Search Results

Search found 23792 results on 952 pages for 'void pointers'.

Page 698/952 | < Previous Page | 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705  | Next Page >

  • can we use layout in Customview ?

    - by UMMA
    friends, i have a custom view class public class Zoom extends View { private Drawable image; private int zoomControler=20; public Zoom(Context context) { super(context); image=context.getResources().getDrawable(R.drawable.icon); setFocusable(true); } @Override protected void onDraw(Canvas canvas) { super.onDraw(canvas); //TransparentPanel tp = new TransparentPanel(this.getContext()); //Button MyButton = new Button(this.getContext()); //MyButton.setText("Press me"); //tp.addView(MyButton); image.setBounds((getWidth()/2)-zoomControler, (getHeight()/2)-zoomControler, (getWidth()/2)+zoomControler, (getHeight()/2)+zoomControler); image.draw(canvas); } } can i use SetContentView(R.layout.mylayout) in this custom view to display that design? or how can i display button with image ondraw method as i have commented the code ? any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Print number series in java

    - by user1898282
    I have to print the series shown below in java: ***1*** **2*2** *3*3*3* 4*4*4*4 My current implementation is: public static void printSeries(int number,int numberOfCharsinEachLine){ String s="*"; for(int i=1;i<=number;i++){ int countOfs=(numberOfCharsinEachLine-(i)-(i-1))/2; if(countOfs<0){ System.out.println("Can't be done"); break; } for(int j=0;j<countOfs;j++){ System.out.print(s); } System.out.print(i); for(int k=1;k<i;k++){ System.out.print(s); System.out.print(i); } for(int j=0;j<countOfs;j++){ System.out.print(s); } System.out.println(); } } But there are lot of for loops, so I'm wondering whether this can be done in a better way or not?

    Read the article

  • typedef fixed length array

    - by Rajorshi
    Hi, I have to define a 24-bit data type.I am using char[3] to represent the type. Can I typedef char[3] to type24? I tried it in a code sample. I put typedef char[3] type42; in my header file. The compiler did not complain about it. But when I defined a function void foo(type24 val) {} in my C file, it did complain. I would like to be able to define functions like type24_to_int32(type24 val) instead of type24_to_int32(char value[3]).

    Read the article

  • how do i close a frame yet open a new frame?(revisited)

    - by altvali
    I'm new at Java and I'm trying to do what the title says, my application has page A, a jpanel with some controls and a specific button, and when the user clicks the button i want page A to disappear and page B to appear (page B has controls that depend on the choices that are made by the user on page A). This has been asked before but there was no satisfactory answer. In the ActionListener implementation, namely public void ActionPerformed(ActionEvent e) from my jpanelForPageA class i can comfortably write this.setVisible(false), but how can i set page B to a visible state?

    Read the article

  • what means "not enclossing class" hier in scala

    - by echo
    Hoi ,i am learning scala and trying to translate some java code to scala. Here are some of the code below in java that I want to translate public class Note{ protected void addNote(Meeting n) { //add n to a list } } public abstract class Meeting{ public Meeting(String name,Note note){ note.addNote(this) } } when i translate them to scala class Note{ protected[Meeting] addNote(n:Meeting){ //add n to list } } abstract class Meeting(name:String,note:Note){ note.addNote(this) } then i got an error in class Note : Meeting is not a enclossing class. what does it mean? I have tried packagename instead of Meeting,like this:protected[packagename] addNote(n:Meeting) ,but i doesnt work.

    Read the article

  • Override onDraw to change how the drawing occurs (Android)

    - by Casebash
    I want to change how my UI elements display, so I am overriding onDraw. The following code allows me to change a View to be drawn using PorterDuff.Mode.DARKEN. Unfortunately, this method involves creating a bitmap the size of the entire screen, then drawing to it then drawing this large bitmap the main screen again, for each UI element. This isn't at all efficient. Is it possible to achieve this in a more effecient way? @Override protected void onDraw(Canvas canvas) { //TODO: Reduce the burden from multiple drawing Bitmap bitmap=Bitmap.createBitmap(canvas.getWidth(), canvas.getHeight(), Config.ARGB_8888); Log.e("tmp",canvas.getClipBounds().toString()); Canvas offscreen=new Canvas(bitmap); super.onDraw(offscreen); //Then draw onscreen Paint p=new Paint(); p.setXfermode(new PorterDuffXfermode(PorterDuff.Mode.DARKEN)); canvas.drawBitmap(bitmap, 0, 0, p); }

    Read the article

  • How to rotate a figure without moving around the stage(actionscript)

    - by Mister PHP
    package { import flash.display.MovieClip; import flash.events.Event; public class Bullet extends MovieClip { private var mc:MovieClip; public function Bullet() { mc = new MovieClip(); mc.graphics.beginFill(0); mc.graphics.drawRect(120, 120, 40, 40); mc.graphics.endFill(); addChild(mc); addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, onEnterFrame); } private function onEnterFrame(e:Event):void{ mc.rotation += 10; } } } how can i make the rotation of the circle without moving him around the stage, just staying in the place he was before and just rotate, not moving anywhere is that posible?? if you try this code you'll see that the circle is rotating and moving around the stage, so that i don't want, how can i change this?

    Read the article

  • C# Constructor Problem When Using Generics

    - by Jimbo
    Please see an example of my code below: public class ScrollableCheckboxList { public List<ScrollableCheckboxItem> listitems; public void ScrollableCheckboxList<TModel>(IEnumerable<TModel> items, string valueField, string textField, string titleField) where TModel : class { listitems = new List<ScrollableCheckboxItem>(); foreach (TModel item in items) { Type t = typeof(TModel); PropertyInfo[] props = new [] { t.GetProperty(textField), t.GetProperty(valueField), t.GetProperty(titleField) }; listitems.Add(new ScrollableCheckboxItem { text = props[0].GetValue(item, null).ToString(), value = props[1].GetValue(item, null).ToString(), title = props[2].GetValue(item, null).ToString() }); } } } The code produces the following error: 'ScrollableCheckboxList': member names cannot be the same as their enclosing type This clearly means that there is a method in the class that has the same name as the class, but usually insinuates that the method is trying to return something (which is not allowed) In my case, all I have done is declare a constructor - why would this be a problem?

    Read the article

  • boost::this_thread::disable_interruption usage confusion

    - by Evgenii
    boost/thread/pthread/shared_mutex.hpp contains this code: ... #include <boost/thread/detail/thread_interruption.hpp> ... class shared_mutex { ... void lock_shared() { boost::this_thread::disable_interruption do_not_disturb; boost::mutex::scoped_lock lk(state_change); while(state.exclusive || state.exclusive_waiting_blocked) { shared_cond.wait(lk); } ++state.shared_count; } ... }; but boost/thread/detail/thread_interruption.hpp does not contain implementation of disable_interruption, only the prototype. in boost_1_42_0/libs/thread/src/pthread we don't have the implementation too how does it work!???

    Read the article

  • Iphone Orientation Change

    - by SG
    I am trying to implement orientation change functionality in my application.I have overrided -(void) didRotateFromInterfaceOrientation:(UIInterfaceOrientation)fromInterfaceOrientation. In this method i change the frame size of the tableview(including the position of the cell items) which is present in the view. The tableview Details: Added to the view as [self.view addSubView:tableView] in the viewDidLoad method of the view controller; Cell item (row) has a textfield and a segmented control. There are 10 cells in the table view and in landscape mode only 2 cells are visible and in potrait mode 5 cells are visible. I have implemented scroller. Issue: Certain times on changing the orientation to potrait mode certain segmented controls in the cell are not rendered (Not shown at all). This happens when i am viewing the last couple of cells in the landscape mode and i change the orientation to potrait mode.

    Read the article

  • databinding to self without code

    - by jcollum
    I'm building a UserControl in WPF. The control has two properties, Title and Description, that I'd like to bind to two textblocks. Seems real straightforward, and I got it working, but I'm curious about something. To get it to work I had to add this code: void CommandBlock_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { this.DataContext = this; } My bindings look like this: <TextBlock Text="{Binding Title}" Width="100" ... /> <TextBlock Text="{Binding Description}" Width="100" ... /> What I'm wondering is how come I couldn't get it to work without the this.DataContext = this; and instead use DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}" (in the UserControl element of the markup)? I'm sure I'm missing something about DataContexts but don't know what.

    Read the article

  • Passing User Data with SetTimer

    - by GJ
    I am calling SetTimer in a function of a Class. SetTimer(NULL, 0, 10000, (TIMERPROC) TimerCallBack); Where TimerCallBack is: static VOID CALLBACK TimerCallBack(HWND, UINT, UINT, DWORD) Now my need is to call one of the method of class which initiated timer, since TimerCallBack is static it has no access to the class object anymore. I cant find any way to pass object pointer along with the SetTimer so that I can receive it back on Callback function. Is there any other way to achieve this, if its not supported using SetTimer then which other way I can implement this.

    Read the article

  • Simple Thread Programming

    - by mike
    I have started to play with threads in c#, but need now help, here is my code: public partial class Form1 : Form { public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); DoCount(); } public void DoCount() { for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) { objTextBox.Text = i.ToString(); Thread.Sleep(100); } } } its a simple win forms with a textbox, i want to see the "counting", but as you see in my code, the textbox shows me 99, it count till 99 and then shows up.. i`ll think, i have to manage this in a new thread but dont know how!

    Read the article

  • How to check for C++ copy ellision

    - by Steve
    I ran across this article on copy ellision in C++ and I've seen comments about it in the boost library. This is appealing, as I prefer my functions to look like verylargereturntype DoSomething(...) rather than void DoSomething(..., verylargereturntype& retval) So, I have two questions about this Google has virtually no documentation on this at all, how real is this? How can I check that this optimization is actually occuring? I assume it involves looking at the assembly, but lets just say that isn't my strong suit. If anyone can give a very basic example as to what successful ellision looks like, that would be very useful I won't be using copy ellision just to prettify things, but if I can be guaranteed that it works, it sounds pretty useful.

    Read the article

  • How can I put the results of Cursor into String[]. For more detail, please refer to the code below

    - by Hicen
    public class DisplayCustomersActivity extends Activity implements Button.OnClickListener { private SalesDB sdb; private ListView lvDCList; @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.displaycustomers); lvDCList = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.lvDCList); sdb = new SalesDB(this); SQLiteDatabase db = sdb.getReadableDatabase(); Cursor results = db.query(sdb.TABLE_CUSTOMER, new String[] {sdb.CUSTOMER_ID, sdb.CUSTOMER_NAME, sdb.CUSTOMER_GENDER}, null, null, null, null, null); int resultCount = results.getCount(); String[] customers = new String[resultCount]; if (resultCount == 0 || !results.moveToFirst()) { customers = null; } else { for(int i=0; i<resultCount; i++) { //Process results to String array here ... ... results.moveToNext(); } } }

    Read the article

  • Is it possible to have a variadic function in C with no non-variadic parameter?

    - by Tim
    I have the following function: void doStuff(int unusedParameter, ...) { va_list params; va_start(params, unusedParameter); /* ... */ va_end(params); } As part of a refactor, I'd like to remove the unused parameter without otherwise changing the implementation of the function. As far as I can tell, it's impossible to use va_start when you don't have a last non-variadic parameter to refer to. Is there any way around this? Background: It is in fact a C++ program, so I could use some operator-overloading magic as suggested here, but I was hoping not to have to change the interface at this point. The existing function does its work by requiring that the variable argument list be null-terminated, and scanning for the NULL, therefore it doesn't need a leading argument to tell it how many arguments it has.

    Read the article

  • printf'ing a matrix

    - by Flavius
    I'm trying to implement an all-purpose function for printing 2D data. What I've come up with is: int mprintf(FILE* f, char* fmt, void** data, size_t cols, size_t rows) The challenge is determining how many bits to read at once from data, based on fmt. The format fmt is going to be the stdlib's-specific format for printf() and alike. Do you have any knowledge of already-existing features from stdlibc (GNU GCC C's) I could use to ease this up? I try avoiding having to do it all manually, because I know "I am stupid" (I don't want to introduce stupid bugs). Thus, reusing code would be the bug-freest way. Thanks Addendum I see there's a /usr/include/printf.h. Can't I use any of those functions to do it right and ease my job at the same time?

    Read the article

  • Manually manipulating ArrayList

    - by jsan
    I have an assignment where I have to create a deque, however I am not allowed to use any built-in classes or interfaces. I am implementing my deque using an array list. My problem is that when I have to, for instance, add to the beginning of the array list (beginning of the queue), i am not allowed to do this: public void addFirst(ArrayList<Integer> array) { array.add(0, int); } Is there a way to do this without using the add() function? Such as manually adding to the front and shifting the rest of the array to the right? Or maybe creating a new array list and copying...I'm not sure. Any help would be great; I have a bunch of functions to write, and getting the first one done will definitely put me in the right direction. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How can I display more info in an error message when using NUnit Assert in a loop?

    - by Ian
    Consider the following code: [Test] public void WidgetTest() { foreach (Widget widget in widgets) { Assert.AreEqual(0, widget.SomeValue); } } If one of the asserts fails, I will get a very unhelpful error message like the one below: 1) Test Failure : WidgetTest.TestSomeValue Expected: 0 But was: 1 at WidgetTest.TestSomeValue() So, the question is, how can I get NUnit to display more useful info, such as the name of the widget, or the iteration of the loop, etc? Even a line number would be more helpful, since this is run in automated manner and I'd like to be able to spot the failing assert without debugging into the code.

