Search Results

Search found 13693 results on 548 pages for 'python metaprogramming'.

Page 165/548 | < Previous Page | 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172  | Next Page >

  • EOF error using recv in python

    - by tipu
    I am doing this in my code, HOST = '192.168.1.3' PORT = 50007 s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.connect((HOST, PORT)) query_details = {"page" : page, "query" : query, "type" : type} s.send(str(query_details)) #data = eval(pickle.loads(s.recv(4096))) data = s.recv(16384) But I am continually getting EOF at the last line. The code I am sending with, self.request.send(pickle.dumps(results))

    Read the article

  • Python: Importing a variable inside of a infinite loop

    - by Jack
    I have two modules, a host and a scanner. Both loop indefinitely to communicate with the serial ports. I want to import the variable "bestchannel" from scanner into host but by importing it, the while loop inside scanner runs first and loops forever. I want each module to run separately but be able to send each other data in real time. Is this possible? (outside of scanning ram) Example Code: http://pastebin.com/pxUBaima I want minchannel from scanner to be accessible to host.

    Read the article

  • Unicode filename to python subprocess.call()

    - by otrov
    I'm trying to run subprocess.call() with unicode filename, and here is simplified problem: n = u'c:\\windows\\notepad.exe ' f = u'c:\\temp\\nèw.txt' subprocess.call(n + f) which raises famous error: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe8' Encoding to utf-8 produces wrong filename, and mbcs passes filename as new.txt without accent I just can't read any more on this confusing subject and spin in circle. I found here lot of answers for many different problems in past so I thought to join and ask for help myself Thanks

    Read the article

  • Using a Loop to add objects to a list(python)

    - by Will
    Hey guys so im trying to use a while loop to add objects to a list. Heres bascially what i want to do: (ill paste actually go after) class x: blah blah choice = raw_input(pick what you want to do) while(choice!=0): if(choice==1): Enter in info for the class: append object to list (A) if(choice==2): print out length of list(A) if(choice==0): break ((((other options)))) as im doing this i can get the object to get added to the list, but i am stuck as to how to add multiple objects to the list in the loop. Here is my actual code i have so far... print "Welcome to the Student Management Program" class Student: def init (self, name, age, gender, favclass): self.name = name self.age = age self.gender = gender self.fac = favclass choice = int(raw_input("Make a Choice: " )) while (choice !=0): if (guess==1): print("STUDENT") namer = raw_input("Enter Name: ") ager = raw_input("Enter Age: ") sexer = raw_input("Enter Sex: ") faver = raw_input("Enter Fav: ") elif(guess==2): print "TESTING LINE" elif(guess==3): print(len(a)) guess=int(raw_input("Make a Choice: ")) s = Student(namer, ager, sexer, faver) a =[]; a.append(s) raw_input("Press enter to exit") any help would be greatly appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Python: why can't descriptors be instance variables?

    - by Continuation
    Say I define this descriptor: class MyDescriptor(object): def __get__(self, instance, owner): return self._value def __set__(self, instance, value): self._value = value def __delete__(self, instance): del(self._value) And I use it in this: class MyClass1(object): value = MyDescriptor() >>> m1 = MyClass1() >>> m1.value = 1 >>> m2 = MyClass1() >>> m2.value = 2 >>> m1.value 2 So value is a class attribute and is shared by all instances. Now if I define this: class MyClass2(object) value = 1 >>> y1 = MyClass2() >>> y1.value=1 >>> y2 = MyClass2() >>> y2.value=2 >>> y1.value 1 In this case value is an instance attribute and is not shared by the instances. Why is it that when value is a descriptor it can only be a class attribute, but when value is a simple integer it becomes an instance attribute?

    Read the article

  • Best way to design a class in python

    - by Fraz
    So, this is more like a philosophical question for someone who is trying to understand classes. Most of time, how i use class is actually a very bad way to use it. I think of a lot of functions and after a time just indent the code and makes it a class and replacing few stuff with self.variable if a variable is repeated a lot. (I know its bad practise) But anyways... What i am asking is: class FooBar: def __init__(self,foo,bar): self._foo = foo self._bar = bar self.ans = self.__execute() def __execute(self): return something(self._foo, self._bar) Now there are many ways to do this: class FooBar: def __init__(self,foo): self._foo = foo def execute(self,bar): return something(self._foo, bar) Can you suggest which one is bad and which one is worse? or any other way to do this. This is just a toy example (offcourse). I mean, there is no need to have a class here if there is one function.. but lets say in __execute something() calls a whole set of other methods.. ?? Thanks

    Read the article

  • how to write or create (when no exist) a file using python and Google AppEngine

    - by zjm1126
    this is my code: f = open('text/a.log', 'wb') f.write('hahaha') f.close() and it is not create a new file when not exist how to do this , thanks updated class MyThread(threading.Thread): def run(self): f = open('a.log', 'w') f.write('hahaha') f.close() error is : Traceback (most recent call last): File "D:\Python25\lib\threading.py", line 486, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "D:\zjm_code\helloworld\views.py", line 15, in run f = open('a.log', 'w') File "d:\Program Files\Google\google_appengine\google\appengine\tools\dev_appserver.py", line 1188, in __init__ raise IOError('invalid mode: %s' % mode) IOError: invalid mode: w

    Read the article

  • Python function argument scope (Dictionaries v. Strings)

