Search Results

Search found 3513 results on 141 pages for 'raw sockets'.

Page 34/141 | < Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41  | Next Page >

  • Java Socks Proxy Socket Error

    - by Ionut Ungureanu
    I am trying to create a http request through a SOCKS (v4 / v5) proxy in Java. After reading about socks communication protocol on WikiPedia, I have put togheter this piece of code: Socket sock = new Socket(); InetSocketAddress remoteProxyAddress = new InetSocketAddress(proxy ip, proxy port); sock.connect(remoteProxyAddress, connTimeout); InputStream in = sock.getInputStream(); OutputStream out = sock.getOutputStream(); out.write(0x04); out.write(0x01); out.write((endpoint.getPort() >> 8) & 0xff); out.write((endpoint.getPort() >> 0) & 0xff); out.write(endpoint.getAddress().getAddress()); out.write(0x0); out.flush(); And here comes the part where I read from the proxy server. The problem is that the response is always "-1". I have tried the proxy on Firefox and it works perfect. So... the problem is in my app. Can anyone help me? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to "unbind" a socket programmatically?

    - by ryan1894
    1) The socket doesn't seem to unbind from the LocalEndPoint until the process ends. 2) I have tried the solutions from the other question, and also tried waiting a minute - to no avail. 3) At the moment I have tried the below to get rid of the socket and its connections: public static void killUser(User victim) { LingerOption lo = new LingerOption(false, 0); victim.connectedSocket.SetSocketOption(SocketOptionLevel.Socket,SocketOptionName.Linger, lo); victim.connectedSocket.Shutdown(SocketShutdown.Both); victim.connectedSocket.Disconnect(true); victim.connectedSocket.Close(); clients.RemoveAt(victim.ID); } 4) After a bit of googling, I can't seem to be able to unbind a port, thus if I have a sufficient amount of connecting clients, I will eventually run out of ports to listen on.

    Read the article

  • buffer size for socket connection in c++

    - by wyatt
    I'm trying to build a basic POP3 mail client in C/++, but I've run into a bit of an issue. Since you have to define the buffer size when building the program, but a message can be arbitrarily large, how do you, say, get the mail server to send it to you in parts? And if this isn't the correct means of solving the problem, what is? And while I'm here, can anyone confirm for me that RFC 2822 is still the current document defining email layout? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Communicate between separate MPI-Programs

    - by Fyg
    I have the following problem: Program 1 has a huge amount of data, say 10GB. The data in question consists of large integer- and double-arrays. Program 2 has 1..n MPI processes that use tiles of this data to compute results. How can I send the data from program 1 to the MPI Processes? Using File I/O is out of question. The compute node has sufficient RAM.

    Read the article

  • "Can´t open socket or connection refused" with .NET

    - by HoNgOuRu
    Im getting a connection refused when I try to send some data to my server app using netcat. server side: IPAddress ip; ip = Dns.GetHostEntry("localhost").AddressList[0]; IPEndPoint ipFinal = new IPEndPoint(ip, 12345); Socket socket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetworkV6, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp); socket.Bind(ipFinal); socket.Listen(100); Socket handler = socket.Accept(); ------> it stops here......nothing happens

    Read the article

  • How do I send telnet option codes?

    - by Matt
    I've written a socket listener in Java that just sends some data to the client. If I connect to the server using telnet, I want the server to send some telnet option codes. Do I just send these like normal messages? Like, if I wanted the client to print "hello", I would do this: PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(clientSocket.getOutputStream()); out.print("hello"); out.flush(); But when I try to send option codes, the client just prints them. Eg, the IAC char (0xff) just gets printed as a strange y character when I do this: PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(clientSocket.getOutputStream()); out.print((char)0xff); out.flush();

    Read the article

  • Can I avoid a threaded UDP socket in Python dropping data?

