BE_PROCESSED "SPFPolicyFilesReceivedOffline\0" typedef struct TarPolicyPair { int AppearanceTime; char *IndividualFile; char *FullPolicyFile; } PolicyPair; enum { bwlist = 0, fzacts, atksig, rules, MaxNumberFileTypes }; void SPFCreateIndividualPolicyListing(PolicyPair *IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate ) { IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate = (PolicyPair *) malloc(sizeof(PolicyPair)); IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate->IndividualFile = (char *)malloc((MAX_POLICY_NAME_SIZE * sizeof(char))); IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate->FullPolicyFile = (char *)malloc((MAX_POLICY_NAME_SIZE * sizeof(char))); IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate->AppearanceTime = 0; memset(IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate->IndividualFile, '\0', (MAX_POLICY_NAME_SIZE * sizeof(char))); memset(IndividualPolicyPairtoCreate->FullPolicyFile, '\0', (MAX_POLICY_NAME_SIZE * sizeof(char))); } void SPFCreateFullPolicyListing(SPFPolicyPair **CurrentPolicyPair, char *PolicyName, char *PolicyRename) { int i; for(i = 0; i < MaxNumberFileTypes; i++) { CreateIndividualPolicyListing((CurrentPolicyPair[i])); // segfaults on this call strncpy((*CurrentPolicyPair)[i].IndividualFile, POLICY_FILES_TO_BE_PROCESSED, (SPF_POLICY_NAME_SIZE * sizeof(char))); } } int main() { SPFPolicyPair *CurrentPolicyPair[MaxNumberFileTypes] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}; int i; CreateFullPolicyListing(&CurrentPolicyPair, POLICY_FILES_TO_BE_PROCESSED, POLICY_FILES_TO_BE_PROCESSED); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • What's the meaning of 'char (*p)[5];'?

    - by jpmelos
    people. I'm trying to grasp the differences between these three declarations: char p[5]; char *p[5]; char (*p)[5]; I'm trying to find this out by doing some tests, because every guide of reading declarations and stuff like that has not helped me so far. I wrote this little program and it's not working (I've tried other kinds of use of the third declaration and I've ran out of options): #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main(void) { char p1[5]; char *p2[5]; char (*p3)[5]; strcpy(p1, "dead"); p2[0] = (char *) malloc(5 * sizeof(char)); strcpy(p2[0], "beef"); p3[0] = (char *) malloc(5 * sizeof(char)); strcpy(p3[0], "char"); printf("p1 = %s\np2[0] = %s\np3[0] = %s\n", p1, p2[0], p3[0]); return 0; } The first and second works alright, and I've understood what they do. What is the meaning of the third declaration and the correct way to use it? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • compilation error

    - by Bond
    #include<dirent.h> #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<sys/stat.h> int main () { struct dirent **namelist; int i,j; char userd[20]; struct stat statBuf; printf("Enter a directory %s\n",userd); scanf("%s",&userd); printf("the dir is %s\n",*userd); i=scandir(".",&namelist,0,alphasort); printf("enter a directory name %s",*userd); printf("scandir returned i=%d\n",&i); if (i<0) perror("Scandir failed to open directory I hope you understand \n"); else { for(j=0;j<i;j++) { printf("j=%d i=%d %s\n",j,i,namelist[j]->d_name); // lstat free(namelist[j]); } } free(namelist); } Can some one help to understand why am I getting warning in above code?

    Read the article

  • 3x3 array = 10 numbers

    - by user1708505
    i have this code #include <math.h> #include <stdio.h> const int n = 3; const int s = 3; int getm(int mat[n][s]); int printm(int mat[n][s]); int main() { int m[n][s]; getm(m); printm(m); return 0; } int getm(int mat[n][s]) { for(int x = 0;x < n;x++) { for (int y = 0;y<s;y++) { scanf("%i ", &mat[x][y]); } } return 0; } int printm(int mat[n][s]) { for(int x = 0;x<n;x++) { for(int y = 0;y<s;y++) { printf("%i ", mat[x][y]); if(y==(s-1)) { printf("\n"); } } } } which shoud ask for 9 numbers to make a 3x3 matrix array, but it actually asks for 10 numbers, printm is working well - printing only 9 numbers. Where is error?