    - by Shaun Meyer
    Hello, given: foo = "foo" def bar(foo): foo = "bar" bar(foo) print foo # foo is still "foo"... foo = {'foo':"foo"} def bar(foo): foo['foo'] = "bar" bar(foo) print foo['foo'] # foo['foo'] is now "bar"? I have a function that has been inadvertently over-writing my function parameters when I pass a dictionary. Is there a clean way to declare my parameters as constant or am I stuck making a copy of the dictionary within the function? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Python - open text file, but specify name when executing command

    - by Dunnolol
    I have a directory of text files that all end in the extension .txt My goal is to print the contents of the text file. I wish to be able use the wildcard *.txt to be able to specific the text file name I wish to open (I'm thinking along the lines of something like "F:\text*.txt" ?), split the lines of the text file, then print the output. Here is an example of what I want to do, but I want to be able to change "somefile" when executing my command. f = open('F:\text\somefile.txt', 'r') for line in f: print line,

    Read the article

  • Python stdout, \r progress bar and sshd with Putty not updating regularly

    - by Kyle MacFarlane
    I have a dead simple progress "bar" using something like the following: import sys from time import sleep current = 0 limit = 50 while current <= limit: sys.stdout.write('\rSynced %s/%s orders' % (current, limit)) current_order += 1 sleep(1) Works fine, except over ssh with Putty. Putty only updates every 3 minutes or if a line ends with \n. Is this a Putty setting, sshd_config, or can I code around it?

    Read the article

  • Invoking a superclass's class methods in Python

    - by LeafStorm
    I am working on a Flask extension that adds CouchDB support to Flask. To make it easier, I have subclassed couchdb.mapping.Document so the store and load methods can use the current thread-local database. Right now, my code looks like this: class Document(mapping.Document): # rest of the methods omitted for brevity @classmethod def load(cls, id, db=None): return mapping.Document.load(cls, db or g.couch, id) I left out some for brevity, but that's the important part. However, due to the way classmethod works, when I try to call this method, I receive the error message File "flaskext/couchdb.py", line 187, in load return mapping.Document.load(cls, db or g.couch, id) TypeError: load() takes exactly 3 arguments (4 given) I tested replacing the call with mapping.Document.load.im_func(cls, db or g.couch, id), and it works, but I'm not particularly happy about accessing the internal im_ attributes (even though they are documented). Does anyone have a more elegant way to handle this?

    Read the article

  • javascript-aware html parser for Python ~

    - by znetor
    <html> <head> <script type="text/javascript"> document.write('<a href="http://www.google.com">f*** js</a>'); document.write("f*** js!"); </script> </head> <body> <script type="text/javascript"> document.write('<a href="http://www.google.com">f*** js</a>'); document.write("f*** js!"); </script> <div><a href="http://www.google.com">f*** js</a></div> </body> </html> I want use xpath to catch all lable object in the html page above... In [1]: import lxml.html as H In [2]: f = open("test.html","r") In [3]: c = f.read() In [4]: doc = H.document_fromstring(c) In [5]: doc.xpath('//a') Out[5]: [<Element a at a01d17c>] In [6]: a = doc.xpath('//a')[0] In [7]: a.getparent() Out[7]: <Element div at a01d41c> I only get one don't generate by js~ but firefox xpath checker can find all lable!? http://i.imgur.com/0hSug.png how to do that??? thx~! <html> <head> </head> <body> <script language="javascript"> function over(){ a.innerHTML="mouse me" } function out(){ a.innerHTML="<a href='http://www.google.com'>google</a>" } </script> <body><li id="a"onmouseover="over()" onmouseout="out()">mouse me</li> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • Python: Lits containg tuples and long int.

    - by Yasmin
    I have a list containing a tuples and long integers the list looks like this: table = [(1L,), (1L,), (1L,), (2L,), (2L,), (2L,), (3L,), (3L,)] How do i convert the table to look like a formal list? so the output would be: table = ['1','1','1','2','2','2','3','3'] For information purposes the data was obtained from a mysql database.

    Read the article

  • String loops in Python

    - by Steve Hunter
    I have two pools of strings and I would like to do a loop over both. For example, if I want to put two labeled apples in one plate I'll write: basket1 = ['apple#1', 'apple#2', 'apple#3', 'apple#4'] for fruit1 in basket1: basket2 = ['apple#1', 'apple#2', 'apple#3', 'apple#4'] for fruit2 in basket2: if fruit1 == fruit2: print 'Oops!' else: print "New Plate = %s and %s" % (fruit1, fruit2) However, I don't want order to matter -- for example I am considering apple#1-apple#2 equivalent to apple#2-apple#1. What's the easiest way to code this? I'm thinking about making a counter in the second loop to track the second basket and not starting from the point-zero in the second loop every time.

    Read the article

  • Multiple levels of 'collection.defaultdict' in Python

    - by Morlock
    Thanks to some great folks on SO, I discovered the possibilities offered by collections.defaultdict, notably in readability and speed. I have put them to use with success. Now I would like to implement three levels of dictionaries, the two top ones being defaultdict and the lowest one being int. I don't find the appropriate way to do this. Here is my attempt: from collections import defaultdict d = defaultdict(defaultdict) a = [("key1", {"a1":22, "a2":33}), ("key2", {"a1":32, "a2":55}), ("key3", {"a1":43, "a2":44})] for i in a: d[i[0]] = i[1] Now this works, but the following, which is the desired behavior, doesn't: d["key4"]["a1"] + 1 I suspect that I should have declared somewhere that the second level defaultdict is of type int, but I didn't find where or how to do so. The reason I am using defaultdict in the first place is to avoid having to initialize the dictionary for each new key. Any more elegant suggestion? Thanks pythoneers!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172  | Next Page >