Search Results

Search found 12925 results on 517 pages for 'email routing'.

Page 8/517 | < Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

• Developing an online email service [closed]

  - by Richard Stokes

  I am interested in developing an online email service (e.g. Gmail, Hotmail, but on a much smaller scale) allowing people to sign up for free email addresses on my domain. The domain in question is already purchased, but I have no idea how to even start. I was hoping to code this using a Ruby framework such as Rails or Sinatra. Firstly, are there any libraries/pre-made solutions to this problem that exist already that would be easy enough to just plug-in to my own site? Secondly, if there are no real pre-made solutions, what are the general steps I need to take to accomplish this task?

  Read the article

• How are SaaS/Mult-Tenancy apps implementing email notifications (sending and receving)?

  - by Mark Redman

  Given multi-tenant application, How are vendors implementing email notifications from an email account setup and programming perspective: Sending emails could come from a generic account: eg [email protected] or [email protected], this seems reasonable considering reply addresses and lilnks can be contained within the email contents. Receiving Emails: How would an application receive email, for instance; to generate support tickets or assign comments in an email to a project/task. I have seen ID's within the subject and some reply to addresses containing the account name eg: [email protected] I realise one can programatically connect to a pop3 server and receive emails and look for the IDs with the subject, but is there a way of setting up and receiving email to a single pop3 account from multiple sub-host name email addresses (not sure on terminology there) eg: [email protected] or [email protected] and check the Account Name from the address? (similar to checking subdomains on a URL) Any practices, experience, comments or sughestions? (not sure its relevant, but using C# asp.net-mvc and services etc)

  Read the article

• Process RECEIVED email attatchment with PHP.

