- by Az
Hi there, back again with some more SQLAlchemy shenanigans.
Let me step through this.
My table is now set up as so:
engine = create_engine('sqlite:///:memory:', echo=False)
metadata = MetaData()
students_table = Table('studs', metadata,
Column('sid', Integer, primary_key=True),
Column('name', String),
Column('preferences', Integer),
Column('allocated_rank', Integer),
Column('allocated_project', Integer)
)
metadata.create_all(engine)
mapper(Student, students_table)
Fairly simple, and for the most part I've been enjoying the ability to query almost any bit of information I want provided I avoid the error cases below.
The class it is mapped from is:
class Student(object):
def __init__(self, sid, name):
self.sid = sid
self.name = name
self.preferences = collections.defaultdict(set)
self.allocated_project = None
self.allocated_rank = 0
def __repr__(self):
return str(self)
def __str__(self):
return "%s %s" %(self.sid, self.name)
Explanation: preferences is basically a set of all the projects the student would prefer to be assigned. When the allocation algorithm kicks in, a student's allocated_project emerges from this preference set.
Now if I try to do this:
for student in students.itervalues():
session.add(student)
session.commit()
It throws two errors, one for the allocated_project column (seen below) and a similar error for the preferences column:
sqlalchemy.exc.InterfaceError: (InterfaceError) Error binding parameter 4
- probably unsupported type. u'INSERT INTO studs (sid, name, allocated_rank,
allocated_project) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)'
[1101, 'Muffett,M.', 1, 888 Human-spider relationships (Supervisor id: 123)]
If I go back into my code I find that, when I'm copying the preferences from the given text files, it actually refers to the Project class which is mapped to a dictionary, using the unique project id's (pid) as keys. Thus, as I iterate through each student via their rank and to the preferences set, it adds not a project id, but the reference to the project id from the projects dictionary.
students[sid].preferences[int(rank)].add(projects[int(pid)])
Now this is very useful to me since I can find out all I want to about a student's preferred projects without having to run another check to pull up information about the project id. The form you see in the error has the object print information passed as:
return "%s %s (Supervisor id: %s)" %(self.proj_id, self.proj_name, self.proj_sup)
My questions are:
I'm trying to store an object in a database field aren't I?
Would the correct way then, be copying the project information (project id, name, etc) into its own table, referenced by the unique project id? That way I can just have the project id field for one of the student tables just be an integer id and when I need more information, just join the tables? So and so forth for other tables?
If the above makes sense, then how does one maintain the relationship with a column of information in one table which is a key index on another table?
Does this boil down into a database design problem?
Are there any other elegant ways of accomplishing this?
Apologies if this is a very long-winded question. It's rather crucial for me to solve this, so I've tried to explain as much as I can, whilst attempting to show that I'm trying (key word here sadly) to understand what could be going wrong.