    Read the article

  • Why does the check for an interface fail?

    - by chobo
    I have a class that implements an interface. In another area of the code I check if that class instance contains that interface, but it doesn't work. The check to see if the class contains the interface always fails (false) when it should be true. Below is a simple representation of what I am trying to accomplish. Example public interface IModel { bool validate(); } public class SomeModel : IModel { public SomeModel { } public bool Validate() { return true; } } // Dummy method public void Run() { SomeModel model = new SomeModel(); if (model is IModel) { string message = "It worked"; } else { string message = "It failed"; } }

    Read the article

  • Call an AsyncTask inside a Thread

    - by Arun
    I am working in an android application and I want to call an AsyncTask from my UI main thread. For that I want to call my AsyncTask from a thread. This is the method that I call from my main UI thread. This is working correctly CommonAysnk mobjCommonAysnk = new CommonAysnk(this, 1); mobjCommonAysnk.execute(); CommonAysnk is my AsyncTask class.I want to pass my activity and an integer parameter to the AsyncTask constructor. How can I call this from a thread as shown below method. Thread t = new Thread() { public void run() { try { CommonAysnk mobjCommonAysnk = new CommonAysnk(this, 1); mobjCommonAysnk.execute(); } catch (Exception ex) { }}}; t.start(); When I tried to call it from a Thread and I am not able to pass the activity parameter correctly. How can we sole this. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How to define an array inside a function in C?

    - by Arunav Dev
    So in my source file I have the folowin function: void update(state* old_state, state* measurement, uint32_t size) { state new_state[size]; //some function using measurement and old_state and returning the result in newstate arm_fadd_32(measurement,old_state,newstate,size); // rest of the code } Now the compiler throws an error saying that error#28:expression must have a constant value. I think it's due to the fact that even though inside the method the size local variable is not changing the compiler is expecting a constant while defining the size. I have tried the following: int const a = size; and then tried to reinitialize it says constant value is not known. I did some research in internet and it appears that there is no easier way without using malloc, which I don't want to since I am using the code for some embedded application. Is there a way to avoid this problem without really using malloc? Thanks in advance guys!

    Read the article

  • Settings cell selected background view removes backgroundview

    - by Chris
    I'm trying to set up custom UITableViewCells. I can set the backgroundView no problem, but if I set selectedBackgroundView, the cell's background becomes white and only the selected background is seen: - (void) createCell: (UITableViewCell*)cell onRow: (NSUInteger)row { UIImageView* bgImage = [[UIImageView alloc] initWithImage:[UIImage imageNamed:@"cell_background_red.png"]]; cell.backgroundView = bgImage; cell.selectedBackgroundView = bgImage; cell.textLabel.hidden = YES; UILabel* titleLabel = [[UILabel alloc] initWithFrame: CGRectMake(20, CGRectGetHeight(cell.frame) / 2, 200, 50)]; titleLabel.text = [[self.ruleList objectAtIndex: row] objectForKey: TitleKey]; titleLabel.backgroundColor = [UIColor clearColor]; [cell.contentView addSubview: titleLabel]; }

    Read the article

  • application Crash when assign multiple argu fun to dynamic button

    - by AJPatel
    for (int i=0;i<[tableDataSource count];i++) { NSDictionary *dict = [tableDataSource objectAtIndex:i]; rowText = [dict objectForKey:@"title"]; UIButton *btn = [UIButton buttonWithType: UIButtonTypeRoundedRect]; [btn setTitle:rowText forState:UIControlStateNormal]; [btn addTarget:self action:@selector(myActionbtnText:) forControlEvents:UIControlEventTouchUpInside]; btn.frame = CGRectMake(60, 40+2*(40*i), 200, 40); btn.alpha = 0.81; [self.view addSubview:btn]; } I got error at assign Action to dynamic button MY action is given Below -(void) myAction:(NSString *)btnText; { NSLog(@"%@ Button Clicked",btnText); }

    Read the article

  • C++0x: how to get variadic template parameters without reference?

    - by Sydius
    Given the following contrived (and yes, terrible) example: template<typename... Args> void something(Args... args) { std::tuple<Args...> tuple; // not initializing for sake of example std::get<0>(tuple) = 5; } It works if you call it like so: int x = 10; something<int>(x); However, it does not work if you call it like this: int x = 10; something<int&>(x); Because of the assignment to 5. Assuming that I cannot, for whatever reason, initialize the tuple when it is defined, how might I get this to work when specifying the type as a reference? Specifically, I would like the tuple to be std::tuple<int> even when Args... is int&.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705  | Next Page >