Search Results

Search found 1661 results on 67 pages for 'messaging indicator'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 29/67 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >

  • Are application servers necessary? Advantages of using one? (And other JEE questions)

    - by Mike
    Apologies for the long question.. there seems to be other similar questions on here but none really clear up my confusion. I'd be really grateful if someone could confirm or correct my understanding: Java Enterprise Edition is a set of APIs for building enterprise applications, which take away the burden of developing parts of the system that aren't actually features of the application you are trying to build (i.e. messaging, transactions etc). To do this, you can use an application server, which implements these APIs. So you could use JBoss, Glassfish, WebSphere, WebLogic etc which would provide your application with these enterprise services. However, there are many other implementations of these individual services available such as ActiveMQ for messaging, Hibernate for persistence, OpenEJB etc. You can download these implementations as Java libraries and include them in your application, and use the services they provide in a similar way to using the services provided by an application server. So if my understanding is correct, my questions are: I've read a lot of places that application servers are necessary for JEE features like EJB, but can't you just use an implementation such as OpenEJB and not need an application server at all? Are there any features that an application server provides which you cannot get from another source? Why would/wouldn't I choose an application server over a custom stack such as Tomcat, OpenEJB, ActiveMQ, and Hibernate? Is Spring a complete alternative to JEE? Does it ever require an application server or always just a servlet container? Why would someone choose Spring over JEE? Any help would be much appreciated!

    Read the article

  • How do I anchor an expander to right side of a ListBox?

    - by Scott
    The XAML code below works fine except I want the expander button to be between the listbox and the grid. If I set the ExpandDirection="Left" the button is between the listbox and the grid but the direction indicator on the button is confusing to users - it point to the right when expanded and it points to the left when it is not expanded. I want the direction indicator to work the way it does when ExpandDirection="Right" but I want the functionality of ExpandDirection="Left". <DockPanel> <Expander ExpandDirection="Right"> <ListBox> <ListBoxItem>Item One</ListBoxItem> <ListBoxItem>Item Two</ListBoxItem> <ListBoxItem>Item Three</ListBoxItem> <ListBoxItem>Item Four</ListBoxItem> <ListBoxItem>Item Five</ListBoxItem> </ListBox> </Expander> <Grid Background="AliceBlue"> <TextBlock > Other Content </TextBlock> </Grid> </DockPanel>

    Read the article

  • List of Objects to be used on ascx view with Inherits data already loaded MVC...

    - by user54197
    I have an object list being loded from a database to a drop down list. The Model loads the data to the Controller. The aspx view includes an ascx view. The ascx view already inherits data from another Project. I cannot set my List object in the ascx page. Can this be done? Model ... string List = dr["example"].ToString().Trim(); int indicator = dr["ex"].ToString().Trim(); LossCauseList.Add(new LossCauses(indicator, List)); ... Controller LossCauses test = new LossCauses(); test.GetLossCauses(LossType); TempData["Select"] = test.LossCauseList; return View(myData); Partial View ... <select id="SelectedProperty"> <% List<string> selectProperty = new List<string>(); selectProperty = TempData["Select"] as List<string>; foreach(var item in selectProperty) { %> <option><%=item.ToString() %></option> <% } %> </select> ... Partial view's List should be an actual LossCauses object. HELP!!!

    Read the article

  • How do you unit test new code that uses a bunch of classes that cannot be instantiated in a test har

    - by trendl
    I'm writing a messaging layer that should handle communication with a third party API. The API has a bunch of classes that cannot be easily (if at all) instantiated in a test harness. I decided to wrap each class that I need in my unit tests with an adapter/wrapper and expose the members I need through this adapter class. Often I need to expose the wrapped type as well which I do by exposing it as an object. I have also provided an interface for for each or the adapter classes to be able to use them with a mocking framework. This way I can substitute the classes in test for whatever I need. The downside is that I have a bunch of adapter classes that so far server no other reason but testing. For me this is a good reason by itself but others may find this not enough. Possibly, when I write an implementation for another third party vendor's API, I may be able to reuse much of my code and only provide the adapters specific to the vendor's API. However, this is a bit of a long shot and I'm not actually sure it will work. What do you think? Is this approach viable or am I writing unnecessary code that serves no real purpose? Let me say that I do want to write unit tests for my messaging layer and I do now know how to do it otherwise.

    Read the article

  • Where are possible locations of queueing/buffering delays in Linux multicast?

    - by Matt
    We make heavy use of multicasting messaging across many Linux servers on a LAN. We are seeing a lot of delays. We basically send an enormous number of small packages. We are more concerned with latency than throughput. The machines are all modern, multi-core (at least four, generally eight, 16 if you count hyperthreading) machines, always with a load of 2.0 or less, usually with a load less than 1.0. The networking hardware is also under 50% capacity. The delays we see look like queueing delays: the packets will quickly start increasing in latency, until it looks like they jam up, then return back to normal. The messaging structure is basically this: in the "sending thread", pull messages from a queue, add a timestamp (using gettimeofday()), then call send(). The receiving program receives the message, timestamps the receive time, and pushes it in a queue. In a separate thread, the queue is processed, analyzing the difference between sending and receiving timestamps. (Note that our internal queues are not part of the problem, since the timestamps are added outside of our internal queuing.) We don't really know where to start looking for an answer to this problem. We're not familiar with Linux internals. Our suspicion is that the kernel is queuing or buffering the packets, either on the send side or the receive side (or both). But we don't know how to track this down and trace it. For what it's worth, we're using CentOS 4.x (RHEL kernel 2.6.9).

    Read the article

  • WPF bound object update notification

    - by Carlo
    I have a TreeView with a few objects bound to it, let's say something like this: public class House { public List<Room> Rooms { get; set; } public List<Person> People { get; set; } public House() { this.Rooms = new List<Room>(); this.People = new List<Person>(); } public void BuildRoom(string name) { this.Rooms.Add(new Room() { Name = name }); } public void DestroyRoom(string name) { this.Rooms.Remove(new Room() { Name = name }); } public void PersonEnter(string name) { this.People.Add(new Person() { Name = name }); } public void PersonLeave(string name) { this.People.Remove(new Person() { Name = name }); } } public class Room { public string Name { get; set; } } public class Person { public string Name { get; set; } } The TreeView is watching over the House object, whenever a room is built / destroyed or a person enters / leaves, my tree view updates itself to show the new state of the house (I omitted some implementation details for simplicity). What I want is to know the exact moment when this update finishes, so I can do something right there, the thing is that I created an indicator of the selected item, and when something moves, I need to update said indicator's position, that's the reason I need it exactly when the tree view updates. Let me know if you know a solution to this. Also, the code is not perfect (DestroyRoom and PersonLeave), but you get the idea. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to reduce the Number of threads running at instance in jetty server ?