    Read the article

  • Without LIB And String file how can i write this code??

    - by muhammadlodhi
    #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<string.h> struct Node; typedef struct Node * PtrToNode; struct Node { char element; PtrToNode Next; }; PtrToNode MakeEmpty(PtrToNode L) { L= new(Node); L->Next=NULL; return L; } void Push(PtrToNode L,char x) { PtrToNode S; S= new(Node); S->element=x; S->Next=L->Next; L->Next=S; } char Pop(PtrToNode L) { PtrToNode P; P=L->Next; char x=P->element; L->Next=P->Next; free(P); return x; } int main() { PtrToNode L; L= MakeEmpty(NULL); char Input[1000]; int i; printf("please enter your equation:"); scanf("%s",Input); for (i = 0;i<strlen(Input);i++) { if (Input[i]=='(') { Push(L,Input[i]); } if (Input[i]==')') { if (L->Next==NULL) { printf("incorrect"); return 0; } else Pop(L); } } if (L->Next==NULL) printf("correct"); else printf("incorrect"); getch(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • how to count multiples of numbers in an input file?

    - by user292489
    i was trying to count the number of multiples of 2, 3, and 6 respectielly from the users input file. but for some reason, my counter is not working. can any bosy hep me please. my code: #include <stdio.h> int main (void) { int num[12]; int i; int counttwo; int countthree; int countsix; int total=0; printf("enter 12 integer numbers:\n"); for(i=0;i<12;i++){ scanf("%d", &num[i]); } for(i=0;i<12;i++){ counttwo=0; if(num[i]%2==0){ counttwo++; } countthree=0; if(num[i]%3==0) { countthree++; } countsix=0; if(num[i]%6==0) { countsix++; } printf("There are %d multiples of 2:\n", counttwo); printf("There are %d multiples of 3:\n", countthree); printf("There are %d multiples of 6:\n", countsix); } return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Stream buffering issue

    - by Kolyunya
    The mod_rewrite documentation states that it is a strict requirement to disable in(out)put buffering in a rewrite program. Keeping that in mind I've written a simple program (I do know that it lacks the EOF check but this is not an issue and it saves one condition check per loop): #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main ( void ) { setvbuf(stdin,NULL,_IOLBF,4200); setvbuf(stdout,NULL,_IOLBF,4200); int character; while ( 42 ) { character = getchar(); if ( character == '-' ) { character = '_'; } putchar(character); } return 42 - 42; } After making some measurements I was shocked - it was over 9,000 times slower than the demo Perl script provided by the documentation: #!/usr/bin/perl $| = 1; # Turn off I/O buffering while (<STDIN>) { s/-/_/g; # Replace dashes with underscores print $_; } Now I have two related questions: Question 1. I believe that the streams may be line buffered since Apache sends a new line after each path. Am I correct? Switching my program to setvbuf(stdin,NULL,_IOLBF,4200); setvbuf(stdout,NULL,_IOLBF,4200); makes it twice as fast as Perl one. This should not hit Apache's performance, should it? Question 2. How can one write a program in C which will use unbuffered streams (like Perl one) and will perform as fast as Perl one?

    Read the article

  • Calling recursive function twice consecutively

    - by Zack
    #include <stdio.h> #define LENGTH 16 void makeBranches(int, int); void display(int, int); int main(){ makeBranches(0, LENGTH-1); } void makeBranches(int left, int right){ if(left >= right){ return; } else{ display(left, right); makeBranches(left, (right+left)/2); makeBranches((right+left/2)+1, right); } } void display(int left, int right){ printf("%d, %d", left, right); int mid = (left+right)/2; int i; for(i = left; i <= right; i++){ if(i == mid) printf("X"); else printf("-"); } if(right == LENGTH-1) printf("\n"); } The problem that I am having is the second call of makeBranches only executes with the values that caused the first call of makeBranches to return and not the original values that the first call used.