    - by 666craig
    First off, I'm new to Python and learning on the job, so be gentle! I'm trying to write a threaded Python app for Windows that reads data from a UDP socket (thread-1), writes it to file (thread-2), and displays the live data (thread-3) to a widget (gtk.Image using a gtk.gdk.pixbuf). I'm using queues for communicating data between threads. My problem is that if I start only threads 1 and 3 (so skip the file writing for now), it seems that I lose some data after the first few samples. After this drop it looks fine. Even by letting thread 1 complete before running thread 3, this apparent drop is still there. Apologies for the length of code snippet (I've removed the thread that writes to file), but I felt removing code would just prompt questions. Hope someone can shed some light :-) import socket import threading import Queue import numpy import gtk gtk.gdk.threads_init() import gtk.glade import pygtk class readFromUDPSocket(threading.Thread): def __init__(self, socketUDP, readDataQueue, packetSize, numScans): threading.Thread.__init__(self) self.socketUDP = socketUDP self.readDataQueue = readDataQueue self.packetSize = packetSize self.numScans = numScans def run(self): for scan in range(1, self.numScans + 1): buffer = self.socketUDP.recv(self.packetSize) self.readDataQueue.put(buffer) self.socketUDP.close() print 'myServer finished!' class displayWithGTK(threading.Thread): def __init__(self, displayDataQueue, image, viewArea): threading.Thread.__init__(self) self.displayDataQueue = displayDataQueue self.image = image self.viewWidth = viewArea[0] self.viewHeight = viewArea[1] self.displayData = numpy.zeros((self.viewHeight, self.viewWidth, 3), dtype=numpy.uint16) def run(self): scan = 0 try: while True: if not scan % self.viewWidth: scan = 0 buffer = self.displayDataQueue.get(timeout=0.1) self.displayData[:, scan, 0] = numpy.fromstring(buffer, dtype=numpy.uint16) self.displayData[:, scan, 1] = numpy.fromstring(buffer, dtype=numpy.uint16) self.displayData[:, scan, 2] = numpy.fromstring(buffer, dtype=numpy.uint16) gtk.gdk.threads_enter() self.myPixbuf = gtk.gdk.pixbuf_new_from_data(self.displayData.tostring(), gtk.gdk.COLORSPACE_RGB, False, 8, self.viewWidth, self.viewHeight, self.viewWidth * 3) self.image.set_from_pixbuf(self.myPixbuf) self.image.show() gtk.gdk.threads_leave() scan += 1 except Queue.Empty: print 'myDisplay finished!' pass def quitGUI(obj): print 'Currently active threads: %s' % threading.enumerate() gtk.main_quit() if __name__ == '__main__': # Create socket (IPv4 protocol, datagram (UDP)) and bind to address socketUDP = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM) host = '192.168.1.5' port = 1024 socketUDP.bind((host, port)) # Data parameters samplesPerScan = 256 packetsPerSecond = 1200 packetSize = 512 duration = 1 # For now, set a fixed duration to log data numScans = int(packetsPerSecond * duration) # Create array to store data data = numpy.zeros((samplesPerScan, numScans), dtype=numpy.uint16) # Create queue for displaying from readDataQueue = Queue.Queue(numScans) # Build GUI from Glade XML file builder = gtk.Builder() builder.add_from_file('GroundVue.glade') window = builder.get_object('mainwindow') window.connect('destroy', quitGUI) view = builder.get_object('viewport') image = gtk.Image() view.add(image) viewArea = (1200, samplesPerScan) # Instantiate & start threads myServer = readFromUDPSocket(socketUDP, readDataQueue, packetSize, numScans) myDisplay = displayWithGTK(readDataQueue, image, viewArea) myServer.start() myDisplay.start() gtk.gdk.threads_enter() gtk.main() gtk.gdk.threads_leave() print 'gtk.main finished!'

    Read the article

  • Writing Java code in Matlab?

    - by scooziexp
    Hi, I'm trying to use the Java commands pw.println() and br.readLine() in Matlab because I have set up a socket (input_socket2) between Matlab and a command-line program I want to control using Java classes BufferedReader and PrintWriter. Before the following snippet of code, I implemented another socket that goes between 2 computers. This works great and I also know that the following snippet of code successfully opens up a communication line between Matlab and the other program. However, Matlab throws an error at pw.println('noop'). I think it has something to do with syntax, but I'm not sure how to write the command in Matlab syntax then: try input_socket2 = Socket(host2,port2); input_stream2 = input_socket2.getInputStream; d_input_stream2 = DataInputStream(input_stream2); br = BufferedReader(InputStreamReader(input_stream2)); pw = PrintWriter(input_socket2.getOutputStream,true); pw.println('noop') br.read end Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Polling servers at the same port - Threads and Java