    - by Thirst for Excellence
    i would like to reduce the live threads on server to reduce the bandwidth consumption for data(data pull while application launching time) transfer from my application to clients in my application. i did setting like is this setting enough to reduce the bandwidth consumption on jetty server ? Please help me any one 1) in Jetty.xml: <Set name="ThreadPool"> <New class="org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool"> <name="minThreads"> 1 > <Set name="maxThreads" value=50> 2: services-config.xml channel-definition id="my-longpolling-amf" class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel" endpoint url="http://MyIp:8400/blazeds/messagebroker/amflongpolling" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint" properties <polling-enabled>true</polling-enabled> <polling-interval-seconds>1</polling-interval-seconds> <wait-interval-millis>60000</wait-interval-millis> <client-wait-interval-millis>1</client-wait-interval-millis> <max-waiting-poll-requests>50</max-waiting-poll-requests> </properties> </channel-definition>

    Read the article

  • Color difference between vista and Win7

    - by MSGrimpeur
    Have an indicator in the form of an image which is displayed in a graphics viewport. The indicator can be any colour the user selects so we created a single image with a pallette and change a specific color in the pallette to the one the user picks using the following code. /// <summary> /// Copies the image and sets transparency and fill colour of the copy. The image is intended to be a simple filled shape such as a square /// with the inside all in one colour. /// </summary> /// <remarks>Assumes the fill colour to be changed is Red, /// black is the boundary colour and off white (RGB 233,233,233) is the colour to be made transparent</remarks> /// <param name="image"></param> /// <param name="fillColour"></param> /// <returns></returns> protected Bitmap CopyWithStyle(Bitmap image, Color fillColour) { ColorPalette selectionIndicatorPalette = image.Palette; int fillColourIndex = selectionIndicatorPalette.IndexOf(Color.Red); selectionIndicatorPalette.Entries[fillColourIndex] = fillColour; image.Palette = selectionIndicatorPalette; Bitmap tempImage = image; tempImage.MakeTransparent(transparentColour); return tempImage; } To be honest I'm not sure if this is a bit cludgy and there is some smarter approach or not, so any thoughts there would help. However the main issue is that this appears to work fine on Win7 but in vista and XP the color does not change. Has any one seen this before. I've found one or two articles that suggest there are some differences in ARGB between them but nothing particularly concrete. Any help greatfully accepted.

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Declares the Future of ASP.NET is Web API

