Search Results

Search found 24043 results on 962 pages for 'private methods'.

Page 699/962 | < Previous Page | 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706  | Next Page >

• Regular Expression Program

  - by david robers

  Hi I have the following text: SMWABCCA ABCCAEZZRHM NABCCAYJG XABCCA ABCCADK ABCCASKIYRH ABCCAKY PQABCCAK ABCCAKQ This method takes a regex in out by the user and SHOULD print out the Strings it applies to but seems to print out something completely different: private void matchIt(String regex) { Pattern p = Pattern.compile(regex); Matcher m = null; boolean found = false; for(int i = 0; i < data.length; i++){ m = p.matcher(data[i]); if(m.find()){ out.println(data[i]); found = true; } } if(!found){ out.println("Pattern Not Found"); } } When inputting "[C]" It outputs: SMWABCCA ABCCAEZZRHM NABCCAYJG XABCCA ABCCADK ABCCASKIYRH ABCCAKY PQABCCAK ABCCAKQ Any ideas why? I think I'm using m.find() improperly...

  Read the article

• Java print binary number using bit-wise operator

  - by user69514

  Hi I am creating a method that will take a number and print it along with its binary representation. The problems is that my method prints all 0's for any positive number, and all 1's for any negative number private static void display( int number ){ System.out.print(number + "\t"); int mask = 1 << 31; for(int i=1; i<=32; i++) { if( (mask & number) != 0 ) System.out.print(1); else System.out.print(0); if( (i % 4) == 0 ) System.out.print(" "); } }

  Read the article

• Disable Adding Item to Collection

  - by Wonko the Sane

  Hi All, I'm sure there's an "easy" answer to this, but for the moment it escapes me. In an MVVM application, I have a property that is a ObservableCollection, used for displaying some set of elements on the view. private readonly ObservableCollection<MyType> mMyCollection = new ObservableCollection<MyType>(); public ObservableCollection<MyType> MyCollection { get { return mMyCollection; } } I want to restrict consumers of this collection from simply using the property to add to the collection (i.e. I want to prevent this from the view): viewModel.MyCollection.Add(newThing); // want to prevent this! Instead, I want to force the use of a method to add items, because there may be another thread using that collection, and I don't want to modify the collection while that thread is processing it. public void AddToMyCollection(MyType newItem) { // Do some thread/task stuff here } Thanks, wTs

  Read the article

• Updating label in another form (C#)

  - by cthulhu

  I want to update label of Form1 from Form2. So here's what I have: // Form1 public string Label1 { get { return this.label1.Text; } set { this.label1.Text = value; } } // Form2 private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Form1 frm1 = new Form1(); frm1.Label1 = this.textBox1.Text; this.Close(); } So the above code doesn't work. However, when I add the following: frm1.Show(); after this.Close(); in Form2 code, the Form1 is being opened again (two windows). But I want it to update in the same window so I suggest this.Close() is unnecessary.

  Read the article

• Fractional Calculator in Java

  - by user2888881

  I am trying to create a fractional calculator in Java with inputs of mixed fractions, proper fractions, improper fractions or integers. It should include the four basic operators as well. The program should be set up as a loop where it is continuous until the user types "quit". I have coded the beginning loop but have no idea where to go from there. Please help, I am a beginner and would really appreciate it. Thank you again. This is what I have so far: import java.util.*; public class FractionCalculator { private static Scanner input; public static void main(String[] args) { input = new Scanner(System.in); String x = "quit"; System.out.println("Enter a fraction"); while (true) { String y = input.next(); if (y.equals(x)) { break; } } } }

  Read the article

• Mapping to a different view based on child type

  - by Ryan Burnham

  So i have a situation where i have common base type but i need to map to a different view based on the child type. It looks like i can use a generic mapping class to handle the inheritance http://geekswithblogs.net/nharrison/archive/2010/07/09/inheriting-a-class-map-in-fluent-nhibernate.aspx But how can i conditionally map to a different view based on the child type? I see an EntityType property but it says its obsolete and will be made private in the next version. As an example i have a base class of ContactInfo is standard between contact types but the values come from different places depending on the contact type, this I'll handle through the sql view.

  Read the article

• Why are Objective-C instance variables declared in an interface?

  - by Chase

  I'm just getting into Objective-C (Java is my primary OO language). Defining an object's instance variables in the interface instead of the class seems strange. I'm used to an interface being a public API definition with nothing besides method signatures (not counting constants here). Is there some reason that state is defined in an interface (even if it is private) and behaviour is defined in a class. It just seems odd that since objects are state+behavior that the definition would be split into two separate places. Is it a design benefit is some way? A pain in the rear issue that you are just forced to deal with in Objective-C? A non-issue, just different? Any background on why it's done this way? Or can you put object state in a class and I just haven't hit that part in my book yet?

  Read the article

• How do I use a graphics method to pass parameters? Example is below.

  - by sonny5

  private static void getCorners(out float Wx, out float Wy, out float Vx, out float Vy) { // note-- I don't know how to flip the Y axis using this method... this is not a "graphics" method // In other words, I should use something like: // flipY(object sender, System.EventArgs e); // but don't know the syntax or whatever // I tried to do this: //Graphics g = this.CreateGraphic //Matrix myMatrix2 = new Matrix(1, 0, 0, -1, 0, 0); // flip Y axis //g.Transform = myMatrix2; //g.TranslateTransform(0, 480, MatrixOrder.Append); // ...but I get the error: // error CS0026: Keyword 'this' is not valid in a static property, static method, or // static field initializer Wx = 1.00F; Wy = 1.00F; // make this 1.00 (not 3.00F) down from the TOP since cannot get Y flipped Vx = ((Wx- WXmin)*((VXmax-VXmin)+VXmin)/(WXmax-WXmin)); Vy = ((Wy-WYmin)*(VYmax-VYmin)/(WYmax-WYmin)+VYmin); } thanks, Sonny5

  Read the article

• ASP.NET check if LinqToEntities returned something or not.

  - by Alex

  How to make this method return boolean value, depending on query return. False - nothing, True - data exists. Before i just returned int from uniqueQuote.Count() but does not look like great method. Thank you! private bool CheckEnquiryUser(int enquiryId, Guid userId) { int selectedEnquiryId = enquiryId; Guid currentUserId = userId; Entities ctx3 = new Entities(); var uniqueQuote = from quot in ctx3.Enquiries.Include("aspnet_Users") where quot.EnquiryId == selectedEnquiryId && quot.aspnet_Users.UserId == currentUserId select quot; bool exist = uniqueQuote; return exist;

  Read the article

• Dictionary as parameter, where the Value-Type is irrelevant

  - by aaginor

  Hi folks, I have a function, that returns the next higher value of a Dictionary-Keys-List compared to a given value. If we have a Key-List of {1, 4, 10, 24} and a given value of 8, the function would return 10. Obviously the type of the Value-Part of the Dictionary doesn't matter for the function, the function-code for a Dictionary<int, int> and Dictionary<int, myClass> would be the same. How has the method-head have to look like, when I want to call the function with any Dictionary, that has int as key-Type and the value-Type is irrelevant? I tried: private int GetClosedKey(Dictionary<int, object> list, int theValue); but it says that there are illegal arguments, when I call it with a Dictionary. I don't want to copy'n'paste the function for each different value-type that my function may be called. Any idea, how to accomplish that? Thanks in advance, Frank

  Read the article

• C# Dispatcher {"The calling thread cannot access this object because a different thread owns it."}

  - by user359446

  Hi, first I need to say that I´m noob with WPF and C#. Application: Create Mandelbrot Image (GUI) My disptacher works perfektly this this case: private void progressBarRefresh(){ while ((con.Progress) < 99) { progressBar1.Dispatcher.Invoke(DispatcherPriority.Send, new Action(delegate { progressBar1.Value = con.Progress; } )); } } I get the Message (Title) when tring to do this with the below code: bmp = BitmapSource.Create(width, height, 96, 96, pf, null, rawImage, stride); this.Dispatcher.Invoke(DispatcherPriority.Send, new Action(delegate { img.Source = bmp; ViewBox.Child = img; //vllt am schluss } )); I will try to explain how my program works. I created a new Thread (because GUI dont response) for the calculation of the pixels and the colors. In this Thread(Mehtod) I´m using the Dispatcher to Refresh my Image in the ViewBox after the calculations are ready. When I´m dont put the calculation in a seperate Thread then I can refresh or build my Image. PS: Sry for my bad english

  Read the article

• VB.NET 2008 Application crashing during Do Loop

  - by RedHaze

  I am writing an application to compare each item on listbox1 to all items on listbox2. If the item is found, then remove it from both lists. The goal is to only have the items that were not found remain on both lists. The problem is, the application just hangs and I never get any results. I looked at my code several times and I cannot figure out what's going on (programming noob I know...). Can anybody help me with this? Code Snippet: Private Sub Button2_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click Dim a As String Dim b As String Dim y As String For i As Integer = 0 To ListBox1.Items.Count - 1 a = ListBox1.Items(i) y = 1 Do While y = 1 For x As Integer = 0 To ListBox2.Items.Count - 1 b = ListBox2.Items(x) Dim res As Int16 = String.Compare(a, b) If res = 0 Then y = 0 ListBox2.Items.Remove(i) ListBox2.Items.Remove(x) ElseIf x = ListBox1.Items.Count Then Exit Do End If Next Loop Next End Sub

  Read the article

• Component not listening to MainApp's state change

  - by tag

  I don't know if this is too difficult or too easy. My custom component is trying to listen to the main application's state changes using StateChangeEvent.CURRENT_STATE_CHANGE private function init(){ addEventListener(StateChangeEvent.CURRENT_STATE_CHANGE, function():void{ Alert.show("parent state changed"); }); } but as expected, it's reporting its own state changes not the main application's. I have 2 options: figure a way to tell it that I really mean the main application's state change not its own or configure the main application to dispatch a specific custom event that the component would listen for Any idea how I could do the first? or do I need the second option in this case?

  Read the article

• Do fields need to be explicitly final to have a "proper" immutable object?

  - by Yishai

  You often read about immutable objects requiring final fields to be immutable in Java. Is this in fact the case, or is it simply enough to have no public mutability and not actually mutate the state? For example, if you have an immutable object built by the builder pattern, you could do it by having the builder assign the individual fields as it builds, or having the builder hold the fields itself and ultimately return the immutable object by passing the values to its (private) constructor. Having the fields final has the obvious advantage of preventing implementation errors (such as allowing code to retain a reference to the builder and "building" the object multiple times while in fact mutating an existing object), but having the Builder store its data inside the object as it is built would seem to be DRYer. So the question is: Assuming the Builder does not leak the Object early and stops itself from modifying the object once built (say by setting its reference to the object as null) is there actually anything gained (such as improved thread safety) in the "immutability" of the object if the object's fields were made final instead?

  Read the article

• Silverlight Windows Phone 7: Load Images From URL

  - by Lennie De Villiers

  Hi, I got the code below that is trying to load an image from the web into an Image control, when I run it I get an error on the given line that no network access is allowed: private void button1_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { WebClient webClientImgDownloader = new WebClient(); webClientImgDownloader.OpenReadCompleted += new OpenReadCompletedEventHandler(webClientImgDownloader_OpenReadCompleted); webClientImgDownloader.OpenReadAsync(new Uri("http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/80000/5000/100/85108/85108.strip.print.gif", UriKind.Absolute)); } void webClientImgDownloader_OpenReadCompleted(object sender, OpenReadCompletedEventArgs e) { BitmapImage bitmap = new BitmapImage(); bitmap.SetSource(e.Result); // ERROR HERE! image1.Source = bitmap; } Silverlight for Windows Phone 7

  Read the article

• struts annotation issue

  - by Gourav

  My issue is that i have an annotation in Struts2 action class like private String[] origfilenofrom; @FieldExpressionValidator(fieldName="origfilenofrom",key="",message="File Length should be 12 for old file format and 15 for new file format",expression="checkorigFileFormat(origfilenofrom)") now my mehtod is public boolean checkorigFileFormat(String[] files ) { for(int counter=0;counter<files.length;counter++) { int n=files[counter].length(); if(!(n==12 || n==15)) { return false; } } return true; } So for any string in that string [], which is returning false the value is bei false. No matter 3 strings in that string [] are true if one is false then the annotaion message is displayed for all. I want the message not to display where the string is true. Help please

  Read the article

• sqlite COUNT in flex returning [object Object]

  - by Adam

  I'm sure this is an easy questions and I'm just doing something stupid but I'm really new to all this code. I'm trying to run a sqlite query in flex to count the total number of records I believe its working fine but I just can't figure out how to display the results - all I get back is [object Object]. private function overviewOne():void{ var stmt:SQLStatement = new SQLStatement(); stmt.sqlConnection = sqlConn; stmt.text = "SELECT COUNT(user_id) FROM tbl_user WHERE status_status ='Away'"; stmt.execute(); var result:SQLResult = stmt.getResult(); acoverviewOne = new Array(result.data); trace (result.data[0]); }

  Read the article

• Qt request never trigger the finished() signal

  - by user63898

  i have something realy strange i have this code : m_url.setUrl("www.cnn.com"); QNetworkRequest request; request.setRawHeader("User-Agent", USER_AGENT.toUtf8()); request.setRawHeader("Accept-Charset", "ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7"); request.setRawHeader("Accept", "text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8"); request.setRawHeader("Accept-Language", "en-us,en;q=0.5"); request.setRawHeader("Connection", "Keep-Alive"); request.setUrl(m_url); reply = qnam.get(request); //QNetworkAccessManager qnam member of the class; connect(reply, SIGNAL(finished()), this, SLOT(httpFinished())); the httpFinished() function that is under private slots: never triggered , why ?

  Read the article

• Need to ignore property in XmlSerialization because of circular reference

  - by NestorArturo

  Have an object with a property I don't need to serialize. The type of this property generates a circular reference which I expected, so I decorated this property with everything comes to my mind: private clsDeclaracion _Declaracion; [DesignerSerializationVisibility(DesignerSerializationVisibility.Hidden)] [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlIgnore] public clsDeclaracion Declaracion { get { return _Declaracion; } set { _Declaracion = value; } } However, the circular reference keeps firing. Tried using a public field with no luck. This is my serialization code: System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer Serializador = new System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer(objeto.GetType()); using (StreamWriter SW = System.IO.File.CreateText(ArchivoTemp)) { Serializador.Serialize(SW, objeto); }

  Read the article

• Why doesn't the C++ default destructor destroy my objects?

  - by Oszkar

  The C++ specification says the default destructor deletes all non-static members. Nevertheless, I can't manage to achieve that. I have this: class N { public: ~N() { std::cout << "Destroying object of type N"; } }; class M { public: M() { n = new N; } // ~M() { //this should happen by default // delete n; // } private: N* n; }; Then this should print the given message, but it doesn't: M* m = new M(); delete m; //this should invoke the default destructor

  Read the article

• Best way of invoking getter by reflection

  - by Javi

  Hello, I need to get the value of a field with a specific annotation, So with reflection I am able to get this Field Object. The problem is that this field will be always private though I know in advance it will always have a getter method. I know that I can use setAccesible(true) and get its value (when there is no PermissionManager), though I prefer to invoke its getter method. I know that I could look for the method by looking for "get+fieldName" (though I know for example for boolean fields are sometimes named as "is+fieldName"). I wonder if there is a better way to invoke this getter (many frameworks use getters/setters to access the attributes so maybe they do in another way). Thanks

  Read the article

• Parsing an WebService URL in Flex

  - by theband

  [Bindable]public var xmlData:Object = new Object(); [Bindable]public var headingData:Object = new Object(); private function getHeadings(evt:ResultEvent):void{ //xmlData = ObjectUtil.toString(evt.result); //ObjectUtil.toString(evt.result) xmlData = evt.result; headingData = xmlData.root.survey; } <mx:WebService id="srv" wsdl="http://domainame/Service.asmx?WSDL"> <mx:operation name="GetClientDetails_ParameterDetails" resultFormat="object" result="getHeadings(event);" /> </mx:WebService> I am able to parse an simple XML and create the components, but i am not able to do when i call an webService. The Method name which fetches the XML is the same. Am i doing something wrong in receiving the XML in Flex.

  Read the article

• C#: Select row from DataGridView

  - by Bi

  Hi I have a form with a DataGridView (of 3 columns) and a Button. Every time the user clicks on a button, I want the get the values stored in the 1st column of that row. Here is the code I have: private void myButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { foreach (DataGridViewRow row in ProductsGrid.Rows) { if (this.ProductsGrid.SelectedRows.Count == 1) { // get information of 1st column from the row string value = this.ProductsGrid.SelectedRows[0].Cells[0].ToString(); } } } However when I click on myButton, the this.ProductsGrid.SelectedRows.Count is 0. Also, how do I ensure that the user selects only one row and not multiple rows? Does this code look right?

  Read the article

• Flex: Problem with CollectionEvent on ArrayCollection

  - by dasnervtdoch

  Hi there, got a reference to an arrayCollection and add event listener like this: collection.addEventListener(CollectionEvent.COLLECTION_CHANGE, onCollectionChange); that´s fine. Now some other component does have the same reference and is adding items to and removing items from that collection. Each time the handler is called: private function onProjectPersonsChange(event:Event):void { if (event.kind == CollectionEventKind.ADD) { //do something } else if (event.kind == CollectionEventKind.REMOVE) { //do something //here is the problem: event.items.length = 0 } else { trace('CollectionEvent: kind not handled!'); } } Does somebody know why the removed item is not in 'items'? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Wait for inline thread to complete before moving to next method...

  - by Tyler

  Hello, I have an android app where I am doing the following: private void onCreate() { final ProgressDialog dialog = ProgressDialog.show(this, "Please wait..", "Doing stuff..", true); new Thread() { public void run() { //do some serious stuff... dialog.dismiss(); } }.start(); stepTwo(); } And I would like to ensure that my thread is complete before stepTwo(); is called. How can I do this? Thanks!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706  | Next Page >