Search Results

Search found 17187 results on 688 pages for 'vpn connection'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 5/688 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • How to use a Network adapter only for a specific Connection on Win7?

    - by Tokk
    Hey, Guys I've got several network adapter in my PC (from LAN, WLAN, VPN etc...) and what I want to accomplish is that some specific adresses use the VPN adapter, while all others use eiter LAN or WLAN. (So for example http://win-server/ is using VPN, while www.google still uses LAN connection.) I've want to solve this with the Windows settings and not the VPN settings to make sure I can do it with every VPN-Provider. Thank You

    Read the article

  • Multiple Set Peer for VPN Failover

    - by Kyle Brandt
    I will have two Cisco routers at Location A serving the same internal networks, and one router in location B. Currently, I have one router in each location with a IPSec site-to-site tunnel connecting them. It looks something like: Location A: crypto map crypto-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp description Tunnel to Location B set peer 12.12.12.12 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA match address internal-ips Location B: crypto map crypto-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp description Tunnel to Location A set peer 11.11.11.11 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA match address internal-ips Can I achieve fail over by simply adding another set peer at location B?: Location A (New secondary Router, configuration on previous router stays the same): crypto map crypto-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp description Tunnel to Location B set peer 12.12.12.12 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA match address internal-ips Location B (Configuration Changed): crypto map crypto-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp description Tunnel to Location A set peer 11.11.11.11 ! 11.11.11.100 is the ip of the new second router at location A set peer 11.11.11.100 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA match address internal-ips Cisco Says: For crypto map entries created with the crypto map map-name seq-num ipsec-isakmp command, you can specify multiple peers by repeating this command. The peer that packets are actually sent to is determined by the last peer that the router heard from (received either traffic or a negotiation request from) for a given data flow. If the attempt fails with the first peer, Internet Key Exchange (IKE) tries the next peer on the crypto map list. But I don't fully understand that in the context of a failover scenerio (One of the routers as Location A blowing up).

    Read the article

  • Sharing Internet Connection using an ad-hoc wifi network

    - by Apps
    I've installed a WiFi Adapter in my Windows XP PC and created an ad-hoc network. I am able to connect to the network through my iPod Touch. On the same PC I have a LAN connection to the Internet. I need to share this internet connection to my iPod too. The problem is Windows did not assign an IP Address (even though assign IP address automatically is selected) to this WiFi network. When I tried to share the Internet connection, I got a message that LAN Network Adapter's IP address will be changed to 192.168.1.1. But if this happens I will not be able to connect to other devices/servers in my LAN Network. How do I share the Internet connection through WiFi?

    Read the article

  • Cannot access internet or remote network after connecting to Windows VPN

    - by Kiewic
    I set up a VPN by creating an incoming VPN connection (VPN server) in my Windows 8 machine at home (not a Windows Server). I forwarded the PPTP port in my router (port 1723) to this machine and enabled PPTP passthrough. In a second Windows 8 machine out of home, I created an outgoing VPN connection (VPN client). And I am able to connect to my home VPN, but I don't have access to any home resource or even internet. This is the output of the client ipconfig: And this are the settings of my VPN server: UPDATE: My VPN server has assigned the 192.168.1.144 IP adress at my home network. So, I tried setting the "IP address assignment" range from 192.168.1.150 to 192.168.1.200. And when a VPN client gets connected, it gets an address in that range, but it doesn't make any difference.