    - by sbwalker
    Sitting on a plane on my way home from Tech Ed 2012 in Orlando, I thought it would be a good time to jot down some key takeaways from this year’s conference. Some of these items I have known since the Microsoft MVP Summit which occurred in Redmond in late February ( but due to NDA restrictions I could not share them with the developer community at large ) and some of them are a result of insightful conversations with a wide variety of industry insiders and Microsoft employees at the conference. First, let’s travel back in time 4 years to the Microsoft MVP Summit in 2008. Microsoft was facing some heat from market newcomer Ruby on Rails and responded with a new web development framework of its own, ASP.NET MVC. At the Summit they estimated that MVC would only be applicable for ~10% of all new web development projects. Based on that prediction I questioned why they were investing such considerable resources for such a relative edge case, but my guess is that they felt it was an important edge case at the time as some of the more vocal .NET evangelists as well as some very high profile start-ups ( ie. Twitter ) had publicly announced their intent to use Rails. Microsoft made a lot of noise about MVC. In fact, they focused so much of their messaging and marketing hype around MVC that it appeared that WebForms was essentially dead. Yes, it may have been true that Microsoft continued to invest in WebForms, but from an outside perspective it really appeared that MVC was the only framework getting any real attention. As a result, MVC started to gain market share. An inside source at Microsoft told me that MVC usage has grown at a rate of about 5% per year and now sits at ~30%. Essentially by focusing so much marketing effort on MVC, Microsoft actually created a larger market demand for it.  This is because in the Microsoft ecosystem there is somewhat of a bandwagon mentality amongst developers. If Microsoft spends a lot of time talking about a specific technology, developers get the perception that it must be really important. So rather than choosing the right tool for the job, they often choose the tool with the most marketing hype and then try to sell it to the customer. In 2010, I blogged about the fact that MVC did not make any business sense for the DotNetNuke platform. This was because our ecosystem relied on third party extensions which were dependent on the WebForms model. If we migrated the core to MVC it would mean that all of the third party extensions would no longer be compatible, which would be an irresponsible business decision for us to make at the expense of our users and customers. However, this did not stop the debate from continuing to occur in our ecosystem. Clearly some developers had drunk Microsoft’s Kool-Aid about MVC and were of the mindset, to paraphrase an old Scottish saying, “If its not MVC, it’s crap”. Now, this is a rather ignorant position to take as most of the benefits of MVC can be achieved in WebForms with solid architecture and responsible coding practices. Clean separation of concerns, unit testing, and direct control over page output are all possible in the WebForms model – it just requires diligence and discipline. So over the past few years some horror stories have begun to bubble to the surface of software development projects focused on ground-up rewrites of web applications for the sole purpose of migrating from WebForms to MVC. These large scale rewrites were typically initiated by engineering teams with only a single argument driving the business decision, that Microsoft was promoting MVC as “the future”. These ill-fated rewrites offered no benefit to end users or customers and in fact resulted in a less stable, less scalable and more complicated systems – basically taking one step forward and two full steps back. A case in point is the announcement earlier this week that a popular open source .NET CMS provider has decided to pull the plug on their new MVC product which has been under active development for more than 18 months and revert back to WebForms. The availability of multiple server-side development models has deeply fragmented the Microsoft developer community. Some folks like to compare it to the age-old VB vs. C# language debate. However, the VB vs. C# language debate was ultimately more of a religious war because at least the two dominant programming languages were compatible with one another and could be used interchangeably. The issue with WebForms vs. MVC is much more challenging. This is because the messaging from Microsoft has positioned the two solutions as being incompatible with one another and as a result web developers feel like they are forced to choose one path or another. Yes, it is true that it has always been technically possible to use WebForms and MVC in the same project, but the tooling support has always made this feel “dirty”. The fragmentation has also made it difficult to attract newcomers as the perceived barrier to entry for learning ASP.NET has become higher. As a result many new software developers entering the market are gravitating to environments where the development model seems more simple and intuitive ( ie. PHP or Ruby ). At the same time that the Web Platform team was busy promoting ASP.NET MVC, the Microsoft Office team has been promoting Sharepoint as a platform for building internal enterprise web applications. Sharepoint has great penetration in the enterprise and over time has been enhanced with improved extensibility capabilities for software developers. But, like many other mature enterprise ASP.NET web applications, it is built on the WebForms development model. Similar to DotNetNuke, Sharepoint leverages a rich third party ecosystem for both generic web controls and more specialized WebParts – both of which rely on WebForms. So basically this resulted in a situation where the Web Platform group had headed off in one direction and the Office team had gone in another direction, and the end customer was stuck in the middle trying to figure out what to do with their existing investments in Microsoft technology. It really emphasized the perception that the left hand was not speaking to the right hand, as strategically speaking there did not seem to be any high level plan from Microsoft to ensure consistency and continuity across the different product lines. With the introduction of ASP.NET MVC, it also made some of the third party control vendors scratch their heads, and wonder what the heck Microsoft was thinking. The original value proposition of ASP.NET over Classic ASP was the ability for web developers to emulate the highly productive desktop development model by using abstract components for creating rich, interactive web interfaces. Web control vendors like Telerik, Infragistics, DevExpress, and ComponentArt had all built sizable businesses offering powerful user interface components to WebForms developers. And even after MVC was introduced these vendors continued to improve their products, offering greater productivity and a superior user experience via AJAX to what was possible in MVC. And since many developers were comfortable and satisfied with these third party solutions, the demand remained strong and the third party web control market continued to prosper despite the availability of MVC. While all of this was going on in the Microsoft ecosystem, there has also been a fundamental shift in the general software development industry. Driven by the explosion of Internet-enabled devices, the focus has now centered on service-oriented architecture (SOA). Service-oriented architecture is all about defining a public API for your product that any client can consume; whether it’s a native application running on a smart phone or tablet, a web browser taking advantage of HTML5 and Javascript, or a rich desktop application running on a PC. REST-based services which utilize the less verbose characteristics of JSON as a transport mechanism, have become the preferred approach over older, more bloated SOAP-based techniques. SOA also has the benefit of producing a cross-platform API, as every major technology stack is able to interact with standard REST-based web services. And for web applications, more and more developers are turning to robust Javascript libraries like JQuery and Knockout for browser-based client-side development techniques for calling web services and rendering content to end users. In fact, traditional server-side page rendering has largely fallen out of favor, resulting in decreased demand for server-side frameworks like Ruby on Rails, WebForms, and (gasp) MVC. In response to these new industry trends, Microsoft did what it always does – it immediately poured some resources into developing a solution which will ensure they remain relevant and competitive in the web space. This work culminated in a new framework which was branded as Web API. It is convention-based and designed to embrace native HTTP standards without copious layers of abstraction. This framework is designed to be the ultimate replacement for both the REST aspects of WCF and ASP.NET MVC Web Services. And since it was developed out of band with a dependency only on ASP.NET 4.0, it means that it can be used immediately in a variety of production scenarios. So at Tech Ed 2012 it was made abundantly clear in numerous sessions that Microsoft views Web API as the “Future of ASP.NET”. In fact, one Microsoft PM even went as far as to say that if we look 3-4 years into the future, that all ASP.NET web applications will be developed using the Web API approach. This is a fairly bold prediction and clearly telegraphs where Microsoft plans to allocate its resources going forward. Currently Web API is being delivered as part of the MVC4 package, but this is only temporary for the sake of convenience. It also sounds like there are still internal discussions going on in terms of how to brand the various aspects of ASP.NET going forward – perhaps the moniker of “ASP.NET Web Stack” coined a couple years ago by Scott Hanselman and utilized as part of the open source release of ASP.NET bits on Codeplex a few months back will eventually stick. Web API is being positioned as the unification of ASP.NET – the glue that is able to pull this fragmented mess back together again. The  “One ASP.NET” strategy will promote the use of all frameworks - WebForms, MVC, and Web API, even within the same web project. Basically the message is utilize the appropriate aspects of each framework to solve your business problems. Instead of navigating developers to a fork in the road, the plan is to educate them that “hybrid” applications are a great strategy for delivering solutions to customers. In addition, the service-oriented approach coupled with client-side development promoted by Web API can effectively be used in both WebForms and MVC applications. So this means it is also relevant to application platforms like DotNetNuke and Sharepoint, which means that it starts to create a unified development strategy across all ASP.NET product lines once again. And so what about MVC? There have actually been rumors floated that MVC has reached a stage of maturity where, similar to WebForms, it will be treated more as a maintenance product line going forward ( MVC4 may in fact be the last significant iteration of this framework ). This may sound alarming to some folks who have recently adopted MVC but it really shouldn’t, as both WebForms and MVC will continue to play a vital role in delivering solutions to customers. They will just not be the primary area where Microsoft is spending the majority of its R&D resources. That distinction will obviously go to Web API. And when the question comes up of why not enhance MVC to make it work with Web API, you must take a step back and look at this from the higher level to see that it really makes no sense. MVC is a server-side page compositing framework; whereas, Web API promotes client-side page compositing with a heavy focus on web services. In order to make MVC work well with Web API, would require a complete rewrite of MVC and at the end of the day, there would be no upgrade path for existing MVC applications. So it really does not make much business sense. So what does this have to do with DotNetNuke? Well, around 8-12 months ago we recognized the software industry trends towards web services and client-side development. We decided to utilize a “hybrid” model which would provide compatibility for existing modules while at the same time provide a bridge for developers who wanted to utilize more modern web techniques. Customers who like the productivity and familiarity of WebForms can continue to build custom modules using the traditional approach. However, in DotNetNuke 6.2 we also introduced a new Service Framework which is actually built on top of MVC2 ( we chose to leverage MVC because it had the most intuitive, light-weight REST implementation in the .NET stack ). The Services Framework allowed us to build some rich interactive features in DotNetNuke 6.2, including the Messaging and Notification Center and Activity Feed. But based on where we know Microsoft is heading, it makes sense for the next major version of DotNetNuke ( which is expected to be released in Q4 2012 ) to migrate from MVC2 to Web API. This will likely result in some breaking changes in the Services Framework but we feel it is the best approach for ensuring the platform remains highly modern and relevant. The fact that our development strategy is perfectly aligned with the “One ASP.NET” strategy from Microsoft means that our customers and developer community can be confident in their current and future investments in the DotNetNuke platform.

    Read the article

  • Another Marketing Conference, part one – the best morning sessions.