    - by John
    Hi there. I'm currently busy working on an IP ban tool for the early versions of Call of Duty 1. (Apparently such a feature wasn't implemented in these versions). I've finished a single threaded application but it won't perform well enough for multiple servers, which is why I am trying to implement threading. Right now, each server has its own thread. I have a Networking class, which has a method; "GetStatus" -- this method is synchronized. This method uses a DatagramSocket to communicate with the server. Since this method is static and synchronized, I shouldn't get in trouble and receive a whole bunch of "Address already in use" exceptions. However, I have a second method named "SendMessage". This method is supposed to send a message to the server. How can I make sure "SendMessage" cannot be invoked when there's already a thread running in "GetStatus", and the other way around? If I make both synchronized, I will still get in trouble if Thread A is opening a socket on Port 99999 and invoking "SendMessage" while Thread B is opening a socket on the same port and invoking "GetStatus"? (Game servers are usually hosted on the same ports) I guess what I am really after is a way to make an entire class synchronized, so that only one method can be invoked and run at a time by a single thread. Hope that what I am trying to accomplish/avoid is made clear in this text. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • java socket programming problem

    - by mk.persia
    Hi, what's wrong with my code? sorry about my bad English package sockettest; import java.io.*; import java.net.*; class sevr implements Runnable{ public void run() { ServerSocket sSkt = null; Socket skt = null; BufferedReader br = null; BufferedWriter bw = null; try{ System.out.println("Server: is about to create socket"); sSkt = new ServerSocket(6666); System.out.println("Server: socket created"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: socket creation failure"); } try{ System.out.println("Server: is listening"); skt = sSkt.accept(); System.out.println("Server: Connection Established"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: listening failed"); } try{ System.out.println("Server: creating streams"); br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(skt.getInputStream())); bw = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(skt.getOutputStream())); System.out.println("Server: stream done"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: stream failed"); } System.out.println("Server: reading the request"); try{ String line = null; while((line =br.readLine()) != null){ System.out.println("Server: client said- "+ line); } } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: reading failed"); } System.out.println("Server: reading fished"); System.out.println("Server: responding"); try{ bw.write("Hi! I am server!"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Server: responding failed"); } System.out.println("Server: responding finished"); System.out.println("Server: is finishing"); try { br.close(); bw.close(); skt.close(); sSkt.close(); } catch (IOException e) { System.out.println("Server: finishing failed"); } System.out.println("Server: done"); } } class clnt implements Runnable{ public void run() { Socket skt = null; BufferedReader br = null; BufferedWriter bw = null; try{ System.out.println("Client: about to create socket"); skt = new Socket(InetAddress.getLocalHost(),6666); System.out.println("Client: socket created"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: socket creation failure"); } try{ System.out.println("Client: creating streams"); br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(skt.getInputStream())); bw = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(skt.getOutputStream())); System.out.println("Client: stream done"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: stream failed"); } System.out.println("Client: requesting"); try{ bw.write("Hi! I am Client!"); } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: requesting failed"); } System.out.println("Client: requesting finished"); System.out.println("Client: reading the respond"); try{ String line = null; while((line =br.readLine()) != null){ System.out.println("Client: server said- "+ line); } } catch(IOException e){ System.out.println("Client: reading failed"); } System.out.println("Client: reading fished"); System.out.println("Clientrver: is finishing"); try { br.close(); bw.close(); skt.close(); } catch (IOException e) { System.out.println("Client: finishing failed"); } System.out.println("Client: done"); } } public class Main { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("Main started"); Thread sThread = new Thread(new sevr()); Thread cThread = new Thread(new clnt()); sThread.start(); cThread.start(); try { sThread.join(); cThread.join(); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { System.out.println("joining failed"); } System.out.println("Main done"); } } output: Main started Server: is about to create socket Client: about to create socket Client: socket created Client: creating streams Server: socket created Server: is listening Server: Connection Established Server: creating streams Server: stream done Server: reading the request Client: stream done Client: requesting Client: requesting finished Client: reading the respond and it waits here forever!