    Read the article

  • PPTP connection disconnect

    - by Vladimir Franciz S. Blando
    My pptp connection wont stay connected, it will disconnect in less than a minute here are some relevant log entries May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Starting VPN service 'pptp'... May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN service 'pptp' started (org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.pptp), PID 15216 May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN service 'pptp' appeared; activating connections May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN plugin state changed: init (1) May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN plugin state changed: starting (3) May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN connection 'Dynalabs' (Connect) reply received. May 31 13:32:31 localhost pppd[15221]: Plugin /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.5/nm-pptp-pppd-plugin.so loaded. May 31 13:32:31 localhost pppd[15221]: pppd 2.4.5 started by root, uid 0 May 31 13:32:31 localhost pptp[15224]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[main:pptp.c:314]: The synchronous pptp option is NOT activated May 31 13:32:31 localhost pppd[15221]: Using interface ppp0 May 31 13:32:31 localhost pppd[15221]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/5 May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/ppp0, iface: ppp0) May 31 13:32:31 localhost NetworkManager[931]: SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device added (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/ppp0, iface: ppp0): no ifupdown configuration found. May 31 13:32:32 localhost pptp[15235]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:251]: Sent control packet type is 1 'Start-Control-Connection-Request' May 31 13:32:32 localhost pptp[15235]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:739]: Received Start Control Connection Reply May 31 13:32:32 localhost pptp[15235]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:773]: Client connection established. May 31 13:32:33 localhost pptp[15235]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:251]: Sent control packet type is 7 'Outgoing-Call-Request' May 31 13:32:34 localhost pptp[15235]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:858]: Received Outgoing Call Reply. May 31 13:32:34 localhost pptp[15235]: nm-pptp-service-15216 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:897]: Outgoing call established (call ID 0, peer's call ID 1536). May 31 13:32:37 localhost pppd[15221]: CHAP authentication succeeded May 31 13:32:37 localhost kernel: [54007.078553] PPP MPPE Compression module registered May 31 13:32:40 localhost pppd[15221]: MPPE 128-bit stateless compression enabled May 31 13:32:42 localhost pppd[15221]: local IP address 10.100.0.52 May 31 13:32:42 localhost pppd[15221]: remote IP address 10.100.0.1 May 31 13:32:42 localhost pppd[15221]: primary DNS address 4.2.2.1 May 31 13:32:42 localhost pppd[15221]: secondary DNS address 255.255.255.255 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN connection 'Dynalabs' (IP Config Get) reply received. May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN Gateway: 103.28.219.2 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Tunnel Device: ppp0 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Internal IP4 Address: 10.100.0.52 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Internal IP4 Prefix: 32 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Internal IP4 Point-to-Point Address: 10.100.0.1 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Maximum Segment Size (MSS): 0 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Forbid Default Route: no May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Internal IP4 DNS: 4.2.2.1 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Internal IP4 DNS: 255.255.255.255 May 31 13:32:42 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> DNS Domain: '(none)' May 31 13:32:43 localhost dnsmasq[2127]: exiting on receipt of SIGTERM May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> DNS: starting dnsmasq... May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> (ppp0): writing resolv.conf to /sbin/resolvconf May 31 13:32:43 localhost dnsmasq[15290]: error at line 2 of /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf May 31 13:32:43 localhost dnsmasq[15290]: FAILED to start up May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN connection 'Dynalabs' (IP Config Get) complete. May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> Policy set 'Dynalabs' (ppp0) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS. May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> VPN plugin state changed: started (4) May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <warn> dnsmasq exited with error: Configuration problem (1) May 31 13:32:43 localhost NetworkManager[931]: <info> (ppp0): writing resolv.conf to /sbin/resolvconf May 31 13:32:43 localhost dbus[872]: [system] Activating service name='org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' (using servicehelper) May 31 13:32:43 localhost dbus[872]: [system] Successfully activated service 'org.freedesktop.nm_dispatcher' May 31 13:33:00 localhost ntpdate[15370]: step time server 91.189.94.4 offset -1.110301 sec May 31 13:33:21 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xd6d6 May 31 13:33:21 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x93aa May 31 13:33:21 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xcc83 May 31 13:33:21 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x2031 May 31 13:33:21 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x13d4 May 31 13:33:22 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x5b11 May 31 13:33:22 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x414b May 31 13:33:22 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x2f5f May 31 13:33:22 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xe9ff May 31 13:33:23 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x8e20 May 31 13:33:23 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x8f0 May 31 13:33:23 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xf166 May 31 13:33:23 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x36e6 May 31 13:33:23 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xdd19 May 31 13:33:23 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xda26 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xac5 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x53a5 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x507e May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x1dc5 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xf87b May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x2f27 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xd10c May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x66ef May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xa294 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xb15 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x52a2 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xd863 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x8a96 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xde19 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x9763 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xb23 May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x83ca May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x964e May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xe8ae May 31 13:33:24 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xf614 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x9b1 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xf086 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xbff4 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x66c5 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xe42 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xf295 May 31 13:33:25 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x86fe May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x3bc1 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xbaad May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x88b5 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xd7a May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x30d5 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x2d8f May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x3933 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x8d42 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x4b4 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xa205 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x7cc5 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x1b6a May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0xf004 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x21b6 May 31 13:33:26 localhost pppd[15221]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x51eb