    Read the article

  • Declaring arrays in c language without initial size

    - by user2534857
    this is the question-- Write a program to manipulate the temperature details as given below. - Input the number of days to be calculated. – Main function - Input temperature in Celsius – input function - Convert the temperature from Celsius to Fahrenheit.- Separate function - find the average temperature in Fahrenheit. how can I make this program without initial size of array ?? #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> void input(int); int temp[10]; int d; void main() { int x=0; float avg=0,t=0; printf("\nHow many days : "); scanf("%d",&d); input(d); conv(); for(x=0;x<d;x++) { t=t+temp[x]; } avg=t/d; printf("Avarage is %f",avg); getch(); } void input(int d) { int x=0; for(x=0;x<d;x++) { printf("Input temperature in Celsius for #%d day",x+1); scanf("%d",&temp[x]); } } void conv() { int x=0; for(x=0;x<d;x++) { temp[x]=1.8*temp[x]+32; } }

    Read the article

  • EMSA_PSS_ENCODE with libssl

    - by luiss
    Hi I'm trying to use libssl to get some EMSA_PSS_ENCRODING through the function RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type1 in libssl, but I can't find nor docs nor solutions, so this is the example code I've written: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <openssl/rsa.h> #include <openssl/err.h> FILE *error_file; int main() { int lSize; const unsigned char *string1= (unsigned char *)"The pen is on the table"; unsigned char *stringa=NULL; int num = 64; if ((stringa = (unsigned char *)OPENSSL_malloc(num)) == NULL) fprintf(stderr,"OPENSSL_malloc error\n"); fprintf(stdout,"string1 len is %u\n",lSize); if(RSA_padding_add_PKCS1_type_1(stringa,num,string1,lSize) != 1) fprintf(stderr,"Error: RSA_PADDING error\n"); error_file = fopen("libssl.log", "w"); ERR_print_errors_fp(error_file); fclose(error_file); fprintf(stdout,(char *)stringa); fprintf(stdout,"\n"); } The problem is that I get no output in stringa, I think the function RSA_padding_add.. should be initialized, but I can't find how to do it in the few doc at the openssl site. Thanks

    Read the article

  • C++ unrestricted union workaround

    - by Chris
    #include <stdio.h> struct B { int x,y; }; struct A : public B { // This whines about "copy assignment operator not allowed in union" //A& operator =(const A& a) { printf("A=A should do the exact same thing as A=B\n"); } A& operator =(const B& b) { printf("A = B\n"); } }; union U { A a; B b; }; int main(int argc, const char* argv[]) { U u1, u2; u1.a = u2.b; // You can do this and it calls the operator = u1.a = (B)u2.a; // This works too u1.a = u2.a; // This calls the default assignment operator >:@ } Is there any workaround to be able to do that last line u1.a = u2.a with the exact same syntax, but have it call the operator = (don't care if it's =(B&) or =(A&)) instead of just copying data? Or are unrestricted unions (not supported even in Visual Studio 2010) the only option?

    Read the article

  • Misaligned Pointer Performance

    - by Elite Mx
    Aren't misaligned pointers (in the BEST possible case) supposed to slow down performance and in the worst case crash your program (assuming the compiler was nice enough to compile your invalid c program). Well, the following code doesn't seem to have any performance differences between the aligned and misaligned versions. Why is that? /* brutality.c */ #ifdef BRUTALITY xs = (unsigned long *) ((unsigned char *) xs + 1); #endif ... /* main.c */ #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define size_t_max ((size_t)-1) #define max_count(var) (size_t_max / (sizeof var)) int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { unsigned long sum, *xs, *itr, *xs_end; size_t element_count = max_count(*xs) >> 4; xs = malloc(element_count * (sizeof *xs)); if(!xs) exit(1); xs_end = xs + element_count - 1; sum = 0; for(itr = xs; itr < xs_end; itr++) *itr = 0; #include "brutality.c" itr = xs; while(itr < xs_end) sum += *itr++; printf("%lu\n", sum); /* we could free the malloc-ed memory here */ /* but we are almost done */ exit(0); } Compiled and tested on two separate machines using gcc -pedantic -Wall -O0 -std=c99 main.c for i in {0..9}; do time ./a.out; done