    - by Roger Hart
    Yesterday I went to Another Marketing Conference. I honestly can’t tell if the title is just tipping over into smug, but in the balance of things that doesn’t matter, because it was a good conference. There was an enjoyable blend of theoretical and practical, and enough inter-disciplinary spread to keep my inner dilettante grinning from ear to ear. Sure, there was a bumpy bit in the middle, with two back-to-back sales pitches and a rather thin overview of the state of the web. But the signal:noise ratio at AMC2012 was impressively high. Here’s the first part of my write-up of the sessions. It’s a bit of a mammoth. It’s also a bit of a mash-up of what was said and what I thought about it. I’ll add links to the videos and slides from the sessions as they become available. Although it was in the morning session, I’ve not included Vanessa Northam’s session on the power of internal comms to build brand ambassadors. It’ll be in the next roundup, as this is already pushing 2.5k words. First, the important stuff. I was keeping a tally, and nobody said “synergy” or “leverage”. I did, however, hear the term “marketeers” six times. Shame on you – you know who you are. 1 – Branding in a post-digital world, Graham Hales This initially looked like being a sales presentation for Interbrand, but Graham pulled it out of the bag a few minutes in. He introduced a model for brand management that was essentially Plan >> Do >> Check >> Act, with Do and Check rolled up together, and went on to stress that this looks like on overall business management model for a reason. Brand has to be part of your overall business strategy and metrics if you’re going to care about it at all. This was the first iteration of what proved to be one of the event’s emergent themes: do it throughout the stack or don’t bother. Graham went on to remind us that brands, in so far as they are owned at all, are owned by and co-created with our customers. Advertising can offer a message to customers, but they provide the expression of a brand. This was a preface to talking about an increasingly chaotic marketplace, with increasingly hard-to-manage purchase processes. Services like Amazon reviews and TripAdvisor (four presenters would make this point) saturate customers with information, and give them a kind of vigilante power to comment on and define brands. Consequentially, they experience a number of “moments of deflection” in our sales funnels. Our control is lessened, and failure to engage can negatively-impact buying decisions increasingly poorly. The clearest example given was the failure of NatWest’s “caring bank” campaign, where staff in branches, customer support, and online presences didn’t align. A discontinuity of experience basically made the campaign worthless, and disgruntled customers talked about it loudly on social media. This in turn presented an opportunity to engage and show caring, but that wasn’t taken. What I took away was that brand (co)creation is ongoing and needs monitoring and metrics. But reciprocally, given you get what you measure, strategy and metrics must include brand if any kind of branding is to work at all. Campaigns and messages must permeate product and service design. What that doesn’t mean (and Graham didn’t say it did) is putting Marketing at the top of the pyramid, and having them bawl demands at Product Management, Support, and Development like an entitled toddler. It’s going to have to be collaborative, and session 6 on internal comms handled this really well. The main thing missing here was substantiating data, and the main question I found myself chewing on was: if we’re building brands collaboratively and in the open, what about the cultural politics of trolling? 2 – Challenging our core beliefs about human behaviour, Mark Earls This was definitely the best show of the day. It was also some of the best content. Mark talked us through nudging, behavioural economics, and some key misconceptions around decision making. Basically, people aren’t rational, they’re petty, reactive, emotional sacks of meat, and they’ll go where they’re led. Comforting stuff. Examples given were the spread of the London Riots and the “discovery” of the mountains of Kong, and the popularity of Susan Boyle, which, in turn made me think about Per Mollerup’s concept of “social wayshowing”. Mark boiled his thoughts down into four key points which I completely failed to write down word for word: People do, then think – Changing minds to change behaviour doesn’t work. Post-rationalization rules the day. See also: mere exposure effects. Spock < Kirk - Emotional/intuitive comes first, then we rationalize impulses. The non-thinking, emotive, reactive processes run much faster than the deliberative ones. People are not really rational decision makers, so  intervening with information may not be appropriate. Maximisers or satisficers? – Related to the last point. People do not consistently, rationally, maximise. When faced with an abundance of choice, they prefer to satisfice than evaluate, and will often follow social leads rather than think. Things tend to converge – Behaviour trends to a consensus normal. When faced with choices people overwhelmingly just do what they see others doing. Humans are extraordinarily good at mirroring behaviours and receiving influence. People “outsource the cognitive load” of choices to the crowd. Mark’s headline quote was probably “the real influence happens at the table next to you”. Reference examples, word of mouth, and social influence are tremendously important, and so talking about product experiences may be more important than talking about products. This reminded me of Kathy Sierra’s “creating bad-ass users” concept of designing to make people more awesome rather than products they like. If we can expose user-awesome, and make sharing easy, we can normalise the behaviours we want. If we normalize the behaviours we want, people should make and post-rationalize the buying decisions we want.  Where we need to be: “A bigger boy made me do it” Where we are: “a wizard did it and ran away” However, it’s worth bearing in mind that some purchasing decisions are personal and informed rather than social and reactive. There’s a quadrant diagram, in fact. What was really interesting, though, towards the end of the talk, was some advice for working out how social your products might be. The standard technology adoption lifecycle graph is essentially about social product diffusion. So this idea isn’t really new. Geoffrey Moore’s “chasm” idea may not strictly apply. However, his concepts of beachheads and reference segments are exactly what is required to normalize and thus enable purchase decisions (behaviour change). The final thing is that in only very few categories does a better product actually affect purchase decision. Where the choice is personal and informed, this is true. But where it’s personal and impulsive, or in any way social, “better” is trumped by popularity, endorsement, or “point of sale salience”. UX, UCD, and e-commerce know this to be true. A better (and easier) experience will always beat “more features”. Easy to use, and easy to observe being used will beat “what the user says they want”. This made me think about the astounding stickiness of rational fallacies, “common sense” and the pathological willful simplifications of the media. Rational fallacies seem like they’re basically the heuristics we use for post-rationalization. If I were profoundly grimy and cynical, I’d suggest deploying a boat-load in our messaging, to see if they’re really as sticky and appealing as they look. 4 – Changing behaviour through communication, Stephen Donajgrodzki This was a fantastic follow up to Mark’s session. Stephen basically talked us through some tactics used in public information/health comms that implement the kind of behavioural theory Mark introduced. The session was largely about how to get people to do (good) things they’re predisposed not to do, and how communication can (and can’t) make positive interventions. A couple of things stood out, in particular “implementation intentions” and how they can be linked to goals. For example, in order to get people to check and test their smoke alarms (a goal intention, rarely actualized  an information campaign will attempt to link this activity to the clocks going back or forward (a strong implementation intention, well-actualized). The talk reinforced the idea that making behaviour changes easy and visible normalizes them and makes them more likely to succeed. To do this, they have to be embodied throughout a product and service cycle. Experiential disconnects undermine the normalization. So campaigns, products, and customer interactions must be aligned. This is underscored by the second section of the presentation, which talked about interventions and pre-conditions for change. Taking the examples of drug addiction and stopping smoking, Stephen showed us a framework for attempting (and succeeding or failing in) behaviour change. He noted that when the change is something people fundamentally want to do, and that is easy, this gets a to simpler. Coordinated, easily-observed environmental pressures create preconditions for change and build motivation. (price, pub smoking ban, ad campaigns, friend quitting, declining social acceptability) A triggering even leads to a change attempt. (getting a cold and panicking about how bad the cough is) Interventions can be made to enable an attempt (NHS services, public information, nicotine patches) If it succeeds – yay. If it fails, there’s strong negative enforcement. Triggering events seem largely personal, but messaging can intervene in the creation of preconditions and in supporting decisions. Stephen talked more about systems of thinking and “bounded rationality”. The idea being that to enable change you need to break through “automatic” thinking into “reflective” thinking. Disruption and emotion are great tools for this, but that is only the start of the process. It occurs to me that a great deal of market research is focused on determining triggers rather than analysing necessary preconditions. Although they are presumably related. The final section talked about setting goals. Marketing goals are often seen as deriving directly from business goals. However, marketing may be unable to deliver on these directly where decision and behaviour-change processes are involved. In those cases, marketing and communication goals should be to create preconditions. They should also consider priming and norms. Content marketing and brand awareness are good first steps here, as brands can be heuristics in decision making for choice-saturated consumers, or those seeking education. 5 – The power of engaged communities and how to build them, Harriet Minter (the Guardian) The meat of this was that you need to let communities define and establish themselves, and be quick to react to their needs. Harriet had been in charge of building the Guardian’s community sites, and learned a lot about how they come together, stabilize  grow, and react. Crucially, they can’t be about sales or push messaging. A community is not just an audience. It’s essential to start with what this particular segment or tribe are interested in, then what they want to hear. Eventually you can consider – in light of this – what they might want to buy, but you can’t start with the product. A community won’t cohere around one you’re pushing. Her tips for community building were (again, sorry, not verbatim): Set goals Have some targets. Community building sounds vague and fluffy, but you can have (and adjust) concrete goals. Think like a start-up This is the “lean” stuff. Try things, fail quickly, respond. Don’t restrict platforms Let the audience choose them, and be aware of their differences. For example, LinkedIn is very different to Twitter. Track your stats Related to the first point. Keeping an eye on the numbers lets you respond. They should be qualified, however. If you want a community of enterprise decision makers, headcount alone may be a bad metric – have you got CIOs, or just people who want to get jobs by mingling with CIOs? Build brand advocates Do things to involve people and make them awesome, and they’ll cheer-lead for you. The last part really got my attention. Little bits of drive-by kindness go a long way. But more than that, genuinely helping people turns them into powerful advocates. Harriet gave an example of the Guardian engaging with an aspiring journalist on its Q&A forums. Through a series of serendipitous encounters he became a BBC producer, and now enthusiastically speaks up for the Guardian community sites. Cultivating many small, authentic, influential voices may have a better pay-off than schmoozing the big guys. This could be particularly important in the context of Mark and Stephen’s models of social, endorsement-led, and example-led decision making. There’s a lot here I haven’t covered, and it may be worth some follow-up on community building. Thoughts I was quite sceptical of nudge theory and behavioural economics. First off it sounds too good to be true, and second it sounds too sinister to permit. But I haven’t done the background reading. So I’m going to, and if it seems to hold real water, and if it’s possible to do it ethically (Stephen’s presentations suggests it may be) then it’s probably worth exploring. The message seemed to be: change what people do, and they’ll work out why afterwards. Moreover, the people around them will do it too. Make the things you want them to do extraordinarily easy and very, very visible. Normalize and support the decisions you want them to make, and they’ll make them. In practice this means not talking about the thing, but showing the user-awesome. Glib? Perhaps. But it feels worth considering. Also, if I ever run a marketing conference, I’m going to ban speakers from using examples from Apple. Quite apart from not being consistently generalizable, it’s becoming an irritating cliché.

