Search Results

Search found 32970 results on 1319 pages for 'zend db select'.

Page 292/1319 | < Previous Page | 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299  | Next Page >

  • Alternative to subqueries

    - by Juanma
    I'm using Mysql 5.1, and have this query, is there a way to not use the subqueries and accomplish the same result? SELECT oref.affiliate_id, ROUND(sum( oph.amount ) * 0.10 ,2) AS tsum FROM operators_referer AS oref LEFT JOIN operators_payments_history AS oph ON oref.operator_id = oph.operator_id WHERE oref.affiliate_id = 28221 AND ( oph.date_paid > ( SELECT MAX(aph.date_paid) FROM affiliates_payments_history AS aph WHERE aph.operator_id = oref.affiliate_id ) OR ( SELECT MAX(aph.date_paid) FROM affiliates_payments_history AS aph WHERE aph.operator_id = oref.affiliate_id ) is NULL )

    Read the article

  • Selecting previous and next row using sp

    - by davor
    I want to select previous and next row from table based on current id. I send current id to stored procedure and use this query: -- previous select top 1 id from table where id < @currentId order by id desc -- next select top 1 id from table where id < @currentId order by id asc The problem is when I send currentId which is the last id in the table and want to select next row. Then is nothing selected. Same problem for previous row, when I send currentId which is first id in table Is it possible to solve this in sql without additional queries?

    Read the article

  • Javascript - Simple form script to hide/show fields

    - by danit
    Im looking for a simple script in javascript that i can extend, at a basic level Im looking to show 1 field based on which option from a <select> the user chooses. <select id="options"> <option value="spoon">Spoon</option> <option value="form">Fork</option> </select> if select=spoon { <input>enter your favorite soup</input> } else { <input>Your gonna need a knife</input> } Simple JS is the key!

    Read the article

  • one query instead of four - is it possible?

    - by Syom
    i must get data from four tables. i wrote the script with four queries, but i use it in ajax, and i wan't to do it by one query. here is queries... $query1 = "SELECT `id`,`name_ar` FROM `tour_type` ORDER BY `order`"; $query2 = "SELECT `id`,`name_ar` FROM `hotel_type` ORDER BY `order`"; $query3 = "SELECT `id`,`name_ar` FROM `food_type` ORDER BY `order`"; $query4 = "SELECT `id`,`name_ar` FROM `cities` WHERE `id_parrent` = '$id_parrent' ORDER BY `name_ar`"; is it possible to write in one query? thanks

    Read the article

  • Issue with SQL query for activity stream/feed

    - by blabus
    I'm building an application that allows users to recommend music to each other, and am having trouble building a query that would return a 'stream' of recommendations that involve both the user themselves, as well as any of the user's friends. This is my table structure: Recommendations ID Sender Recipient [other columns...] -- ------ --------- ------------------ r1 u1 u3 ... r2 u3 u2 ... r3 u4 u3 ... Users ID Email First Name Last Name [other columns...] --- ----- ---------- --------- ------------------ u1 ... ... ... ... u2 ... ... ... ... u3 ... ... ... ... u4 ... ... ... ... Relationships ID Sender Recipient Status [other columns...] --- ------ --------- -------- ------------------ rl1 u1 u2 accepted ... rl2 u3 u1 accepted ... rl3 u1 u4 accepted ... rl4 u3 u2 accepted ... So for user 'u4' (who is friends with 'u1'), I want to query for a 'stream' of recommendations relevant to u4. This stream would include all recommendations in which either the sender or recipient is u4, as well as all recommendations in which the sender or recipient is u1 (the friend). This is what I have for the query so far: SELECT * FROM recommendations WHERE recommendations.sender IN ( SELECT sender FROM relationships WHERE recipient='u4' AND status='accepted' UNION SELECT recipient FROM relationships WHERE sender='u4' AND status='accepted') OR recommendations.recipient IN ( SELECT sender FROM relationships WHERE recipient='u4' AND status='accepted' UNION SELECT recipient FROM relationships WHERE sender='u4' AND status='accepted') UNION SELECT * FROM recommendations WHERE recommendations.sender='u4' OR recommendations.recipient='u4' GROUP BY recommendations.id ORDER BY datecreated DESC Which seems to work, as far as I can see (I'm no SQL expert). It returns all of the records from the Recommendations table that would be 'relevant' to a given user. However, I'm now having trouble also getting data from the Users table as well. The Recommendations table has the sender's and recipient's ID (foreign keys), but I'd also like to get the first and last name of each as well. I think I require some sort of JOIN, but I'm lost on how to proceed, and was looking for help on that. (And also, if anyone sees any areas for improvement in my current query, I'm all ears.) Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to output items in Order in MySQL?

    - by RailsRor
    I have a column called "menu_order" which has no default value. When I select the contents of this column using the following select statement: SELECT * FROM categories ORDER BY menu_order ASC It lists the category items that have nothing as their menu order first and then the one's that have 1's and 2's and 3's. Is there any way to prevent SQL from take nothing to come before numbers when I am trying to list things in order? So for example, if I have: cat_name | menu_order ---------------------- Lunch | 1 Dinner | And I perform my query, the output should be: Lunch Dinner Not: Dinner Lunch

    Read the article

  • Issue with undefined namespace

    - by SoBeK
    "xmlns="VL01" Seems to be causing the style-sheet to fail(works fine if removed), do no know how to address it the style-sheet. I feel like this is basic XLST 101 but I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around it. Any assisting would be greatly appreciated. Cheers XML <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Report xsi:schemaLocation="VL01 http://site.com/ReportServer?%2FVMS%20Reports%2FVL01&amp;rs%3ACommand=Render&amp;rs%3AFormat=XML&amp;rs%3ASessionID=lk44ff55z5q3ck3b5pfuxo45&amp;rc%3ASchema=True" Name="VL01" textbox41="VL01 - Checklist Report&#xD;&#xA;" textbox1946=" 2) Target Element&#xD;&#xA;     Target Element List&#xD;&#xA;        Windows 7&#xD;&#xA;3) Report Options&#xD;&#xA; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="VL01"> <list2> <Item_Collection> <Item /> </Item_Collection> </list2> <list1> <list1_Details_Group_Collection> <list1_Details_Group Key="V0001070" EffectiveDate="04 Mar 1998 16:03:47:000" LongName2="Name..."/> </list1_Details_Group_Collection> </list1> </Report> XSL <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <xsl:output method="xml" version="4.0" indent="yes"/> <xsl:variable name="var-checklist_name"> <xsl:value-of select="substring-after(substring-before(translate(Report/@textbox1946, '&#xD;&#xA;', ''),'3)'),'Target&#x00A0;Element&#x00A0;List')"/> </xsl:variable><xsl:template match="/"> <html> <body> <table> <xsl:apply-templates select="Report/list1/list1_Details_Group_Collection"/> </table> </body> </html> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="Report/list1/list1_Details_Group_Collection"> <xsl:for-each select="list1_Details_Group"> <Import_List> <Checklist_Name> <xsl:value-of select="normalize-space(translate($var-checklist_name, '&#x00A0;', ' '))"/> </Checklist_Name> <Vuln_ID><xsl:value-of select="number(substring-after(@VulKey,'V'))"/></Vuln_ID> <Short_Name><xsl:value-of select="substring(@LongName2,1,255)"/></Short_Name> <Release_Date><xsl:value-of select="substring(@EffectiveDate,1,11)"/></Release_Date> </Import_List> </xsl:for-each> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>

    Read the article

  • Selecting data effectively sql

    - by learner135
    Hi, I have a very large table with over 1000 records and 200 columns. When I try to retreive records matching some criteria in the WHERE clause using SELECT statement it takes a lot of time. But most of the time I just want to select a single record that matches the criteria in the WHERE clause rather than all the records. I guess there should be a way to select just a single record and exit which would minimize the retrieval time. I tried ROWNUM=1 in the WHERE clause but it didn't really work cause I guess the engine still checks all the records even after finding the first record matching the WHERE criteria. Is there a way to optimize in case if I want to select just a few records? Thanks in advance. Edit: I am using oracle 10g.

    Read the article

  • which sql consumes less memory

    - by prmatta
    Yesterday I asked a question on how to re-write sql to do selects and inserts in batches. I needed to do this to try and consume less virtual memory, since I need to move millions of rows here. The object is to move rows from Table B into Table A. Here are the ways I can think of doing this: SQL #1) INSERT INTO A (x, y, z) SELECT x, y, z FROM B b WHERE ... SQL #2) FOREACH SELECT x,y,z FROM B b WHERE ... INSERT INTO A(x,y,z); END FOREACH; SQL #3) FOREACH SELECT FIRST 2000 x,y,z FROM B b WHERE ... INSERT INTO A(x,y,z); END FOREACH; SQL #4) FOREACH SELECT FIRST 2000 x,y,z FROM B b WHERE ... AND NOT EXISTS IN (SELECT * FROM A) INSERT INTO A(x,y,z); END FOREACH; Are any of the above incorrect? The database is informix 11.5.