    Read the article

  • Internet connection slower than network connection speed

    - by Mike Pateras
    I've got a computer connected to a wireless router on a different floor. When I look at the network connection, I'm told the signal strength is low, and that I've got a connection of about 26mbps (often higher). However, my internet connection on that machine is very slow. Speedtests show it at about 1-2mbps, and it really shows when loading pages and video. I have fiber optic internet access, and the machine that's connected to the router/modem via cable gets the 20mbps on speed tests, and is extremely fast in every day use. My question is, is the advertised 26mbps+ connection speed perhaps inaccurate, and that my wireless bandwidth is the likely bottleneck here? Or is the signal strength what's key here? And what might I do about this? Power cycling the router helped a bit, a speed test went as high as 6mbps after doing that.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu Live USB: best practices for secure net traffic

    - by Och
    I want to to set up a live USB with Ubuntu, in the most secure way. So I want to have the persistent data on a second USB, something that its not that much problematic. How to configure a very safe Internet surfing (throughout a VPN?) Which are the best practices that could be implemented to have the Ubuntu live in a USB, the persistent data in other, and with the Internet access to a VPN (the Ubuntu privacy remix gives most of this, except the VPN config), Any ideas of how to combine the best of Ubuntu privacy remix, and Internet access to a VPN?

    Read the article

  • Share openVPN connection

    - by Douglas Gemignani
    Hello, Currently I have a server (dev tun) running openVPN and my WinXP client is able to connect to the server just fine. I have an ethernet device and I need to send data to a computer under the server's network, so since the device can't connect on its own I need to configurate my Windows XP to share its VPN connection. So, on my WinXP machine i have: Network Adapter #1 (ip 192.168.0.2 gw 192.168.0.1 with internet access). OpenVPN Connection (dhcp). Network Adapter #2 (crossover cable with device). Here is my client.ovpn cert gertec.crt key gertec.key client ns-cert-type server user nobody group nobody remote IP PORT ca ca.crt dev tun dev-node OpenVPN proto udp resolv-retry infinite nobind comp-lzo verb 3 I would appreciate any help.

    Read the article

  • How do I remote desktop to my work's Windows box from my Mac at home through VPN?

    - by CT
    I would like to remote desktop from my Macbook to my Work's laptop from home. I connect to the work's network via Cisco VPN. My Cisco VPN clients connects fine in Mac OS X but I am unable to remote desktop. I am also unable to ping my work laptop. The laptop is powered on and not sleeping. I can access it via LogMeIn. If I were to actually pug into our network at the building. I can remote desktop to my work laptop from my Macbook. If I use a Windows virtual machine and connect using the Windows Cisco VPN client, I am able to RDP and ping my work laptop. What is wrong with my OS X VPN connection?

    Read the article

  • How do I remote desktop to my work's Windows box from my Mac at home through VPN?

    - by CT.
    I would like to remote desktop from my Macbook to my Work's laptop from home. I connect to the work's network via Cisco VPN. My Cisco VPN clients connects fine in Mac OS X but I am unable to remote desktop. I am also unable to ping my work laptop. The laptop is powered on and not sleeping. I can access it via LogMeIn. If I were to actually pug into our network at the building. I can remote desktop to my work laptop from my Macbook. If I use a Windows virtual machine and connect using the Windows Cisco VPN client, I am able to RDP and ping my work laptop. What is wrong with my OS X VPN connection?