    Read the article

  • Frequently getting booted from Securemote VPN-1 Connection

    - by Nick L.
    I connect to my office's network remotely through the Checkpoint SecuRemote E75 (R75) VPN application, but recently it's been causing me a lot of issues when connecting from home. I connect through a WRT54GL router running DD-WRT v24 firmware, so I have no clue if that affects anything. I took a dump of the logs for Checkpoint and here are the messages that populate when I get booted but I have no clue how to decipher them and my IT department is completely clueless in terms of resolving the situation. I'm thinking the router is blocking the keep alive connection or something along those lines, but I have no idea how to fix the problem. [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:49][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TR_OFFICE_MODE::TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Not sending packet because it's not to the enc domain [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TR_EVENTS] TR_EVENTS::Raise: Running registered cb... [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TrComInf] TrComInf::TrComInfSendAsynchronic: __start__ 22:47:50.606 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TrComInf] TrComInf::TrComInf::TrComInfSendAsynchronic: Acquiring mutex [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][messaging] messaging::send_all: Sending Message {{ 2 }} , len 185 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][tcpserver] TcpMultiPipe::pipe_if_send: Message (193 bytes) written successfully to socket 0x224 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TrComInf] TrComInf::TrComInf::TrComInfSendAsynchronic: Released mutex [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TrComInf] TrComInf::TrComInfSendAsynchronic: __end__ 22:47:50.606. Total time - 0 milliseconds [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TR_SRV2CL] TR_SRV2CL::SendNotification: Successfully sent notification of type TR_NOTIFICATION_TRAFFIC_IDLE [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][vna] vna_trap: received VNA_TRAP_FORWARD_PACKET [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][vna] vna_traffic_fwd_do : forwarding packet with 98 bytes [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Packet to destination 192.168.162.15 of protocol 17 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:50][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TR_OFFICE_MODE::TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Not sending packet because it's not to the enc domain [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:51][vna] vna_trap: received VNA_TRAP_FORWARD_PACKET [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:51][vna] vna_traffic_fwd_do : forwarding packet with 98 bytes [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:51][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Packet to destination 192.168.162.15 of protocol 17 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:51][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TR_OFFICE_MODE::TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Not sending packet because it's not to the enc domain [ 2388 2392][30 Aug 22:47:52][TracService] service_ctrl_ex: Called with ctrl_code 14 [ 2388 2392][30 Aug 22:47:52][TracService] service_ctrl_ex: System got SERVICE_CONTROL_SESSIONCHANGE message event type 4 session 2 [ 2388 2392][30 Aug 22:47:52][TracService] service_ctrl_ex: Console/remote disconnect has occured in session 2 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][vna] vna_trap: received VNA_TRAP_FORWARD_PACKET [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][vna] vna_traffic_fwd_do : forwarding packet with 98 bytes [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Packet to destination 192.168.162.15 of protocol 17 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_OFFICE_MODE] TR_OFFICE_MODE::TrOfficeMode::OmSendIpFrameCB: Not sending packet because it's not to the enc domain [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_CONN_MANAGER] TR_CONN_MANAGER::ConnEnum: Returning connection at position 1 [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_EVENTS] TR_EVENTS::Raise: Running registered cb... [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_CONN_MANAGER] TR_CONN_MANAGER::ConnEventMainHandler: no gw handle [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_CONN_MANAGER] TR_CONN_MANAGER::ConnEventMainHandler: Current connection state is TR_CONN_STATE_CONNECTED. Receiving event of type CONN_EVENT_SYSTEM_SESSION_LOGOFF. Connection handle = 1. System state: TR_SYSTEM_STATE_RUNNING [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][CONFIG_MANAGER] suspend_tunnel_while_locked return value false, because it is Default variable. Scope: site 12.43.159.10, gw NULL ,user USER [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_CONN_MANAGER] TR_CONN_MANAGER::ConnEventConnectedHandler: no gw handle [ 2388 2932][30 Aug 22:47:52][TR_CONN_MANAGER] TR_CONN_MANAGER::ConnEventConnectedHandler: receive session logoff event while connected. cancelling connection Thanks all. :)

    Read the article

  • Asus EEE PC 1005HA battery not being detected

    - by Imran
    My EEE PC's battery is not being detected since this morning. The battery indicator doesn't turn on, Power Options in Windows doesn't detect a battery either. Apart from removing the battery and plugging it back again (which I already did), what can I do??

    Read the article

  • Brightness controls not adjusting the brightness in ubuntu 10.10 64 bit on hp dm3t notebook

    - by user26768
    I picked up an hp dm3t laptop with intel HD graphics and installed ubuntu 10.10 64 bit on it. It works great -- the only problem is that the brightness controls don't work. The brightness is always at full. When I try to adjust it down, the indicator graphic indicates that it's going down but the actual brightness doesn't change. Is there anything that I can try to make this work? I'd really appreciate any help.