    Read the article

  • Parsing string based on initial format

    - by Kayla
    I'm trying to parse a set of lines and extract certain parts of the string based on an initial format (reading a configuration file). A little more explanation: the format can contain up to 4 parts to be formatted. This case, %S will skip the part, %a-%c will extract the part and will be treated as a string, %d as int. What I am trying to do now is to come up with some clever way to parse it. So far I came up with the following prototype. However, my pointer arithmetic still needs some work to skip/extract the parts. Ultimately each part will be stored on an array of structs. Such as: struct st_temp { char *parta; char *partb; char *partc; char *partd; }; ... #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #define DIM(x) (sizeof(x)/sizeof(*(x))) void process (const char *fmt, const char *line) { char c; const char *src = fmt; while ((c = *src++) != '\0') { if (c == 'S'); // skip part else if (c == 'a'); // extract %a else if (c == 'b'); // extract %b else if (c == 'c'); // extract %c else if (c == 'd'); // extract %d (int) else { printf("Unknown format\n"); exit(1); } } } static const char *input[] = { "bar 200.1 / / (zaz) - \"bon 10\"", "foo 100.1 / / (baz) - \"apt 20\"", }; int main (void) { const char *fmt = "%S %a / / (%b) - \"%c %d\""; size_t i; for(i = 0; i < DIM (input); i++) { process (fmt, input[i]); } return (0); }

    Read the article

  • Difference between the address space of parent process and its child process in Linux?

    - by abbas1707
    Hi, I am confused about it. I have read that when a child is created by a parent process, child gets a copy of its parent's address space. What it means here by copy? If i use code below, then it prints same addresses of variable 'a' which is on heap in all cases. i.e in case of child and parent. So what is happening here? #include <sys/types.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main () { pid_t pid; int *a = (int *)malloc(4); printf ("heap pointer %p\n", a); pid = fork(); if (pid < 0) { fprintf (stderr, "Fork Failed"); exit(-1); } else if (pid == 0) { printf ("Child\n"); printf ("in child heap pointer %p\n", a); } else { wait (NULL); printf ("Child Complete\n"); printf ("in parent heap pointer %p\n", a); exit(0); } }

    Read the article

  • Second user-defined function returns garbage value?

    - by mintyfresh
    I have been teaching myself C programming, and I've come to a difficult point with using variables across functions. When, I compile this program and run it, the function askBirthYear returns the correct value, but sayAgeInYears returns either 0 or a garbage value. I believe it has something to do with how I used the variable birthYear, but I'm stumped on how to fix the issue. Here is the code: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int askBirthYear(int); void sayAgeInYears(int); int birthYear; int main(void) { askBirthYear(birthYear); sayAgeInYears(birthYear); return EXIT_SUCCESS; } void askBirthYear(int birthYear) { printf("Hello! In what year were you born?\n"); scanf("%d", &birthYear); printf("Your birth year is %d.\n", birthYear); return birthYear; } void sayAgeInYears(int birthYear) { int age; age = 2012 - birthYear; printf("You are %d years old.\n", age); }

    Read the article

  • C related, store a signed long int (32bit) as 4 octets?

    - by Doori Bar
    I managed to get a unsigned long int octets-representation (BE) by reading IPv4 methods, and I managed to read about how signed integers are using the MSB as the sign indicator, which makes 00 00 00 00 to be 0, while 7F FF FF FF is 2147483647. But I can't manage how to do the same for signed long integers? #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int main (void) { unsigned long int intu32; unsigned char octets[4]; intu32 = 255; octets[3] = (intu32) & 255; octets[2] = (intu32 >> 8) & 255; octets[1] = (intu32 >> 16) & 255; octets[0] = (intu32 >> 24) & 255; printf("(%d)(%d)(%d)(%d)\n", octets[0], octets[1], octets[2], octets[3]); intu32 = (octets[0] << 24) | (octets[1] << 16) | (octets[2] << 8) | octets[3]; printf("intu32:%lu\n", intu32); return 0; } Thanks in advance, Doori bar

    Read the article

  • array and point problem

    - by bezetek
    Here, I have a bad program. Its outputs confusing me, anyone can tell me why ? #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main() { int i = 0; char *a_result[10]; char *b_result[10]; for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) { char a_array[10]; char *b_array = malloc(10*sizeof(char)); int j = 0; for (j = 0; j < 9; j++) { a_array[j] = 'a' + i; b_array[j] = 'a' + i; } a_array[j] = '\0'; b_array[j] = '\0'; a_result[i] = a_array; b_result[i] = b_array; } for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) printf("a_result: %s b_result: %s\n",a_result[i],b_result[i]); return 0; } I think the a_result and b_result should be the same, but it is not. Here is the output on my computer. a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: aaaaaaaaa a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: bbbbbbbbb a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: ccccccccc a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: ddddddddd a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: eeeeeeeee a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: fffffffff a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: ggggggggg a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: hhhhhhhhh a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: iiiiiiiii a_result: jjjjjjjjj b_result: jjjjjjjjj any explanation about this is appreciate!

    Read the article

  • Compression Program in C

    - by Delandilon
    I want to compress a series of characters. For example if i type Input : FFFFFBBBBBBBCCBBBAABBGGGGGSSS (27 x 8 bits = 216 bits) Output: F5B7C2B3A2B2G5S3 (14 x 8 bits = 112bits) So far this is what i have, i can count the number of Characters in the Array. But the most important task is to count them in the same sequence. I can't seem to figure that out :( Ive stared doing C just a few weeks back, i have knowledge on Array, pointers, ASCII value but in any case can't seem to count these characters in a sequence. Ive try a bit of everything. This approach is no good but it the closest i came to it. #include <stdio.h> #include <conio.h> int main() { int charcnt=0,dotcnt=0,commacnt=0,blankcnt=0,i, countA, countB; char str[125]; printf("*****String Manipulations*****\n\n"); printf("Enter a string\n\n"); scanf("%[^'\n']s",str); printf("\n\nEntered String is \" %s \" \n",str); for(i=0;str[i]!='\0';i++) { // COUNTING EXCEPTION CHARS if(str[i]==' ') blankcnt++; if(str[i]=='.') dotcnt++; if(str[i]==',') commacnt++; if (str[i]=='A' || str[i]=='a') countA++; if (str[i]=='B' || str[i]=='b') countA++; } //PRINT RESULT OF COUNT charcnt=i; printf("\n\nTotal Characters : %d",charcnt); printf("\nTotal Blanks : %d",blankcnt); printf("\nTotal Full stops : %d",dotcnt); printf("\nTotal Commas : %d\n\n",commacnt); printf("A%d\n", countA); }

    Read the article

  • checking every digit in a number for oddness

    - by tryt
    Hello. I was writing a function which checks if every digit in a number is odd. I came accross this weird behaviour. Why does the second function return different (incorrect) results, eventhough its basically the same? (implemented in an opposite way) #include <stdio.h> int all_odd_1(int n) { if (n == 0) return 0; if (n < 0) n = -n; while (n > 0) { if (n&1 == 1) n /= 10; else return 0; } return 1; } int all_odd_2(int n) { if (n == 0) return 0; if (n < 0) n = -n; while (n > 0) { if (n&1 == 0) return 0; else n /= 10; } return 1; } int main() { printf("all_odd_1\n"); printf("%d\n", all_odd_1(-131)); printf("%d\n", all_odd_1(121)); printf("%d\n", all_odd_1(2242)); printf("-----------------\n"); printf("all_odd_2\n"); printf("%d\n", all_odd_2(131)); printf("%d\n", all_odd_2(121)); printf("%d\n", all_odd_2(2242)); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • compile error:c language in telnet(linux)

    - by lilyrose07
    #include<stdio.h> #include<unistd.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include<pthread.h> int count=0; void *thread_function(void *arg) { while(count<10) { if(count%2==1) { count++; } else {sleep(1);} } } int main(int argc,int *argv) { int res; pthread_t a_thread[2]; void *thread_result; int n; while(count<10) { if(count%2==0) {printf("%d",count); count++; } else{sleep(1);} } for(n=0;n<2;n++) { pthread_create(&(a_thread[n]),NULL,thread_function,NULL); } while(count==9) {pthread_join(a_thread[0],&thread_result); } while(count==10) { pthread_join(a_thread[1],&thread_result); } printf("%d",count); return 0; } in telnet,linux i write gcc za.c error list: undefined reference to pthread_create,pthread_join in function 'main' //why??