    Read the article

  • Cannot mount a CIFS network share over VPN

    - by Aron Rotteveel
    I have setup u VPN connection to our Windows 2008 server at the office and it seems to work fine. For some reason, however, I still am not able to access the network shares over a VPN connection using my standard fstab entries. When I am physically connected to the network, it works fine, but now when trying this over VPN I get the following error: mount error(110): Connection timed out Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) My /etc/fstab looks like this: //server2008/share /mnt/share cifs iocharset=utf8,credentials=/home/aron/.smbcredentials,uid=1000 0 0 As said, it works fine when physically connected, but over VPN it just wont work. Any help is appreciated. EDIT: It seems the Windows firewall is making things harder on me. When I turn it off, I get a bit further, although I still get the following error message: Unable to find suitable address. The strange thing is that I have file sharing added as an exception to the firewall. Port 137-139 and port 445 are open, which should suffice, shouldn't it? EDIT Jan 20th: Still not working. When I have the firewall turned on, it times out. When I turn it off, I get the not suitable address error. Turning the firewall off is not an option, by the way.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 12.04 VPN default route issue when using the UI

    - by Pieter Pabst
    When setting up a VPN connection using the UI (System settings = Network) the VPN connection is used as the default route after connecting to it. How can I avoid this? That is without assigning manual addresses. I want the connection to use DHCP. It should use the eth* interfaces for my default route, like they are used before making the connection. The VPN route should only be used when connecting to addresses in the ppp0 adapters range. If possible using the UI only, not that I'm not used to editing config files... But the point of using Ubuntu for me was the "it just works" concept (which is true for 99% of the time, keep up the good work). I tried setting the "Method" combobox in the "Configure..." dialogue to "Automatic (VPN) addresses only". That doesn't make a difference. (Another thing I noticed; the UI shows my connection as a "Wireless connection" in the list control on the left. Don't know why... it has the right icon, but that's probably something for the bug tracker)

    Read the article

  • Failed pinging a LAN card of the server from the client using shared internet connection

    - by bobo
    The server (Windows XP Pro SP3) has two LAN cards (LAN card A and B) and is connected to the internet using ADSL. The ADSL connection is shared to LAN card B using Internet Connection Sharing. The client (Windows XP Pro SP3) has one LAN card, and is connected to LAN card B of the server so that it has access to the internet. The IP address on the LAN cards are defined as follows: Server: LAN card A: 192.168.0.3/24 (manually defined by me) LAN card B: 192.168.0.1/24 (manually defined by Internet Connection Sharing) Client: LAN card: 192.168.0.123/24 (assigned by DHCP) Default gateway: 192.168.0.1 From the server, I can ping 192.168.0.123 successfully. From the client, it can access the internet without any problem. I can also ping 192.168.0.1 successfully but for 192.168.0.3, it failed with the Request Timeout error message. Why did the ping fail, and what should be done to make the ping possible? (all firewalls have been turned off.)

    Read the article

  • set proxy for vpn server on ubuntu server 12.4

    - by Morteza Soltanabadiyan
    I have a vpn server with HTTPS, L2TP , OPENVPN , PPTP. i want to set proxy in the server so all connection that comes from vpn clients use the proxy that i set in my server. I made a bash script file for it , but proxy not working. gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy mode 'manual' gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy.http enabled true gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy.http host 'cproxy.anadolu.edu.tr' gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy.http port 8080 gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy.http authentication-user 'admin' gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy.http authentication-password 'admin' gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy use-same-proxy true export http_proxy=http://admin:[email protected]:8080 export https_proxy=http://admin:[email protected]:8080 export HTTP_PROXY=http://admin:[email protected]:8080 export HTTPS_PROXY=http://admin:[email protected]:8080 Now , I don't know what to do to make a global proxy for server and all vpn clients use it automatically.