  - by Eli

  Hi All, I have a php script that will an catch email passed to it and process it. #!/usr/local/bin/php -q <?php while (!feof(STDIN)) {$s .= fgets(STDIN);} // Now do some work on the email source in $s. ?> This works fine. My question is how to save an attachment into the file system from the source. For example, if I isolate the section below, how do I need to process it before saving it into a gif file to create a valid gif? I assume I need to change the encoding, or otherwise process it, but does anyone know exactly? Thanks! --------------090607000609050308090504 Content-Type: image/gif; name="tfk.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <part1.06050801.05020504@etc....> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tfk.gif" R0lGODlheAA8APcAAAAAAP/////Wgv+xEgliOAEcDxAnFiAyHTA+JEBKK0BKLFBWM2BhOv// nf//tfz60dDEPdnPT//0Z3BtQf/kBv/pKM/KoO3UHendgoB5SOTGB/HSCNm8D7+oEvrhRcW1 U+visL2dA3hlAqqNBM+vB52DBo+ET4+EUJp+AnNgCmdUCZV9EredLJuKQ4x9PVNCBo1yC39n C6OGFYBpFp+QV4RtI1pMIJWBPq+cXkExBDQuHQwLCDYoBnRdIM+zbMCnZaiWabeleH1zWu/K e9+/dNi5dntsSaSPYpWDXHJmS6CQbl1UQOOYB/6xEv2wEv2vEvuuEvqtEvmsEvirEvaqEvWq EvSpEvOoEvGmE+6kE+yjE+uiE+qhE+mgE+efE+SdE+OcE9+ZEykdBtWvZejAcuS9cfHIeO/H d/nQffXMe/PLevzTf/rRfvnRfvjPffbNfPLKeurDdv7Vgf3UgfzTgPvTgPrSf/fPfvbOffTN fPHKe+/Jeu7Ied+7cty5cP7Vgv3VgvXOfvPMfdOxbOvGete0b7+hZfjRhNGyc+rIgti5eLWb aL+lb9K3gMWtfYh4V3dpTKyadGRcTOGaE9qVFNWRFNGOFM6MFMyKFMqJFMiHFMWFFMOEFMGC Fbx/FTQoE9CpYs2mYduzadiwZ962a921a9yzauC4beO7b5F7UeG/gO/Mis2vd3ZpUZaGaW5j T4l9aLd7FbJ3Fa50FatxFahvFqZuFh0VCLaPUMKZV7yUVMigXEhDO6RsFqFqFp9oFp1nFppl FpdjFpRgFp12PqN7QqeARa6GSrKKTXJgRJBdF49cF4xaF4pYF4VVF2BCG4diLkk1G5ZuOJpy O3hnT4dWF4FSF35PF4JaKo9nNHpMF3hLGHdKGHZJGHVJGHNIGHNHGHFGGHdOIXtSJPvWrHFF GG9EGG5DGG1DGG9FGnBGG3FHHHNJHaJ6V/+kbdJPBP+PTua4nv65lmAfAvR7ROWLYvygdM+O ce9IBb1YLKQ3ET8TBY1aSyMEAS4tLf///yH5BAEAAP8ALAAAAAB4ADwAAAj/AAkIHEiwoMGD CBMqXMiwocOHBARInEixosWLGDNq3Mixo8eOAj+KHEmypEmQEU+qXMmypcSQLmPK7BgoUSJA EwE1itaP2io6cjDCnEm0qMRESIQIUVUnaKJX+/RFCyKo6cWhRrO2XPVqx75+vBK1cYOkXz5y /JIVyUPnakqKRGhkmJvBxBCTPn78IIIxr4m5NFjiCNxRzpEd8+jd4xFpzx1GOvTR0+eqEB87 bitmQIBjwgEfOBIQnojDgAkBRA4swIjAxA8DGSz6SKD6B47TFX2MzLD64iFGiIAKmGMEgD54 9uYpKaOGkKt973YtGhSnTWaKNO4umKDRAF8BC3Bj/zRR4HvFIQV0X/RhYOSC0RRVSdohZtEh OnUcecWHr90PP3vsgYMOI4xhyCCEYGYRVhSll9sCfPlwwETeZSThhBfhUMACDAjwAwMZcAee iAL4AKEAJiTww3ukTWAADhYBsoRx9cSzCh5oDKHEAfMwQYMhAAoy4AgsAOGHHm0t+BZFOGA4 0QQmGHCXCSJKmNEQCTCAAEYMcKfehrghQNgEGVT4QwEZiCYRlD9saVEdAOyDjzvyqBJHHnz4 wYgkI8gQSR+CtLEIgSMoAegc11U0QYcTtTmBepxJFOKavUk0xAEmMMBomhQZ8MNEVkpERHse IvCopBOgd5dcAkwg4gSVtv/h1Tv46MNKH3rgEccgSryggVqC2NEIoUocmWRFDEp0AHwqDnEX EQXcJYCYFxHBAF8JxGZRkxRB+aSICeDgrLI+0JCARCrSUAB8E90Byy397CNGJJa1oSsSt2yA AiyE3NHIJyGE8AgifNSRKKgFiCdAAlmuGi1qBcBIUYgJSOvZpxWBSNEBjAoAG7oNC0DDhAyD PEECJFJ0BxFHJOGPCNAEkSAdb6SyAwkaROPIHo58QkIH1PwQh4LILmnpD+pZah4RGA/xg7RP KjyEeZJm0LFEPkBN0dQaEfEsRnbwUcgPScQQgg2I4DGHHUcAgIK+vKjCCg8cQJCEIdUdrFVF f+3/TREduvqhhA4clNCKKm3YscgOOciwwQuwBPHCBRE8YggZdwRVdEXIiCPOOKCLUwwqGNGh CzafjyMONrjgoVEau0xDzDG5jAKH5kXJQccdZzTizwsbiABLInksngIJG5AQjT8zSIBBMjiU gQfuEzEoDhZZbKE9Fp5884ZFdBwzTBjZb4HFF7+Ug8ZFcpACTjCadCLLL8x4c8becrRBiCQ5 aKBBDvxaHAxgQAIKhCAHI3AACGqwCOlR7yVGQ8cAJkjBTphjDRWpwzGEsQUKDsAKtAhHGti3 i2tw4goUfAIWZoELv81BDUDQgQo0QAIxKEEJYuhBCjZAAQpswAMPeIAL/xbRhzw8UADWw4IH