    Read the article

  • Cannot determine why pointer variable will not address elements in a string in this program?

    - by Smith Will Suffice
    I am attempting to utilize a pointer variable to access elements of a string and there are issues with my code generating a compilation error: #include <stdio.h> #define MAX 29 char arrayI[250]; char *ptr; int main(void) { ptr = arrayI; puts("Enter string to arrayI: up to 29 chars:\n"); fgets(arrayI, MAX, stdin); printf("\n Now printing array by pointer:\n"); printf("%s", *ptr); ptr = arrayI[1]; //(I set the pointer to the second array char element) printf("%c", *ptr); //Here is where I was wanting to use my pointer to //point to individual array elements. return 0; } My compiler crieth: [Warning] assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] I do not see where my pointer was ever assigned to the integer data type? Could someone please explain why my attempt to implement a pointer variable is failing? Thanks all!

    Read the article

  • Template function overloading with identical signatures, why does this work?

    - by user1843978
    Minimal program: #include <stdio.h> #include <type_traits> template<typename S, typename T> int foo(typename T::type s) { return 1; } template<typename S, typename T> int foo(S s) { return 2; } int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { int x = 3; printf("%d\n", foo<int, std::enable_if<true, int>>(x)); return 0; } output: 1 Why doesn't this give a compile error? When the template code is generated, wouldn't the functions int foo(typename T::type search) and int foo(S& search) have the same signature? If you change the template function signatures a little bit, it still works (as I would expect given the example above): template<typename S, typename T> void foo(typename T::type s) { printf("a\n"); } template<typename S, typename T> void foo(S s) { printf("b\n"); } Yet this doesn't and yet the only difference is that one has an int signature and the other is defined by the first template parameter. template<typename T> void foo(typename T::type s) { printf("a\n"); } template<typename T> void foo(int s) { printf("b\n"); } I'm using code similar to this for a project I'm working on and I'm afraid that there's a subtly to the language that I'm not understanding that will cause some undefined behavior in certain cases. I should also mention that it does compile on both Clang and in VS11 so I don't think it's just a compiler bug.

    Read the article

  • Program that edits string and prints each word individually with C

    - by Michael_19
    I keep getting the error segmentation fault (core dumped) when I run my progam. #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> int nextword(char *str); int main(void) { char str[] = "Hello! Today is a beautiful day!!\t\n"; int i = nextword(str); while(i != -1) { printf("%s\n",&(str[i])); i = nextword(NULL); } return 0; } int nextword(char *str) { // create two static variables - these stay around across calls static char *s; static int nextindex; int thisindex; // reset the static variables if (str != NULL) { s = str; thisindex = 0; // TODO: advance this index past any leading spaces while (s[thisindex]=='\n' || s[thisindex]=='\t' || s[thisindex]==' ' ) thisindex++; } else { // set the return value to be the nextindex thisindex = nextindex; } // if we aren't done with the string... if (thisindex != -1) { nextindex = thisindex; // TODO: two things // 1: place a '\0' after the current word // 2: advance nextindex to the beginning // of the next word while (s[nextindex] != ' ' && s[nextindex] != '\0') nextindex++; str[nextindex] = '\0'; nextindex++; } return thisindex; } The goal of the program is to print each word in the string str[] to the console on a new line. I am a beginning programmer and this is an assignment so I must use this type of format (no string library allowed). I just would like to know where I went wrong and how I can fix it.

    Read the article

  • linux find the command invoked

    - by Subbu
    I am writing a C program which determines the number of bytes read from the standard input . I found out there are ways to give input to the program piped input redirection entering into command line while the program is waiting for input How to find the exact command by which the program was executed from the shell . I tried using command-line arguments but failed . #include <stdio.h> int main(int argc,char *argv[]) { char buffer[100]; int n; for(n=1;n<argc;n++) printf("argument: %s\t",argv[n]); printf("\n"); if(argc==1) printf("waiting for input :"); else if (argc==3) printf("Not waiting for input . Got the source from command itself ."); n = read(0,buffer,100); if(n==-1) printf("\nError occured in reading"); printf("\nReading successfully done\n"); return 0; } Also ,

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33  | Next Page >