Search Results

Search found 4206 results on 169 pages for 'equals operator'.

Page 53/169 | < Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >

  • switch linq syntax

    - by scrat789
    var folders = from r in this.bdd.Rights join f in this.bdd.Folders on r.RightFolderId equals f.FolderId join rs in this.bdd.RightSpecs on r.RightSpecId equals rs.SpecIdRight where r.RightUserId == userId where rs.SpecRead == true where rs.SpecWrite == true select f; How transform this linq query in the other syntax? var folders = this.bdd.Rights.Where(r => r.....

    Read the article

  • references in C++

    - by Alexander
    Once I read in a statement that The language feature that "sealed the deal" to include references is operator overloading. Why are references needed to effectively support operator overloading?? Any good explanation?

    Read the article

  • Only error showing is null, rss feed reader not working

    - by Callum
    I have been following a tutorial which is showing me how to create an rssfeed reader, I come to the end of the tutorial; and the feed is not displaying in the listView. So I am looking for errors in logCat, but the only one I can find is one just saying 'null', which is not helpful at all. Can anyone spot a potential problem with the code I have written? Thanks. DirectRSS(main class): package com.example.rssapplication; import java.util.List; import android.app.ListActivity; import android.content.pm.ActivityInfo; import android.os.Bundle; import android.util.Log; import android.widget.ArrayAdapter; import android.widget.ListView; public class DirectRSS extends ListActivity{ @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.directrss); //Set to portrait, so that every time the view changes; it does not run the DB query again... setRequestedOrientation (ActivityInfo.SCREEN_ORIENTATION_PORTRAIT); try{ RssReader1 rssReader = new RssReader1("http://www.skysports.com/rss/0,20514,11661,00.xml"); ListView list = (ListView)findViewById(R.id.list); ArrayAdapter<RssItem1> adapter = new ArrayAdapter<RssItem1>(this, android.R.layout.simple_list_item_1); list.setAdapter(adapter); list.setOnItemClickListener(new ListListener1(rssReader.getItems(),this)); }catch(Exception e) { String err = (e.getMessage()==null)?"SD Card failed": e.getMessage(); Log.e("sdcard-err2:",err + " " + e.getMessage()); // Log.e("Error", e.getMessage()); Log.e("LOGCAT", "" + e.getMessage()); } } } ListListener1: package com.example.rssapplication; import java.util.List; import android.app.Activity; import android.content.Intent; import android.net.Uri; import android.view.View; import android.widget.AdapterView; import android.widget.AdapterView.OnItemClickListener; public class ListListener1 implements OnItemClickListener{ List<RssItem1> listItems; Activity activity; public ListListener1(List<RssItem1> listItems, Activity activity) { this.listItems = listItems; this.activity = activity; } @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> parent, View view, int pos, long id) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Intent i = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_VIEW); i.setData(Uri.parse(listItems.get(pos).getLink())); activity.startActivity(i); } } RssItem1: package com.example.rssapplication; public class RssItem1 { private String title; private String link; public String getTitle() { return title; } public void setTitle(String title) { this.title = title; } public String getLink() { return link; } public void setLink(String link) { this.link = link; } } RssParseHandler1: package com.example.rssapplication; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import org.xml.sax.Attributes; import org.xml.sax.SAXException; import org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler; public class RssParseHandler1 extends DefaultHandler{ private List<RssItem1> rssItems; private RssItem1 currentItem; private boolean parsingTitle; private boolean parsingLink; public RssParseHandler1(){ rssItems = new ArrayList<RssItem1>(); } public List<RssItem1> getItems(){ return rssItems; } @Override public void startElement(String uri, String localName, String qName, Attributes attributes) throws SAXException { if("item".equals(qName)){ currentItem = new RssItem1(); } else if("title".equals(qName)){ parsingTitle = true; } else if("link".equals(qName)){ parsingLink = true; } // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.startElement(uri, localName, qName, attributes); } @Override public void endElement(String uri, String localName, String qName) throws SAXException { if("item".equals(qName)){ rssItems.add(currentItem); currentItem = null; } else if("title".equals(qName)){ parsingTitle = false; } else if("link".equals(qName)){ parsingLink = false; } // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.endElement(uri, localName, qName); } @Override public void characters(char[] ch, int start, int length) throws SAXException { if(parsingTitle) { if(currentItem!=null) { currentItem.setTitle(new String(ch,start,length)); } } else if(parsingLink) { if(currentItem!=null) { currentItem.setLink(new String(ch,start,length)); parsingLink = false; } } // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.characters(ch, start, length); } } RssReader1: package com.example.rssapplication; import java.util.List; import javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser; import javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory; public class RssReader1 { private String rssUrl; public RssReader1(String rssUrl) { this.rssUrl = rssUrl; } public List<RssItem1> getItems() throws Exception { SAXParserFactory factory = SAXParserFactory.newInstance(); SAXParser saxParser = factory.newSAXParser(); RssParseHandler1 handler = new RssParseHandler1(); saxParser.parse(rssUrl, handler); return handler.getItems(); } } Here is the logCat also: 08-25 11:13:20.803: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.803: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.803: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.813: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.813: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.813: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.813: W/ApplicationPackageManager(26291): getCSCPackageItemText() 08-25 11:13:20.843: D/AbsListView(26291): Get MotionRecognitionManager 08-25 11:13:20.843: E/sdcard-err2:(26291): SD Card failed null 08-25 11:13:20.843: E/LOGCAT(26291): null 08-25 11:13:20.843: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:20.843: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.873: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 0 08-25 11:13:20.883: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.903: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.933: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.963: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:20.973: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:21.323: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called 08-25 11:13:21.333: D/AbsListView(26291): onVisibilityChanged() is called, visibility : 4 08-25 11:13:21.333: D/AbsListView(26291): unregisterIRListener() is called

