Search Results

Search found 1848 results on 74 pages for 'printf'.

Page 60/74 | < Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >

• string reverse without new array

  - by Codeguru

  hi can anybody tell me the error in this? #include<stdio.h> int main() { char a[]="abcdefgh"; int i=0; int n=strlen(a); char *first; char *second; char *c; *first=a[0]; *second=a[7]; for(i=0;i<=n/2;i++) { *c=*first; *first=*second; *second=*c; first++; second--; } for(i=0;i<=7;i++) { printf("%c",a[i]); } }

  Read the article

• Limited recursion in C?

  - by function

  I ran this program and it output ... 65088 65089 65090 and then it stopped. Windows 7 said a.exe stopped working. Here is the code: #include <stdio.h> void go(void); main() { go(); } void go(void) { static int i = 0; printf("%d\n", i++); go(); } I think this program should keep on printing numbers indefinitely due to recursion, but it stops at 65090! The C code is compiled with gcc. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Reading from a file into an array in c

  - by NaNa21

  My file contains a series of numbers (integer, float, integer, float ....), each written on a separate line. The numbers of columns are different from one line to another i.e. 1 2.45 3 1.75 5 3.45 7 2.55 9 3.25 6 1.75 4 3.55 6 2.55 9 2.45 The program should read the contents of the entire file and place the data into an array of type float with an entry for each line. Here is my basic solution, but this is only suitable if I have fixed no of columns. float Read(FILE *pFile) { char line[50]; char letter[5]; fi = fopen("file.txt", "r"); while (fgets(line,200,fi)!=NULL) { sscanf(line,"%f %f %f",&a[i], &a2[i],&a3[i]); printf("%2.0f %2.5f %2.0f\n",a[i],a2[i],a3[i]); } fclose(fi); return a[i]; } Please HELP.

  Read the article

• Bash file descriptor leak

  - by Charles Duffy

  I get a file descriptor leak when running the following code: function get_fd_count() { local fds cd /proc/$$/fd; fds=( * ) # avoid a StackOverflow source colorizer bug echo "${#fds[@]}" } function fd_leak_func() { echo ">> Current FDs: $(get_fd_count)" read retval new_state < <(set +e; new_state=$(echo foo); retval=$?; printf "%d %s\n" $retval $new_state) } function parent_func() { while fd_leak_func; do :; done } parent_func Tested on both 3.2.25 and 4.0.28. Taking the while loop out of parent_func and running it at top level makes the problem go away. What's going on here? More to the point, are workarounds available?

  Read the article

• Unexpected output on initializing array by using both `element-by-element` & `designated` technique

  - by haccks

  C99 provides a feature to initialize arrays by using both element-by-element & designated method together as: int a[] = {2,1,[3] = 5,[5] = 9,6,[8] = 4}; On running the code: #include <stdio.h> int main() { int a[] = {2,1,[3] = 5,[0] = 9,4,[6] = 25}; for(int i = 0; i < sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]); i++) printf("%d ",a[i]); return 0; } (Note that Element 0 is initialized to 2 and then again initialised by designator [0] to 9) I was expecting that element 0(which is 2) will be replaced by 9(as designator [0] = 9) and hence o/p will become 9 1 0 5 4 0 25 Unfortunately I was wrong as o/p came; 9 4 0 5 0 0 25 Any explanation for unexpected o/p?

  Read the article

• How to insert data in mysql data base table

  - by user1289538

  I am inserting data in MySQL data base but in field it does not insert data. I am using following code $providernpi=$_POST['ProviderNPI']; $patienid=$_POST['PatientID']; $fileurl=$_POST['FileURL']; $filetype=$_POST['FileTYPE']; $datasynid=$_POST['DataSynID']; $appointmentlistingsid=$_POST ['AppointmentListingsID']; $query=("INSERT INTO AppointmentDataSync (ProviderNPI,PatientID, FileURL,FileType,DataSyncID,AppointmentListingsID) VALUES ('$providernpi', '$patientid','$fileurl','$filetype','$datasynid','$appointmentlistingid')"); mysql_query($query,$con); printf("Records inserted: %d\n", mysql_affected_rows()); echo($patienid) ?>

  Read the article

• Why the streams in C++?

  - by oh boy

  As you all know there are libraries using streams such as iostream and fstream. My question is: Why streams? Why didn't they stick with functions similar to print, fgets and so on (for example)? They require their own operators << and >> but all they do could be implemented in simple functions like above, also the function printf("Hello World!"); is a lot more readable and logical to me than cout << "Hello World"; I also think that all of those string abstractions in C++ all compile down to (less efficient) standard function calls in binary.

  Read the article

• perror() give seg. fault

  - by Jack

  After an error occurs, I call perror(), naturally. But I'm getting a segmentation fault when I do this or printf("error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); I have no idea what is happing. int fd; if((fd = open(FILENAME, O_RDONLY)) == -1) { perror("fbi"); exit(1); } for(;;) { readed = read(fd, buffer, BUFSIZE); if(readed == 0) break; if(readed == -1) { perror("fbi"); // <- here's the error exit(1); } How to fix this?

  Read the article

• Pointers in C with binary file

  - by darkie15

  Hi All, I am reading the contents of the file using fread into an char array. But I am not sure why it is not getting printed in the output. Here is the code: void getInfo(FILE* inputFile) { char chunk[4]; int liIndex; for (liIndex = 0 ; liIndex < 4 ; liIndex++) { fread(chunk, sizeof(char), 4, inputFile); } printf("\n chunk %s", chunk); } Output prints nothing at all. Where am I going wrong? Regards , darkie

  Read the article

• How to open a text file that's not in the same folder?

  - by nunos

  Since C it's not a language I am used to program with, I don't know how to do this. I have a project folder where I have all the .c and .h files and a conf folder under which there is a config.txt file to read. How can I open that? FILE* fp = fopen("/conf/config.txt"); if (fp != NULL) { //do stuff } else printf("couldn't open file\n"); I keep getting the error message. Why? Thanks.

  Read the article

• What is the problem with this code?

  - by eSKay

  #include<stdio.h> class A { public: int a;}; class B: public A { public: static int b; B(){ b++; printf("B:%d\n",b); } }; int main() { A* a1 = new B[100]; A* a2 = new B(); return 0; } Error: In function `main': undefined reference to `B::b' undefined reference to `B::b' undefined reference to `B::b' undefined reference to `B::b'

  Read the article

• c language:make fgets to keep taking input until I press enter twice?

  - by wello horld

  hi I would like to ask how I would modify this code for the question: (It only accepts one input then prints it out. I want it to keep going until I hit enter (\n) twice. #include <stdio.h> #define MAXLENGTH 1000 int main(void) { char string[MAXLENGTH]; fgets(string, MAXLENGTH, stdin ); printf("%s\n", string); return 0; } I'm confused at the fgets(string, MAXLENGTH, stdin ); line, what does stdin mean/do?

  Read the article

• poll(2) doesn't empty the event queue

  - by sasayins

  Hi, Im using linux as my programming platform. I am using poll(2) to know if my device is triggering an event. The first call of poll is ok, it blocks and wait for the event to happen. But in the second poll function call, it will return but it capture the event. Below are my code ret = poll( fds, 1, 2000); //2 secs timeout if( fds[0].revents & POLLIN && ret > 0) { printf("event occur\n"); } It seems the queue/buffer is not empty, im just assuming. What do you think is the problem? Thanks.

  Read the article

• CString a = "Hello " + "World!"; Is it possible?

  - by Sanctus2099

  I'm making my own string class and I was wondering if there's any way to replace the compiler behaviour around " characters. As I said in the title I'd like to make it so that CString a = "Hello " + "World!"; would actually work and not give a compiler error telling that it can't add 2 pointers. My string class automatically converts to char* when needed and thus writing printf(a) would not break the code. I'm sure this is a rather weird question but if it's possible I'd really like to know how to do it. Thank you very much

  Read the article

• C Different answers for a variable when running 'Debug' and 'Start without debug'

  - by Craz

  I keep getting this weird output from my code everytime I use the 'start without degugging' (ctrl-F5) as opposed to normal 'debug' (F5). When I try to find the following value of norm_differnece in debug (pressing F5) mode, it gives me the correct answer for norm_difference normdifference = 1.000000 but in 'start without debugging' (pressing ctrl-f5) the wrong output normdifference = 1456816083547664100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.000000 The following is a segment of code which is gives the output Note: X[] = is a array of stored DOUBLE values for(i=0;i<n;i++){ sum_difference += (pow((X[i*n]-X[i]),2)); } norm_difference = sqrt(norm_difference); for(i=0;i<n;i++){ sum_norm_1 += pow(X[i],2); } norm_1 = sqrt(norm_1); //Take square root of the sum of squares for the row printf("normdifference = %f \n norm_1 = %f \n",norm_difference,norm_1);

  Read the article

• Can func get the lineno who call itself? (C/C++)

  - by kingkai

  Hi, I've a problem , as the following code discribe itself. 1 #include<stdlib.h> 2 #include<stdio.h> 3 void log() 4 { 5 printf("Log [Line:%d]\n",__LINE__); 6 } 7 int main() 8 { 9 log(); 10 log(); 11 } The expected result is Log [Line:9] Log [Line:10] But, the fact is Log [Line:5] Log [Line:5] No surprising, LINE has been substituted at the pre-process stage as 5. My Question is, how to design the log function to get the expected result? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Why is this simple hello world code segfaulting?

  - by socks

  Excuse the beginner level of this question. I have the following simple code, but it does not seem to run. It gets a segmentation fault. If I replace the pointer with a simple call to the actual variable, it runs fine... I'm not sure why. struct node { int x; struct node *left; struct node *right; }; int main() { struct node *root; root->x = 42; printf("Hello world. %d", root->x); getchar(); return 0; } What is wrong with this code?