    Read the article

  • 64-bit Cisco VPN client (IPsec) ?

    - by mika
    Cisco VPN client (IPsec) does not support 64bit Windows. Worse, Cisco does not even plan to release a 64-bit version, instead they say that "For x64 (64-bit) Windows support, you must utilize Cisco's next-generation Cisco AnyConnect VPN Client." Cisco VPN Client Introduction Cisco VPN Client FAQ But SSL VPN licences cost extra. For example, most new ASA firewalls come with plenty of IPSec VPN licences but only a few SSL VPN licences. What alternatives do you have for 64-bit Windows? So far, I know two: 32-bit Cisco VPN Client on a virtual machine NCP Secure Entry Client on 64-bit Windows Any other suggestions or experiences? -mika-

    Read the article

  • File transfer problems through VPN when Cisco IPS is enabled

    - by Richard West
    We have a Cisco ASA 5510 firewall with the IPS module installed. We have a customer that we must connect to via VPN to their network to exchange files via FTP. We use the Cisco VPN client (version 5.0.01.0600) on our local workstations, which are behind the firewall and subject to the IPS. The VPN client is successful in connecting to the remote site. However when we start the FTP file transfer we are able to upload only 150K to 200K of data, then everything stops. A minute later the VPN session is dropped. I think I have isolated this to an IPS issue by temporarily disabling the Service Policy on the ASA for the IPS with the following command: access-list IPS line 1 extended permit ip 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inactive After this command was issued I then established the VPN to the remote site and was successful in transferring the entire file. While still connected to the VPN and FTP session I issued the command to enable the IPS: access-list IPS line 1 extended permit ip 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 The file transfer was tried again and was once again successful so I closed the FTP session and reopened it, while keeping the same VPN session open. This file transfer was also successful. This told me that nothing with the FTP programs was being filtered or causing the problem. Furthermore, we use FTP to exchange files with many sites everyday without issue. I then disconnected the original VPN session, which was established when the access-list was inactive, and reconnected the VPN session, now with the access-list active. After starting the FTP transfer the file stopped after 150K. To me this seems like the IPS is blocking, or somehow interfering with the initial VPN setup to the remote site. This only started happening last week after the latest IPS signature updates were applied (sig version 407.0). Our previous sig version was 95 days old becuase the system was not auto updating itself. Any ideas on what could be causing this problem?

    Read the article

  • Mac OS X 10.6 issues connecting via vpn to Microsoft server

    - by chris hough
    I am currently running Mac OS X Snow Leopard and trying to use the native vpn client to connect to our Microsoft vpn server. If I route all traffic via the vpn connection I am able to connect to our servers, however, external traffic to i.e. google or stack overflow is blocked. If I uncheck the checkbox to route all traffic via the vpn I can connect to the vpn, however, I can not connect to my servers, external traffic to google or stackoverflow works though. Is this a vpn client issue, do I need to purchase Mac OS X vpn software instead of the native client, or is there a Microsoft vpn server setting that has to be checked. I am not familiar with the server software, but I wanted to post this question here to help out our network admin with the Mac OS X machines.