    Read the article

  • JBoss AS 5: starts but can't connect (Windows, remote)

    - by Nuwan
    Hello I installed Jboss 5.0GA and Its works fine in localhost.But I want It to access through remote Machine.Then I bind my IP address to my server and started it.This is the command I used run.bat -b 10.17.62.63 Then the server Starts fine This is the console log when starting the server > =============================================================================== > > JBoss Bootstrap Environment > > JBOSS_HOME: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA > > JAVA: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_34\bin\java > > JAVA_OPTS: -Dprogram.name=run.bat -server -Xms128m -Xmx512m > -XX:MaxPermSize=25 6m -Dorg.jboss.resolver.warning=true -Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=3600000 -Ds un.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=3600000 > > CLASSPATH: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\bin\run.jar > > =============================================================================== > > run.bat: unused non-option argument: ûb run.bat: unused non-option > argument: 0.0.0.0 13:43:38,179 INFO [ServerImpl] Starting JBoss > (Microcontainer)... 13:43:38,179 INFO [ServerImpl] Release ID: JBoss > [Morpheus] 5.0.0.GA (build: SV NTag=JBoss_5_0_0_GA date=200812041714) > 13:43:38,179 INFO [ServerImpl] Bootstrap URL: null 13:43:38,179 INFO > [ServerImpl] Home Dir: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA 13:43:38,179 INFO > [ServerImpl] Home URL: file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/ 13:43:38,195 INFO > [ServerImpl] Library URL: file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/lib/ 13:43:38,195 > INFO [ServerImpl] Patch URL: null 13:43:38,195 INFO [ServerImpl] > Common Base URL: file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/common/ > > 13:43:38,195 INFO [ServerImpl] Common Library URL: > file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/comm on/lib/ 13:43:38,195 INFO [ServerImpl] > Server Name: default 13:43:38,195 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Base Dir: > C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server 13:43:38,195 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Base > URL: file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/ > > 13:43:38,210 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Config URL: > file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/serve r/default/conf/ 13:43:38,210 INFO > [ServerImpl] Server Home Dir: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server\defaul t > 13:43:38,210 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Home URL: > file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/ default/ 13:43:38,210 INFO > [ServerImpl] Server Data Dir: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server\defaul t\data > 13:43:38,210 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Library URL: > file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/serv er/default/lib/ 13:43:38,210 INFO > [ServerImpl] Server Log Dir: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server\default \log > 13:43:38,210 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Native Dir: > C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server\defa ult\tmp\native 13:43:38,210 INFO > [ServerImpl] Server Temp Dir: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server\defaul t\tmp > 13:43:38,210 INFO [ServerImpl] Server Temp Deploy Dir: > C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server \default\tmp\deploy 13:43:39,710 INFO > [ServerImpl] Starting Microcontainer, bootstrapURL=file:/C:/j > boss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/conf/bootstrap.xml 13:43:40,851 INFO > [VFSCacheFactory] Initializing VFSCache [org.jboss.virtual.pl > ugins.cache.IterableTimedVFSCache] 13:43:40,866 INFO > [VFSCacheFactory] Using VFSCache [IterableTimedVFSCache{lifet > ime=1800, resolution=60}] 13:43:41,616 INFO [CopyMechanism] VFS temp > dir: C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server\defaul t\tmp 13:43:41,648 INFO > [ZipEntryContext] VFS force nested jars copy-mode is enabled. > > 13:43:44,288 INFO [ServerInfo] Java version: 1.6.0_34,Sun > Microsystems Inc. 13:43:44,288 INFO [ServerInfo] Java VM: Java > HotSpot(TM) Server VM 20.9-b04,Sun Microsystems Inc. 13:43:44,288 > INFO [ServerInfo] OS-System: Windows XP 5.1,x86 13:43:44,569 INFO > [JMXKernel] Legacy JMX core initialized 13:43:50,148 INFO > [ProfileServiceImpl] Loading profile: default from: org.jboss > .system.server.profileservice.repository.SerializableDeploymentRepository@e72f0c > (root=C:\jboss-5.0.0.GA\server, > key=org.jboss.profileservice.spi.ProfileKey@143b > 82c3[domain=default,server=default,name=default]) 13:43:50,148 INFO > [ProfileImpl] Using repository:org.jboss.system.server.profil > eservice.repository.SerializableDeploymentRepository@e72f0c(root=C:\jboss-5.0.0. > GA\server, > key=org.jboss.profileservice.spi.ProfileKey@143b82c3[domain=default,s > erver=default,name=default]) 13:43:50,148 INFO [ProfileServiceImpl] > Loaded profile: ProfileImpl@8b3bb3{key=o > rg.jboss.profileservice.spi.ProfileKey@143b82c3[domain=default,server=default,na > me=default]} 13:43:54,804 INFO [WebService] Using RMI server > codebase: http://127.0.0.1:8083 / 13:44:12,147 INFO [CXFServerConfig] > JBoss Web Services - Stack CXF Runtime Serv er 13:44:12,147 INFO > [CXFServerConfig] 3.1.2.GA 13:44:29,788 INFO > [Ejb3DependenciesDeployer] Encountered deployment AbstractVFS > DeploymentContext@29776073{vfszip:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/myE-e > jb.jar} 13:44:29,819 INFO [Ejb3DependenciesDeployer] Encountered > deployment AbstractVFS > DeploymentContext@29776073{vfszip:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/myE-e > jb.jar} 13:44:29,819 INFO [Ejb3DependenciesDeployer] Encountered > deployment AbstractVFS > DeploymentContext@29776073{vfszip:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/myE-e > jb.jar} 13:44:29,819 INFO [Ejb3DependenciesDeployer] Encountered > deployment AbstractVFS > DeploymentContext@29776073{vfszip:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/myE-e > jb.jar} 13:44:37,116 INFO [JMXConnectorServerService] JMX Connector > server: service:jmx > :rmi://127.0.0.1/jndi/rmi://127.0.0.1:1090/jmxconnector 13:44:38,022 > INFO [MailService] Mail Service bound to java:/Mail 13:44:43,162 WARN > [JBossASSecurityMetadataStore] WARNING! POTENTIAL SECURITY RI SK. It > has been detected that the MessageSucker component which sucks > messages f rom one node to another has not had its password changed > from the installation d efault. Please see the JBoss Messaging user > guide for instructions on how to do this. 13:44:43,209 WARN > [AnnotationCreator] No ClassLoader provided, using TCCL: org. > jboss.managed.api.annotation.ManagementComponent 13:44:43,600 INFO > [TransactionManagerService] JBossTS Transaction Service (JTA version) > - JBoss Inc. 13:44:43,600 INFO [TransactionManagerService] Setting up property manager MBean and JMX layer 13:44:44,366 INFO > [TransactionManagerService] Initializing recovery manager 13:44:44,678 > INFO [TransactionManagerService] Recovery manager configured > 13:44:44,678 INFO [TransactionManagerService] Binding > TransactionManager JNDI R eference 13:44:44,787 INFO > [TransactionManagerService] Starting transaction recovery man ager > 13:44:46,428 INFO [Http11Protocol] Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on > http-127.0.0 .1-8080 13:44:46,459 INFO [AjpProtocol] Initializing > Coyote AJP/1.3 on ajp-127.0.0.1-80 09 13:44:46,459 INFO > [StandardService] Starting service jboss.web 13:44:46,475 INFO > [StandardEngine] Starting Servlet Engine: JBoss Web/2.1.1.GA > 13:44:46,616 INFO [Catalina] Server startup in 350 ms 13:44:46,709 > INFO [TomcatDeployment] deploy, ctxPath=/web-console, vfsUrl=manag > ement/console-mgr.sar/web-console.war 13:44:48,553 INFO > [TomcatDeployment] deploy, ctxPath=/juddi, vfsUrl=juddi-servi > ce.sar/juddi.war 13:44:48,678 INFO [RegistryServlet] Loading jUDDI > configuration. 13:44:48,694 INFO [RegistryServlet] Resources loaded > from: /WEB-INF/juddi.prope rties 13:44:48,709 INFO [RegistryServlet] > Initializing jUDDI components. 13:44:48,991 INFO [TomcatDeployment] > deploy, ctxPath=/invoker, vfsUrl=http-invo ker.sar/invoker.war > 13:44:49,162 INFO [TomcatDeployment] deploy, ctxPath=/jbossws, > vfsUrl=jbossws.s ar/jbossws-management.war 13:44:49,475 INFO > [RARDeployment] Required license terms exist, view vfszip:/C: > /jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/jboss-local-jdbc.rar/META-INF/ra.xml > 13:44:49,569 INFO [RARDeployment] Required license terms exist, view > vfszip:/C: > /jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/jboss-xa-jdbc.rar/META-INF/ra.xml > 13:44:49,741 INFO [RARDeployment] Required license terms exist, view > vfszip:/C: > /jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/jms-ra.rar/META-INF/ra.xml > 13:44:49,819 INFO [RARDeployment] Required license terms exist, view > vfszip:/C: > /jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/mail-ra.rar/META-INF/ra.xml > 13:44:49,912 INFO [RARDeployment] Required license terms exist, view > vfszip:/C: > /jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/deploy/quartz-ra.rar/META-INF/ra.xml > 13:44:50,069 INFO [SimpleThreadPool] Job execution threads will use > class loade r of thread: main 13:44:50,115 INFO [QuartzScheduler] > Quartz Scheduler v.1.5.2 created. 13:44:50,131 INFO [RAMJobStore] > RAMJobStore initialized. 13:44:50,131 INFO [StdSchedulerFactory] > Quartz scheduler 'DefaultQuartzSchedule r' initialized from default > resource file in Quartz package: 'quartz.properties' > > 13:44:50,131 INFO [StdSchedulerFactory] Quartz scheduler version: > 1.5.2 13:44:50,131 INFO [QuartzScheduler] Scheduler DefaultQuartzScheduler_$_NON_CLUS TERED started. 13:44:51,194 INFO > [ConnectionFactoryBindingService] Bound ConnectionManager 'jb > oss.jca:service=DataSourceBinding,name=DefaultDS' to JNDI name > 'java:DefaultDS' 13:44:51,819 WARN [QuartzTimerServiceFactory] sql > failed: CREATE TABLE QRTZ_JOB > _DETAILS(JOB_NAME VARCHAR(80) NOT NULL, JOB_GROUP VARCHAR(80) NOT NULL, DESCRIPT ION VARCHAR(120) NULL, JOB_CLASS_NAME VARCHAR(128) NOT > NULL, IS_DURABLE VARCHAR( 1) NOT NULL, IS_VOLATILE VARCHAR(1) NOT > NULL, IS_STATEFUL VARCHAR(1) NOT NULL, R EQUESTS_RECOVERY VARCHAR(1) > NOT NULL, JOB_DATA BINARY NULL, PRIMARY KEY (JOB_NAM E,JOB_GROUP)) > 13:44:51,912 INFO [SimpleThreadPool] Job execution threads will use > class loade r of thread: main 13:44:51,928 INFO [QuartzScheduler] > Quartz Scheduler v.1.5.2 created. 13:44:51,928 INFO [JobStoreCMT] > Using db table-based data access locking (synch ronization). > 13:44:51,944 INFO [JobStoreCMT] Removed 0 Volatile Trigger(s). > 13:44:51,944 INFO [JobStoreCMT] Removed 0 Volatile Job(s). > 13:44:51,944 INFO [JobStoreCMT] JobStoreCMT initialized. 13:44:51,944 > INFO [StdSchedulerFactory] Quartz scheduler 'JBossEJB3QuartzSchedu > ler' initialized from an externally provided properties instance. > 13:44:51,959 INFO [StdSchedulerFactory] Quartz scheduler version: > 1.5.2 13:44:51,959 INFO [JobStoreCMT] Freed 0 triggers from 'acquired' / 'blocked' st ate. 13:44:51,975 INFO [JobStoreCMT] > Recovering 0 jobs that were in-progress at the time of the last > shut-down. 13:44:51,975 INFO [JobStoreCMT] Recovery complete. > 13:44:51,975 INFO [JobStoreCMT] Removed 0 'complete' triggers. > 13:44:51,975 INFO [JobStoreCMT] Removed 0 stale fired job entries. > 13:44:51,990 INFO [QuartzScheduler] Scheduler > JBossEJB3QuartzScheduler_$_NON_CL USTERED started. 13:44:52,381 INFO > [ServerPeer] JBoss Messaging 1.4.1.GA server [0] started 13:44:52,569 > INFO [QueueService] Queue[/queue/DLQ] started, fullSize=200000, pa > geSize=2000, downCacheSize=2000 13:44:52,584 INFO [QueueService] > Queue[/queue/ExpiryQueue] started, fullSize=20 0000, pageSize=2000, > downCacheSize=2000 13:44:52,709 INFO [ConnectionFactory] Connector > bisocket://127.0.0.1:4457 has l easing enabled, lease period 10000 > milliseconds 13:44:52,709 INFO [ConnectionFactory] > org.jboss.jms.server.connectionfactory.Co nnectionFactory@1a8ac5e > started 13:44:52,725 WARN [ConnectionFactoryJNDIMapper] > supportsFailover attribute is t rue on connection factory: > jboss.messaging.connectionfactory:service=ClusteredCo nnectionFactory > but post office is non clustered. So connection factory will *no t* > support failover 13:44:52,725 WARN [ConnectionFactoryJNDIMapper] > supportsLoadBalancing attribute is true on connection factory: > jboss.messaging.connectionfactory:service=Cluste redConnectionFactory > but post office is non clustered. So connection factory wil l *not* > support load balancing 13:44:52,740 INFO [ConnectionFactory] > Connector bisocket://127.0.0.1:4457 has l easing enabled, lease period > 10000 milliseconds 13:44:52,740 INFO [ConnectionFactory] > org.jboss.jms.server.connectionfactory.Co nnectionFactory@1d43178 > started 13:44:52,740 INFO [ConnectionFactory] Connector > bisocket://127.0.0.1:4457 has l easing enabled, lease period 10000 > milliseconds 13:44:52,756 INFO [ConnectionFactory] > org.jboss.jms.server.connectionfactory.Co nnectionFactory@52728a > started 13:44:53,084 INFO [ConnectionFactoryBindingService] Bound > ConnectionManager 'jb > oss.jca:service=ConnectionFactoryBinding,name=JmsXA' to JNDI name > 'java:JmsXA' 13:44:53,225 INFO [TomcatDeployment] deploy, ctxPath=/, > vfsUrl=ROOT.war 13:44:53,553 INFO [TomcatDeployment] deploy, > ctxPath=/jmx-console, vfsUrl=jmx-c onsole.war 13:44:53,975 INFO > [TomcatDeployment] deploy, ctxPath=/TestService, vfsUrl=TestS > erviceEAR.ear/TestService.war 13:44:55,662 INFO [JBossASKernel] > Created KernelDeployment for: myE-ejb.jar 13:44:55,709 INFO > [JBossASKernel] installing bean: jboss.j2ee:jar=myE-ejb.jar,n > ame=RPSService,service=EJB3 13:44:55,725 INFO [JBossASKernel] with > dependencies: 13:44:55,725 INFO [JBossASKernel] and demands: > 13:44:55,725 INFO [JBossASKernel] > jboss.ejb:service=EJBTimerService 13:44:55,725 INFO [JBossASKernel] > and supplies: 13:44:55,725 INFO [JBossASKernel] > jndi:RPSService/remote 13:44:55,725 INFO [JBossASKernel] Added > bean(jboss.j2ee:jar=myE-ejb.jar,name=RP SService,service=EJB3) to > KernelDeployment of: myE-ejb.jar 13:44:56,772 INFO > [SessionSpecContainer] Starting jboss.j2ee:jar=myE-ejb.jar,na > me=RPSService,service=EJB3 13:44:56,803 INFO [EJBContainer] STARTED > EJB: com.monz.rpz.RPSService ejbName: RPSService 13:44:56,819 INFO > [JndiSessionRegistrarBase] Binding the following Entries in G lobal > JNDI: > > > 13:44:57,381 INFO [DefaultEndpointRegistry] register: > jboss.ws:context=myE-ejb, endpoint=RPSService 13:44:57,428 INFO > [DescriptorDeploymentAspect] Add Service id=RPSService > address=http://127.0.0.1:8080/myE-ejb/RPSService > implementor=com.monz.rpz.RPSService > invoker=org.jboss.wsf.stack.cxf.InvokerEJB3 mtomEnabled=false > 13:44:57,459 INFO [DescriptorDeploymentAspect] JBossWS-CXF > configuration genera ted: > file:/C:/jboss-5.0.0.GA/server/default/tmp/jbossws/jbossws-cxf1864137209199 > 110130.xml 13:44:57,569 INFO [TomcatDeployment] deploy, ctxPath=/myE-ejb, vfsUrl=myE-ejb.j ar 13:44:57,709 WARN [config] > Unable to process deployment descriptor for context '/myE-ejb' > 13:44:59,334 INFO [Http11Protocol] Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on > http-127.0.0.1-8 080 13:44:59,397 INFO [AjpProtocol] Starting Coyote > AJP/1.3 on ajp-127.0.0.1-8009 13:44:59,459 INFO [ServerImpl] JBoss > (Microcontainer) [5.0.0.GA (build: SVNTag= JBoss_5_0_0_GA > date=200812041714)] Started in 1m:21s:233ms But Still I cant connect to It when I Type my IP address in my browser thanks

    Read the article

  • How to retrieve names of all private MSMQ queues - efficiently?

    - by Damian Powell
    How can I retrieve the names of all of the private MSMQ queues on the local machine, without using System.Messaging.MessageQueue.GetPrivateQueuesByMachine(".")? I'm using PowerShell so any solution using COM, WMI, or .NET is acceptable, although the latter is preferable. Note that this StackOverflow question has a solution that returns all of the queue objects. I don't want the objects (it's too slow and a little flakey when there are lots of queues), I just want their names.

    Read the article

  • Free web app that can be used to keep track of loans made to people (like Mint)

    - by ShaChris23
    Is there a web app that is: Free Behaves like Mint But allows me to keep track of money I loan or owe other people? I should be able to setup an "account" for each person that I loan out to, and be able to "check off" when the person returns me the money, etc. I should also be able to add notes to each transaction to help me remember what it was for. Would be even nicer if I can add transactions via text messaging, email, etc.

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu vs Kubuntu: The closest Windows experience

    - by Leonardo
    For an experienced Windows user wanting to start experimenting with Linux, which distro provides the closest Windows experience? Assuming the use cases enumerated below: Web browsing Working with Office 2003/2007 documents File indexing (desktop search) Basic Sql Server 2005 database administration Media playback(MP3, M4P, WMV, WMA, dvds, etc) Windows Live instant messaging Skype calls/video calls Organizing millions of files FTP/SFTP, SSH, telnet automation

    Read the article

  • No power to HP pavilion dv 1000

    - by Imajica666
    I am working on a friends laptop. I get no power indicator light while plugged in to ac outlet. Will not power on with just the battery. Might this be a case of replacing the system board? I have never broken open a laptop so I am not sure what the best path to take might be. Thanks for any opinions.

    Read the article

  • Excel Data Organization: Array Formulas? Tables? Named Range?

    - by Joe Arasin
    I'm trying to make a huge Excel sheet reasonably maintainable, but it's huge in the "hundred-table-db" direction, rather than the "hundred-thousand-row-table" direction. I want to have a baseline data table that looks something like this: | Indicator | Units | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | Source | | GDP | $Gazillion | 300 | 350 | 400 | 450 | BLS | | Population | Millions | 350 | 400 | 450 | 500 | Census | | PetMonkeyPopulation | Thousands | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | SimiansRUs | And then be able to have another sheet that looks like: | | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | | MonkeysPerCapita | .1 | .2 | .3 | .4 | | MonkeysPerDollar | .01 | .01 | .01 | .01 | | GDPPerCapita | 300 | 400 | 450 | 600 | Is there some standard way to make this kind of thing maintainable?

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2003 calendar's "far" future is blank when scheduling

    - by wfaulk
    If a user tries to schedule a meeting in the "far" future, where ""far" future" seems to mean "seven or more weeks into the future", no existing meetings show up, and resources (at least) frequently (if not always) show up with the white-with-black-hatching "No Information" indicator in the meeting creation window, but shows up fine if you look at the actual calendar from the main Outlook window. Is this expected behavior? If so, is there any way to extend how far out Exchange/Outlook will look?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36  | Next Page >