Search Results

Search found 57023 results on 2281 pages for 'object to string'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 420/2281 | < Previous Page | 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427  | Next Page >

  • Support for encoding query string or POST data in YUI ?

    - by faB
    How do you encode a javascript object/hash (pairs of properties and values) into a URL-encoded query string with YUI (2.7.0 or 3.0.0 Beta) ? I want to do the equivalent of Object.toQueryString() from Prototype: I need this to encode parameters for GET and POST requests with YAHOO.util.Connect. It turns out YAHOO.util.Connect has a setForm() method to serialize a form but that still leaves me out cold to encode parameters for GET requests, or the 4th parameter of YAHOO.util.Connect.asyncRequest() to pass post data.

    Read the article

  • How do I implement multiple kinds of an object in OOP?

    - by Jeremy Rudd
    I have multiple kinds of an object, say Car for example. Do I have each kind in an inherited class/subclass of Car? Do I place these under a cartype namespace so as not to mess up the main namespace? Then later when I need an array of cars, should I declare it as var currentCars():Car or var currentCars():Object? Would the former support any subclass of Car?

    Read the article

  • What are the reasons to select Object Oriented Programming over Procedural Programming?

    - by Starx
    Nowadays, Standard Coding has become Synonymous to Object Oriented Programming. But what are the reasons that forced classical procedural programming out of the way and rose the new concept of Object Oriented Programming. What were the limitations that Procedural Programming could not accomplish? and Does procedural language still hold some value in the field of programming? If yes, What are they, and What are there advantages over OOP?

    Read the article

  • Is it safe to access asp.net session variables through static properties of a static object?

    - by Ronnie Overby
    Is it safe to access asp.net session variables through static properties of a static object? Here is what I mean: public static class SessionHelper { public static int Age { get { return (int)HttpContext.Current.Session["Age"]; } set { HttpContext.Current.Session["Age"] = value; } } public static string Name { get { return (string)HttpContext.Current.Session["Name"]; } set { HttpContext.Current.Session["Name"] = value; } } } Is it possible that userA could access userB's session data this way?

    Read the article

  • Why does Joda time change the PM in my input string to AM?

    - by Tree
    My input string is a PM time: log(start); // Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:30:00 PM I'm using Joda Time's pattern syntax as follows to parse the DateTime: DateTimeFormatter parser1 = DateTimeFormat.forPattern("EEEE, MMMM dd, yyyy H:mm:ss aa"); DateTime startTime = parser1.parseDateTime(start); So, why is my output string AM? log(parser1.print(startTime)); // Sunday, January 09, 2011 6:30:00 AM

    Read the article

  • Why can't I create a Date from a string including milliseconds?

    - by KooiInc
    In javascript you can create a Date object from a string, like var mydate = new Date('2008/05/10 12:08:20'); console.log(mydate); //=> Sat May 10 2008 12:08:20 GMT+0200 Now try this using milliseconds in the string var mydate = new Date('2008/05/10 12:08:20:551'); // or '2008/05/10 12:08:20.551' console.log(mydate); //=> NaN Just out of curiosity: why is this?

    Read the article

  • How can I send a json string to view as a json object?

    - by yapiskan
    I have a json string in an action of MVC controller. I want to send it to view as a JSON object. How can I solve this? public JsonResult Json() { ... some code here ... string jsonString = "{\"Success\":true, \"Msg\":null}"; return new JsonResult() { Data = jsonString, JsonRequestBehavior = JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet }; }

    Read the article

  • Why an object declared in method is subject to garbage collection before the method returns?

    - by SiLent SoNG
    Consider an object declared in a method: public void foo() { final Object obj = new Object(); // A long run job that consumes tons of memory and // triggers garbage collection } Will obj be subject to garbage collection before foo() returns? UPDATE: Previously I thought obj is not subject to garbage collection until foo() returns. However, today I find myself wrong. I have spend several hours in fixing a bug and finally found the problem is caused by obj garbage collected! Can anyone explain why this happens? And if I want obj to be pinned how to achieve it? Here is the code that has problem. public class Program { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { String connectionString = "jdbc:mysql://<whatever>"; // I find wrap is gc-ed somewhere SqlConnection wrap = new SqlConnection(connectionString); Connection con = wrap.currentConnection(); Statement stmt = con.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY, ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY); stmt.setFetchSize(Integer.MIN_VALUE); ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select instance_id, doc_id from crawler_archive.documents"); while (rs.next()) { int instanceID = rs.getInt(1); int docID = rs.getInt(2); if (docID % 1000 == 0) { System.out.println(docID); } } rs.close(); //wrap.close(); } } After running the Java program, it will print the following message before it crashes: 161000 161000 ******************************** Finalizer CALLED!! ******************************** ******************************** Close CALLED!! ******************************** 162000 Exception in thread "main" com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.CommunicationsException: And here is the code of class SqlConnection: class SqlConnection { private final String connectionString; private Connection connection; public SqlConnection(String connectionString) { this.connectionString = connectionString; } public synchronized Connection currentConnection() throws SQLException { if (this.connection == null || this.connection.isClosed()) { this.closeConnection(); this.connection = DriverManager.getConnection(connectionString); } return this.connection; } protected void finalize() throws Throwable { try { System.out.println("********************************"); System.out.println("Finalizer CALLED!!"); System.out.println("********************************"); this.close(); } finally { super.finalize(); } } public void close() { System.out.println("********************************"); System.out.println("Close CALLED!!"); System.out.println("********************************"); this.closeConnection(); } protected void closeConnection() { if (this.connection != null) { try { connection.close(); } catch (Throwable e) { } finally { this.connection = null; } } } }

    Read the article

  • How is "Make Object ID" implemented in the .NET debugger?

    - by Omer Raviv
    Hi, I would like know how this feature is implemented in VS - I understand it holds some sort of weak-reference to the object in the debugged-application's memory, but how exactly is it accomplished? I know simply tracking the address (as in native code) wouldn't work, because the GC might move the object about, invalidating the address. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Is there a built-in .NET method for getting all of the properties and values for an object?

    - by Ben McCormack
    Let's say I have: public class Item { public string SKU {get; set; } public string Description {get; set; } } .... Is there a built-in method in .NET that will let me get the properties and values for variable i of type Item that might look like this: {SKU: "123-4556", Description: "Millennial Radio Classic"} I know that .ToString() can be overloaded to provide this functionaility, but I couldn't remember if this was already provided in .NET.

    Read the article

  • What is more correct class name or object name in UML sequence diagram?

    - by atch
    I was just wondering if it is more correctly to as a label of objects in UML sequence diagram instead of object name (which is irrelevant in my opinion and less informative than class name) provide class name. Another thing, while returning information instead of listing all objects names would it be a better solution to just write collection; Diagram with object names: Diagram with class names: As it's clearly visible from the second diagram that it is much more informative than the first one, and I think it is more practical.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427  | Next Page >