Search Results

Search found 5165 results on 207 pages for 'const cast'.

Page 83/207 | < Previous Page | 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90  | Next Page >

• Evaluation of (de)reference operators

  - by Micha

  I have an (uncommented...) source file which I'm trying to understand. static const Map *gCurMap; static std::vector<Map> mapVec; then auto e = mapVec.end(); auto i = mapVec.begin(); while(i!=e) { // ... const Map *map = gCurMap = &(*(i++)); // ... } I don't understand what &(*(i++)) does. It does not compile when just using i++, but to me it looks the same, because I'm "incrementing" i, then I'm requesting the value at the given address and then I'm requesting the address of this value?!

  Read the article

• Basic C++ code for multiplication of 2 matrix or vectors (C++ beginner)

  - by Ice

  I am a new C++ user and I am also doing a major in Maths so thought I would try implement a simple calculator. I got some code off the internet and now I just need help to multiply elements of 2 matrices or vectors. Matrixf multiply(Matrixf const& left, Matrixf const& right) { // error check if (left.ncols() != right.nrows()) { throw std::runtime_error("Unable to multiply: matrix dimensions not agree."); } /* I have all the other part of the code for matrix*/ /** Now I am not sure how to implement multiplication of vector or matrix.**/ Matrixf ret(1, 1); return ret; }

  Read the article

• how to use replace_regex_copy() from boost::algorithm library?

  - by Vincenzo

  This is my code: #include <string> #include <boost/algorithm/string/regex.hpp> string f(const string& s) { using namespace boost::algorithm; return replace_regex_copy(s, "\\w", "?"); } This is what compiler says: no matching function for call to ‘replace_regex_copy(const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&, std::string, std::string) The link to the library: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/doc/html/boost/algorithm/replace_regex_copy.html Could anyone please help? Thanks! ps. Boost library is in place, since other functions from it work fine.

  Read the article

• does overload operator-> a compile time action?

  - by Brent

  when I tried to compile the code: struct S { void func2() {} }; class O { public: inline S* operator->() const; private: S* ses; }; inline S* O::operator->() const { return ses; } int main() { O object; object->func(); return 0; } there is a compile error reported: D:\code>g++ operatorp.cpp -S -o operatorp.exe operatorp.cpp: In function `int main()': operatorp.cpp:27: error: 'struct S' has no member named 'func' it seems that invoke the overloaded function of "operator-" is done during compile time? I'd add "-S" option for compile only.

  Read the article

• C++: use array of strings wrapped in namespace?

  - by John D.

  I got the following code, wishing to wrap a group of strings nicely in a namespace: namespace msgs { const int arr_sz = 3; const char *msg[arr_sz] = {"blank", "blank", "blank" }; msg[0] = "Welcome, lets start by getting a little info from you!\n"; msg[1] = "Alright, bla bla bla.."; msg[2] = "etc."; } The code inside works nicely inside a function, but I don't know how to return an array from it. The namespace idea LOOKS fine, but it returns on the last three lines: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conversion before ‘=’ token Why can't I define the array inside a namespace, do I need to do something first? It's nice because I can call it like printf(msgs::msg[1]) etc. I want to do this I just can't wrap my head around what's wrong :(

  Read the article

• C++: Throwing shared_ptr of derived and catching shared_ptr of base?

  - by hasvn

  Ok, I've been told this problem: Why can you throw a pointer to a derived class and catch a pointer to its base... but you can't do that with shared_ptrs? Example, this works: class Base {}; class Derived : public Base {}; int main() { try { throw new Derived() ; } catch( const Base2 * b ) { printf("Received a base" ) ; } return 0 ; } But this doesn't int main() { try { throw std::tr1::shared_ptr<Derived>( new Derived() ) ; } catch( const std::tr1::shared_ptr<Base> & b ) { printf("Received a base" ) ; } return 0 ; } Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Is it possible for a parent to use a child's constant or static variables from inside a static metho

  - by ryeguy

  Below is an example of what I'm trying to do. The parent can't access any of the child's variables. It doesn't matter what technique I use (static or constants), I just need some kind of functionality like this. class ParentClass { public static function staticFunc() { //both of these will throw a (static|const) not defined error echo self::$myStatic; echo self::MY_CONSTANT; } } class ChildClass extends ParentClass { const MY_CONSTANT = 1; public static $myStatic = 2; } ChildClass::staticFunc();

  Read the article

• Redundant naming in C/C++ typedefs/structs

  - by bloomy

  #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> const int NAMELEN=30; const int MAXCLASSSIZE=10; typedef struct StudentRec { char lastname[NAMELEN]; char firstname[NAMELEN]; long int ID; int finalmark; }Student; I'm new to coding..and I have a question about why there is Student; after the bracket.. is it a format that we have to follow.

  Read the article

• Singly-Linked Lists insert_back and isIncreasing

  - by rezivor

  I just finished writing a program that I can add, remove or print objects to a list, but I am having difficulty implementing two more functions that is insert_back, which inserts a value to the end of a list. Also,I have to modify the representation of a List and alter whatever methods are necessary to make insert_back run in constant time: O(1). This new operation should have the signature: void List::insert_back( const Object& data ); Also, isIncreasing, For example, for a list containing head-() (11) (8) (15) (3), isIncreasing() should return false. However, it would return true when working on a list containing head- () (7) (9) (15). This new operation should have the signature: bool List::isIncreasing() const; Thank you

  Read the article

• Returning objects with dynamic memory

  - by Caulibrot

  I'm having trouble figuring out a way to return an object (declared locally within the function) which has dynamic memory attached to it. The problem is the destructor, which runs and deletes the dynamic memory when the object goes out of scope, i.e. when I return it and want to use the data in the memory that has been deleted! I'm doing this for an overloaded addition operator. I'm trying to do something like: MyObj operator+( const MyObj& x, const MyObj& y ) { MyObj z; // code to add x and y and store in dynamic memory of z return z; } My destructor is simply: MyObj::~MyObj() { delete [] ptr; } Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

  Read the article

• Change Wallpaper in windows mobile

  - by niks86

  Hello Friends, Hey im devloping application in that i want to set images as the wallpaper for that i written below code.when i used remote registry in registry value get updated but the wallpaper of the windows mobile does not changed.Can u plz tel me what i need to do. Here is my code. [DllImport("coredll.dll")] private static extern int SendMessage(IntPtr hWnd, uint msg, int wParam, int lParam); public const int HWND_BROADCAST = 0xffff; public const int WM_WININICHANGE = 0x001A; File.Copy(@"\My Documents\My Pictures\Album Sample_05.jpg", @"\My Documents\My Pictures\Album Sample_09.jpg", true); Registry.SetValue(@"HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Today", "Wall", @"\My Documents\My Pictures\Album Sample_05.jpg"); SendMessage((IntPtr)HWND_BROADCAST, WM_WININICHANGE, 0xF2, 0); plz help me. Thanks.

  Read the article

• C++ Declaring an uninitialized variable without a null constructor

  - by xbonez

  Consider the DUPoint class, whose declaration appears below. Assume this code appears in a file named DUPoint.h: #include <string> class DUPoint { public: DUPoint (int x, int y); int getX () const; int getY () const; void setX (int x); void setY (int y); void print(); private: int x_; int y_; }; Is it true that you cannot declare an uninitialized DUPoint variable with a statement such as DUPoint P; using this class as currently configured because it has no null constructor?

  Read the article

• What's the simplest way of defining lexicographic comparison for elements of a class?

  - by the_mandrill

  If I have a class that I want to be able to sort (ie support a less-than concept), and it has several data items such that I need to do lexicographic ordering then I need something like this: struct MyData { string surname; string forename; bool operator<(const MyData& other) const { return surname < other.surname || (surname==other.surname && forename < other.forename); } }; This becomes pretty unmanageable for anything with more than 2 data members. Are there any simpler ways of achieving it? The data members may be any Comparable class.