    Read the article

  • NHibernate and objects with value-semantics

    - by Groo
    Problem: If I pass a class with value semantics (Equals method overridden) to NHibernate, NHibernate tries to save it to db even though it just saved an entity equal by value (but not by reference) to the database. What am I doing wrong? Here is a simplified example model for my problem: Let's say I have a Person entity and a City entity. One thread (producer) is creating new Person objects which belong to a specific existing City, and another thread (consumer) is saving them to a repository (using NHibernate as DAL). Since there is lot of objects being flushed at a time, I am using Guid.Comb id's to ensure that each insert is made using a single SQL command. City is an object with value-type semantics (equal by name only -- for this example purposes only): public class City : IEquatable<City> { public virtual Guid Id { get; private set; } public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual bool Equals(City other) { if (other == null) return false; return this.Name == other.Name; } public override bool Equals(object obj) { return Equals(obj as City); } public override int GetHashCode() { return this.Name.GetHashCode(); } } Fluent NH mapping is something like: public class PersonMap : ClassMap<Person> { public PersonMap() { Id(x => x.Id) .GeneratedBy.GuidComb(); References(x => x.City) .Cascade.SaveUpdate(); } } public class CityMap : ClassMap<City> { public CityMap() { Id(x => x.Id) .GeneratedBy.GuidComb(); Map(x => x.Name); } } Right now (with my current NHibernate mapping config), my consumer thread maintains a dictionary of cities and replaces their references in incoming person objects (otherwise NHibernate will see a new, non-cached City object and try to save it as well), and I need to do it for every produced Person object. Since I have implemented City class to behave like a value type, I hoped that NHibernate would compare Cities by value and not try to save them each time -- i.e. I would only need to do a lookup once per session and not care about them anymore. Is this possible, and if yes, what am I doing wrong here?

    Read the article

  • How do i cast an object to a string when object is not a string?

    - by acidzombie24
    I have class A, B, C. They all can implicitly convert to a string public static implicit operator A(string sz_) { ... return sz; } I have code that does this object AClassWhichImplicitlyConvertsToString { ... ((KnownType)(String)AClassWhichImplicitlyConvertsToString).KnownFunc() } The problem is, AClassWhichImplicitlyConvertsToString isnt a string even though it can be typecast into one implicitly. I get a bad cast exception. How do i say its ok as long as the class has an operator to convert into a string?

    Read the article

  • Reading three words and sorting them in lexicographic order

    - by Derrick
    I am trying to create a program that asks the User to type three words and sort them in lexicographic order. EXAMPLE; Enter three words separated by spaces: Pear Orange Apple Apple Orange Pear The program is working fine (if I attempt the above example) except for one type of combination example that I will show below. EXAMPLE; Enter three words separated by spaces: Orange Apple Pear Apple Pear Pear The program is skipping the first word (Orange) if it is supposed to appear in the middle of the three words. I believe that this line of code is affecting the program because it says that "this assigned value is never used" but I'm not sure how to fix it since I'm still an entry Java learner. middle = firstWord; Because of that line being unused, it's why Pear appeared twice. import java.util.*; public static void main(String[] args) { Scanner wordInput = new Scanner(System.in); String firstWord; String secondWord; String thirdWord; System.out.println("Enter three words separated by spaces: "); firstWord = wordInput.next(); secondWord = wordInput.next(); thirdWord = wordInput.next(); String top = firstWord; String bottom = firstWord; if( top.compareTo(secondWord) > 0) { top = secondWord; } if( top.compareTo(thirdWord) > 0) { top = thirdWord; } if( bottom.compareTo(secondWord) < 0) { bottom = secondWord; } if( bottom.compareTo(thirdWord) < 0) { bottom = thirdWord; } String middle; if( !firstWord.equals(bottom) && !firstWord.equals(top) ) { middle = firstWord; } if( !secondWord.equals(bottom) && !secondWord.equals(top) ) { middle = secondWord; } else { middle = thirdWord; } System.out.println( top ); System.out.println( middle ); System.out.println( bottom ); } } Does anyone what I am missing or doing wrong? :( Please and thank you for any help!

    Read the article

  • overloading new/delete problem

    - by hidayat
    This is my scenario, Im trying to overload new and delete globally. I have written my allocator class in a file called allocator.h. And what I am trying to achieve is that if a file is including this header file, my version of new and delete should be used. So in a header file "allocator.h" i have declared the two functions extern void* operator new(std::size_t size); extern void operator delete(void *p, std::size_t size); I the same header file I have a class that does all the allocator stuff, class SmallObjAllocator { ... }; I want to call this class from the new and delete functions and I would like the class to be static, so I have done this: template<unsigned dummy> struct My_SmallObjectAllocatorImpl { static SmallObjAllocator myAlloc; }; template<unsigned dummy> SmallObjAllocator My_SmallObjectAllocatorImpl<dummy>::myAlloc(DEFAULT_CHUNK_SIZE, MAX_OBJ_SIZE); typedef My_SmallObjectAllocatorImpl<0> My_SmallObjectAllocator; and in the cpp file it looks like this: allocator.cc void* operator new(std::size_t size) { std::cout << "using my new" << std::endl; if(size > MAX_OBJ_SIZE) return malloc(size); else return My_SmallObjectAllocator::myAlloc.allocate(size); } void operator delete(void *p, std::size_t size) { if(size > MAX_OBJ_SIZE) free(p); else My_SmallObjectAllocator::myAlloc.deallocate(p, size); } The problem is when I try to call the constructor for the class SmallObjAllocator which is a static object. For some reason the compiler are calling my overloaded function new when initializing it. So it then tries to use My_SmallObjectAllocator::myAlloc.deallocate(p, size); which is not defined so the program crashes. So why are the compiler calling new when I define a static object? and how can I solve it?

    Read the article

  • apply $expand to service operation

    - by Thurein
    Hi, I have a service operation in my dataservice, which returns a list of objects. Is it possible to apply $expand to the result. [WebGet] public IQueryable<contact> GetFilterByContactDetailCount(String city) { var result = from c in CurrentDataSource.Contacts join ca in CurrentDataSource.ContactAddresses on c.ContactID equals ca.ContactID join a in CurrentDataSource.Addresses on ca.AddressID equals a.AddressID where (String.IsNullOrEmpty(city) || a.City.Contains(city))) select c; return result.AsQueryable<Contact>(); } Thanks Thurein

    Read the article

  • Cannot convert lamda expression

    - by Kirsty White
    If I try: Groups = students.Remove(f => f.StudentID.Equals(studentID)); I get an error on this line: f => f.StudentID.Equals(studentID) I am having difficulty from my previous posts here linq deleted users still associated with groups and here Delete method in WCF So I thought maybe I could delete the students contained within groups but I get an error Cannot convert lamda expression to type Student because it is not a delegate type.