    Read the article

  • Sending email to gmail account using c++ on windows error check

    - by LCD Fire
    I know this has been disscused a lot, but I I'm not asking how to do it, I'm just asking why it doesn't work. What I am doing wrong. It says that the email was sent succesfully but I don't see it in my inbox. I want to send an email to a gmail account, not through it. #include <iostream> #include <windows.h> #include <fstream> #include <conio.h> #pragma comment(lib, "ws2_32.lib") // Insist on at least Winsock v1.1 const int VERSION_MAJOR = 1; const int VERSION_MINOR = 1; #define CRLF "\r\n" // carriage-return/line feed pair using namespace std; // Basic error checking for send() and recv() functions void Check(int iStatus, char *szFunction) { if((iStatus != SOCKET_ERROR) && (iStatus)) return; cerr<< "Error during call to " << szFunction << ": " << iStatus << " - " << GetLastError() << endl; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int iProtocolPort = 25; char szSmtpServerName[64] = ""; char szToAddr[64] = ""; char szFromAddr[64] = ""; char szBuffer[4096] = ""; char szLine[255] = ""; char szMsgLine[255] = ""; SOCKET hServer; WSADATA WSData; LPHOSTENT lpHostEntry; LPSERVENT lpServEntry; SOCKADDR_IN SockAddr; // Check for four command-line args //if(argc != 5) // ShowUsage(); // Load command-line args lstrcpy(szSmtpServerName, "smtp.gmail.com"); lstrcpy(szToAddr, "[email protected]"); lstrcpy(szFromAddr, "[email protected]"); // Create input stream for reading email message file ifstream MsgFile("D:\\d.txt"); // Attempt to intialize WinSock (1.1 or later) if(WSAStartup(MAKEWORD(VERSION_MAJOR, VERSION_MINOR), &WSData)) { cout << "Cannot find Winsock v" << VERSION_MAJOR << "." << VERSION_MINOR << " or later!" << endl; return 1; } // Lookup email server's IP address. lpHostEntry = gethostbyname(szSmtpServerName); if(!lpHostEntry) { cout << "Cannot find SMTP mail server " << szSmtpServerName << endl; return 1; } // Create a TCP/IP socket, no specific protocol hServer = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if(hServer == INVALID_SOCKET) { cout << "Cannot open mail server socket" << endl; return 1; } // Get the mail service port lpServEntry = getservbyname("mail", 0); // Use the SMTP default port if no other port is specified if(!lpServEntry) iProtocolPort = htons(IPPORT_SMTP); else iProtocolPort = lpServEntry->s_port; // Setup a Socket Address structure SockAddr.sin_family = AF_INET; SockAddr.sin_port = iProtocolPort; SockAddr.sin_addr = *((LPIN_ADDR)*lpHostEntry->h_addr_list); // Connect the Socket if(connect(hServer, (PSOCKADDR) &SockAddr, sizeof(SockAddr))) { cout << "Error connecting to Server socket" << endl; return 1; } // Receive initial response from SMTP server Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() Reply"); // Send HELO server.com sprintf(szMsgLine, "HELO %s%s", szSmtpServerName, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() HELO"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() HELO"); // Send MAIL FROM: <[email protected]> sprintf(szMsgLine, "MAIL FROM:<%s>%s", szFromAddr, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() MAIL FROM"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() MAIL FROM"); // Send RCPT TO: <[email protected]> sprintf(szMsgLine, "RCPT TO:<%s>%s", szToAddr, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() RCPT TO"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() RCPT TO"); // Send DATA sprintf(szMsgLine, "DATA%s", CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() DATA"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() DATA"); //strat writing about the subject, end it with two CRLF chars and after that you can //write data to the body oif the message sprintf(szMsgLine, "Subject: My own subject %s%s", CRLF, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() DATA"); // Send all lines of message body (using supplied text file) MsgFile.getline(szLine, sizeof(szLine)); // Get first line do // for each line of message text... { sprintf(szMsgLine, "%s%s", szLine, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() message-line"); MsgFile.getline(szLine, sizeof(szLine)); // get next line. } while(!MsgFile.eof()); // Send blank line and a period sprintf(szMsgLine, "%s.%s", CRLF, CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() end-message"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() end-message"); // Send QUIT sprintf(szMsgLine, "QUIT%s", CRLF); Check(send(hServer, szMsgLine, strlen(szMsgLine), 0), "send() QUIT"); Check(recv(hServer, szBuffer, sizeof(szBuffer), 0), "recv() QUIT"); // Report message has been sent cout<< "Sent " << argv[4] << " as email message to " << szToAddr << endl; // Close server socket and prepare to exit. closesocket(hServer); WSACleanup(); _getch(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Listening socket

    - by hoodoos
    I got a strange problem, I never actually expirienced this before, here is the code of the server (client is firefox in this case), the way I create it: _Socket = new Socket( AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp ); _Socket.Bind( new IPEndPoint( Settings.IP, Settings.Port ) ); _Socket.Listen( 1000 ); _Socket.Blocking = false; the way i accept connection: while( _IsWorking ) { if( listener.Socket.Poll( -1, SelectMode.SelectRead ) ) { Socket clientSocket = listener.Socket.Accept(); clientSocket.Blocking = false; clientSocket.SetSocketOption( SocketOptionLevel.Tcp, SocketOptionName.NoDelay, true ); } } So I'm expecting it hang on listener.Socket.Poll till new connection comes, but after first one comes it hangs on poll forever. I tried to poll it constantly with smaller delay, let's say 10 microseconds, then it never goes in SelectMode.SelectRead. I guess it maybe somehow related on client's socket reuse? Maybe I don't shutdown client socket propertly and client(firefox) decides to use an old socket? I disconnect client socket this way: Context.Socket.Shutdown( SocketShutdown.Both ); // context is just a wrapper around socket Context.Socket.Close(); What may cause that problem?

    Read the article

  • Does it make sense to have several UDP ports ready? Will packets be dropped?

    - by Gubatron
    I'm coding a networking application on Android. I'm thinking of having a single UDP port and Datagram socket that receives all the datagrams that are sent to it and then have different processing queues for these messages. I'm doubting if I should have a second or third UDP socket on standby. Some messages will be very short (100bytes or so), but others will have to transfer files. My concern is, will the Android kernel drop the small messages if it's too busy handling the bigger ones?

    Read the article

  • n00b: receive input over TCP/IP and use it to update HTML

    - by mawg
    This has got to be a FAQ, so can someone please just direct me to a "network programming for dummies" URL? The server wants to push information to a client or broadcast to all, when an event happens - as opposed to the clients constantly polling the server "just in case". The client then updates a browser page display. How do I do that? (toldya it was a n00b question) Should I have a thread which receives info on a socket and then writes it to a database which the browser display (PHP) can process with an HTML refresh tag, or what? Sorry to sound so dumb.

    Read the article

  • socket.error: [Errno 10054]

    - by C0d3r
    import socket, sys if len(sys.argv) !=3 : print "Usage: ./supabot.py <host> <port>" sys.exit(1) irc = sys.argv[1] port = int(sys.argv[2]) sck = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) sck.connect((irc, port)) sck.send('NICK supaBOT\r\n') sck.send('USER supaBOT supaBOT supaBOT :supaBOT Script\r\n') sck.send('JOIN #darkunderground' + '\r\n') data = '' while True: data = sck.recv(1024) if data.find('PING') != -1: sck.send('PONG ' + data.split() [1] + '\r\n') print data elif data.find('!info') != -1: sck.send('PRIVMSG #darkunderground supaBOT v1.0 by sourD' + '\r\n') print sck.recv(1024) when I run this code I get this error.. socket.error: [Errno 10054] An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host it says that the error is in line 16, in data = sck.recv(1024)

    Read the article

  • Put a java socket-like program in a cloud service

    - by user293030
    I developed a server side java program, basically is a relay server so I can easily pass NATs and firewalls. The program works, but now I need a cloud service to host it. Do you know where/how I can put a java socket-like program in the cloud? Obviously, I prefer a free service or at least a free service while I'm testing. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • how to go back to first if statement if no choices are valid - python

    - by wondergoat77
    how can i have python move to the top of an if statement if nothing is satisfied correctly i have a basic if/else statement like this: print "pick a number, 1 or 2" a = int(raw_input("> ") if a == 1: print "this" if a == 2: print "that" else: print "you have made an invalid choice, try again." what i want is to prompt the user to make another choice for 'a' this if statement without them having to restart the entire program, but am very new to python and am having trouble finding the answer online anywhere.