  Read the article

• to store char* from function return value

  - by samprat

  Hi folks, I am trying to implement a function which reads from Serial Port ( Linux) and retuns char*. The function works fine but how would I store return value from function. example of function is char *ReadToSerialPort() { char *bufptr; char buffer[256]; // Input buffer/ / //char *bufptr; // Current char in buffer // int nbytes; // Number of bytes read // bufptr = buffer; while ((nbytes = read(fd, bufptr, buffer+sizeof(buffer)-bufptr -1 )) > 0) { bufptr += nbytes; // if (bufptr[-1] == '\n' || bufptr[-1] == '\r') /*if ( bufptr[sizeof(buffer) -1] == '*' && bufptr[0] == '$' ) { break; }*/ } // while ends if ( nbytes ) return bufptr; else return 0; *bufptr = '\0'; } // end ReadAdrPort //In main int main( int argc , char *argv[]) { char *letter; if(strcpy(letter, ReadToSerialPort()) >0 ) { printf("Response is %s\n",letter); } }

  Read the article

• Macros giving problems with dladdr()

  - by Veger

  I have implemented tracing behavior using the -finstrument-functions option of gcc and this (simplified) code: void __cyg_profile_func_enter(void *this_fn, void *call_site) { Dl_info di; if(dladdr(this_fn, &di)) printf("entered %s\n", (di.dli_sname?di_dli_sname:"<unknown>")); } This works great, except for one thing: macros are processed as well, but the function prints the information of the function which contains the macro. So functions containing macros have their information printed multiple times (which is of course undesired). Is there anything to detect that a macro is being processed? Or is is possible to turn off instrumenting macros at all? PS Same problems occur with sizeof()

  Read the article

• Structs and pointers

  - by user1763861

  I have a few questions about structs and pointers For this struct: typedef struct tNode_t { char *w; } tNode; How come if I want to change/know the value of *w I need to use t.w = "asdfsd" instead of t->w = "asdfasd"? And I compiled this successfully without having t.w = (char *) malloc(28*sizeof(char)); in my testing code, is there a reason why tt's not needed? Sample main: int main() { tNode t; char w[] = "abcd"; //t.word = (char *) malloc(28*sizeof(char)); t.word = w; printf("%s", t.word); } Thanks.

  Read the article

• Inconsistent behaviour from SDL_BlitSurface

  - by bardes

  Here is an example code: #include <SDL/SDL.h> #include <SDL/SDL_image.h> #include <stdio.h> int main() { if(SDL_Init(SDL_INIT_EVERYTHING) == -1) { printf("SDL ERROR: %s", SDL_GetError()); return 1; } SDL_Surface *screen; screen = SDL_SetVideoMode(128, 128, 32, SDL_SWSURFACE); SDL_Surface *img; img = IMG_Load("./debug.png"); SDL_BlitSurface(img, NULL, screen, NULL); SDL_Flip(screen); SDL_Delay(1000); SDL_FreeSurface(img); SDL_Quit(); return 0; } It compiles fine, but when I run it sometimes it works and most times only part of the image is displayed. I really can't imagine what's causing that... EDIT: This is the image I'm using to test the program: http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3858/debugi.png

  Read the article

• function declaration

  - by robUK

  Hello, gcc 4.1.2 c89 I am reviewing some code and I have come across the following function. I have never seen a function declared like this before. There are no data types for the paraemeters. My best guess is that the function is using a list of data types separated by semi-colons. The return type seems to be returning a function with those parameters. However, the read function is not defined anywhere. What is the advantage and purpose of declaring a function like this? Many thanks for any advice, int my_read(fd, ptr, cnt) int fd; char *ptr; unsigned cnt; { printf("Read\n"); return(read(fd, ptr, cnt)); }

  Read the article

• Can typeid() be used to pass a function?

  - by Kerb_z

  I tried this and got the output as: void Please explain the following Code: #include <cstdio> #include <typeinfo> using namespace std ; void foo() { } int main(void) { printf("%s", typeid(foo()).name());// Please notice this line, is it same as typeid( ).name() ? return 0; } AFAIK: The typeid operator allows the type of an object to be determined at run time. So, does this sample code tell us that a function that returns void is of *type void*. I mean a function is a method and has no type. Correct?

  Read the article

• Is this syntactically correct?

  - by Borrito

  I have code in one of the source file as follows: #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> int a ; int b = 256 ; int c = 16 ; int d = 4 ; int main() { if ((d <= (b) && (d == ( c / sizeof(a)))) { printf("%d",sizeof(a) ); } return 0; } I have removed the casts and have simplified on the data names. The sizeof(a) can be taken as 4. I want to know if the the if syntax is a valid one and if so why doesn't it execute? PS : I haven't sat down on this for long due to time constraints. Pardon me if you find a childish error in the code.

  Read the article

• Why the gtk windows hangs?

  - by httpinterpret

  void forloop2() { int i = 0; while(TRUE) { printf("forloop2\n"); } } int main() { GtkWidget *window; g_thread_init(NULL); gdk_threads_init(); g_thread_create((GThreadFunc)forloop2, NULL, FALSE, NULL); gtk_init(NULL, NULL); window = gtk_window_new(GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL); gtk_widget_show_all (window); gtk_main(); } It seems the created thread affects gtk_window_new(my programe hangs here), how do I do it correctly?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67  | Next Page >