    Read the article

  • calculating change (over a period) for a dated field

    - by morpheous
    I have two tables with the following schema: CREATE TABLE sales_data ( sales_time date NOT NULL, product_id integer NOT NULL, sales_amt double NOT NULL ); CREATE TABLE date_dimension ( id integer NOT NULL, datestamp date NOT NULL, day_part integer NOT NULL, week_part integer NOT NULL, month_part integer NOT NULL, qtr_part integer NOT NULL, year_part integer NOT NULL, ); I want to write two types of queries that will allow me to calculate: period on period change (e.g. week on week change) change in period on period change (e.g. change in week on week change) I would prefer to write this in ANSI SQL, since I dont want to be tied to any particular db. [Edit] In light of some of the comments, if I have to be tied to a single database (in terms of SQL dialect), it will have to be PostgreSQL The queries I want to write are of the form (pseudo SQL of course): Query Type 1 (Period on Period Change) ======================================= a). select product_id, ((sd2.sales_amt - sd1.sales_amt)/sd1.sales_amt) as week_on_week_change from sales_data sd1, sales_data sd2, date_dimension dd where {SOME CRITERIA) b). select product_id, ((sd2.sales_amt - sd1.sales_amt)/sd1.sales_amt) as month_on_month_change from sales_data sd1, sales_data sd2, date_dimension dd where {SOME CRITERIA) Query Type 2 (Change in Period on Period Change) ================================================= a). select product_id, ((a2.week_on_week_change - a1.week_on_week_change)/a1.week_on_week_change) as change_on_week_on_week_change from (select product_id, ((sd2.sales_amt - sd1.sales_amt)/sd1.sales_amt) as week_on_week_change from sales_data sd1, sales_data sd2, date_dimension dd where {SOME CRITERIA) as a1), (select product_id, ((sd2.sales_amt - sd1.sales_amt)/sd1.sales_amt) as week_on_week_change from sales_data sd1, sales_data sd2, date_dimension dd where {SOME CRITERIA) as a2) WHERE {SOME OTHER CRITERIA}

    Read the article

  • Doing a UNION ALL on two different COUNTs using Linq-To-Sql

    - by Danno
    Is it possible to write a linq-to-sql statement that will return two different COUNTs that have been put into a single dataset using UNION ALL? I know this is syntactically wrong but here's what I'm trying to do: (from t1 in TableOne select t1).Count().Union( (from t2 in TableTwo select t2).Count() ) Here's the sql I would like would like to have generated: select count(*) from TableOne union all select count(*) from TableTwo I realize that Count() returns an int and does not have a Union method on it and therein lies my question. Can Linq-to-Sql be written that will achieve what I'm after?

    Read the article

  • Getting size of a webpage before parsing it

    - by user2869844
    I am trying to parse a webpage using jsoup and all is working good using this code: class DownloadSearchResultsTask extends AsyncTask<String, Integer, ArrayList> { private String link = "link"; private String title = "title"; private String vote = "vote"; private String age = "age"; private String size = "size"; private String seeders = "seeders"; private String leechers = "leachers"; @Override protected void onPreExecute() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onPreExecute(); } @Override protected ArrayList doInBackground(String... params) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub ArrayList <HashMap<String, String>> searchResult = new ArrayList<HashMap<String, String>>(); HashMap<String, String> map; String link, title, vote, age, size, seeders, leechers; try { HttpURLConnection httpURLConnection=(HttpURLConnection) new URL("http://www.facebook.com").openConnection(); Log.d("VIVZ", httpURLConnection.getContentLength()+""); } catch (MalformedURLException e1) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e1.printStackTrace(); } catch (IOException e1) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block e1.printStackTrace(); } Document mDocument; try { long l1=System.nanoTime(); Log.e("VIVZ",l1+""); mDocument = Jsoup .connect(params[0]) .userAgent( "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WindowsNT 5.1; en-US; rv1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6") .referrer("http://www.google.com").get(); long l2=System.nanoTime(); Log.e("VIVZ",(l2-l1)+""); Elements mResults = mDocument.select("div.results dl"); for (Element result : mResults) { map = new HashMap<String, String>(); Elements elements = result.select("dt a"); for (Element linkAndTitle : elements) { link = linkAndTitle.attr("abs:href"); title = linkAndTitle.text(); map.put(this.link, link); map.put(this.title, title); } elements = result.select("dd span.v"); for (Element v : elements) { vote = v.text(); map.put(this.vote, vote); } elements = result.select("dd span.a"); for (Element a : elements) { age = a.text(); map.put(this.age, age); } elements = result.select("dd span.s"); for (Element s : elements) { size = s.text(); map.put(this.size, size); } elements = result.select("dd span.u"); for (Element u : elements) { seeders = u.text(); map.put(this.seeders, seeders); } elements = result.select("dd span.d"); for (Element d : elements) { leechers = d.text(); map.put(this.leechers, leechers); } searchResult.add(map); } Log.e("VIVZ", searchResult.toString()); return searchResult; } catch (IOException e) { // TODO Auto-generated catch block Log.e("VIVZ",e+""); } return null; } @Override protected void onPostExecute(ArrayList result) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onPostExecute(result); } } The problem is i want to get the size of page before parsing it and show a Determinate progress bar please help me ..... thanx in advance

