Search Results

Search found 2220 results on 89 pages for 'gcc'.

Page 70/89 | < Previous Page | 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77  | Next Page >

• Whats wrong with my makefile

  - by user577220

  ##################################################################### # This is the filesystem makefile "make_BuddyAlloc". # Author:Michael Gomes # Date:2 jan 2011 ###################################################################### #variable defination CC = gcc CFLAGS = -g -O2 SRC_DIR=src INC_DIR=inc OBJ_DIR=obj #List of source files SOURCE= buddyMain.c \ Copy.c \ #List of object files OBJECTS=$(addprefix $(OBJ_DIR)/,$(SOURCE:.c=.o)) #BuddyAlloc is dependent on "obj/*.o". BuddyAlloc : $(OBJECTS) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o BuddyAlloc $< #obj/*.o depends on src/*.c and inc/*.h, we are redirecting the object files to obj folder $(OBJECTS):$(SRC_DIR)/$(SOURCE) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -I$(INC_DIR) -o $(OBJ_DIR)/$(OBJECTS) -c $< #Cleans all the *.exe files clean: rm -f *.exe I have kept the source files under src folder includes under inc folder and the object files are being saved in obj folder .given above is the makefile i am trying to create for my mini project. I keep getting the error no rule to make target 'Copy.c' needed by 'obj/buddyAlloc.o', but it works fine it i dont include Copy.c, what did i do wrong?

  Read the article

• Whats wrong with this C program?

  - by Prab

  It should give me the number of inputs entered by the user. But it gives 100. I compiled with gcc. #include <stdio.h> int arr[100]; int count=0; int max=100; int main(){ int i, input; printf("Enter integer values one by one, q to quit.\n"); for(i=0;i<max;i++){ scanf("%d",&input); arr[i]=input; if(input=='q')break; count++; } printf("You entered %d values.\n",count); return 0; }

  Read the article

• closing sockets on linux and windows

  - by robUK

  Hello, gcc 4.4.4 c89 Visual Studio VC++ 2008 I am writing a cross platform client server application. It will run on both linux and windows. However, I am just wondering what I have done for closing the sockets is correct. I close the file descriptor. However, if there is a problem with closing it. What is the best way to handle this. Maybe some data is still being sent or received? Many thanks for any advice, if(close(sockfd) == -1) { #if defined ( _WIN32 ) fprintf(stderr, "[ %d ] [ %s ] [ %s ] [ %d ]\n", WSAGetLastError(), strerror(errno), __func__, __LINE__); #elif( __linux__ ) fprintf(stderr, "[ %s ] [ %s ] [ %d ]\n", strerror(errno), __func__, __LINE__); #endif return CS_FAILURE; }

  Read the article

• Assigning a pointer variable to a const int in C++?

  - by John

  I'm wondering if anyone can explain the following to me: If I write int i = 0; float* pf = i; I get a compile error (gcc 4.2.1): error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to ‘float*’ Makes sense - they are obviously two completely different types. But if instead I write const int i = 0; float* pf = i; It compiles without error. Why should the 'const' make a difference on the right hand side of the assignment? Isn't part of the idea of the 'const' keyword to be able to enforce type constraints for constant values? Any explanation I have been able to come up with feels kind of bogus. And none of my explanations also explain the fact that const int i = 1; float* pf = i; fails to compile. Can anyone offer an explanation?

  Read the article

• Why is Python 3.1.3 in the header listed as a syntax error?

  - by squashua

  Hi, I'm a newbie programmer so I'll do my best to clearly ask my question. I'm running Python scripts in Mac 10.6.5 and now trying to write and save to a text file (following instructions in HeadsUp Python book). Whenever I hit function+F5 (as instructed) I get the same "invalid syntax" error and Idle highlights the "1" in "Python 3.1.3" of the header. Here's the header to which I'm referring: Python 3.1.3 (r313:86882M, Nov 30 2010, 09:55:56) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5494)] on darwin Type "copyright", "credits" or "license()" for more information. Extremely frustrating. I've checked and rechecked the code but this doesn't seem to be code related because the "syntax error" is in regards to the header text that posts in every Idle/Python session. Help anyone? Thanks, Squash

  Read the article

• how to specify a pointer to an overloaded function?