    Read the article

  • LinkedList.contains execution speed

    - by Le_Coeur
    Why Methode LinkedList.contains() runs quickly than such implementation: for (String s : list) if (s.equals(element)) return true; return false; I don't see great difference between this to implementations(i consider that search objects aren't nulls), same iterator and equals operation

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL left outer joins

    - by César
    Is this query equivalent to a LEFT OUTER join? var rows = from a in query join s in context.ViewSiteinAdvise on a.Id equals s.SiteInAdviseId where a.Order == s.Order select new {....}; I tried this but it did not result from s in ViewSiteinAdvise join q in query on s.SiteInAdviseId equals q.Id into sa from a in sa.DefaultIfEmpty() where s.Order == a.Order select new {s,a} I need all columns from View

    Read the article

  • string.format vs + for string concatenatoin

    - by AMissico
    Which is better in respect to performance and memory utilization? // + Operator oMessage.Subject = "Agreement, # " + sNumber + ", Name: " + sName; // String.Format oMessage.Subject = string.Format("Agreement, # {0}, Name: {1}", sNumber, sName); My preference is memory utilization. The + operator is used throughout the application. String.Format and StringBuilder is rarely use. I want to reduce the amount of memory fragmentation caused by excessive string allocations.

    Read the article

  • Is there a way for a user to disable an AlertDialog completely?

    - by NewGuyChris
    In the app I'm making, I have an "if" statement where if two strings are saved to a certain string, an AlertDialog pops up. These strings will stay the same for some users, thus having this AlertDialog constantly pop up whenever they launch the activity where the ALertDialog is set to appear. Code (I have no setNegativeButton as of yet): private void SetWarning() { AlertDialog.Builder alert = new AlertDialog.Builder(this); alert.setTitle("Warning!"); alert.setMessage(R.string.Warning); alert.setPositiveButton("Ok", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int whichButton) { //No action needed; just close the AlertDialog. } }); alert.show(); } Here is a segment of my code that makes this AlertDialog appear: SharedPreferences sharedPreferences = getSharedPreferences("MY_PREF", MODE_PRIVATE); String s = sharedPreferences2.getString("MEM1", ""); String s2 = sharedPreferences2.getString("MEM2", ""); if(s.equals("String1") && s2.equals("String2")) SetWarning(); Is there a way to make an "alert.setNegativeButton" method where if the user clicks it, the AlertDialog will NEVER appear again? I'm thinking of maybe somehow implementing another SavedPreferences somehow so it saves the users selection and will then prevent the AlertDialog from ever appearing again. So far, to no luck. I've searched to find nothing, other than people asking how to disable buttons in an AlertDialog. Thank you! New updated code: alert.setNegativeButton("Cancel", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int whichButton) { //set sharedpreferences boolean called DONTSHOWAGAIN to true; SharedPreferences sharedPreferences2 = getSharedPreferences("MY_PREF", MODE_PRIVATE); Boolean dontShowAgain = sharedPreferences2.getBoolean("dontShowAgain ", false); SharedPreferences.Editor ed = sharedPreferences2.edit(); ed.putBoolean("dontShowAgain", true); ed.commit(); } }); alert.show(); } private void StringWarning() { SharedPreferences sharedPreferences2 = getSharedPreferences("MY_PREF", MODE_PRIVATE); String s = sharedPreferences2.getString("MEM1", ""); String s2 = sharedPreferences2.getString("MEM2", ""); if(s.equals("String1") && s2.equals("String2")){ if(!dontShowAgain){ SetWarningExamConflict(); } }

    Read the article

  • Is this the best approach using generics to check for nulls

    - by user294747
    public static T IsNull<T>(object value, T defaultValue) { turn ((Object.Equals(value,null)) | (Object.Equals(value,DBNull.Value)) ? defaultValue : (T)value); } public static T IsNull<T>(object value) where T :new() { T defaultvalue = new T(); return IsNull(value, defaultvalue); } Have tested, and can use against data objects, classes and variables. Just want to know if there is better way to go about this.

    Read the article

  • c#: can you use a boolean predicate as the parameter to an if statement?

    - by Craig Johnston
    In C#, can you use a boolean predicate on its own as the parameter for an if statement? eg: string str = "HELLO"; if (str.Equals("HELLO")) { Console.WriteLine("HELLO"); } Will this code output "HELLO", or does it need to be: string str = "HELLO"; if (str.Equals("HELLO") == true) { Console.WriteLine("HELLO"); } If there is anything else wrong with the above code segments, please point it out.

    Read the article

  • Type hinting for functions in Clojure

    - by mikera
    I'm trying to resolve a reflection warning in Clojure that seems to result from the lack of type inference on function return values that are normal Java objects. Trivial example code that demonstrates the issue: (set! *warn-on-reflection* true) (defn foo [#^Integer x] (+ 3 x)) (.equals (foo 2) (foo 2)) => Reflection warning, NO_SOURCE_PATH:10 - call to equals can't be resolved. true What is the best way to solve this? Can this be done with type hints?

    Read the article

  • h:selectOneMenu not populating a 'selected' item

    - by dann.dev
    I'm having trouble with an h:selectOneMenu not having a selected item when there is already something set on the backing bean. I am using seam and have specified a customer converter. When working on my 'creation' page, everything works fine, something from the menu can be selected, and when the page is submitted, the correct value is assigned and persisted to the database as well. However when I work on my 'edit' page the menu's default selection is not the current selection. i have gone through and confirmed that something is definitely set etc. My selectOneMenu looks like this: <h:selectOneMenu id="selVariable" value="#{customer.variableLookup}" converter="#{variableLookupConverter}"> <s:selectItems var="source" value="#{customerReferenceHelper.variableLookups()}" label="#{source.name}" /> </h:selectOneMenu> And the converter is below. It very simple and just turns the id from string to int and back etc: @Name( "sourceOfWealthLookupConverter" ) public class SourceOfWealthLookupConverter implements Serializable, Converter { @In private CustomerReferenceHelper customerReferenceHelper; @Override public Object getAsObject( FacesContext arg0, UIComponent arg1, String arg2 ) { VariableLookup variable= null; try { if ( "org.jboss.seam.ui.NoSelectionConverter.noSelectionValue".equals( arg2 ) ) { return null; } CustomerReferenceHelper customerReferenceHelper = ( CustomerReferenceHelper ) Contexts.getApplicationContext().get( "customerReferenceHelper" ); Integer id = Integer.parseInt( arg2 ); source = customerReferenceHelper.getVariable( id ); } catch ( NumberFormatException e ) { log.error( e, e ); } return variable; } @Override public String getAsString( FacesContext arg0, UIComponent arg1, Object arg2 ) { String result = null; VariableLookup variable= ( VariableLookup ) arg2; Integer id = variable.getId(); result = String.valueOf( id ); return result; } } I've seen a few things about it possibly being the equals() method on the class, (that doesn't add up with everything else working, but I overrode it anyway as below, where the hashcode is just the id (id is a unique identifier for each item). Equals method: @Override public boolean equals( Object other ) { if ( other == null ) { return false; } if ( this == other ) { return true; } if ( !( other instanceof VariableLookup ) ) { return false; } VariableLookup otherVariable = ( VariableLookup ) other; if ( this.hashCode() == otherVariable.hashCode() ) { return true; } return false; } I'm at my wits end with this, I can't find what I could have missed?! Any help would be much appreciated

    Read the article

  • If I never ever use HashSet, should I still implement GetHashCode?

    - by Dimitri C.
    I never need to store objects in a hash table. The reason is twofold: coming up with a good hash function is difficult and error prone. an AVL tree is almost always fast enough, and it merely requires a strict order predicate, which is much easier to implement. The Equals() operation on the other hand is a very frequently used function. Therefore I wonder whether it is necessary to implement GetHashCode (which I never need) when implementing the Equals function (which I often need)?

    Read the article

  • C++: How to require that one template type is derived from the other

    - by Will
    In a comparison operator: template<class R1, class R2> bool operator==(Manager<R1> m1, Manager<R2> m2) { return m1.internal_field == m2.internal_field; } Is there any way I could enforce that R1 and R2 must have a supertype or subtype relation? That is, I'd like to allow either R1 to be derived from R2, or R2 to be derived from R1, but disallow the comparison if R1 and R2 are unrelated types.

    Read the article

  • c++ template and its element type

    - by David
    This is my template matrix class: template<typename T> class Matrix { public: .... Matrix<T> operator / (const T &num); } However, in my Pixel class, I didn't define the Pixel/Pixel operator at all! Why in this case, the compiler still compiles?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60  | Next Page >