    Read the article

  • Why did the following linq to sql query generate a subquery?

    - by Xaisoft
    I did the following query: var list = from book in books where book.price > 50 select book; list = list.Take(50); I would expect the above to generate something like: SELECT top 50 id, title, price, author FROM Books WHERE price > 50 but it generates: SELECT [Limit1].[C1] as [C1] [Limit1].[id] as [Id], [Limit1].[title] as [title], [Limit1].[price] as [price], [Limit1].[author] FROM (SELECT TOP (50) [Extent1].[id] as as [Id], [Extent1].[title] as [title], [Extent1].[price] as [price], [Extent1].[author] as [author] FROM Books as [Extent1] WHERE [Extent1].[price] > 50 ) AS [Limit1] Why does the above linq query generate a subquery and where does the C1 come from?

    Read the article

  • mysql query to concat information from 3 tables - getting incorrect result count

    - by iPfaffy
    I have 3 tables in my database. ab_contacts id first_name last_name addressbook_id ab_addressbooks name id co_comments id link_id comment I'd like to create a query that will let me select all the contacts and comments related to them in a given addressbook. To select all the people in a given addressbook, I can use: select count(*) from ab_contacts where addressbook_id = '50'; This returns 8152 people. However, when I run my query: select ab_contacts.first_name, ab_contacts.last_name, ab_contacts.email, ab_addressbooks.name, co_comments.comments from ab_contacts JOIN ab_addressbooks ON (ab_contacts.addressbook_id = ab_addressbooks.id) JOIN co_comments ON (ab_contacts.id = co_comments.link_id) WHERE ab_contacts.addressbook_id = '50';` the format works, but I only get 1045 results. I'm sure there is something I am missing, but I cannot figure it out. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How to combine these three sql queries into one?

    - by lam3r4370
    How to combine these two sql queries into one? SELECT DISTINCT * FROM rss WHERE MATCH(content,title) AGAINST ('$filter') SELECT COUNT(content) FROM rss WHERE MATCH(content,title) AGAINST ('$filters') And if the result is 0 from the above query - SELECT DISTINCT * FROM rss WHERE content LIKE '%$filters%' OR title LIKE '%$filters%'; $filter .= $row['filter']; $filters = $row['filter']; $filters may be more than one keyword

    Read the article

  • How to insert the last id from a table into another table in MySQL?

    - by James
    I want to take the id of the most recent item in a database, increment it by one and insert that new id in to another table. I tried: $select = mysql_query("SELECT id FROM tableName ORDER BY id DESC"); while ($return = mysql_fetch_assoc($select)) { $id = $return['id']; $newId = $id++; } mysql_query("INSERT INTO anotherTable (someColumn) VALUES ('$newId')"); But it didn't work. How can this be done?

    Read the article

  • If and only if condition SQL -- SQL server 2008

    - by user494901
    I'm writing a SQL statement to select a user on a table if that user does not exist on another table, then I want to pull in all their data from another table then I'll be outputting all that in Coldfusion. How do I do this? I have tried, my atempt is below: pro_profile == All employees mod_userStatus == All Professional Staff members I am doing the not exists to remove professional stuff to just get our student staff. mod_StudentCertifications is a listing of the certifications they (students) hold. If we do an AND statement between the where statements it returns no users, or only users that meet both conditions, if we do an OR it will return users with only 1 condition. I need it first Match the not exists then proceed to the exists statement. Is that do able? Here's my Statement: SELECT profileID, firstName, lastName FROM pro_Profile WHERE not exists ( SELECT profileID FROM mod_userStatus WHERE mod_userStatus.profileID = pro_Profile.profileID ) OR exists ( SELECT cprAdultExp, cprInfantChildExp, cprFPRExp, aedExp, firstAidExp, emtExp, waterSafetyInstructionExp, bloodPathogensExp, oxygenAdminExp, lifegaurdingExp, wildernessResponderExp, notes FROM mod_StudentCertifications WHERE mod_StudentCertifications.profileID = pro_Profile.profileID );

    Read the article

  • error in fill datagrid whit query

    - by Amir Tavakoli
    i have a data-gride-view and i add my query to this when write my query i catch this error: The schema returned by the new query differs from the base query and this my query: SELECT B.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsDep' AS TableName, B.SettingValue, B.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsDep AS B ON A.SettingKey = B.SettingKey UNION SELECT C.SettingKey, 'SysSettingsMachine' AS TableName, C.SettingValue, C.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettingsMachine AS C ON A.SettingKey = C.SettingKey UNION SELECT D.SettingKey, 'SysSettings' AS TableName, D.SettingValue, D.SettingDesc FROM SysCustomer AS A INNER JOIN SysSettings AS D ON A.SettingKey = D.SettingKey help me to solve this, tnx

    Read the article

  • Selecting data from mysql table and related data from another to join them

    - by knittledan
    Ive looked at other questions and answers but still dont understand which brings me here. I have one data base two tables. lets say table1 and table2 from database. I'm looking to grab all the information from table1 and only one column from table2 that coincides with the correct row in table1. Example which I know is wrong: SELECT table1.*, table2.time_stamp FROM table1, table2 WHERE table1.ticket_id=$var AND table1.user_id = table2.user_id Basically select data from table1 then use a value from the selected table to grab the related data from table2 and join them to output them as one mysql_query. Im sure its simple and has been asked before. edit: I dont receive an error. SQL just returns noting. log form of this would be: $sqlResults = mysql_query("SELECT table1.* FROM table1 WHERE table1.ticket_id=$var") while($rowResult = mysql_fetch_array( $sqlResults )) { $userID = $rowResult['user_id']; $sqlResults2 = mysql_query("SELECT table2.time_stamp FROM table2 WHERE table2.user_id=$userID") } I want to combine that into one sql statement so i dont have to hit table2 for every row table1 has

    Read the article

  • MSSQL / T-SQL : How to update equal percentages of a resultset?

    - by Kent Comeaux
    I need a way to take a resultset of KeyIDs and divide it up as equally as possible and update records differently for each division based on the KeyIDs. In other words, there is SELECT KeyID FROM TableA WHERE (some criteria exists) I want to update TableA 3 different ways by 3 equal portions of KeyIDs. UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value1 WHERE KeyID IN (the first 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value2 WHERE KeyID IN (the second 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) UPDATE TableA SET FieldA = Value3 WHERE KeyID IN (the third 1/3 of the SELECT resultset above) or something to that effect. Thanks for any and all of your responses.

    Read the article

  • Subquery vs Traditional join with WHERE clause?

    - by BradC
    When joining to a subset of a table, any reason to prefer one of these formats over the other? Subquery version: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN (SELECT * FROM Classification WHERE CustomerType = 'Standard') AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID vs the WHERE clause at the end: SELECT ... FROM Customers AS c INNER JOIN Classification AS cf ON c.TypeCode = cf.Code INNER JOIN SalesReps AS s ON cf.SalesRepID = s.SalesRepID WHERE cf.CustomerType = 'Standard' The WHERE clause at the end feels more "traditional", but the first is arguably more clear, especially as the joins get increasingly complex. Only other reason I can think of to prefer the second is that the "SELECT *" on the first might be returning columns that aren't used later (In this case, I'd probably only need to return cf.Code and Cf.SalesRepID)

    Read the article

  • Execute query stored in variable in a very specific way

    - by niao
    Greetings, I have a problem as follows: I have an SQL variable declared: DECLARE @myVariable nvarchar(max) a third party library set a value for this variable. To simplify, lets say that the value is as follows: SET @myVariable = 'Select ROWGUID from MySampleTable' Now, I want to execute the following query: SELECT ROWGUID FROM myTable WHERE ROWGUID in (exec sp_executesql @myVariable ) However, the above statement does not work because it returns an error telling me that I can't execute stored procedure in that way. I made a workaround and this is what I wrote: create table #temptable (ID uniqueidentifier null) if(@myVariable is not null AND @myVariable !='') insert into #temptable exec sp_executesql @myVariable SELECT ROWGUID FROM myTable WHERE ROWGUID in (select * from #temptable) DROP TABLE #temptable This works fine.However I don't think it is a good idea to use temporary table. How can I achieve the same result without necessity of creating temporary tables? I am using SQL SERVER 2005

    Read the article

  • XForms and multiple inputs for same model tag

    - by iHeartGreek
    Hi! I apologize ahead of time if I am not asking this properly.. it is hard to put into words what I am asking.. I have XForms model such as: <file> <criteria> <criterion></criterion> </criteria> </file> I want to have multiple input text boxes that create a new criterion tag. user interface such as: <xf:input ref="/file/criteria/criterion" model="select_data"> <xf:label>Select</xf:label> </xf:input> <xf:input ref="/file/criteria/criterion" model="select_data"> <xf:label>Select</xf:label> </xf:input> <xf:input ref="/file/criteria/criterion" model="select_data"> <xf:label>Select</xf:label> </xf:input> And I would like the XML output to look like this (once user has entered in info): <file> <criteria> <criterion>AAA</criterion> <criterion>BBB</criterion> <criterion>CCC</criterion> </criteria> </file> The way I have it doesn't work, as it sees the 3 input fields to be referring all to the same criterion tag. How do I differentiate? Thanks! I hope that made some sense! BEGIN FIRST EDIT Thanks for the responses for the basic text box! However, I now need to do this with a listbox. But for the life of me, I can't figure out how. I read somewhere to use with the xforms:select and deselect events.. but I didn't know where to place them, and the places I tried gave me very weird behaviour. I am currently implementing the following: <xf:select ref="instance('criteria_data')/criteria/criterion" selection="" appearance="compact" > <xf:label>Choose criteria</xf:label> <xf:itemset nodeset="instance('criteria_choices')/choice"> <xf:label ref="@label"></xf:label> <xf:value ref="."></xf:value> </xf:itemset> </xf:select> However when multiple choices are submitted, all selection values are inserted into the same node, separated by spaces. For example: If AAA and BBB and FFF were selected from listbox, it would result in the following XML: <criterion>AAA BBB FFF</criterion> How do I change my code to have each selection be in a separate node? i.e. I want it to look like this: <criterion>AAA</criterion> <criterion>BBB</criterion> <criterion>FFF</criterion> Thanks! END FIRST EDIT BEGIN SECOND EDIT: For the listboxes (ie xf:select appearance="compact") I ended up allowing the spaces to occur in the same node and then just transformed that xml using xsl to generate a properly formatted new xml doc (with separate individual nodes). Unfortunately, I did not find a less cumbersome solution by inserting them originally into separate nodes. The selected answer works very well for text boxes however, hence why I selected it as the answer. END SECOND EDIT

    Read the article

  • Strange postgresql behavior

    - by Sergey
    Hi can someone explain me why it works like this? = select client_id from clients_to_delete; ERROR: column "client_id" does not exist at character 8 but, when putting this inside an IN()... = select * from orders where client_id in(select client_id from clients_to_delete); it works! and select all rows in the orders table. Same when running delete/update. Why it doesn't produce an error like before? Thank you!

    Read the article

  • SQL Server GROUP BY troubles!

    - by Lucas311
    I'm getting a frustrating error in one of my SQL Server 2008 queries. It parses fine, but crashes when I try to execute. The error I get is the following: Msg 8120, Level 16, State 1, Line 4 Column 'customertraffic_return.company' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause. SELECT * FROM (SELECT ctr.sp_id AS spid, Substring(ctr.company, 1, 20) AS company, cci.email_address AS tech_email, CASE WHEN rating IS NULL THEN 'unknown' ELSE rating END AS rating FROM customer_contactinfo cci INNER JOIN customertraffic_return ctr ON ctr.sp_id = cci.sp_id WHERE cci.email_address <> '' AND cci.email_address NOT LIKE '%hotmail%' AND cci.email_address IS NOT NULL AND ( region LIKE 'Europe%' OR region LIKE 'Asia%' ) AND SERVICE IN ( '1', '2' ) AND ( rating IN ( 'Premiere', 'Standard', 'unknown' ) OR rating IS NULL ) AND msgcount >= 5000 GROUP BY ctr.sp_id, cci.email_address) AS a WHERE spid NOT IN (SELECT spid FROM customer_exclude) GROUP BY spid, tech_email

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299  | Next Page >