    Read the article

  • DNS "recursion not available" using a Cisco AnyConnect VPN connection

    - by codeape
    Does anyone have experience with configuring Cisco AnyConnect VPN? We have a problem with client DNS name resolution when connected over VPN. To me, it looks as if the Cisco AnyConnect VPN client intercepts DNS queries from the clients. Can someone confirm that the AnyConnect VPN client in fact does this (intercepts DNS traffic)? Where is this configured on the VPN server? EDIT: Here's how the routing table changes when I connect to the VPN: [~] $ diff -u /tmp/route_normal /tmp/route_vpn --- /tmp/route_normal 2010-01-20 19:23:47.000000000 +0100 +++ /tmp/route_vpn 2010-01-20 19:24:46.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface +xxx.xxx.xx.xx.i 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 ath0 172.16.53.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vmnet1 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ath0 +172.17.20.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 cscotun 0 +192.168.111.0 172.17.20.212 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 cscotun 0 172.16.140.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 vmnet8 +172.16.0.0 172.17.20.212 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 cscotun 0 default 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ath0 EDIT 2: The IT guy has done "something" on the VPN endpoint. Now I get "recursion not available" when doing nslookup. The DNS servers have recursion enabled. So it must be the Cisco VPN DNS interception messing this up. ubuntu@domU-12-31-39-00-ED-14:~$ /opt/cisco/vpn/bin/vpn connect xxx.xxxxxx.xx ... >> Please enter your username and password ... >> notice: Establishing VPN... >> state: Connected >> notice: VPN session established to ... ubuntu@domU-12-31-39-00-ED-14:~$ nslookup www.vg.no ;; Got recursion not available from ..., trying next server ;; Got recursion not available from ..., trying next server ;; Got recursion not available from ..., trying next server ;; Got recursion not available from ..., trying next server Server: 172.16.0.23 Address: 172.16.0.23#53 ** server can't find www.vg.no.compute-1.internal: REFUSED ubuntu@domU-12-31-39-00-ED-14:~$ ping 195.88.55.16 PING 195.88.55.16 (195.88.55.16) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 195.88.55.16: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=110 ms 64 bytes from 195.88.55.16: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=111 ms 64 bytes from 195.88.55.16: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=109 ms ^C --- 195.88.55.16 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2017ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 109.953/110.379/111.075/0.496 ms

    Read the article

  • Advice needed: ADSL and VPN for a small company

    - by Saajid Ismail
    Hi. I need advice on purchasing an ADSL modem/router for a small company. At the moment, we are using the iBurst Wireless service for internet connectivity. I have the iBurst desktop modem, which connects to my Netgear WNR2000 router via ethernet. I am using the Netgear WNR2000 to deploy a wireless network as well. I have also set up a VPN using Windows Server 2003, and enabled the VPN Passthrough settings on the Netgear router. I am able to connect to the office network remotely without difficulty. However the problem that I've read is that the Netgear WNR2000 only supports VPN passthrough for a single session. This is simply not good enough. I need to be able to support at least 3 concurrent VPN connections immediately, and up to 5 in the near future. Now I am cancelling my iBurst Wireless service and have just got my ADSL line installed. I have to purchase an ADSL modem, and now is a good time to think of future proofing my investment. I need a good ADSL modem, that will allow me to support at least 5 concurrent VPN connections, or more, without breaking the bank. My budget is about 150-200 USD. I believe that my current Netgear WNR2000 router will be useless, except maybe to extend my wireless network in the future by a bit. Is there a solution where I can still use my Netgear WNR2000 for WiFi, for e.g., by connecting a cheaper non-WiFi ADSL modem to the Netgear router? If not, then which WiFi-enabled ADSL modem/router that supports at least 5 VPN passthroughs can you recommend? To sum it up, I need an ADSL modem/router that is: ADSL & ADSL2+ compatible has built-in 802.11n 270/300mbps WiFi (if having this feature doesn't push the price up too much) supports at least 5 VPN connections using VPN passthrough EDIT: Answer 2.10 in the following FAQ has me a bit worried - What is VPN/multiple VPN Pass-through?

    Read the article

  • Router slowing my connection?

    - by Roberto
    I have a Linksys WRT54G and I pay for a 12Mbps connection. I've been testing my connection using speedtest.net for many days and always get 8Mbps. I called the support and they told me to bypass the router and test. I did it and got 16Mbps (much more than I pay for), so I thought "this guy just changed my speed so can he blame my router", and he blamed it. But to my surprise, everytime I bypass the router I get 16Mbps and when I use the router I get 8Mbps. Is this guy trolling me somehow (configuring the VOIP-modem-stuff to different profiles depending o the MAC address connecting to it) or is my router a POS? How can I find out? I don't know what's the thing the router connects to, it's a kind of VOIP adapter; the link is this one, but unfortunately I don't think you'll understand because it's in Portuguese. I know they can remotely connect to it, that's the origin of my conspiracy theory :) I just tested wired to the router and got 10Mbps (and still 8Mbps on wifi and 16Mbps without router) O_o I'm 5cm away from my router, so no obstacles to interfere, right? ------ UPDATE ------- It's a WRT54G V8, I'm using firmware v8.00.7 (will install 8.00.8 tomorrow, but I saw that it's only a minor fix to UPnP denial of service security vulnerability). Results: IPerf LAN-LAN: 80Mbps IPerf LAN-WLAN: 19Mbps (therefore we can ignore wireless issues/settings) I wasn't able to make the (W)LAN-WAN NAT-enabled test with IPerf, I get a connection refused error. I'm not sure if did it right: ran in server mode, configured router to forward that port to my IP and tried to connect to my internet IP that got from this site. I don't think there is a way to disable NAT using this firmware. Question: Let's suppose it's an underpowered hardware issue. Is it right to assume that custom firmwares could resolve the issue because they are possibly better implemented and would make better use of the router resources? I couldn't find any references pointing to wired performance improvements with the use of custom firmware.

    Read the article

  • Squid traffic tunneled through VPN

    - by NerdyNick
    So what I'm trying to do is have a Squid Proxy run on 1 machine along side a VPN connection. What I want to happen is all traffic running though the Squad Proxy would run though the VPN for its outbound. ie Desktop - (Squid Proxy - VPN) The goal is to allow my desktop selective tunneling through the VPN. So that Instant Messaging and the like that do not need to run through the VPN can go through my normal traffic. Typically I would go though a SSH Proxy but currently am forced to use VPN to gain entry into the office, and a Squid proxy seemed like it might work out the easiest for what I am needing. EDIT Realize I forgot to actually state what problem I'm running into. I have the Squid setup and verified it works, but once I connect to the VPN. All requests to Squid get accepted but Squid is unable to make the request over the VPN. So the client ends up just sitting there.

    Read the article

  • PPTP VPN from Ubuntu cannot connect

    - by Andrea Polci
    I'm trying to configure under Linux (Kubuntu 9.10) a VPN I already use from Windows. I installed the network-manager-pptp package and added the VPN under Network Manager. These are the parameters under "advanced" button: Authentication Methods: PAP, CHAP, MSCHAP, MSCHAP2, EAP (I also tried "MSCHAP, MSCHAP2") Use MPPE Encryption: yes Crypto: Any Use stateful encryption: no Allow BSD compression: yes Allow Deflate compression: yes Allow TCP header compression: yes Send PPP echo packets: no When I try to connnect it doesn't work and this is what I get in the system log: 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager <info> Starting VPN service 'org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.pptp'... 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN service 'org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.pptp' started (org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.pptp), PID 4931 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN service 'org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.pptp' just appeared, activating connections 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pppd[4932] Plugin /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.5//nm-pptp-pppd-plugin.so loaded. 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN plugin state changed: 3 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pppd[4932] pppd 2.4.5 started by root, uid 0 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN connection 'MYVPN' (Connect) reply received. 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices added (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/ppp0, iface: ppp0) 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena NetworkManager SCPlugin-Ifupdown: device added (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/ppp0, iface: ppp0): no ifupdown configuration found. 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pppd[4932] Using interface ppp0 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pppd[4932] Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/pts/2 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pptp[4934] nm-pptp-service-4931 log[main:pptp.c:314]: The synchronous pptp option is NOT activated 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:251]: Sent control packet type is 7 'Outgoing-Call-Request' 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:858]: Received Outgoing Call Reply. 2010-04-08 13:53:47 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:897]: Outgoing call established (call ID 1, peer's call ID 14800). 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pppd[4932] CHAP authentication succeeded 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pppd[4932] CHAP authentication succeeded 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pppd[4932] LCP terminated by peer 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:929]: Call disconnect notification received (call id 14800) 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_disp:pptp_ctrl.c:788]: Received Stop Control Connection Request. 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:251]: Sent control packet type is 4 'Stop-Control-Connection-Reply' 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[callmgr_main:pptp_callmgr.c:258]: Closing connection (shutdown) 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:251]: Sent control packet type is 12 'Call-Clear-Request' 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[callmgr_main:pptp_callmgr.c:258]: Closing connection (shutdown) 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[ctrlp_rep:pptp_ctrl.c:251]: Sent control packet type is 12 'Call-Clear-Request' 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pptp[4927] nm-pptp-service-4918 log[call_callback:pptp_callmgr.c:79]: Closing connection (call state) 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pppd[4932] Modem hangup 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pppd[4932] Connection terminated. 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN plugin failed: 1 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager SCPlugin-Ifupdown: devices removed (path: /sys/devices/virtual/net/ppp0, iface: ppp0) 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena pppd[4932] Exit. 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN plugin failed: 1 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN plugin state changed: 6 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager <info> VPN plugin state change reason: 0 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager <WARN> connection_state_changed(): Could not process the request because no VPN connection was active. 2010-04-08 13:53:48 pcelena NetworkManager <info> Policy set 'Auto eth0' (eth0) as default for routing and DNS. 2010-04-08 13:54:01 pcelena NetworkManager <debug> [1270727641.001390] ensure_killed(): waiting for vpn service pid 4931 to exit 2010-04-08 13:54:01 pcelena NetworkManager <debug> [1270727641.001479] ensure_killed(): vpn service pid 4931 cleaned up The error that sticks out here is "pppd[4932] LCP terminated by peer". Does anyone has suggestion on what can be the problem and how to make it work?

    Read the article

  • Squid traffic tunneled through VPN

    - by NerdyNick
    So what I'm trying to do is have a Squid Proxy run on 1 machine along side a VPN connection. What I want to happen is all traffic running though the Squad Proxy would run though the VPN for its outbound. ie Desktop - (Squid Proxy - VPN) The goal is to allow my desktop selective tunneling through the VPN. So that Instant Messaging and the like that do not need to run through the VPN can go through my normal traffic. Typically I would go though a SSH Proxy but currently am forced to use VPN to gain entry into the office, and a Squid proxy seemed like it might work out the easiest for what I am needing. EDIT Realize I forgot to actually state what problem I'm running into. I have the Squid setup and verified it works, but once I connect to the VPN. All requests to Squid get accepted but Squid is unable to make the request over the VPN. So the client ends up just sitting there.

    Read the article

  • Unable to connect to Windows VPN from iPad

    - by Justin
    I have a 16 GB iPad wifi I can't get to connect to VPN. The error I get is: "A connection could not be established to the PP server. Try reconnecting. If the problem continues, verify your settings and contact your Administrator." I have tried a variety of tasks to troubleshoot the issue: I have verified that another iPad on another network can connect to the VPN I am trying to connect to I can connect to this VPN from the same network the iPad uses on a Windows machine I have verified an iPhone user can connect to this VPN from a different network I have reset the iPad's network settings I have reset the entire iPad and restored settings I have compared my settings w/ a screenshot from the iPad that works and confirmed everything is correct I have used the IP address and domain name of our VPN server in the settings I have tried deleting the VPN settings in the iPad and recreating them I have verified in the logs of VPN server that I'm not even getting to the VPN server (no log entry) I have verified that I cannot VPN from the iPad on separate network (different ISP and router) Are there any other ways to troubleshoot VPN on an iPad?

    Read the article

  • No internet access when I'm connect to my company's VPN

    - by Iago
    I googled my problem and I've read some questions in Ask Ubuntu, but I didn't solve my problem. I connect to a PPTP VPN server and it works well, but when I'm connected to that VPN I don't have Internet access but private network access. If I check "Use this connection only for resources on its network", I have Internet access, but this way I haven't access to my company's private network. What's the problem? Help, please.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >