I am supposed to make a class that should be a container for an interval of values (like in mathematics). I have already decided that I'll use internally a SortedSet.
One of the the things I'm supposed to implement is a method that "gets an ordered set with all the elements in the interval".
class Interval {
private SortedSet sortedSet = new something();
...
<<method that should return an ordered set of values>>
}
My question resides in what should be both the method's return type and name. Several hypothesis arise:
SortedSet getSortedElements(); I am internally using a SortedSet, so I should return that type. I should state that intent in the method's name.
SortedSet getElements(); I am internally using a SortedSet, but there's no point in stating that in the method name(I don't see a big point in this one).
Set getElements(); I should try to always return the most basic type, thus I am returning a Set. By the contract and definition of the method, people already know all the elements are in order.
Set getSortedElements(); For the method return type, the same as above. About the method name, you are stating clearly what this method is going to return: a set of elements that are sorted.
I'm inclined to use 4. , but the others also seem alright. Is there a clear winner? Why?