    Read the article

  • breaking out from socket select

    - by kamziro
    I have a loop which basically calls this every few seconds (after the timeout): while(true){ if(finished) return; switch(select(FD_SETSIZE, &readfds, 0, 0, &tv)){ case SOCKET_ERROR : report bad stuff etc; return; default : break; } // do stuff with the incoming connection } So basically for every few seconds (which is specified by tv), it reactivates the listening. This is run on thread B (not a main thread). There are times when I want to end this acceptor loop immediately from thread A (main thread), but seems like I have to wait until the time interval finishes.. Is there a way to disrupt the select function from another thread so thread B can quit instantly?

    Read the article

  • java timer and socket problem

    - by Guru
    Hi there, I'm trying to make a program which listens to the client input stream by using socket programming and timer but whenever timer executes.. it gets hanged Please help me out here is the code... private void jButton1MouseClicked(java.awt.event.MouseEvent evt) { // TODO add your handling code here: try { ServerUserName=jTextField1.getText(); ss=new ServerSocket(5000); jButton1.enable(false); jTextArea1.enable(true); jTextField2.enable(true); Timer t=new Timer(2000, new ActionListener() { public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) { try { s=ss.accept(); InputStream is=s.getInputStream(); DataInputStream dis=new DataInputStream(is); jTextArea1.append(dis.readUTF()); } catch(IOException IOE) { } catch(Exception ex) { setLbl(ex.getMessage()); } } }); t.start(); } catch(IOException IOE) { } } Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • recvfrom returns invalid argument when *from* is passed

    - by Aditya Sehgal
    I am currently writing a small UDP server program in linux. The UDP server will receive packets from two different peers and will perform different operations based on from which peer it received the packet. I am trying to determine the source from where I receive the packet. However, when select returns and recvfrom is called, it returns with an error of Invalid Argument. If I pass NULL as the second last arguments, recvfrom succeeds. I have tried declaring fromAddr as struct sockaddr_storage, struct sockaddr_in, struct sockaddr without any success. Is their something wrong with this code? Is this the correct way to determine the source of the packet? The code snippet follows. ` /*TODO : update for TCP. use recv */ if((pkInfo->rcvLen=recvfrom(psInfo->sockFd, pkInfo->buffer, MAX_PKTSZ, 0, /* (struct sockaddr*)&fromAddr,*/ NULL, &(addrLen) )) < 0) { perror("RecvFrom failed\n"); } else { /*Apply Filter */ #if 0 struct sockaddr_in* tmpAddr; tmpAddr = (struct sockaddr_in* )&fromAddr; printf("Received Msg From %s\n",inet_ntoa(tmpAddr->sin_addr)); #endif printf("Packet Received of len = %d\n",pkInfo->rcvLen); } `

    Read the article

  • TCP Socket.Connect is generating false positives

    - by Mark
    I'm experiencing really weird behavior with the Socket.Connect method in C#. I am attempting a TCP Socket.Connect to a valid IP but closed port and the method is continuing as if I have successfully connected. When I packet sniffed what was going on I saw that the app was receiving RST packets from the remote machine. Yet from the tracing that is in place it is clear that the connect method is not throwing an exception. Any ideas what might be causing this? The code that is running is basically this IPEndPoint iep = new IPEndPoint(System.Net.IPAddress.Parse(m_ipAddress), m_port); Socket tcpSocket = new Socket(AddressFamily.InterNetwork, SocketType.Stream, ProtocolType.Tcp); tcpSocket.Connect(iep); To add to the mystery... when running this code in a stand alone console application, the result is as expected – the connect method throws an exception. However, when running it in the Windows Service deployment we have the connect method does not throw an exception. Edit in response to Mystere Man's answer How would the exception be swallowed? I have a Trace.WriteLine right above the .Connect method and a Trace.WriteLine right under it (not shown in the code sample for readability). I know that both traces are running. I also have a try catch around the whole thing which also does a Trace.Writeline and I don't see that in the log files anywhere. I have also enabled the internal socket tracing as you suggested. I don't see any exceptions. I see what appears to be successful connections. I am trying to identify differences between the windows service app and the diagnostic console app I made. I am running out of ideas though End edit Thanks