  - by davka

  I want to pass an overloaded function to the std::for_each() algorithm. e.g.: void f(char c); void f(int i); std::string s("example"); std::for_each(s.begin(), s.end(), f); I'd expect the compiler to resolve f() by the iterator type. Apparently, it (gcc 4.1.2) doesn't do it. So, how can I specify which f() I want? thanks a lot

  Read the article

• Resolve circular typedef dependency?

  - by Nick

  What is the best way to resolve the following circular dependency in typedef-ing these structs? Note the C language tag - I'm looking for a solution in standard gcc C. typedef struct { char* name; int age; int lefthanded; People* friends; } Person; typedef struct { int count; int max; Person* data; } People;

  Read the article

• C++ runtime, display exception message

  - by aaa

  hello. I am using gcc on linux to compile C++ code. There are some exceptions which should not be handled and should close program. However, I would like to be able to display exception string: For example: throw std::runtime_error(" message"); does not display message, only type of error. I would like to display messages as well. Is there way to do it? it is a library, I really do not want to put catch statements and let library user decide. However, right now library user is fortran, which does not allow to handle exceptions. in principle, I can put handlers in wrapper code, but rather not to if there is a way around Thanks

  Read the article

• Initializing a array after declaration

  - by robUK

  Hello, gcc 4.4.3 c89 I have the following code as a sample of what I am trying to do. I don't know the actual size of the array, until I enter the function. However, I don't think I can set the array size after I have declared it. I need it global as some other functions will need to access the device names. Many thanks for any suggestions, /* global */ char *devices_names[]; void fill_devices(size_t num_devices) { devices_names[num_devices]; /* start filling */ }

  Read the article

• How to split the definition of template friend funtion within template class?

  - by ~joke

  The following example compiles fine but I can't figure out how to separate declaration and definition of operator<<() is this particular case. Every time I try to split the definition friend is causing trouble and gcc complains the operator<<() definition must take exactly one argument. #include <iostream> template <typename T> class Test { public: Test(const T& value) : value_(value) {} template <typename STREAM> friend STREAM& operator<<(STREAM& os, const Test<T>& rhs) { os << rhs.value_; return os; } private: T value_; }; int main() { std::cout << Test<int>(5) << std::endl; }

  Read the article

• Initializing an array after declaration

  - by robUK

  Hello, gcc 4.4.3 c89 I have the following code as a sample of what I am trying to do. I don't know the actual size of the array, until I enter the function. However, I don't think I can set the array size after I have declared it. I need it global as some other functions will need to access the device names. Many thanks for any suggestions, /* global */ char *devices_names[]; void fill_devices(size_t num_devices) { devices_names[num_devices]; /* start filling */ }

  Read the article

• Macros giving problems with dladdr()

  - by Veger

  I have implemented tracing behavior using the -finstrument-functions option of gcc and this (simplified) code: void __cyg_profile_func_enter(void *this_fn, void *call_site) { Dl_info di; if(dladdr(this_fn, &di)) printf("entered %s\n", (di.dli_sname?di_dli_sname:"<unknown>")); } This works great, except for one thing: macros are processed as well, but the function prints the information of the function which contains the macro. So functions containing macros have their information printed multiple times (which is of course undesired). Is there anything to detect that a macro is being processed? Or is is possible to turn off instrumenting macros at all? PS Same problems occur with sizeof()

  Read the article

• How are OpenGL programs debugged?

  - by manasij7479

  I'm trying to find what is causing a segfault when glDrawArrays is called (as gdb says) in my simple program. When I use the OpenGl calls directly, the program runs fine. But when I wrap them up into two classes (under construction, of vao and vbo) the program segfaults. So, in my wrappers, I definitly disabled something or set something I'm not supposed to. My question is, how do I get some diagnostics that will help me pinpoint the source of the problem ? I'm looking for something similar to what glGetShaderiv does, but for vao and vbo s, that will tell me if I have..say.. unbound a buffer by mistake. [I'm not posting the code here, but if any of you want to donate some time by testing a segfaulting example, here is a tar.gz of the source . You'll need working libraries of sfml-2.0rc, glew and gcc=4.6 .]

  Read the article

• Error including errno.h

  - by TechWiz

  Every time I try to compile a project that includes errno.h in linux, I get issues using the error codes. GCC spits out errors saying the error codes aren't declared and I get the same issue with 3rd party projects that are, of course, known to compile. I have the Linux headers for my kernel installed. Any suggestions as to what else it could be? edit: Snippet at error code: if ((res != 0) && (errno == EEXIST)) Snippet of includes: ... #include <dirent.h> #include <errno.h> #include <stdarg.h> ... as is with no ifdef edit: Well I'm convinced my system's Linux headers are hosed somehow... that, or I'm missing some environment vars.

  Read the article

• why does it use the movl instead of push ?!

  - by user554403

  hi all. pay attention to this code : #include <stdio.h> void a(int a, int b, int c) { char buffer1[5]; char buffer2[10]; } int main() { a(1,2,3); } after that : gcc -S a.c that command shows our source code in assembly. now we can see in the main function, we never use "push" command to push the arguments of the a function into the stack. and it used "movel" instead of that main: pushl %ebp movl %esp, %ebp andl $-16, %esp subl $16, %esp movl $3, 8(%esp) movl $2, 4(%esp) movl $1, (%esp) call a leave why does it happen? what's difference between them?

  Read the article

• what to use in place of std::map::emplace?

  - by kfmfe04

  For containers such as std::map< std::string, std::unique_ptr< Foo >>, it looks like emplace() has yet to be implemented in stdc++ as of gcc 4.7.2. Unfortunately, I can't store Foo directly by value as it is an abstract super-class. As a simple, but inefficient, place-holder, I've just been using std::map< std::string, Foo* > in conjunction with a std::vector< std::unique_ptr< Foo >> for garbage collection. Do you have a interim solution that is more efficient and more easily replaced once emplace() is available?

  Read the article

• Limited recursion in C?

  - by function

  I ran this program and it output ... 65088 65089 65090 and then it stopped. Windows 7 said a.exe stopped working. Here is the code: #include <stdio.h> void go(void); main() { go(); } void go(void) { static int i = 0; printf("%d\n", i++); go(); } I think this program should keep on printing numbers indefinitely due to recursion, but it stops at 65090! The C code is compiled with gcc. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• what's wrong with my one-liner strncpy: while(*s++ = *t++ && n-- > 0);?

  - by pvd

  #include <stdio.h> #define STR_BUF 10000 #define STR_MATCH 7 void mystrncpy(char* s, char* t, int n) { while(*s++ = *t++ && n-- > 0); } int main() { int result; char str_s[STR_BUF] = "not so long test string"; char buf_1[STR_BUF]; mystrncpy(buf_1, str_s, STR_MATCH); printf ("buf_1 (mystrncpy, 7 chars): %s\n", buf_1); return 0; } When I run it, nothing happened ian@ubuntu:~/tmp$ gcc myncpy.c -o myn&&./myn buf_1 (mystrncpy, 7chars):

  Read the article

• Translate sequence in macro parameters to separate macros

  - by Alex Tiger

  How to acces each element in macro if the definition is like MACRO(name, seq) and the code is like: MACRO("TheName", (Elem1) (Elem2) (Elem3) ) I want to generate the next code: MACRO("TheName", ELEMMACRO(Elem1) ELEMMACRO(Elem2) ELEMMACRO(Elem3) ) Or something like that. In other words, I want to process every parameter separately (I don't care of definition, even if it will be something like MACRO("TheName", Elem1, Elem2, Elem3 ) There could be more elements, there could be less. I have tried V_ARGS (I need it only for gcc), but I can only copy all the elements by that, not to process them separately. What can I do? P.S. Because of some reasons, I can't use Boost.

  Read the article

• If I write a framework that gets information from the Internet, should I make a degelate or use blocks?

  - by Time Machine

  Say I'm writing a publicly available framework for the Vimeo API. This framework needs to get information from the Internet. Because this can take some time, I need to use threadin to prevent the UI from hanging. Foundation uses delegates for this, like NSURLConnectionDelegate. However, Game Kit uses blocks as callback functions. What is the recommended way of doing this? I know blocks aren't supported in standard GCC versions, but they require less, much less code for the one that uses my framework. Delegates, on the other hand, are real methods and when protocols are used, I'm sure the methods are implemented. Thanks.

  Read the article

• function declaration

  - by robUK

  Hello, gcc 4.1.2 c89 I am reviewing some code and I have come across the following function. I have never seen a function declared like this before. There are no data types for the paraemeters. My best guess is that the function is using a list of data types separated by semi-colons. The return type seems to be returning a function with those parameters. However, the read function is not defined anywhere. What is the advantage and purpose of declaring a function like this? Many thanks for any advice, int my_read(fd, ptr, cnt) int fd; char *ptr; unsigned cnt; { printf("Read\n"); return(read(fd, ptr, cnt)); }

  Read the article

• Compare to a defined constants in C?

  - by J.W.

  I am trying to compare to a defined constants in C, and I have simplified my program to the following.. #include "stdio.h" #include "stdlib.h" #define INVALID_VALUE -999; int main(int argc, const char* argv[]) { int test=0; if(test==INVALID_VALUE) //The error line.. return INVALID_VALUE; return 0; }; And when I use gcc to compile. it gives out error "error: expected ‘)’ before ‘;’ token" Any reason that this cannot be done.

  Read the article

• Visual Studio C++ adds "junk" to my programs

  - by sub

  I have looked into the binaries produced by MSVC 2010 from my source code, and saw everything being filled with "junk". I don't know how to explain, but my executables are being added too much unnecessary information, like: Lots of Microsoft default error messages, I don't want them XML schema settings (Why!?) Other things not important for the execution of the main program How can I stop MSVC doing this? Do I have to switch to GCC? In all other programs (written in C++ too, from Word processors to games), this junk simply doesn't exist.

  Read the article

• headfile conflict let every line becomes "not declared"

  - by altria

  I have a.h a.cpp b.h and a library for b. The thing is, if I choose to include b.h in either a.h or a.cpp, it will let complier return "was not declared in this scope" for every line of a.h. The same program works fine on another computer, although Makefile might be different. I have to admit, I think I may have change some settings, but I forgot which one I changed. Is there anybody have any idea? I am using linux and gcc.

  Read the article

• 10.10 freezing when sftp downloading

  - by aGr

  My ubuntu 10.10 is freezing during downloading from my other computer on sftp. I thought it might be some nautilus issues so I tried it via command line and I got the same thing - after few minutes the whole computer freezes. Mostly the numlock led is blinking (I've heard somewhere that this means a kernel panic), but not in 100% cases. I dunno if that helps but here is a log from /var/log/message in the time that this happened. At least I hope so - it wasn't that big, when it happened before. But this looks quite "errorish", right? (isn't complete - see bottom) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: imklog 4.2.0, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="4.2.0" x-pid="953" x-info="http://www.rsyslog.com"] (re)start Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb rsyslogd: rsyslogd's groupid changed to 103 Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb rsyslogd: rsyslogd's userid changed to 101 Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.35-24-generic (buildd@vernadsky) (gcc version 4.4.5 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.4.4-14ubuntu5) ) #42-Ubuntu SMP Thu Dec 2 01:41:57 UTC 2010 (Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map: Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009e800 (usable) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 000000000009e800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000dffa8000 (usable) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000dffa8000 - 00000000dffb0000 (ACPI NVS) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000dffb0000 - 00000000dffbff00 (ACPI data) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000dffbff00 - 00000000dfff0000 (ACPI NVS) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000dfff0000 - 00000000e0000000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 00000000ff700000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000120000000 (usable) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: 0000000120000000 - 0000000140000000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] Notice: NX (Execute Disable) protection cannot be enabled: non-PAE kernel! Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] DMI 2.5 present. Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0xdffa8 max_arch_pfn = 0x100000 Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] Scanning 0 areas for low memory corruption Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] modified physical RAM map: Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000000010000 - 000000000009e800 (usable) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] modified: 000000000009e800 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] modified: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) Jan 5 17:57:49 tomas-ntb kernel: [ 0.000000] modified: 0000000000100000 - 00000000dffa8000 (usable) ... to long - for whole and better view click here

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77  | Next Page >