  Read the article

• Loading Unmanaged C++ in C#. Error Attempted to read or write protected memory

  - by Thatoneguy

  I have a C++ function that looks like this __declspec(dllexport) int ___stdcall RegisterPerson(char const * const szName) { std::string copyName( szName ); // Assign name to a google protocol buffer object // Psuedo code follows.. Protobuf::Person person; person->set_name(copyName); // Error Occurs here... std::cerr << person->DebugString() << std::endl; } The corresponding C# code looks like this... [DllImport(@"MyLibrary.dll", SetLastError = true)] public static unsafe extern int RegisterPerson([MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPTStr)]string szName) Not sure why this is not working. My C++ library is compiled as Multi Threaded DLL with MultiByte encoding. Any help would be appreciated. I saw this is a common problem online but no answers lead me to a solution for my problem.

  Read the article

• Different sizes of same strings - Telnet programming

  - by tommyogp

  Hi all, I have been trying to create an iphone app sending telnet command. However what puzzling me is that the sizes of certain strings are so much different, particularly when they include \n or \r. I listed out a few examples. Please assist. const char *a = "play 25\n"; int sizeBitA1 = sizeof(a); // 8 units int sizeBitA2 = sizeof("play 25\n"); // 9 units const char *b = "\r\n"; int sizeBitB1 = sizeof(b); // 8 units int sizeBitB2 = sizeof("\r\n"); // 3 units

  Read the article

• Problem with Initializing Consts

  - by UdiM

  This code, when compiled in xlC 8.0 (on AIX 6.1), produces the wrong result. It should print 12345, but instead prints 804399880. Removing the const in front of result makes the code work correctly. Where is the bug? #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string> long int foo(std::string input) { return strtol(input.c_str(), NULL, 0); } void bar() { const long int result = foo("12345"); printf("%u\n", result); } int main() { bar(); return 0; } Compilation command: /usr/vacpp/bin/xlC example.cpp -g

  Read the article

• can `const char*` cause problems?

  - by lego69

  Can I use free for const char*? Will this cause any problems?

  Read the article

• Debugging metaprograms [C++]

  - by atch

  Hi, Is there any way to check step by step what's going on in let's say template? I mean how it is instantiated step by step and so on? In book I've mentioned here , I found (2 minutes ago) quite interesting example of how binary could be implemented as a metafunction. template <unsigned long N> struct binary { static unsigned const value = binary<N/10>::value << 1 // prepend higher bits | N%10; // to lowest bit }; template <> // specialization struct binary<0> // terminates recursion { static unsigned const value = 0; }; and I think it could be quite useful to be able to see step by step what's been done during the instantiation of this template. Thanks for your replies.

  Read the article

• How to split the definition of template friend funtion within template class?

  - by ~joke

  The following example compiles fine but I can't figure out how to separate declaration and definition of operator<<() is this particular case. Every time I try to split the definition friend is causing trouble and gcc complains the operator<<() definition must take exactly one argument. #include <iostream> template <typename T> class Test { public: Test(const T& value) : value_(value) {} template <typename STREAM> friend STREAM& operator<<(STREAM& os, const Test<T>& rhs) { os << rhs.value_; return os; } private: T value_; }; int main() { std::cout << Test<int>(5) << std::endl; }

  Read the article

• How to access constant defined in child class from parent class functions?

  - by kavoir.com

  I saw this example from php.net: <?php class MyClass { const MY_CONST = "yonder"; public function __construct() { $c = get_class( $this ); echo $c::MY_CONST; } } class ChildClass extends MyClass { const MY_CONST = "bar"; } $x = new ChildClass(); // prints 'bar' $y = new MyClass(); // prints 'yonder' ?> But $c::MY_CONST is only recognized in version 5.3.0 or later. The class I'm writing may be distributed a lot. Basically, I have defined a constant in ChildClass and one of the functions in MyClass (father class) needs to use the constant. Any idea?

  Read the article

• Getting the fractional part of a float without using modf()

  - by knight666

  Hi, I'm developing for a platform without a math library, so I need to build my own tools. My current way of getting the fraction is to convert the float to fixed point (multiply with (float)0xFFFF, cast to int), get only the lower part (mask with 0xFFFF) and convert it back to a float again. However, the imprecision is killing me. I'm using my Frac() and InvFrac() functions to draw an anti-aliased line. Using modf I get a perfectly smooth line. With my own method pixels start jumping around due to precision loss. This is my code: const float fp_amount = (float)(0xFFFF); const float fp_amount_inv = 1.f / fp_amount; inline float Frac(float a_X) { return ((int)(a_X * fp_amount) & 0xFFFF) * fp_amount_inv; } inline float Frac(float a_X) { return (0xFFFF - (int)(a_X * fp_amount) & 0xFFFF) * fp_amount_inv; } Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Removing Unused (Unreferenced) Static Global Variable Constants in C++

  - by Synetech inc.

  Hi, I have a header file with a few common constants like names and stuff that are automatically included in each project (an example follows). The thing is that they are included in the compiled binary (EXE) whether they are used (referenced) or not. If I use DEFINEs instead, then naturally they are not included if they are not used, but of course consts are better than defines so… I tried Googling it, but the closest thing I could find was a question right here on SO that did not quite help. Matters of i18n aside, how can I keep the ones that are not used out of the binary, while still keeping it easy to use like this? Thanks. //COMMON.H: static const CString s_Company _T("Acme inc."); //etc. static const CString s_Digits _T("0123456789"); //TEST.CPP: #include common.h int main() { AfxMessageBox(s_Company); } //s_Company should be in the final EXE, but s_Digits should not be, but is

  Read the article

• C++: Could Polymorphic Copy Constructors work?

  - by 0xC0DEFACE

  Consider: class A { public: A( int val ) : m_ValA( val ) {} A( const A& rhs ) {} int m_ValA; }; class B : public A { public: B( int val4A, int val4B ) : A( val4A ), m_ValB( val4B ) {} B( const B& rhs ) : A( rhs ), m_ValB( rhs.m_ValB ) {} int m_ValB; }; int main() { A* b1 = new B( 1, 2 ); A* b2 = new A( *b1 ); // ERROR...but what if it could work? return 0; } Would C++ be broken if "new A( b1 )" was able to resolve to creating a new B copy and returning an A? Would this even be useful?

  Read the article

• Copy unmanaged data into managed array

  - by JeffRSon

  I need to copy native (i.e. unmanaged) data (byte*) to managed byte array with C++/CLI (array). I tried Marshal::Copy (data is pointed to by const void* data and is dataSize bytes) array<byte>^ _Data=gcnew array<byte>(dataSize); System::Runtime::InteropServices::Marshal::Copy((byte*)data, _Data, 0, dataSize); This gives error C2665: none of the 16 overloads can convert all parameters. Then I tried System::Runtime::InteropServices::Marshal::Copy(new IntPtr(data), _Data, 0, dataSize); which produces error C2664: parameter 1 cannot be converted from "const void*" to "__w64 int". So how can it be done and is Marshal::Copy indeed the "best" (simplest/fastest) way to do so?

  Read the article

• Best way to handle storing (possibly NULL) char * in a std::string

  - by John

  class MyClass { public: void setVar(const char *str); private: std::string mStr; int maxLength; //we only store string up to this length }; What's the best approach to implement setVar when the external code is quite likely to pass in NULL for an empty string (and cannot be changed)? I currently do something a bit like: void MyClass::setVar(const char *str) { mStr.assign(str ? str : "",maxLength); } But it seems kind of messy. ideas?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90  | Next Page >