    Read the article

  • Need Help finding an appropriate task assignment algorithm for a college project involving coordinat

    - by Trif Mircea
    I am a long time lurker here and have found over time many answers regarding jquery and web development topics so I decided to ask a question of my own. This time I have to create a c++ project for college which should help manage the workflow of a company providing all kinds of services through in the field teams. The ideas I have so far are: client-server application; the server is a dispatcher where all the orders from clients get and the clients are mobile devices (PDAs) each team in the field having one a order from a client is a task. Each task is made up of a series of subtasks. You have a database with estimations on how long a task should take to complete you also know what tasks or subtasks each team on the field can perform based on what kind of specialists made up the team (not going to complicate the problem by adding needed materials, it is considered that if a member of a team can perform a subtask he has the stuff needed) Now knowing these factors, what would a good task assignment algorithm be? The criteria is: how many tasks can a team do, how many tasks they have in the queue, it could also be location, how far away are they from the place but I don't think I can implement that.. It needs to be efficient and also to adapt quickly is the human dispatcher manually assigns a task. Any help or leads would be really appreciated. Also I'm not 100% sure in the idea so if you have another way you would go about creating such an application please share, even if it just a quick outline. I have to write a theoretical part too so even if the ideas are far more complex that what i outlined that would be ok ; I'd write those and implement what I can. Edit: C++ is the only language I know unfortunately.

    Read the article

  • .NET Remoting: Getting underlying socket?

    - by Alan
    Hi, I'm writing a light remoting app to assist in debugging a problem with remoting communication. This app mimics much of what a larger application does: Periodically sends a heartbeat to another peer application, and periodically verifies that a heartbeat has been received within some time threshold. What we're seeing is in our big application, the heartbeats seem to get dropped. One peer will go for long periods of time without seeing heartbeats from another peer, until the peer that is "dead" is restarted. The big application is responsive in all other ways. We believe it has something to do with the network setup. We were able to repro the problem locally, and fixed it by making some configuration changes to our test environment. To help our customer diagnose the issue, the mini-remoting app needs to log as much information as possible. So, is there a way to get the underlying socket for the remoting connection? I'm aware that I could write a custom sink for this, but I'd like to keep the actual remoting process as close to what is implemented in the big app as possible. Also as an aside, any ideas why the big-app might be "dropping" heartbeats?

    Read the article

  • Daemonize() issues on Debian

    - by djTeller
    Hi, I'm currently writing a multi-process client and a multi-treaded server for some project i have. The server is a Daemon. In order to accomplish that, i'm using the following daemonize() code: static void daemonize(void) { pid_t pid, sid; /* already a daemon */ if ( getppid() == 1 ) return; /* Fork off the parent process */ pid = fork(); if (pid < 0) { exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } /* If we got a good PID, then we can exit the parent process. */ if (pid > 0) { exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } /* At this point we are executing as the child process */ /* Change the file mode mask */ umask(0); /* Create a new SID for the child process */ sid = setsid(); if (sid < 0) { exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } /* Change the current working directory. This prevents the current directory from being locked; hence not being able to remove it. */ if ((chdir("/")) < 0) { exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } /* Redirect standard files to /dev/null */ freopen( "/dev/null", "r", stdin); freopen( "/dev/null", "w", stdout); freopen( "/dev/null", "w", stderr); } int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) { daemonize(); /* Now we are a daemon -- do the work for which we were paid */ return 0; } I have a strange side effect when testing the server on Debian (Ubuntu). The accept() function always fail to accept connections, the pid returned is -1 I have no idea what causing this, since in RedHat & CentOS it works well. When i remove the call to daemonize(), everything works well on Debian, when i add it back, same accept() error reproduce. I've been monitring the /proc//fd, everything looks good. Something in the daemonize() and the Debian release just doesn't seem to work. (Debian GNU/Linux 5.0, Linux 2.6.26-2-286 #1 SMP) Any idea what causing this? Thank you

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41  | Next Page >