ByCLY2TQGL/oIAW/IAxjqIGE1qjEEgcwCV/kwm9ywAMr/EE3A37idxegAA1D0IEPWAADLjiC HwSBqM1RZBxc8OATatHCidTBGL1AIQXDoAxcHKsipHCGFj1ICVo44xzW8Zsd4sALMZSAhyRQ gQhCkAIeiOGTPHgBDGrwCGMpqSJ49CAWgrELPxrDFlVgpDN0UceLFKMTHtzCLKyBjFMcUit0 GIIQAAA8NabgFrcIZQ1aAIQgBOEDM0iGZX6JRKNhIwyqFEYrBaAGQCqRgpiwRi6OOJE/oIMZ tcAEFyrhjGOggpxZkUMggiCGEGwgBZ9MQQg0QP+BCkigAQ5wQAM6YAQEGcyOE4EGJTyYBWGE QgBxKMYsvjlBTWgDFPCcCB3GgItvXAMc2SjHGGq5ETlkVCRoUMUSYpCDWxyvhx0oAQxm0IOa 9iAGN8hFKHJRjGPcD4IVUagHvcCMMaCCGLGgggc9wY1RnNQNuihGNtDhDF/E4hKaqIYpLpIG NajBFLvAhTTQgY464oEMowCFLowxjWxIwxgj1UgdCCGEW6iAAxTgwAqewVduOIMZwgjGMJxh DWs4AxieaGL1jCZUChI1FN/wxBSWCo53aoQO5rBFJy5BvilAwQlYAMY2KaIGb3jjG80QRi0y wc5QGAMa4bgGM5TRi1j/aKISmYgFM6ZBiozMQRCuAJ4GVBANbQAjFpX4QhayUAUqWKF8zIWC Jqax2KAudIrO+AYmoJDCWZSjDB3RhS0+2wQPdqEZo7BIKIKBBSpMQQpQeAIVZrEMT1QiC+6V QhTi2wQnQGEKnCjHKTASRkfo4AXRcMYJ97vFBvtCF9WlSGMnOAlgYMIJHqyFOeDgETSYgxNb PK8oLNIGc1SivBR0AhWk8AQUN3iCUOAEOohWETuo9Bm00MITpkgJKbx4AE6oRikinNDrwlgK Lt6jOdwgElKYeIkivsgulOHjF0vBEsFwRi/CgGEPSoGVpTtFNjjB3QlGgRblKIc1ajGJHS8R /wvb+Gk1rfvjAVTCG3EgyS6E4eYJRtkibwCHkT3YBC8MIxu7KIUuynGJPg/gCdMtHTpiUeZH y4IYaXBDGXCBDWB0YYl3viJQJTzoLUKBFuZYn0jKYI08UvDPFpnGJrZYaGUgI0l/AEU1skDo L5SDDRc5hTV4PUVwyFkAdSCGJ5a4CXB8b9QTuWadJxiMGYuEDNf4gnmbMeKLHEMWS2xCF5iB C5LOIRuWcDQWuiFqipgzFlFYajEsUoxlezAW4VD1nO/4aQpSIQuVniAVloGLk1YE217Ydrct ogtfLJEKtkAGSSVCDDIz1BvtnkgavnFiCjbhF1+sSL2X6F1gQ1si4/+Q4gTBYOEuO7Ya4/QI whWOEV30gtCUKMezKTIHdDTag77W90RYnXAKRkEZoKC3vSnoiwsSGeWuXvk1uPFzD4bhGrsw uERm/mpu1/zmFJQCLfpYkThk28VOuEQ2LmKKZkR9AFJAutKXOAx04I5BqaRgFoaxC21cYouV 0IZTOcJ1P1dj4ZybBUO9bpFc/KLKMObjRUhRjX5P8AlgFvnSJygMuz9dAOOw/ACwoE1QWKPU A7Ao4jFS+AF04fAYGfkEmxAGbRxbInbwuaO5cA0yXATbYFhiLIzxQNlTsPN3N1rKPTgFkMsh F82YxBY38Q3fa4TVoteC3C3yB2lgIoWWcDr/RZ4vjFh6cBbIICcayoEJF7v+GqFwnUTmYPxH K8PzJxcAO6ywRMnPQRfMIHoD0ASxYA55lhGjwAzmN0GrNFoUsXFGBmnSUBFyMAbXUGo5Fwem QGMTkQu+AHkTdAnMUA7GcAzGgA7gsHlS0Azo8Aeftw4gyEQtOBzIIAxKxXwFmHEVAQrKoG6s dESoYA0UBQWbQF0TIQejsA2Z4Ghe4AzZoA3MYA4TJwBm0A2LBHSaEAuyEAue4AsgZnTMMIP5 xw6TJW8aVQy94GgDEAWzYAwH1Xi/4H4NKGXCUGlPgAn4V4HcoAlqaAm+gAmUIAv4N367YA0C uERi94VmFoYuOIZl/1hB5kA0bXAO4LZEV2ALxWAGtrR5o5d5FfFtfdYElRAOTDYHuXANS7hF VoBCWWANpIMRNfgFajhBV5AJzjBrYCiG+zYR6hBvHmQJtkcRZwAOuOhBVCALqVYRc3AO2GSM IHcREzZBYfANI5SAqEdyx5BRk8gMvzALXCgLtFALwbAM2nANV7iGjPh56VBmU3AFkMYNHEYR orCHVEAFVVAFVoAFYTAMSUcRbFAOlbAFXDCQW7CP/chz5hALm7CQCzkL4OAG6+cLmcCQC8kJ mUAJlDAJlsANZ9CIF/EHeDAK6FAO3gAO5WAO57ALY1AKztCMMJaO+VcMvlALvjAMzDAM1v9w Dr+EhN6wDMrwk8pQDdagDedAUnKADtdQWEppDc7GfSj4DVAJleHQguYEDqcVlVHJDdywDdoQ CuTEBmNADCPJOm+QBm+ABnZQR2PADG9HBc2wVZ9XYuZgDmRFVtQkAHIAB3VJVqSACuhATXNA BmUwmGWACmSwcxXxB2+wmIuZaY34B26gBozJmGlgBmZwBmdATiXGDJwABl7wBaJlEXOAC7UQ cF7QexSRLGszB3LwB62pEa5pUprjkX4zEnKAC7aQBS3WBE2AfhYhbC45QZ3QlJ9Xm8b5e9cQ nAMgeRLxB2sgCt+AS4uXXqlpNMd5nRNBedrmQZdgDoepBuhgDtr/UIyRZw4mV5zYaRI/cAIL oB4n0CUScQIKgANiIp8SYQbccI4TNAsf9Q3VYAvB53FiZw7yV53p2RII4Cx3cQKBcQB88SEC kAGBsQCfIgfiJUhDVQmUQFFARgWTEAzFwGSndKArQSoSQaHg8SnrKQAn8CntKRF/NAtbgGRb FAVVgAVcMAmZ4AvgoAtviFAkOhKEsQAS0yoTehcr2qLTQlrH0AyycFuUUAmawAmxMAu9MAzN sA3SkAsjlBHJEqQdoQB8gQMKsBclwhmEQQMnkKJDoABJMxyjcAxtBQ3ZIDvGgAy6EAqmYAZa 96Vg+hFZMxFEkDTfwRdOozUfaRJ++qeMGvoRi9qokKoRjxqplFo0EHGpmJqpmrqpCBEQADs= --------------090607000609050308090504--

  Read the article

• Freemarker - lack of special character in email subject template cause email content crash

  - by freakman

  im fighting with strange error. Im using seperate freemarker templates for mail subject and body. It is sent using org.springframework.mail.javamail.JavaMailSender. Only templates that contains some special swedish character works in my application ( yes you read right... not the other way). If I delete it my email content crashes. It contains then: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit .. html code here .. My freemarker.properties file locale=sv_SE classic_compatible=false number_format= date_format=yyyy-MM-dd time_format=HH:mm datetime_format=yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm output_encoding=UTF-8 url_escaping_charset=UTF-8 auto_import=spring.ftl as spring auto_include= default_encoding=UTF-8 localized_lookup=true strict_syntax=true whitespace_stripping=true template_update_delay=10 Ive tried to convert subject file with dos2unix tool. Using 'find -bi subject.ftl' show that encoding is us-ascii. With added special character - utf-8. This thing is suprisingly strange for me... //SOLUTION: use :set bomb and save file in vim.

  Read the article

• Why isn't ICMP routing with iptables nat routing

  - by Scott Forsyth - MVP

  I'm using iptables on Ubuntu server to route a public IP to a private IP. I want to nat all traffic, including 80, 443 and ICMP. However, it appears that ICMP isn't routing. I have a steady ping going to the public IP and it never stops, even with NAT pointing to a bogus IP. Here are the rules that I'm using: iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 206.72.119.76 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.240.5.5 iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -s 10.240.5.5 -j SNAT --to-source 206.72.119.76 I tried with rules for ICMP specifically, but no such luck: iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 206.72.119.76 - icmp --icmp-type echo-request -j DNAT --to-destination 10.240.5.5 Any ideas?

  Read the article

• dynamic routing between openvpn tunnels

  - by pQd

  i'm thinking about using dynamic routing [ OSPF or RIP ] via OpenVPN tunnels. right now i have few offices connected in full mesh, but this is not scalable solution as we add more locations. i would like to avoid situation when plenty of internal traffic is affected if one of two vpn termination points that i plan to use is down. do you have similar configuration working in production? if so - what routing daemon did you use - quagga? something else? did you encounter any problems? thanks!

  Read the article

• ASP.NET MVC 2 RC2 Routing - How to clear low-level values when using ActionLink to refer to a higher

  - by Gary McGill

  [NOTE: I'm using ASP.NET MVC2 RC2.] I have URLs like this: /customer/123/order/456/item/index /customer/123/order/456/item/789/edit My routing table lists the most-specific routes first, so I've got: // customer/123/order/456/item/789/edit routes.MapRoute( "item", // Route name "customer/{customerId}/order/{orderId}/item/{itemId}/{action}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Items", action = "Details" }, // Parameter defaults new { customerId = @"\d+", orderId = @"\d+", itemId = @"\d+" } // Constraints ); // customer/123/order/456/item/index routes.MapRoute( "items", // Route name "customer/{customerId}/order/{orderId}/item/{action}", // URL with parameters new { controller = "Items", action = "Index" }, // Parameter defaults new { customerId = @"\d+", orderId = @"\d+" } // Constraints ); When I'm in the "Edit" page, I want a link back up to the "Index" page. So, I use: ActionLink("Back to Index", "index") However, because there's an ambient order ID, this results in the URL: /Customer/123/Order/456/Item/789/Index ...whereas I want it to "forget" the order ID and just use: /Customer/123/Order/456/Item/Index I've tried overriding the order ID like so: ActionLink("Back to Index", "index", new { orderId=string.empty }) ...but that doesn't work. How can I persuade ActionLink to "forget" the order ID?

  Read the article

• QoS / PBR Routing Questions

  - by Bernard

  I have a 50Mbs Satellite link and a 10Mbs Microwave link supplying a very remote location. Behind these links, I have a 6,400 seat network - with about 3,000 signed in at any one time. My goal is to send all of the Voip traffic (Google Chat, Magic Jack, Skype, Speakeasy, Vonage, Vonage PC, Yahoo) through the microwave link which has 100ms latency. The rest of the traffic can utilize any remaining bandwidth of the microwave link with excess being diverted to the higher latency (600ms) satellite connection. The problem I've had so far is that most automatic routing configurations weigh the bandwidth heavily for preference - and I'm only wanting latency considered. Additionally, I don't know if this can even be handled with the routing hardware I have at my disposal (Cisco 3640, 3745, & 3845). Any recommendations (or really good starting points) would be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• Routing based on source address in Windows Server 2008 R2

  - by rocku

  Hi, I'm implementing a direct routing load balanced solution using Windows Server 2008 R2 as back-end server. I've configured a loopback interface with the external IP address. This works, I am receiving packets with the external IP address and respond to them appropriately. However our infrastructure requires that traffic which is being load-balanced should go through a different gateway then any other traffic originating from the server, ie. updates etc. So basicly I need to route packets based on source address (external IP) to another gateway. The built-in Windows 'route' command allows routing based on destination address only. I've tried setting a default gateway on the loopback interface and mangled with weak/strong host send/receive parameters on the interfaces, however this didn't work. Is there any way around this, possibly using third party tools?

  Read the article

• Layer 3 switch routing

  - by Yoshiwaan

  I need help moving over to using our layer 3 switch as the inter vlan routing device rather than our cisco router. I've mostly got it working but I've got stuck near the end and need some advice (I think I just need a bit of education on the subject really). Cur I have a Dell PowerConnect 7048 connecting to a Cisco 1841 router. I've got a few key excerpts from the configs to provide the key information. On the powerconnect I have the following: ip routing ip default-gateway 172.31.14.1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.31.14.1 253 ! interface vlan 1 ip address 172.31.14.254 255.255.255.0 exit interface vlan 2 ip address 172.31.19.254 255.255.255.0 exit interface vlan 4 ip address 172.31.16.254 255.255.255.0 ! interface Gi1/0/1 description 'Link to L7Router01' switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan except 3,7-4093 exit ! and on the Cisco the following: interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 172.31.14.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly ! interface FastEthernet0/0.2 description Accounts VLAN encapsulation dot1Q 2 ip address 172.31.19.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly ! interface FastEthernet0/0.4 description Voice VLAN encapsulation dot1Q 4 ip address 172.31.16.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside ip virtual-reassembly ! So what I'm doing is moving clients over so that their default gateway is a 172.31.x.254 address rather than a 172.31.x.1 address. This works great for inter-vlan routing, I have no issues with this. The switch can also access the router no worries, and users on the 172.31.14.0/24 network can access all interfaces and sub-interfaces on the router, including 172.31.14.1. They can also access all of the interfaces that the router connects off to, no worries there. The problem I have is that users on the 172.31.16.0/24 and 172.31.19.0/24 subnets cannot access either 172.31.14.1 or any of the subnets the router connects to. They can, however, connect to BOTH of the sub interfaces on the router from either subnet. What am I missing here? Why can't the vlans connect to the non-sub interface on the router? Are tagged packets being sent to this interface?

  Read the article

• Linux policy routing - packets not coming back

  - by Bugsik

  i am trying to set up policy routing on my home server. My network looks like this: Host routed VPN gateway Internet link through VPN 192.168.0.35/24 ---> 192.168.0.5/24 ---> 192.168.0.1 DSL router 10.200.2.235/22 .... .... 10.200.0.1 VPN server The traffic from 192.168.0.32/27 should be and is routed through VPN. I wanted to define some routing policies to route some traffic from 192.168.0.5 through VPN as well - for start - from user with uid 2000. Policy routing is done using iptables mark target and ip rule fwmark. The problem: When connecting using user 2000 from 192.168.0.5 tcpdump shows outgoing packets, but nothing comes back. Traffic from 192.168.0.35 works fine (here I am not using fwmark but src policy). Here is my VPN gateway setup: # uname -a Linux placebo 3.2.0-34-generic #53-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 15 10:49:02 UTC 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # iptables -V iptables v1.4.12 # ip -V ip utility, iproute2-ss111117 IPtables rules (all policies in table filter are ACCEPT) # iptables -t mangle -nvL Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 770K packets, 314M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 767K packets, 312M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 5520 packets, 1920K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 782K packets, 901M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 74 4707 MARK all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 owner UID match 2000 MARK set 0x3 Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 788K packets, 903M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination # iptables -t nat -nvL Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 996 packets, 51172 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 7 packets, 432 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 1364 packets, 112K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 2302 packets, 160K bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 119 7588 MASQUERADE all -- * vpn 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Routing: # ip addr show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master lan state UNKNOWN qlen 1000 link/ether 00:40:63:f9:c3:8f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: lan: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP link/ether 00:40:63:f9:c3:8f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.5/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global lan inet6 fe80::240:63ff:fef9:c38f/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: vpn: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 100 link/none inet 10.200.2.235/22 brd 10.200.3.255 scope global vpn # ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32764: from all fwmark 0x3 lookup VPN 32765: from 192.168.0.32/27 lookup VPN 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default # ip route show table VPN default via 10.200.0.1 dev vpn 10.200.0.0/22 dev vpn proto kernel scope link src 10.200.2.235 192.168.0.0/24 dev lan proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.5 # ip route show default via 192.168.0.1 dev lan metric 100 10.200.0.0/22 dev vpn proto kernel scope link src 10.200.2.235 192.168.0.0/24 dev lan proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.5 TCP dump showing no traffic coming back when connection is made from 192.168.0.5 user 2000 # tcpdump -i vpn tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on vpn, link-type RAW (Raw IP), capture size 65535 bytes ### Traffic from user 2000 on 192.168.0.5 ### 10:19:05.629985 IP 10.200.2.235.37291 > 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http: Flags [S], seq 2868799562, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 6887764 ecr 0,nop,wscale 4], length 0 10:19:21.678001 IP 10.200.2.235.37291 > 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http: Flags [S], seq 2868799562, win 14600, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 6891776 ecr 0,nop,wscale 4], length 0 ### Traffic from 192.168.0.35 ### 10:23:12.066174 IP 10.200.2.235.49247 > 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http: Flags [S], seq 2294159276, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 4,nop,nop,TS val 557451322 ecr 0,sackOK,eol], length 0 10:23:12.265640 IP 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http > 10.200.2.235.49247: Flags [S.], seq 2521908813, ack 2294159277, win 14480, options [mss 1367,sackOK,TS val 388565772 ecr 557451322,nop,wscale 1], length 0 10:23:12.276573 IP 10.200.2.235.49247 > 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http: Flags [.], ack 1, win 8214, options [nop,nop,TS val 557451534 ecr 388565772], length 0 10:23:12.293030 IP 10.200.2.235.49247 > 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http: Flags [P.], seq 1:480, ack 1, win 8214, options [nop,nop,TS val 557451552 ecr 388565772], length 479 10:23:12.574773 IP 10.100-78-194.akamai.com.http > 10.200.2.235.49247: Flags [.], ack 480, win 7776, options [nop,nop,TS val 388566081 ecr 557451552], length 0

  Read the article

• Static Routes and the Routing Table

  - by TheD

  This is very much a learning question if someone would be happy to explain a couple of concepts. My question is - the default routing table that exists in, in my case, a default Windows 7 install, what do each of the routes in the table do? Here is a screenshot: The 10.128.4.0 is just a route I've added while messing. I understand from a question I posted on Superuser the first route is just a default route that will route all traffic for any IP to my default gateway on my Interface in use. But what about the others? And how would the routing table handle a machine with multiple NIC's, perhaps connected to two different networks, or maybe even two NIC's on the same network so a VM can have a physical Network card instead of each VM sharing the hosts. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Help me a routing server on Windows XP

  - by Lu Lu

  I am developing client/server applications and need to test them on Internet environment. However, I only have one PC without connecting the public internet, so I have a plan to simulate a virtual internet environment on my PC. I think I will install the virtual machines for my purpose, but I can install only one machine because of my slowly PC. At the moment, my PC has 2 machines: the host machine (use Windows XP) & the virtual machine (use Windows Server 2003 Ent). Each machine will have 2 network adapter (host-only & internal), and in 2 network adapters, the internal adapter is private on each machine, and host-only adapters are connected together. With Windows 2003, routing server is ok, but I wonder on Windows XP, are there any routing server product? Please help me. Thanks.

  Read the article

• auto-summarization: classful vs classless routing protocols

  - by yorble

  Suppose a router R1 is directly connected to the following subnets: 10.1.0.0/24 10.1.1.0/24 10.1.2.0/24 10.1.3.0/24 If it is running RIPv1, it will advertise: "i have the network 10.0.0.0" (implicitly understood by receiving RIPv1 routers as 10.0.0.0/8 because the protocol is classful) but suppose we changed the routing protocol to RIPv2 and turned ON auto-summarization. Would it behave in the same way? Would it advertise: "i have the network 10.0.0.0" (advertised WITHOUT subnet mask, and implicitly understood by other routers as 10.0.0.0/8) OR would it auto-summarize in a non classful way like: "i have 10.1.0.0/22" (advertised as network id and subnet mask pair) In other words, does turning on auto-summarization in RIPv2 (or other classless routing protocols) cause it to auto-summarize in a classful manner or simply auto-summarize classlessly to the best of its ability?

  Read the article

• Validate email address in Javascript?

  - by pix0r

  What's the best way to validate an email address in Javascript? Though this solution may be simple, I'm sure this is one of those useful things that people will be Googling for and deserves its own entry on the site

  Read the article

• Setup routing and iptables for new VPN connection to redirect **only** ports 80 and 443

  - by Steve

  I have a new VPN connection (using openvpn) to allow me to route around some ISP restrictions. Whilst it is working fine, it is taking all the traffic over the vpn. This is causing me issues for downloading (my internet connection is a lot faster than the vpn allows), and for remote access. I run an ssh server, and have a daemon running that allows me to schdule downloads via my phone. I have my existing ethernet connection on eth0, and the new VPN connection on tun0. I believe I need to setup the default route to use my existing eth0 connection on the 192.168.0.0/24 network, and set the default gateway to 192.168.0.1 (my knowledge is shaky as I haven't done this for a number of years). If that is correct, then I'm not exactly sure how to do it!. My current routing table is: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface MSS Window irtt 0.0.0.0 10.51.0.169 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 tun0 0 0 0 10.51.0.1 10.51.0.169 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 tun0 0 0 0 10.51.0.169 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0 0 0 0 85.25.147.49 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 0 0 0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0 0 eth0 0 0 0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0 eth0 0 0 0 After fixing the routing, I believe I need to use iptables to configure prerouting or masquerading to force everything for destination port 80 or 443 over tun0. Again, I'm not exactly sure how to do this! Everything I've found on the internet is trying to do something far more complicated, and trying to sort the wood from the trees is proving difficult. Any help would be much appreciated. UPDATE So far, from the various sources, I've cobbled together the following: #!/bin/sh DEV1=eth0 IP1=`ifconfig|perl -nE'/dr:(\S+)/&&say$1'|grep 192.` GW1=192.168.0.1 TABLE1=internet TABLE2=vpn DEV2=tun0 IP2=`ifconfig|perl -nE'/dr:(\S+)/&&say$1'|grep 10.` GW2=`route -n | grep 'UG[ \t]' | awk '{print $2}'` ip route flush table $TABLE1 ip route flush table $TABLE2 ip route show table main | grep -Ev ^default | while read ROUTE ; do ip route add table $TABLE1 $ROUTE ip route add table $TABLE2 $ROUTE done ip route add table $TABLE1 $GW1 dev $DEV1 src $IP1 ip route add table $TABLE2 $GW2 dev $DEV2 src $IP2 ip route add table $TABLE1 default via $GW1 ip route add table $TABLE2 default via $GW2 echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr ip rule add from $IP1 lookup $TABLE1 ip rule add from $IP2 lookup $TABLE2 ip rule add fwmark 1 lookup $TABLE1 ip rule add fwmark 2 lookup $TABLE2 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $DEV1 -j SNAT --to-source $IP1 iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $DEV2 -j SNAT --to-source $IP2 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CONNMARK --restore-mark iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $DEV1 -m state --state NEW -j CONNMARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i $DEV2 -m state --state NEW -j CONNMARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m connmark --mark 2 -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -m state --state NEW -m connmark ! --mark 0 -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $DEV2 -m state --state NEW -p tcp --dport 80 -j CONNMARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i $DEV2 -m state --state NEW -p tcp --dport 443 -j CONNMARK --set-mark 2 route del default route add default gw 192.168.0.1 eth0 Now this seems to be working. Except it isn't! Connections to the blocked websites are going through, connections not on ports 80 and 443 are using the non-VPN connection. However port 80 and 443 connections that aren't to the blocked websites are using the non-VPN connection too! As the general goal has been reached, I'm relatively happy, but it would be nice to know why it isn't working exactly right. Any ideas? For reference, I now have 3 routing tables, main, internet, and vpn. The listing of them is as follows... Main: default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 10.38.0.1 via 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.38.0.206 85.removed via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.73 metric 1 Internet: default via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 10.38.0.1 via 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.38.0.206 85.removed via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.73 metric 1 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 scope link src 192.168.0.73 VPN: default via 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 10.38.0.1 via 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 10.38.0.205 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.38.0.206 85.removed via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000 192.168.0.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.73 metric 1

  Read the article

• Routing based on source address in Windows Server 2008 R2

  - by rocku

  I'm implementing a direct routing load balanced solution using Windows Server 2008 R2 as back-end server. I've configured a loopback interface with the external IP address. This works, I am receiving packets with the external IP address and respond to them appropriately. However our infrastructure requires that traffic which is being load-balanced should go through a different gateway then any other traffic originating from the server, ie. updates etc. So basicly I need to route packets based on source address (external IP) to another gateway. The built-in Windows 'route' command allows routing based on destination address only. I've tried setting a default gateway on the loopback interface and mangled with weak/strong host send/receive parameters on the interfaces, however this didn't work. Is there any way around this, possibly using third party tools?

  Read the article

• Body of email breaks distribution list in exchange?

  - by widgisoft

  Hi, I have a very odd problem that I'm not sure is a programming issue or a server issue :-p. Basically I'm sending an email to an exchange distribution list that includes a PHP stack trace; during certain faults the trace includes really high level information such as the machine's environment variables (during file reads, etc.). I went through a copy of the email line by line until the email sent and it appears the line: [SUDO_COMMAND] => /etc/init.d/httpd restart is the culprit. Adding a string replacement in before the email is sent allows a successful send. What I don't understand is WHY these stream of characters are causing the issue ONLY on the distribution email. If I send the email to myself as well, i.e. "[email protected]; [email protected]", then I get the email fine. Re-ordering the list doesn't make a difference the group never gets the email. Because the individual gets the email and not the group I'm assuming the fault is with exchange and some rogue filtering - I've gone through it with the sysadmins and there's no filtering of any sort on that group... so maybe it's a bug? I can't find anyone else having recorded this specific fault so I figured I'd open it here. For now I'm just not using the distribution list but it'd be nice to eventually find the solution. Many thanks, Chris

  Read the article

• enable email on Godaddy when using Zerigo on Heroku hosted app

  - by joelmaranhao

  A little recap of what I have done ... and then my questions Q1, Q2 and Q3 1 - I developed a RoR app that I deployed on Heroku. biowatts.heroku.com 2 - I bought a domain name at GoDaddy: biowattsonline.com 3 - I am using Zerigo addon as for the DNS heroku addons:add custom_domains heroku addons:add zerigo_dns:basic 4 - Added my domains in Heroku heroku domains:add biowattsonline.com heroku domains:add www.biowattsonline.com and subdomains heroku domains:add calculator.biowattsonline.com Q1: Where do we configure the forward to http://biowattsonline.com/biogas_calculator ? 5 - Configured GoDaddy adding the Zerigo domains In the Nameservers section a.ns.zerigo.net b.ns.zerigo.net c.ns.zerigo.net d.ns.zerigo.net e.ns.zerigo.net The GoDaddy DNS section is empty: "Not hosted here" Ok this works all fine ... http://biowattsonline.com is correctly found 6 - Subdomain forward I want calculator.biowattsonline.com to be forwarded to biowattsonline.com/biogas_calculator Q2: So I created the forward in GoDaddy ... but is that correct? 7 - GoDaddy email Q3: I have one free email account with go GoDaddy, only now that I am using Zerigo I don't know how configure GoDaddy to make it work again?... because it work with the default values Any ideason Q1, Q2 and Q3? Thanks, Joel

  Read the article

• Evolution email forgets all settings after reboot

  - by jbrendel

  My Evolution email client keeps forgetting all settings after a reboot or even a logout/login! Please help! I have recently installed Ubuntu 12.04 on a new laptop. To move my Evolution settings and email over to the new machine, I selected "backup", which creates a single tar.gz archive of all Evolution settings and mail. I copied the file to the new computer, started Evolution which presented me with the startup assistant. I selected 'restore from backup', pointed at the tar.gz file and all was beautifully restored. All seemed to work just fine. However, after a reboot I noticed that Evolution seems to have forgotten all settings: I get the startup assistant again when I start Evolution. I checked that the .conf/evolution and .local/share/evolution directories were still present, yet, none of that seemed to matter, it wanted me to restore from a backup again. The version of Ubuntu (12.04) and Evolution (3.2.3) are the same on the old and new laptop. Just stopping and restarting Evolution does not cause this problem. Even if I manually kill all Evolution related processes, the settings will be remembered and it can start up no problem. The problem only happens on logout/login or reboot. Any help is greatly appreciated! Thank you very much!

  Read the article

• Server Firewall preventing sending of email [migrated]

  - by Jo Fitzgerald

  The firewall on my VPS appears to be preventing my site from sending email. It was working fine until the end of last month. My hosting provider (Webfusion) has been next to useless. I am able to send email if I open INPUT ports 32768-65535, but not if these ports are closed. Why would this be? I have the following rules in my firewall: # sudo iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination VZ_INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination VZ_FORWARD all -- anywhere anywhere Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP) target prot opt source destination VZ_OUTPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain VZ_FORWARD (1 references) target prot opt source destination Chain VZ_INPUT (1 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:www ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:https ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:smtp ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ssmtp ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:pop3 ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:domain ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:domain ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpts:32768:65535 ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpts:32768:65535 ACCEPT tcp -- localhost.localdomain localhost.localdomain ACCEPT udp -- localhost.localdomain localhost.localdomain Chain VZ_OUTPUT (1 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere The VPS is running Plesk 10.4.4 (please ask if you require further technical information to help me)

  Read the article

• Password-free logins using your email address only?

  - by Mario

  The state of logins is horrendous. With each site having it's own rules for passwords, it can be very hard to remember what variation you used on any given site. Logins are pure pain. One thing I love about Craigslist is that it did away with logins altogether. I know this design may not suit every site, but there's something to their design that beckons to be repeated. OpenID is great on sites that have adopted it, but it's still not standard. Would it be feasible/wise to use an email address as a login and provide no password? The site would send a short-term key directly to your email address. You click on the link and you're in. When you're done, you "logout" and your key is terminated. I've toyed with this idea before. What concerns (i.e. spammers, bots, etc.) would make this impractical or unsafe and could they be overcome?

  Read the article

• Sending an email with attachment from server side

  - by SaravananArumugam

  I have to create a word document in a specific format and send it as attachment to some email addresses. I have a preview screen for the report which on approval has to be send in email. This is an ASP.NET MVC 3 application. I am left with a few options here. I am creating the preview using html. I can convert this html into doc and send it, which would be a straight solution. But capturing the Response object's output is being a tough job. I thought of using Mail merge functionality of MS word, where I'll be filling the placeholders of the doc template. But the problem is conceptually, it doesn't appear to be mail merge. I have found someone suggesting to use RTF format and replace the placeholders with database values. Which is the right thing to do? What's the best solution here? Is there any other option than the three listed above?

  Read the article

• RoR routing problem. Calling custom action, but getting redirected to show action

  - by conorgil

  I am working on a project in ruby on rails and I am having a very difficult time with a basic problem. I am trying to call a custom action in one of my controllers, but the request is somehow getting redirected to the default 'show' action and I cannot figure out why. link in edit.html.erb: <%= link_to 'Mass Text Entry', :action=>"create_or_add_food_item_from_text" %> Error from development.log: ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound (Couldn't find Menu with ID=create_or_add_food_item_from_text): app/controllers/menus_controller.rb:20:in `show' routes.rb file: ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| map.resources :nutrition_objects map.resources :preference_objects map.resources :institutions map.resources :locations map.resources :menus map.resources :food_items map.resources :napkins map.resources :users map.resource :session, :controller => 'session' map.root :controller=>'pages', :action=>'index' map.about '/about', :controller=>'pages', :action=>'about' map.contact '/contact', :controller=>'pages', :action=>'contact' map.home '/home', :controller=>'pages', :action=>'index' map.user_home '/user/home', :controller=>'rater', :action=>'index' map.user_napkins '/user/napkins', :controller=>'rater', :action=>'view_napkins' map.user_preferences '/user/preferences',:controller=>'rater', :action=>'preferences' map.blog '/blog', :controller=>'pages', :action=>'blog' map.signup '/signup', :controller=>'users', :action=>'new' map.login '/login', :controller=>'session', :action=>'new' map.logout '/logout', :controller=>'session', :action=>'destroy' # Install the default routes as the lowest priority. map.connect ':controller/:action' map.connect ':controller/:action/:id' map.connect ':controller/:action/:id.:format' end Menus_controller.rb: class MenusController < ApplicationController ... def create_or_add_food_item_from_text end ... end create_or_add_food_item_from_text.html.erb simply has a div to show a form with a text box in it. I have the rest of my app working fine, but this is stumping me. Any help is appreciated.

  Read the article

• Dynamically generate PDF and email it using django

  - by Shane

  I have a django app that dynamically generates a PDF (using reportlab + pypdf) from user input on an HTML form, and returns the HTTP response with an application/pdf MIMEType. I want to have the option between doing the above, or emailing the generated pdf, but I cannot figure out how to use the EmailMessage class's attach(filename=None, content=None, mimetype=None) method. The documentation doesn't give much of a description of what kind of object content is supposed to be. I've tried a file object and the above application/pdf HTTP response. I currently have a workaround where my view saves a pdf to disk, and then I attach the resulting file to an outgoing email using the attach_file() method. This seems wrong to me, and I'm pretty sure there is a better way.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >