Why isn't functional language syntax more close to human language?
- by JohnDoDo
I'm interested in functional programming and decided to get head to head with Haskell. My head hurts... but I'll eventually get it...
I have one curiosity though, why is the syntax so cryptic (in lack of another word)?
Is there a reason why it isn't more expressive, more close to human language?
I understand that FP is good at modelling mathematical concepts and it borrowed some of it's concise means of expression, but still it's not math... it's a language.