Search Results

Search found 26004 results on 1041 pages for 'debian based'.

Page 3/1041 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Debian dependency problems / partially installed

  - by Michael

  I tried to install curl support for php 5 on my debian squeeze machine and since I'm having problems. After trying to install curl I got dependency issues which I tried to solve by removing what started the issues. From one thing came another and I'm currently looking at ~29 issues when I try to do an apt-get upgrade. These issues vary from unable to config, dependency and unable to remove errors. I tried apt-get upgrade -f and installing packages using dpkg command. I tried removing using purge and force. I manually removed stuff to try and fix it. I tried running dpkg --configure -a. I've to say I'm still pretty new to linux so I'm out of idea's and cant seem to find an answer online that matches my problems. Here's a part of the apt-get upgrade command output: Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Reading state information... 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 29 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libgeoip1 (1.4.7~beta6+dfsg-1) ... Bus error dpkg: error processing libgeoip1 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 135 Setting up libisc62 (1:9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze3) ... Bus error dpkg: error processing libisc62 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 135 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libdns69: libdns69 depends on libgeoip1 (>= 1.4.7~beta6+dfsg); however: Package libgeoip1 is not configured yet. libdns69 depends on libisc62; however: Package libisc62 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libdns69 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libisccc60: libisccc60 depends on libisc62; however: Package libisc62 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libisccc60 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libisccfg62: libisccfg62 depends on libdns69; however: Package libdns69 is not configured yet. .. continues Errors were encountered while processing: libgeoip1 libisc62 libdns69 libisccc60 libisccfg62 libbind9-60 liblwres60 bind9-host libavahi-core7 libdaemon0 avahi-daemon libexif12 libffi5 libgomp1 libgphoto2-port0 libgphoto2-2 libperl5.10 libsensors4 libsnmp15 libhpmud0 libieee1284-3 libnss-mdns libossp-uuid16 libpq5 libv4l-0 libsane libsane-hpaio libssh2-1 python-gobject dpkg --configure -a Setting up libpq5 (8.4.8-0squeeze2) ... Bus error dpkg: error processing libpq5 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 135 Setting up libperl5.10 (5.10.1-17squeeze2) ... Bus error dpkg: error processing libperl5.10 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 135 Setting up libffi5 (3.0.9-3) ... Bus error dpkg: error processing libffi5 (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 135 Setting up libexif12 (0.6.19-1) ... .. continues Suggestions are really welcome I really don't know what to do. Michael.

  Read the article

• LTS vs normal release software versions synced from Debian

  - by Jasper Loy

  I read that LTS releases are based on Debian testing while normal releases are based on Debian unstable. Given the long release cycle of Debian, is it possible for some software to be of a more recent version in a normal release X than in LTS release X+1? If the answer is yes, would there be a difference between an upgrade and a fresh install (perhaps upgrade holds back more recent version automatically)?

  Read the article

• sendmail user unknown - debian lenny

  - by Rimian

  My php's mail() function just stopped working a short while ago. It's started returning FALSE. I am not much of a sysadmin so please forgive my ignorance. I set my php.ini send_path option to: "sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -i" and restarted apache. Then, I learnt how to test sendmail like so: sudo /usr/sbin/sendmail -bv [email protected] [email protected]... deliverable: mailer esmtp, host example.com., user [email protected] The example email is a real mail box. I have also seen unknown user messages in the mail log. Can anyone please help me debug this? Cheers, Rim

  Read the article

• Duplicate incoming TCP traffic on Debian Squeeze

  - by Erwan Queffélec

  I have to test a homebrew server that accepts a lot of incoming TCP traffic on a single port. The protocol is homebrew as well. For testing purposes, I'd like to send this traffic both : - to the production server (say, listening on port 12345) - to the test server (say, listening on port 23456) My clients apps are "dumb" : they never read data back, and the server never replies anyway, my server only accepts connections, and do statistical computations and store/forward/service both raw and computed data. Actually, client apps and hardware are so simple there is no way I can tell clients to send their stream on both servers... And using "fake" clients is not good enough. What could be the simplest solution ? I can of course write an intermediary app that just copy incoming data and send it back to the testing server, pretending to be the client. I have a single server running Squeeze and have total control over it. Thanks in advance for your replies.

  Read the article

• compile lastest bnx2 driver on debian squeeze

  - by markus

  I want to upgrade the bnx2 network card driver in a Dell Power Edge R410. I downloaded the latest driver version from the broadcom website. If I want to compile the driver it fails with the following errors: make make -C bnx2/src KVER=2.6.32-5-amd64 PREFIX= make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2-2.0.23b/src' make -C /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2-2.0.23b/src modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64' Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 2 modules make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64' make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2-2.0.23b/src' make -C bnx2x/src KVER=2.6.32-5-amd64 PREFIX= make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src' make -C /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-amd64/build M=`pwd` modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64' CC [M] /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.o In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x.h:68, from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:80: /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1009:1: error: "PCI_VPD_LRDT_ID_STRING" redefined In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:34: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1327:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x.h:68, from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:80: /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1011:1: error: "PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA" redefined In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:34: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1328:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x.h:68, from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:80: /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1013:1: error: "PCI_VPD_LRDT_RW_DATA" redefined In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:34: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1329:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x.h:68, from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:80: /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1019:1: error: "PCI_VPD_SRDT_END" redefined In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:34: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1334:1: error: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x.h:68, from /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.c:80: /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1032: error: conflicting types for ‘pci_vpd_lrdt_size’ /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1355: error: previous definition of ‘pci_vpd_lrdt_size’ was here /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1037: error: conflicting types for ‘pci_vpd_srdt_size’ /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1366: error: previous definition of ‘pci_vpd_srdt_size’ was here /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1042: error: conflicting types for ‘pci_vpd_find_tag’ /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1391: error: previous declaration of ‘pci_vpd_find_tag’ was here /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1077: error: conflicting types for ‘pci_vpd_info_field_size’ /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1377: error: previous definition of ‘pci_vpd_info_field_size’ was here /tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_compat.h:1082: error: conflicting types for ‘pci_vpd_find_info_keyword’ /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-common/include/linux/pci.h:1403: error: previous declaration of ‘pci_vpd_find_info_keyword’ was here make[5]: *** [/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src/bnx2x_main.o] Fehler 1 make[4]: *** [_module_/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src] Fehler 2 make[3]: *** [sub-make] Fehler 2 make[2]: *** [all] Fehler 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64' make[1]: *** [bnx2x.o] Fehler 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/netxtreme2-6.2.23/bnx2x-1.62.15/src' make: *** [l2build] Fehler 2

  Read the article

• I keep getting OpenSSL Header Version not found error when compiling OpenSSH Debian Squeeze

  - by Romoku

  I built Openssl1.0.0d ./config shared no-threads zlib It installed fine to the default /usr/local/ssl I went and downloaded OpenSSH 5.8p2 and ran ./configure but now it keeps giving me a Openssl version header not found error even when I set --with-ssl-dir= I've tried it with arguments /usr/local/ssl/include /usr/local/ssl/include/openssl /usr/include /usr/local/ssl/lib I looked in config.log and found error: openssl/opensslv.h: no such file or directory which makes little sense since I pointed openssh to where it is store. /etc/ld.so.conf include /usr/local/ssl/lib I'm at a loss at this point. Answer (maybe): Because I am an idiot. include /usr/local/ssl/lib is incorrect. /usr/local/ssl/lib is correct. It needs to be before the first include.

  Read the article

• How to enable Chinese on Debian lenny?

  - by Computist

  I have already installed Chinese fonts $ sudo apt-cache search chinese $ sudo apt-get install ttf-arphic-bkai00mp ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp ... added locales $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales, and chose the following en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8 zh_CN GB2312 zh_CN.GBK GBK zh_CN.UTF-8 UTF-8 zh_TW BIG5 zh_TW.UTF-8 UTF-8 However when I try to create a file with Chinese characters in file name by touch <some chinese characters ...>.txt, it fails and substituted Chinese characters with --------- at terminal. How to fix this? [Edit, Aug. 15, 2011, 21:42] After rebooting, everything is working.

  Read the article

• How to setup a virtual machine in Ubuntu desktop to run Debian Server

  - by stickman

  I want to run a virtual machine in my Ubuntu desktop that runs a Debian server. The purpose of this is to generate Debian packages. I have some C++ applications that were originally developed on my Ubuntu machine, and I need to (re)compile them on a Debian server in order to: build Deb packages for deployment on a Debian server make sure that the applications will definitely work on a debian server The idea is so that I can do 90% of my development on Ubuntu (where I am more comfortable), and deploy a binary package that definitely works on Debian. BTW, I am developing on Karmic Kola (Ubuntu 9.10). [Edit] Following the advice I got so far, I have installed debootstrap and Debian 'Lenny' on /srv/chroot/debian_lenny on my machine. I am not sure this is the server version, but in any case I dont think that matters for my purposes (though it would be useful to know how to specifically install the server version). At the moment though, I am like a fish out of water, since there is no GUI, and it is only a console that I have in the chroot jail. I had a look in the home folder (I cheated, by using the KNavigator in Ubuntu), and there are no folders there - which presumably mean that no users have been set up as yet in the Debian "system". I would like to know how to do the following: Download and install the dev tools needed for (re)compiling my C++ apps Copy my projects from the Ubuntu "system" to the Debian "system" After building the binaries, I would like to create a debian binary package containing all of my binaries, so that I can install the package on a Debian server (my remote server)

  Read the article

• Debian Wheezy 7.5 64bit xfce4 install error ( no desktop environment installed already )

  - by GeoMind

  i wrote a CD with an iso-image from debian.org. the debian-7.5.0-amd64-CD-1.iso from this folder. Debian Wheezy 7.5 stable 64bit There was an error at Select and install software step. It said Retrieving file 770 from 800 and then it failed the installation. I continued the instal and when i opened the computer it doesn't work the Ctrl + Alt + F7 as i waited. It starts at tty1 and after logging in i edited config file cause it had a lot of errors and said E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages or Couldn't found the package. FILE: /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.5.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 CD Binary-1 20140426-13:37]/ wheezy main #deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 7.5.0 _Wheezy_ - Official amd64 CD Binary-1 20140426-13:37]/ wheezy main deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free After that i tried to install xfce4 as desktop environment. Guide found at Linux Panda But it print at terminal: What i sould do? How i can fix this problem?

  Read the article

• Debian Package Control file Question.

  - by AJ

  Hello, I need to create a debian package for a java application. In my package there a .jar file which is executable , a script which will run this jar file and a .so file for fmod. I read the tutorial provided at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/ My question is in control file there is a Depends field which basically mentions the packages that need to installed in order to install my application. How do i find which packages are required for my application. I followed the instructions provided in the link for one of the .so and did ~/Desktop/PennTotalRecall/native/fmod/lib/linux64$ dpkg -S libfmodex64-4.28.09.so dpkg: libfmodex64-4.28.09.so not found. It gives above result. Also my application requires java 1.5 to be installed in order for it to run. How do I specify in my debian package. Thanks, AJ

  Read the article

• Debian Stable vs Ubuntu LTS for Server?

  - by Kevin

  Quick question: Which is a better platform for a professional use server? Debian Stable or Ubuntu LTS? The third party software we plan to use, works on both. Which one is better on it own merits? Take into account things like the kernel (Ubuntu for example has its own custom kernel for servers), and other Ubuntu specific customizations. I keep switching back and forth, and I need to decide so I can recommend one or the other to a client. Right now, I think I am going to choose Debian Stable. Recently, I have had Ubuntu Server Edition 10.04.1 have a few strange issues... I have Ubuntu setup to do automatic updates via a simple script, and every few months or so, libapache2-mod-php5 gets removed because of conflicting packages... Thereby causing me to loose the php function of the web server. Debian Stable has not done anything like this.

  Read the article

• Adding Debian Sid as Package Repository?

  - by user1131467

  I am running 12.04 Precise beta (upgraded from 11.10 Oneiric) and I added the following line to my /etc/apt/source.list: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free In order to get a newer version of a package (octave 3.6) that I needed but was not available in the precise repository. This worked fine, but now when I want to upgrade there is a large number of packages that need to get updated. I assume this is because sid has newer versions of many of the packages than precise. I've temporarily disabled the sid repository, and this works fine - however I am curious to know what would happen if I allowed all those upgrades to go through? Would it break my system? Are the structures of Ubuntu Precise and Debian Sid repositories fundamentally different somehow?

  Read the article

• Updating Debian kernel

  - by Devator

  I'm trying to update my Debian machine to 2.6.32-46 (which is the new stable). However, after doing apt-get update my apt-cache search linux-image shows me: linux-headers-2.6.32-5-486 - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-486 linux-headers-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem linux-headers-2.6.32-5-686 - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-686 linux-headers-2.6.32-5-amd64 - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 linux-headers-2.6.32-5-openvz-686 - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-openvz-686 linux-headers-2.6.32-5-vserver-686-bigmem - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-vser ver-686-bigmem linux-headers-2.6.32-5-vserver-686 - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-vserver-686 linux-headers-2.6.32-5-xen-686 - Header files for Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-686 linux-image-2.6.32-5-486 - Linux 2.6.32 for old PCs linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem-dbg - Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-686-big mem linux-image-2.6.32-5-686-bigmem - Linux 2.6.32 for PCs with 4GB+ RAM linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 - Linux 2.6.32 for 64-bit PCs linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-686-dbg - Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-openvz- 686 linux-image-2.6.32-5-openvz-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, OpenVZ support linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-686-bigmem-dbg - Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5 -vserver-686-bigmem linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-686-bigmem - Linux 2.6.32 for PCs with 4GB+ RAM, Li nux-VServer support linux-image-2.6.32-5-vserver-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Linux-VServer su pport linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686-dbg - Debugging infos for Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-686 linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686 - Linux 2.6.32 for modern PCs, Xen dom0 support linux-image-2.6-486 - Linux 2.6 for old PCs (meta-package) linux-image-2.6-686-bigmem - Linux 2.6 for PCs with 4GB+ RAM (meta-package) linux-image-2.6-686 - Linux 2.6 for modern PCs (meta-package) linux-image-2.6-amd64 - Linux 2.6 for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) linux-image-2.6-openvz-686 - Linux 2.6 for modern PCs (meta-package), OpenVZ sup port linux-image-2.6-vserver-686-bigmem - Linux 2.6 for PCs with 4GB+ RAM (meta-packa ge), Linux-VServer support linux-image-2.6-vserver-686 - Linux 2.6 for modern PCs (meta-package), Linux-VSe rver support linux-image-2.6-xen-686 - Linux 2.6 for modern PCs (meta-package), Xen dom0 supp ort linux-image-486 - Linux for old PCs (meta-package) linux-image-686-bigmem - Linux for PCs with 4GB+ RAM (meta-package) linux-image-686 - Linux for modern PCs (meta-package) linux-image-amd64 - Linux for 64-bit PCs (meta-package) linux-image-openvz-686 - Linux for modern PCs (meta-package), OpenVZ support linux-image-vserver-686-bigmem - Linux for PCs with 4GB+ RAM (meta-package), Lin ux-VServer support linux-image-vserver-686 - Linux for modern PCs (meta-package), Linux-VServer sup port linux-image-xen-686 - Linux for modern PCs (meta-package), Xen dom0 support So, 2.6.32-46 doesn't seem to be found. How can I update to this kernel? My sources.list: ###### Debian Main Repos deb http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib deb-src http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib ###### Debian Update Repos deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib deb http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-proposed-updates main contrib deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main contrib deb-src http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-proposed-updates main contrib

  Read the article

• Package Dependencies Error in almost every install

  - by Betaxpression

  New to Ubuntu. In the other sofware sources i have "Debian 4.0 eth" officially supported "non-us.debian.org/"; etc ... "ppa.launcpad.net" and installing applications has stopped working. I think i first came across this problem after installing Blender 2.58 When using update manager it is prompting for a partial upgrade. Almost every software when trying to install showing the same error Package Dependencies Error or GPG PUB KEY missing, tried to fixing to them but no luck. Output to: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade (links disabled http:// -- http:/ as new user can't put more no. of hyperlinks) Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US InRelease Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release.gpg Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US Release Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/contrib TranslationIndex Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main TranslationIndex Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/non-free TranslationIndex Err http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main Sources 503 Service Unavailable Err http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/contrib Sources 503 Service Unavailable Err http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/non-free Sources 503 Service Unavailable Err http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main amd64 Packages 503 Service Unavailable Err http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/contrib amd64 Packages 503 Service Unavailable Err http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/non-free amd64 Packages 503 Service Unavailable Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/contrib Translation-en_IN Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/contrib Translation-en Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main Translation-en_IN Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/main Translation-en Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/non-free Translation-en_IN Ign http:/non-us.debian.org stable/non-US/non-free Translation-en Ign http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty InRelease Ign http:/archive.canonical.com natty InRelease Ign http:/extras.ubuntu.com natty InRelease Ign http:/http.us.debian.org stable InRelease Ign http:/ftp.us.debian.org etch InRelease Ign http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates InRelease Hit http:/archive.canonical.com natty Release.gpg Get:1 http:/extras.ubuntu.com natty Release.gpg [72 B] Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Get:2 http:/http.us.debian.org stable Release.gpg [1,672 B] Ign http:/linux.dropbox.com natty InRelease Ign http:/ftp.us.debian.org etch Release.gpg Ign http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty-security InRelease Hit http:/archive.canonical.com natty Release Hit http:/extras.ubuntu.com natty Release Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Get:3 http:/linux.dropbox.com natty Release.gpg [489 B] Ign http:/ftp.us.debian.org etch Release Ign http:/dl.google.com stable InRelease Get:4 http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty Release.gpg [198 B] Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Hit http:/archive.canonical.com natty/partner Sources Hit http:/extras.ubuntu.com natty/main Sources Get:5 http:/linux.dropbox.com natty Release [2,599 B] Get:6 http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Hit http:/archive.canonical.com natty/partner amd64 Packages Hit http:/extras.ubuntu.com natty/main amd64 Packages Get:7 http:/linux.dropbox.com natty/main amd64 Packages [784 B] Get:8 http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty-security Release.gpg [198 B] Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Ign http:/archive.canonical.com natty/partner TranslationIndex Ign http:/extras.ubuntu.com natty/main TranslationIndex Get:9 http:/http.us.debian.org stable Release [104 kB] Ign http:/linux.dropbox.com natty/main TranslationIndex Hit http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty Release Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Ign http:/http.us.debian.org stable Release Hit http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty-updates Release Get:10 http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease [316 B] Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Hit http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty-security Release Get:11 http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease [316 B] Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease Hit http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty/restricted Sources Get:12 http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty Release.gpg [316 B] Ign http:/http.us.debian.org stable/main Sources/DiffIndex Get:13 http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty Release.gpg [316 B] Hit http:/archive.ubuntu.com natty/main Sources Ign http:/ftp.us.debian.org etch/contrib TranslationIndex Ign http:/http.us.debian.org stable/contrib Sources/DiffIndex Get:14 http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty Release.gpg [1,502 B] Ign http:/http.us.debian.org stable/non-free Sources/DiffIndex Ign http:/ftp.us.debian.org etch/main TranslationIndex Get:15 http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty Release.gpg [1,928 B] Ign http:/http.us.debian.org stable/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http:/ftp.us.debian.org etch/non-free TranslationIndex Ign http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty Release.gpg Hit http:/http.us.debian.org stable/contrib amd64 Packages/DiffIndex W: GPG error: http:/http.us.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY AED4B06F473041FA NO_PUBKEY 64481591B98321F9 W: GPG error: http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease: File /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ppa.launchpad.net_sunab_kdenlive-release_ubuntu_dists_natty_InRelease doesn't start with a clearsigned message W: GPG error: http:/ppa.launchpad.net natty InRelease: File /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ppa.launchpad.net_ubuntu-wine_ppa_ubuntu_dists_natty_InRelease doesn't start with a clearsigned message E: Could not open file /var/lib/apt/lists/http.us.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrib_binary-amd64_Packages.IndexDiff - open (2: No such file or directory) output to: sudo cat /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 11.04 _Natty Narwhal_ - Release amd64 (20110427.1)]/ natty main restricted # See http:/help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty main restricted deb-src http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-updates main restricted deb-src http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-updates restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty universe deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty multiverse deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-updates multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from the 'backports' ## repository. ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. # deb http:/us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-backports main restricted universe multiverse # deb-src http:/us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-security main restricted deb-src http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-security restricted main multiverse universe #Added by software-properties deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-security universe deb http:/archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. deb http:/archive.canonical.com/ubuntu natty partner deb-src http:/archive.canonical.com/ubuntu natty partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http:/extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty main deb-src http:/extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu natty main deb http:/ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb-src http:/ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free deb http:/http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free deb-src http:/http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free deb http:/non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http:/non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free Thanks But after removing Debian repositories still getting this error: W:GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net natty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 9BDB3D89CE49EC21, W:GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net natty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 80E7349A06ED541C, W:GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net natty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 8C851674F96FD737, W:GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net natty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 94E58C34A8670E8C, E:Unable to parse package file /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_natty-updates_multiverse_i18n_Index (1) I actually tried this before, but i am always getting this error --Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 8C851674F96FD737 gpg: requesting key F96FD737 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com ?: keyserver.ubuntu.com: Connection refused gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Connection refused gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Total number processed: 0

  Read the article

• debian dependencies (libssl-dev and libncurses5)

  - by RubyFreak

  I'm trying to install under RVM the Ruby Enterpise (REE) under debian My debian is squeeze (uname -r) 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5.028stab070.14xen i did try to install ree but it complains that it is missing libssl-dev and libreadline5-dev. I did update my lenny to squeeze, but i didn't update the kernel, since its a production server. The operational system is already updated and upgraded sources.list: deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ squeeze main contrib non-free deb http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main deb-src http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates main I did try to install it using the following command: apt-get install libssl-dev libreadline5-dev But unfortunately i'm getting the following problems: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libreadline5-dev: Depends: libncurses5-dev but it is not going to be installed libssl-dev: Depends: libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8o-4squeeze1) but 0.9.8o-6 is to be installed E: Broken packages I was thinking to reinstall those packages and install again, but it has too many dependencies, and it is a production server, that i would like to know if there is any other way to fix it. Or at least to double check if it is necessary to reinstall both :-/

  Read the article

• Where to find URLs for sources.list for debian for running apt-get update?

  - by Boda Cydo

  Can anyone tell me where to find URLs to put in /etc/apt/sources.list for debian so that I could run apt-get update? I couldn't find the precise answer by searching Google. When I currently try running apt-get update I get: W: Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/contrib/binary-i386/Packages Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 130.89.148.12 21] W: Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/non-free/binary-i386/Packages Unable to fetch file, server said 'Failed to open file. ' [IP: 130.89.148.12 21] I have no idea how to solve this. Here is how my current sources.list looks like: deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian lenny main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian lenny/updates main contrib non-free deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian lenny/updates main contrib non-free I'm running debian_version 5.0.8: # cat /etc/debian_version 5.0.8 Thanks!

  Read the article

• Debian packaging and localization of control files

  - by Julien Nicoulaud

  Is there a way to provide localized versions of the Debian packaging control files (changelog, control and copyright for example) ?

  Read the article

• Is there a "standard" way to make daemon in Debian?

  - by Kuroki Kaze

  I need to create a daemon from the application in Debian. Is there any standard tool for this in Debian like "upstart" in Ubuntu? I need only start-stop commands, to start a program as a daemon with some options and a pid file and kill it with pid file. I looked at init.d but it seems these are for boot-time launch. I want to start my daemon manually.

  Read the article

• Eclipse version in Debian package directories too old. Alternatives to manual install?

  - by Håvard Geithus

  Ian Murdock, the founder of Debian, has commented that package management is "the single biggest advancement Linux has brought to the industry". (Wikipedia) But for some reason I'm forced to install eclipse manually if I want the most recent version, rather than the ancient eclipse 3.5.2 from the Debian package directories. Why? Is there a more convenient way to get the newer version? (I know the manual install is very little work, but I still think it should be unnecessary)

  Read the article

• How to set up GRUB2 chainloader to other Grub (Fedora, Debian) on GPT

  - by basic6

  I'm trying to set up a dedicated GRUB2 which (chain-)loads another GRUB on a disk with GPT partition table. Relevant partitions: /dev/sda1 BIOS_BOOT /dev/sda2 BOOT (ext2) /dev/sda3 FEDORA (ext4) /dev/sda6 DEBIAN (ext4) I installed Fedora first, using /dev/sda2 as boot partition. Then I installed Debian. The Debian installer recognized the Fedora installation and added it as boot entry, then installed its GRUB into the MBR. While this works for the moment, it's pretty messy, because every Debian update may change the boot config, removing the Fedora entry (tried it) and the other way around. That's why I want both systems to have their own boot loader and one main boot loader (that could reside on /dev/sda2), which loads one of them. This is what I've tried: Moved everything from /dev/sda2 to /dev/sda3/boot Removed /boot mount point in Fedora (so /dev/sda2 isn't used anymore) From a live Linux, installed GRUB2 to the MBR (grub-install --boot-directory=sda2 /dev/sda) Wrote a menu.lst: title Fedora root (hd0,2) chainloader +1 (Again, for Debian) Converted that to a grub.cfg script (grub-menu2cfg or something like that) When booting, actually got a GRUB2 menu with "Fedora" (and "Debian") When selecting any one of those: error: invalid signature Issued "grub-install /dev/sda6" (and ...sda3) from all kinds of live Linux systems, all of which failed with another error message (in the case of the Debian installer, without explanation at all) Added --force to the chainloader line, now it says "loading", then reboots Found douzens of howtos, none of which seem to work for me Since I get the self-made GRUB2 menu on bootup, I've at least successfully installed the first stage of GRUB, right? When trying to chainload, some signature is checked and seems to be wrong - how do I fix it? The boot menus (Fedora with its different Kernel versions and Debian with Debian and Fedora as well) are now on the system partitions (/dev/sda3, /dev/sda6), is there anything else to do on these partitions, so they can be chainloaded? Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• Turn-based games [closed]

  - by Blue

  I've been looking for tutorials on turn-based games. I found an incomplete tutorial series by InsugentX about turn-based games. I haven't looked through it, but since it's incomplete, I worry that I won't be able to finish the scripts. I'm looking for tutorials or some good tips or advice to create turn-based games(similar to Worms). Recently I finished watching the WalkerBoys' tutorials so I am familiar with code. Where can I find some info and/or tutorials on creating Turn-based games? I'd prefer it to be video format. How can I create turn-based games (not the entire thing, only the set-up) or a turn-based event like in Worms? To explain more, How do I create 2 parties(1st player, 2nd player) exchanging turns(turn-based games and/or hotseat). While parties have characters similar to Worms(having more than 1 character within each party)? Do I use an array, an enum? I don't have any experience in turn-based games, so I would like to know how to actually make turn-based games. I can't find any reference to help me with construction of a turn-based game code similar to Worms in a programming language I can understand.

  Read the article

• How to easily upgrade MySQL 5.0.32 to MySQL 5.1.20 or higher on Debian Etch?

  - by Ferdy

  I have a home server running Debian Etch with MySQL 5.0.32 on it. I'm not much of a Linux administrator but two years ago I installed the server and it runs fine. I used the official MySQL package for Debian at that time. Since then I have been happily making use of it. Now I need to use a MySQL function that is only available in MySQL 5.1.20 and higher. Therefore I would like to upgrade. I'm not that confident in messing with something I need every day so I wanted to check with you what the best upgrade path would be? Obviously I prefer a simple upgrade that keeps my database, users and settings in place as they are now.

  Read the article

• Install VMWare Tools from VMWare Workstation 7.1.1 build-282343 on Debian squeeze: complaint about gcc path not valid

  - by Misha Koshelev

  Dear All: I am trying to install VMWare tools on Debian Squeeze. My error: Before you can compile modules, you need to have the following installed... make gcc kernel headers of the running kernel Searching for GCC... The path "/usr/bin/gcc" is not valid path to the gcc binary. Would you like to change it? [yes] uname -a: Linux debian 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Sat Sep 18 02:14:45 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux dpkg -l | grep make ii make 3.81-8 An utility for Directing compilation. dpkg -l | grep gcc ii gcc 4:4.4.4-2 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.4 4.4.4-8 The GNU C compiler ii gcc-4.4-base 4.4.4-8 The GNU Compiler Collection (base package) ii libgcc1 1:4.4.4-8 GCC support library whereis gcc gcc: /usr/bin/gcc /usr/lib/gcc Thank you Misha

  Read the article

• Is there a market for a Text-based empire-building game?

  - by Vishnu

  I am working on building a text-based in-browser empire building game. The screen will be split into a console and an EXTREMELY rough vector map of your empire (just squares in a bigger square). Commands such as building and expanding would be typed into the console and automatically reflected in the map. Would there be any market for such a game? Would anyone want to play? To clarify, it would be online and everyone's empire would be in the same 'world'.

  Read the article

• unstripped binary or object creating debian package

  - by Jaime

  I'm new to package creation and I'm trying to create a .deb package and keep getting 'unstripped-binary-or-object' on all my libraries and executables. I have everything setup in the directory tree where I want them to end up (and a DEBIAN folder with the control file) and then do fakeroot dpkg-deb --build ./mypackage when I lint with lintian mypackage.deb I get that error. Any ideas or suggestions? Thanks

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >